I have a Big Theory about the connection of illegitimacy, the Paternal Name, feminism, lesbian heroines and the bildungsroman but I might save it for the Headshop unless provoked.
ex, I provoke thee!
Names are a big deal. I do get irritated by the argument "you're just keeping your father's name so you're not challenging anything..." I kept my name, which anyway is only about 2 generations back and was taken from the name of the family farm in Scandinavia (and is, admittedly, WAY better than the spouse's). I was embarrassingly young when I married so keeping my name was important for me, symbolically, to say: this marriage is not going to run on traditional terms. It does not signal a radical break with my past identity and a "melding" of my identity INTO his. It's a partnership.
I had a friend with an unusual last name who moved around a great deal as a child. She kept her name on marriage, which turned out to be a good thing, because it was the only way a girlfriend from the 6th grade, in a town she'd moved away from years before, was able to reconnect with her. This friend is now one of the few connections she has to her childhood, as both her parents died when she was young.
And I know so many women who are in the situation described up-thread, who wind up stuck with an ex-'s name, having built a career with it, and unsure what to do afterwards, not really wanting it, or to leap back 20 years to their birth name, nor feeling like a "new" name is right for them at that point, either.
This is one of those issues where young women, especially, seem prone to think that keeping your name is like not shaving your legs ["we're so over that now! it's not oppression anymore! What you older women don't understand is that our generation is so free that we can freely choose to make this choice, under absolutely no pressure, and not be affected by it!"]. Me, I just think that view's a little naive. But then I'm a bitchy old school feminist. |