|
|
Be fair, Sleaze - QP was not saying that Neil Gaiman was the benchmark of quality. Eir train of thought, as far as I follow it, was:
1) I like both the themes Neil Gaiman writes about and the way he writes about them.
2) Others do not like Neil Gaiman's writing, either because of the themes or the way they are written about, or both.
3) Those who do not like Neil Gaiman's style of writing, but do like the writing of other people addressing the same themes, might therefore be able to provide the names of other authors addressing the same themes in what they feel is a better prose style.
However, I'm having some trouble pinning down what is sectionable off as thematic in his work. For example, is "non-normative sexuality" a Neil Gaiman theme, or is "clunky and inept treatment of non-normative sexuality" a theme? If the former, then we have an awful lot to choose from. If the latter, then critique of style gets caught up in critique of theme.
So, that's why I'm wondering what is meant by themes here. At the top level, you might say his themes are love, death, the passing of time, immortality, divinity.. big stuff. Or do we mean "gods who are somehow rendered less than divine, albeit more than human" or "deities who encapsulate the constituent elements of life" or "people in long flappy coats"... |
|
|