|
|
i wonder at how seriously australia took this triangular series
I dunno; in his post-match interview Ponting, although dignified and generous in his praise of England, couldn't hide his disappointment at the result. One of the most-cited reasons for Australia's dominance is their commitment to the cause. Punter can be a pretty spiky fella and historically, playing against England sees him at his most combative - remember his anger (justified) at the use of specialist substitutes during the 2005 Ashes? The same is true for the rest of the team; I'd be surprised if they were complacent going into the finals. Would be a bit out of character.
More than England coming home with a little pride, I'm delighted that we got something out of the tour because I've read more and more over the last few years articles questioning the relevance of the Ashes. When Australia went unbeaten for 16 years, there were a few voices wondering if the time wouldn't be better spent playing against a more competitive nation, Pakistan for instance.
Now, I don't know how seriously this was taken across Australia but I'm just glad that even with the Test whitewash, the ODI fightback at least gave the tour some spice - it can be boring when the win is a foregone conclusion.
Not that England would know how that feels!
I love the Ashes. Bar the football World Cup which, at it's best is The Best Thing, it's my favourite sporting contest. Thankfully, this tour has been both sporting and, at last, a contest. |
|
|