|
|
From The Guardian today:
Half of probiotic drinks fail bacteria test.
Essentially this feature reports a claim that half of all probiotic drinks don't actually contain lactobacilli or Bifidobacterium cultures (either at all or in enough quantities to be effective).
Shoppers should be suspicious unless the probiotic drinks and capsules state they contain lactobacilli or bifidobacterium and stipulate a minimum of 10 million bacteria per bottle.
An interesting factoid here.
Research published by the Food Standards Agency last year indicated that some probiotics do reach the gut but found that, out of 35 bacterial strains in 12 commercial products, only lactobacillus was sufficiently robust to survive the whole digestive process.
Whilst it isn't too surprising to discover this, considering the recent upswing in sales of products with "friendly" bacteria. It is important to note that this doesn't apply across the board.
Half the products on sale don't contain the bacteria they say on the label. As a rule of thumb, you can trust the big manufacturers. Their quality control is very good. It would be disastrous for Nestlé, Danone or Yakult to have these other organisms in their products," he said.
On the other hand, there are a lot of manufacturers - many of which sell products on the web - who are unheard of and these are the ones to worry about. Half of the products you can buy have got the wrong bacteria in them, the wrong amount, or are completely sterile.
So it's important to shop smart and do a bit of research when buying probiotic supplements/foodstuff.
Lack of regulation of probiotics is obviously leaving the door open for crap products to be sold to people. It also damages the reputation of probiotic therapy when half of them are no use whatsoever.
The scientists also advised that anyone over 65 should take the products. Past this age, the number of healthy bacteria decrease 1,000-fold to around just 2% of the gut's natural flora.
I did think that this line was interesting, given the reported unwillingness of doctors to provide probiotics on prescription. Obviously the elderly really shouldn't have to buy their own probiotics as it's necessary for their continued health. Perhaps, at least, it could be subsidised? |
|
|