BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Avatars [PICS]

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
Mistoffelees
17:10 / 02.01.06
In this thread we succumb to the craving of having avatars.
On other forums (forii?), I have various avatars, and I sometimes think, it would be nice to have one here, too.

So, what would your avatar be, if you could have one on Barbelith? Let´s see some imaginative and interesting avs, please.

I propose the avatar size to be 100*100 max, and for those, who like to have a bigger avatar, 500*500 should be the limit.

And to start off, here is mine:

 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
17:17 / 02.01.06
If we could also have sigs, that would be nice. Have you any idea how tiring typing in a whole paragraph from Chapter House Dune after every post is?
 
 
Mistoffelees
17:44 / 02.01.06
Hm, maybe we could have a seperate thread for sigs?

Here´s an av for you.
 
 
Aertho
18:05 / 02.01.06
I agree with Haus.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
18:15 / 02.01.06
Also, a small MIDI file that opens whenever somebody opens a thread to which we posted last?
 
 
TeN
19:15 / 02.01.06
I actually kind of like Barbelith's lack of avatars and sigs and the like... it keeps away the clutter that you get on other boards and keeps things smooth and streamlined.

nicer smileys might be nice though (I know there's a seperate thread for that)
 
 
Mistoffelees
19:17 / 02.01.06
Hear, hear!

It seems, I opened a can of creative ideas, that have been waiting quite some time to emerge.
 
 
w1rebaby
19:19 / 02.01.06
You've not got real avatars unless you've got Flash avatars, moving, making sounds, setting cookies. That's all I'm saying.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:25 / 02.01.06
Yes. I would like there to be many more smileys, and for them to be animated and, where possible, also equipped with sound effects. At the moment I find that I am wasting a lot of time expressing emotions, ideas and questions through typing words rather than through, for example, an animated GIF of a tiny yellow face looking confused, and then breaking into a smile, kissing a little pink face which has appeared next to it, and then blushing.

____________

Tannhauser Shuster-Slatt

"Most FRPG players are little snobs that won't let truly intelligent people like myself join their games. And if I do join their game, their characters snub mine because they are different. I get my character killed off because I made the mistake of looking different. That's why I accuse FRPG's of teaching racism." - Molatar

"have never really understood why people were so eager to change the entire pureblood sentimentality, because there is not a shadow of a doubt in my mind that if I were in the wizarding world, I would share those Pureblood sentiments. The whole package. Purebloods are better than mudbloods.

Obviously, the prejudism against mudbloods is supposed to symbolize the prejudism in our world, but sometimes I have to wonder if JK really wanted to put forth that message. It seems for me that she's failed miserably, if I could feel so indifferent to mudbloods and their ordeal.

And prejudism isn't always heinous. Prejudism is not letting a ten year old near a stove; it's not letting your fourteen year old daughter date an eighteen year old boy; it's teaching your child not to talk to strangers." - ljname onlyinfatuated

"The time for talking is over. Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign. "
- Rimmer, Polymorph
 
 
Mistoffelees
19:31 / 02.01.06
It´s interesting that you react so strongly to the idea of avatars (and signatures, that you mentioned). Do you really think, it´s all just clutter?

And I have to say, you could use a smiley every once in a while. Your irony sometimes is too finely honed for naive minds like me.
 
 
w1rebaby
19:42 / 02.01.06


---
Eta, from behind me, pinned the first of five veils about my face. It was light, and shimmering, of white silk, almost transparent. Then, one after the other, she added the freedom veil, or veil of the citizeness, the pride veil, the house veil, and street veil. Each of these is heavier and more opaque than the one which lies within. The street veil, worn publicly, is extremely bulky, quite heavy and completely opaque; not even the lineaments of the nose and cheeks are discernible when it is worn; the house veil is worn indoors when there are those present who are not of the household, as in conversing with or entertaining associates of one's companion. Veils are worn in various numbers and combinations by Gorean free women, this tending to vary by preference and caste. Many low-class Gorean women own only a single veil which must do for all purposes. Not all high-caste women wear a large number of veils. A free woman, publicly, will commonly wear one or two veils; a frequent combination is the light veil, or last veil, and the house or street veil. Rich, vain women of high caste may wear ostentatiously as many as nine or ten veils. In certain cities, in connection with the free companionship, the betrothed or pledged beauty may wear eight veils, several of which are ritualistically removed during various phases of the ceremony of companionship; the final veils, and robes, of course, are removed in private by the male who, following their removal, arms interlocked with the girl, drinks with her the wine of the companionship, after which he completes the ceremony. This sort of thing, however, varies considerably from city to city. In some cities the girl is unveiled, though not disrobed, of course, during the public ceremony. The friends of the male may then express their pleasure and joy in her beauty, and their celebration of the good fortune of their friend. The veil, it might be noted, is not legally imperative for a free woman; it is rather a matter of modesty and custom. Some low-class, uncompanioned, free girls do not wear veils. Similarly certain bold free women neglect the veil. Neglect of the veil is not a crime in Gorean cities, though in some it is deemed a brazen and scandalous omission. Slave girls may or may not be veiled, this depending on the will of their master. Most slave girls are not permitted to veil themselves. Indeed, not only are they refused the dignity of the veil, but commonly they are placed in brief, exciting slave livery and may not even bind their hair. Such girls, healthy and vital, their hair unbound, their considerable charms well revealed by the brevity of their costume, are thought by men to constitute one of the more pleasurable aspects of the scenery of a city. Are the slaves of Ar, for example, more beautiful than those of, say, Ko-ro-ba, or Tharna? Men, the beasts, heatedly discuss such questions. In some cities, and among some groups and tribes, it might be mentioned, though this is not common, veils may be for most practical purposes unknown, even among free women. The cities of Gor are numerous and pluralistic. Each has its own history, customs and traditions. On the whole, however, Gorean culture prescribes the veil for free women. Eta fastened the fourth of five veils upon me, the house veil. Though Eta wore only the shameful, scandalous Ta-Teera, she pinned the veils expertly. She, now only a delicious, half-naked slave girl, had once been free. She did her work beautifully. SLAVE GIRL OF GOR, (11) Pages 107-108
 
 
Jack Fear
19:44 / 02.01.06
Perhaps the answer, my dear Mistoffolees, is not for Haus to dumb down, but instead for you to smarten up.
 
 
TeN
19:44 / 02.01.06
yeah, see, that would bother me to no end
it's longer than the rest of the thread, for fuck's sake
 
 
Mistoffelees
19:47 / 02.01.06
Oh, thank you for calling me stupid, because I don´t get his wittyness.
 
 
w1rebaby
19:49 / 02.01.06
kingmob_draw.jpg (6K) oh shit, I forgot my avatar
 
 
All Acting Regiment
19:49 / 02.01.06
Hmm, I dunno man, I don't think little gif smileys are very hardcore. Can't you make your own with all the symbols etc on the keyboard? "(%" or "({", that sort of thing?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:50 / 02.01.06
He didn't call you stupid, Mist. Just not smart enough. There's a difference.

Now, to turn the question round - why should we have avatars? What, precisely, do you think they would give Barbelith that it does not have now apart from a comforting familiarity?
 
 
neukoln
19:59 / 02.01.06
What, precisely, do you think they would give Barbelith that it does not have now apart from a comforting familiarity?

I'm not sure he does want Barbelith to introduce them. I read his first post as saying he likes them, other boards he uses have them, Barbelith doesn't have them and that's OK, but hey if they did... which would you use?

Personally, I hate them, and turn them and emoticons off on the boards on which they are offered.
 
 
Triplets
20:01 / 02.01.06
Mist, there's a couple of reasons Barbie doesn't have avatars and the main ones are:

1. 99.9% of the time they're shit
2. Unless you post in the style of Scooby Doo your Scooby Doo avatar has no context in the post it's connected to, Raggy.
3. They don't fit with Bobby Lith's minimalism which puts message content before everything else - which is why we don't have post count, date registered etc displayed either.
 
 
Triplets
20:02 / 02.01.06
Oh, and my Barbelith avatar would be this:
 
 
Mistoffelees
20:09 / 02.01.06
I'm not sure he does want Barbelith to introduce them. I read his first post as saying he likes them, other boards he uses have them, Barbelith doesn't have them and that's OK, but hey if they did... which would you use?

Yes, that´s what I meant.

For me, avatars make users more recognizable. I see the picture and know, ah yes, that´s hir. On Barbelith, many posters change their names quite often. Now haus and stoatie for example stay recognizable, but others I don´t recognize (when the old name under the new one has vanished, of course).
Especially with older threads that can sometimes be confusing.

Of course, people could change their avatars quite often too, I guess.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:14 / 02.01.06
I've actually changed my imaginary avatar in the course of this conversation, from Tilda Swinton in Constantine to a picture of Bob Holness in a bus driver's uniform.
 
 
Mistoffelees
20:19 / 02.01.06
1. 99.9% of the time they're shit

Agreed. Mine is nice though, no?

2. Unless you post in the style of Scooby Doo your Scooby Doo avatar has no context in the post it's connected to, Raggy.

But you could imagine, that the figure in the av is telling you what you are reading in the user´s posting. So if you read my post, you could imagine Manny in his fur coat, sipping his coffee and telling you what I wrote.

I know of a poster on another forum, who changed his Big Lebowski av into another av, because people imagined him in the voice and way of the dude.

3. They don't fit with Bobby Lith's minimalism which puts message content before everything else - which is why we don't have post count, date registered etc displayed either.

It is possible to get these infos though:
your post count 2480
you joined Apr 2004

So this thread could be the home of the avatars for people who would like one. If somebody really is interested if and what av you have chosen, ze can look it up in this thread.
There are curious people like that.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
20:51 / 02.01.06
I also kind of figured the point of the thread wasn't to suggest that we had them (God, I hope not anyway)...

Anyway, even getting past their general crapness, there's no point. That guy on B*rn* R*b*t*cs already has the manga girl with the bouncing breasts. THAT, my friends, is unlikely ever to be beaten in terms of being the ultimate avatar. Every time I see it, I feel like it tells me all I need to know about the owner.

Mine, though, would be a horse. Drinking booze.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
21:04 / 02.01.06
Like this one.

 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
21:10 / 02.01.06
Only smaller, obviously. But seeing as how it's not ACTUALLY an avatar, I think a lot of detail gets lost in the shrinking process. It's the look in the eye that does it for me.
 
 
Mike Modular
21:17 / 02.01.06
Hmm, so not this, then...?

 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
21:19 / 02.01.06
Ah, you see, now we encounter the other difficulty of discussing what we WOULD do if things worked differently here- I don't think I could decide between the two. Therefore if we DID have avatars, I'd find myself having to argue for multiple suits.

Because that picture clearly rocks a snow leopard's ass!
 
 
■
22:44 / 02.01.06
Snow liger, even.
 
 
SMS
00:13 / 03.01.06
 
 
---
07:19 / 03.01.06
 
 
pointless & uncalled for
08:36 / 03.01.06
I think that you've all got it wrong. We should all have avatars by law. They should all be of Steve Balmer, throwing chairs. You will be known by what type of chair Steve is throwing and why.

Naturally sigs should be a full DNA decoding of the celebrity that you have most enjoyed stalking and have managed to perform a successful biopsy on.
 
 
A
10:47 / 03.01.06


(I couldn't find a picture of a unicorn riding a dolphin over a rainbow, sadly.)
 
 
bjacques
10:50 / 03.01.06
Mine would be the Wicker Man, and a reminder of how I look after 2 weeks of holiday food and driving everywhere.

 
 
Ganesh
10:53 / 03.01.06
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply