BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Science of Girls Aloud

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
13:47 / 15.11.05
The last thread ran to nine pages, but a lot of that was general discussion not just about Girls Aloud but also pop as a genre, so I figured we could do with a thread that's purely about the new material. (Which is partly to say, if people want to critique the new material, do so here, but if you have a general point about a certain kind of pop music, have a look around in that thread and elsewhere and see what's been said about that already - this may all sound defensive but with my Moderator trousers on I'm trying to find the best place for a range of responses from new posters and old, pop fans and otherwise.)

'Long Hot Summer' wasn't bad, but it didn't feel like it held any surprises, either (not in the way that 'The Show' or 'Love Machine' or the other highlights from What Will The Neighbours Say? did). 'Biology', on the other hand... It starts with big clomping piano chords and a guitar bluesy riff. Then it mutates into a different song. And then another one. There are four distinct parts, and forget verse-chorus-verse, each is as hooky as a pirate ship captained by the bass player for New Order. But unlike some artists, the transition from part to another never feels jarring (the new Franz Ferdinand is marred by this in places, I reckon). The quirkiness of the lyrics (Alabama returns, random cappucinnos to go, magic numbers) is pretty much a GA standard, but this is still one of the most unexpected pop singles of the year, and it has me very excited about the album.
 
 
Dxncxn
19:54 / 17.11.05
I’m rather less confident. I still haven’t worked out what exactly I think is wrong with "Long Hot Summer" (and it’s certainly not for want of trying), but I can’t shake the feeling that it’s markedly less than the sum of its (many, many) parts. And while I’d agree that "Biology" is better, it’s the first time I’ve felt a Xenomania production was messing around with structure purely for the sake of doing so. It doesn’t feel organic (Oh! the irony) - and I don’t mean in an Ocean Colour Scene, acoustic guitars kind of way. "The Show" is every bit as structurally innovative, but without seeming, to me, like it’s holding up a big, intrusive neon sign about it.

There’s still no question in my mind that Higgins & co. have got the tunes: I think that "Funny How" and "Ace Reject" are among the stand-out tracks on ‘Come & Get It’ and ‘Taller In More Ways’ (which is some achievement in the first instance). It’s just: I get the impression that they write very specifically according to their concept of the artist in question - the Sugababes stuff sounds nothing like the GA stuff, which in turns sounds nothing like the Rachel/Kylie stuff, and so on - and I worry that their idea of what Girls Aloud are about is moving steadily away from the stuff that I like.
 
 
Char Aina
04:14 / 18.11.05
well, the thing i instinctively and fervently hate about all female fronted pop music is...
what?
oh.
right.
sorry.

its not terrible, but i feel that this last single is markedly worse than some of their earlier output.
the chorus gives me that itchy brain feeling (the bad one) when i hear it, and its all the worse for being among some better verses.

i was never a big fan but i reckon their star has blinked on this one.

(i also still reckon everyone gives the red head way too much stick. that whole argument isnt really music forum material, though, so lets just keep it here in these brackets)
 
 
Dxncxn
11:26 / 10.12.05
So, ‘Chemistry’ came out this week. I’ve been writing and re-writing this post for a couple of days, ‘cause I don’t think I’ve really got the hang of the music forum yet, but there were some things that I wanted to say.

It’s much, much better than ‘What Will The Neighbours Say?’. My opinion on it - as an album, if that’s important, which I can’t decide - is a source of much internal debate, since I really don’t like the last two songs (particularly “Racy Lacey” - a vaguely ‘Parklife’ failed-comedy number about a girl who’s “not too bright” but has lots of sex with lots of men - which is awful in more or less every possible way). But as source material for the final third (or more) of an eventual career-spanning compilation, it’s better than I’d ever hoped. I know that it’ll seem a ridiculous statement to some, but I think that, in just three years, they’ve amassed a body of work of as much breadth and quality as any pop band I can think of.

The stuff I’ve left out of this post is mostly descriptions of the songs I like, ‘cause it kept reading like typical music journalist wank. Suffice to say that, for 11 tracks, it does everything I could have asked for (and it’s a real grower in places, if anyone’s unsure on a first or second lesson. In fact, the constant structural fiddling really works, here, in that I’ve listened to it maybe 20 times already, and I still don’t feel like I’ve totally pinned it down - let alone got anything close to fed up with it - ‘cause there’s so many different things going on).

It’s the exact right mixture of clever and stupid. It’s got the first really good Xenomania ballad (in “Whole Lotta History”). “Swinging London Town” - the subject matter of which is (thankfully) more or less the exact opposite of what the title suggests - is good enough to be a very-nearly-worthy successor to “Graffiti My Soul”. “Wild Horses” is to the Doobie Brothers what “Love Machine” was to the Stray Cats. “It’s Magic”, umm, *is*. And I’ve even changed my mind about “Long Hot Summer”. And so on...

So: buy, my pretties, buy! (Although, contrary to Popjustice - although perhaps not to common sense - I wouldn’t bother with the limited edition Christmas disc).

Flyboy, have you been more prompt this time round? Anyone else?
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
15:11 / 12.12.05
Yeah, my copy arrived on Friday. I'm enjoying it, but there's no way I'd agree that it's "much, much better" than WWTNS? Partly because I rate that album very highly. I was thinking that Chemistry might be more consistent if less immediate, but having checked the tracklisting of WWTNS?, there's very little that's not great on there - the cover of 'I'll Stand By You' is the only clunker.

The new album feels more obviously and perhaps self-consciously sophisticated - I think that might be a mixed blessing, though. Mind you, this all sounds very negative and I don't want to give that impression at all - I'm totally loving 'Models' and 'Wild Horses' and especially 'It's Magic' which, interestingly, is the one song the Girls have a writing credit for.
 
 
autopilot disengaged
19:36 / 14.12.05
i played 'swinging london town' (which has the best self-lacerating pop lyrics i can remember) to a dancefloor full o'hipsters. they danced, but betrayed no emotion.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
11:12 / 17.12.05
'Watch Me Go' has revealed itself as the real OMG WTF AWESOME song on this album - ie, the equivalent to 'Graffiti My Soul'. One of the things I love about it is the way each element is better than the one that comes before it sequentially: so, pretty good opening refrain (verse and chorus don't apply and probably haven't since 'The Show'), builds into really good "Quarter past one, I was having fun" count, which itself gets admirably barmy at the "You were back again, said your name was Ben" bit. Where it really peaks though is the rap about the strippers and vicars - except that isn't the peak, because there's strill the crowning glory - the chant: "I know what you're thinking / You've been thinking 'bout my butt!"

It needs to be a single.
 
 
Dxncxn
23:06 / 17.12.05
For me the strippers and the vicars are preferable to the butt, but I totally agree about the ‘This bit’s my favourite...Oh, no, this bit’s my favourite’ thing. And the same is happening with the album as a whole: I’m constantly flitting between “Wild Horses”, “Watch Me Go”, “Whole Lotta History”, “Swinging London Town” and “It’s Magic” as my favourite track. At the moment it’s “Whole Lotta History”. It’s weird - and nice - to hear them doing something so normal-sounding, and I like the whole fifties-high-school-dance sound of it, and the way the lyrics are like they’re trying to write a standard but can’t get away from the odd idiosyncratic bits. And there’s a nice pretend-lack-of-eloquence going on as well. “I’m falling all around when you miss me” is one of those which kind of doesn’t make sense but you know exactly what they’re getting at.

I’m assuming the next single is likely to be either “Models” or “Wild Horses” (mainly because they tend to group all the likely singles together at the start these days). I’d pick the latter - for the intentionally messy singing on the choral intro, for the train noises (particularly the can’t-really-be-arsed first & second ones each time), for the fantastic proper-western hi-hat in your right ear at the end of every fourth bar, for the fact that the first ninety seconds has no less than six different sections. And so on. And “Models” I don’t completely get (yet). Although I have (rather belatedly) realised that the “Why don’t you call...” bit is very much related to the rest of the song, which has been a big step forwards.

On the subject of the lyrics to “Swinging London Town”, I’m finding them intriguing - at least in part because the band didn’t write them. (For anyone who hasn’t heard the song, it’s about getting sucked into alcohol/drug-fuelled celebrity/trust fund culture: “I guess I’m neck deep in it and starting to drown/Along with all the wannabes in swinging London town”). It’s obviously playing with the public perception of the band, but the exact nature of that relationship is unclear. (It’s a bit like with “Some Girls”, where I certainly heard people suggest that Richard X was mocking Rachel Stevens, although I’m uncertain that that was the case, and would be even more sceptical of it here). Again, it took a while, but I finally spotted today that the “Do you know me/Really really know me?” bit in the middle is referring back to the start of each verse (“Do you know the me that wakes in places/Faces I’ve never seen...” etc.) It’s funny: when I first heard the title, as I mentioned earlier, I anticipated an unpleasant “Austin Powers”-ish celebration of how much fun it is to be a scenester, but I couldn’t have been more wrong. They may or may not mean it - they may or may not even think about the lyrics at all - but, the wobble on the word “bubbly” aside, the delivery is fantastically, impeccably desperate & bitter throughout, and I’m very impressed.
 
 
Seth
08:49 / 23.12.05
OK, I think I've downloaded just about all their music now. And now I need assistance: help me cull the best of each into a mix CD. Realistically I have so much music to listen to that I won't prioritise each album, but the select highlights of each on one disc might get heavy play.

Weapons from the Wall, I choose you!
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
20:33 / 23.12.05
Disclaimer: I haven't heard the first album. And I'm not sure how many songs fit on a CD these days. But I'd say the list should look something like this - and if it doesn't all fit, just take off anything you're familiar with already from the radio. Oh, and just for fun, the ones in bold are what I'd choose if I was forced to take it down to ten songs...

Sound Of The Underground
No Good Advice
Love Machine
The Show
Jump

Wake Me Up
Hear Me Out
Graffiti My Soul
Real Life
Here We Go
Models

Biology
Wild Horses
Watch Me Go
Waiting
Whole Lotta History
Swinging London Town
It's Magic
 
 
matthew.
23:58 / 27.03.06
So, I live in Canada, where the main vehicle of pop culture is a channel called Muchmusic, and this channel has probably never aired any Girls Aloud. I guess I heard of them through the ol' Barbelith. There you go, Flyboy, the Music forum is working.

I got the album Chemistry, and I'm loving it. There is such a... total honesty about them. Girls Aloud is not about activism, or deep weighty subjects, but about going to the club and hanging out. It's a breath of fresh air. Their voices are good, but not the absolute greatest. No one would ever compare these girls to Aretha Franklin, but it doesn't matter. There's an attitude of... "fuck it, let's just sing some songs and dance" to the whole proceedings. It doesn't have that plastic and artificial feel to it that some pop music seems to drip with.

"Watch Me Go" is a definite fun song. As someone more eloquent put it upthread, it's a song made up of little parts that are super catchy and super fun. After listening to the song, I find it hard to get the fadeout out of my head. Embrassingly, I end up singing the song outloud at work and people wonder what the fuck I'm talking about.

I normally eschew pop music for all the pretentious and arrogant reasons that "indie hipsters" like me use to dismiss pop, but I fucking love this CD. It's an example of pop music being popular for a good reason: it's fun music that you can dance to, and isn't that enough?

Any North American Barbeloids familiar with Girls Aloud other than through Barbelith?
 
 
buddhistpunk
13:00 / 29.03.06
I try so, so hard to not like Girls Aloud. They are the epitome of everything I don't like about current chart/popular music. But I have to admit that "Whole Lotta History" hits a chord with me. I think that both Mr BP and I would agree that "Love Machine" shows definite rockabilly hints, and I also profess a liking for "The Show" which invokes summer memories.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
06:57 / 22.08.06
I just want to bump this so I can read and post to it later. I run for 2 hours a week to a specially-selected GA playlist so the songs mentioned are a big part of my life right now.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
18:33 / 22.08.06
Well, it's a great thread and it's wonderful to see my favourite band of the moment being taken seriously, and discussed intelligently. I don't have much to argue with or even to add, except that the whole spoken section of "Swinging London Town" falls kind of flat for me, rather like the talking in "Never Ever" ~ it's one thing to do amateur school-choir ("Wild Horses"), and another yet to do bad school drama. It doesn't seem to scan, and it's delivered very clumsily. Maybe that's the "point" ~ for it to be flat, anyway ~ but the images seem emptily stereotypical. The song escapes 1960s Austin Powers, but this is almost a 1980s stereotype of what the rich kids do ("Sushi... Chelsea chicks...Hooray Henries..." it's like a Christmas stocking guide to Sloane Rangers). This section seems to deal in dated, easy caricature, comparable perhaps to Williams' "Life Thru A Lens" ("Mix with the local gentry and don't crash Tarquin's Bentley") or something from mid-1990s Blur ("He’s never cheap or cheerful He’s Hugo and he’s Boss").

Anyway, the line "Do you know the me that wakes" is stunning by comparison, grimly self-reflective ~ a surprising lyric, very much unlike the shallow list of London drinking types. It reminds me a little of a line I was enjoying last night, Britney's "Say hello to the girl that I am", boldly opening "Overprotected".

xoxoxoxNADINExoxoxoxo
sorry I am just copying stuff out of my rough book there.

Just as a slight addition to the thread, I was going to give my thoughts on why "Biology" seemed a quintessential GA tracks at the moment.

1. Several different songs, cut-and-shut together like one of the cars in the "Long Hot Summer" garage. I think the video illustrates this pretty well, with the girls changing costume and background across the various sections, and changing back again.

2. Similarly, the way the structure slots those sections together, repeating a couple and just abandoning others after one use.

0) Intro
a) Why Don't You Fool Me
b) I Got One Alabama Return + Closer [I count these as 1]
c) You Give It Up
d) You Can't Escape My Biology
a) Why Don't You Fool Me
d) You Can't Escape My Biology
0) Intro

I think I've got that right ~ looking at it this way, it's just incredible that you have one verse, once, never repeated, so whatever glimpse of a meaningful "story" in this more wordy, more narrative-heavy section is simply abandoned after one shot. The glorious "You Give It Up" section is used once, where some songs would try to bleed it to death ~ it's as though it's so great, it could only be played one time only, or as though they've got so much great stuff, they can just throw that out with no need to wring it dry, even with a single repeat.

3. Near-meaningless lyric, which nevertheless has some teasing hint that it could make sense. There's a notion there somewhere, darting between the lines, of a girl who has to get away from a boy (presumably ~ a geek, even) because when they get together it's just too dangerous and hot, but they can't escape their biology.

She wants love, hugs, to be needed, instead of wicked games, and so she's got her ticket away to Alabama (why a return, in that case?), but she's not going to be able to resist that pull back to him.

She knows she should zip it up, give it up, get her head in the shade, freeze and cool off, but the red heat, the thrill, the heartbeat is just getting closer, and closer, and closer...

And that's about all you can get out of it, at a push. Typical.

4. Pastiche and tribute to musical history. I would identify Bowie's "Jean Genie" in the Intro there ~ maybe others hear something different, or something more. Cf. "My Sharona" = "No Good Advice", and so on.

5. I suggest, a bit more controversially perhaps, that the song reflects the band's hierarchy and order of importance. It opens entirely with Nadine. The song is only taken over by Tweedy with "So I got my cappuccino to go", 46 seconds into the track. If you check the video, Nicole does not say a word until about 1.27, and then she says one word: "closer". Once. Sarah and Kimberley come in a little bit earlier.

Tweedy is the closest the band has to a frontwoman, I would suggest, but isn't it the case that Nadine has the only solo ballad ("No Regrets")? If Nicole solos on "It's Magic", I only realised it today, and listening to that track again I found it really feeble.

I might find it hard to support this opinion with anything but my own feelings but I believe those are the two strongest and most dominant members of the band, and "Biology" reflects that order of things.
 
 
Dxncxn
14:00 / 23.08.06
These are the full lyrics to ‘Biology’, taken from (oh yes!) the karaoke video on the cd single (since there’s no lyrics in the album booklet, and I can’t get into the official web site anymore). While there’s no absolute guarantee that they’re totally accurate - I mean, I’ve seen obviously incorrect lyrics printed on album covers before - there’s some interesting stuff there: specifics that aren’t what I’d initially assumed, which make me think they are genuine (“He still creeps closer”, frexample).

Why don’t you fool me, feed me, say you need me
Without wicked games
C’mon and hold me, hug me, say you love me
And not my dirty brain

I got one Alabama return
That’ll take me far away from you
Cos when you take me in your arms
I turn to slave, I can’t be saved
So I got my cappuccino to go
And I’m heading for the hills again
Cos if we party any more we’ll start a fire
Of pure desire

Closer
Your mind’s flying blind with your head and your face getting red
And your heart beats closer
You fall on your knees and the geek at your feet says you’re neat
And the beat gets closer
You die for the thrill at the kill and your heart’s had its fill
But he still creeps closer
You want it to freeze but you’re weak, in too deep, and the beat,
and the beat gets closer
closer

We give it up
And then they take it away
A girl’s got to zip it up
And get her head in the shade
Baby if we give it up
It’s just a matter of time
Before all the heavy stuff
Comes back to bite your behind

You can’t mistake my biology
The way that we talk, the way that we walk, it’s there in our thoughts
The magic number’s in front of me
The way that we talk, the way that we walk, so easily caught
You can’t mistake my biology
The way that we talk, the way that we walk, it’s there in our thoughts
We’re gonna cause a controversy
The way that we talk, the way that we walk, so easily caught

I agree with Miss Wonderstarr’s analysis: it’s dangerous to rely on a relationship based entirely on physical computability, however strong that may be. In terms of specifics, the Alabama return bit is the most difficult - Google seems to suggest that it’s the official name for some sort of tax paperwork, which I don’t think helps, particularly. I guess, rather than a return ticket, it could just be ‘I have one opportunity to return’, although it’s still not completely satisfactory. The magic number/cause a controversy lines seem a bit like filler. It’s interesting that the power dynamic in the relationship isn’t all one way: yes, I turn to slave, but this contrasts with “the geek at your feet”. In which case presumably the ‘they’ in “We give it up*/And then they take it away” isn’t necessarily the boys in question, but possibly society in general. Which in turn suggests that the constantly shifting ‘you/he’s and ‘we/i’s are more carefully deployed than I’d initially assumed.

(A disclaimer: I don’t know if there is actually a coherent reading available, and I’m not upset or disappointed if it turns out that there isn’t. But I think it’s worth looking, because if there is, and I only miss it because I’m not concentrating hard enough, well then more fool me).

On band hierarchy, I’d disagree, to an extent, with the notion that Cheryl’s the frontwoman. I guess it depends on how these things are defined: she’s obviously the most famous, but Nadine certainly sings more (and, while I’d struggle to back this up, I’d also suggest she wins hands down on the patented Knowles standing-in-the-middle-ometer).

I’m not sure I’d draw any particular conclusions from solo ballad vocals, myself. Are you saying that that’s where a singer properly proves their worth? I can see your point, to an extent, although for me, Nadine is actually at her worst on the ballads - all unnecessary Mariah ‘virtuosity’ - and far better when she’s more restrained (cf “Watch Me Go”).

And finally, “It’s Magic” is currently my favourite track on ‘Chemistry’ - it takes “Whole Lotta History”s structurally-innovative-without-sounding-like-it thing to a whole ‘nother level; although I know from various comments online that it’s a lot of peoples’ least favourite. I think Nicola’s vocal’s great. Yes, she still sounds like she’s about twelve - if that’s what you mean by ‘feeble’, I can kind of see your point - but I think it works for the song in question.

Much more to say, as ever on this topic, but the Real World looms. (Not MTV’s The Real World. That would be bizarre. Just the washing up & stuff...)


____________________
* Assuming that "We give it up" is actually '(Despite our best intentions) we have The Sex', rather than 'We abandon the relationship'.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
14:56 / 23.08.06
In terms of specifics, the Alabama return bit is the most difficult - Google seems to suggest that it’s the official name for some sort of tax paperwork, which I don’t think helps, particularly. I guess, rather than a return ticket, it could just be ‘I have one opportunity to return’, although it’s still not completely satisfactory.

Maybe the character is from Alabama? To get away from the relationship, she'd therefore need a "return" ticket to her home. I was wondering (not that I really expected to find any consistency) about "heading for the hills" with regard to Alabama ~ I don't know the state, but the world authority on everything, Wikipedia, states that although two-thirds of the land mass is "gentle plain", North Alabama is "mostly mountainous". "Head for the hills" is a colloquial phrase anyway, I'm sure.


The power relationship is complicated even in that one line: "You fall on your knees and the geek at your feet..." She's on her knees, but the geek's still submissive to her! Intertextually it reminds me of "Teenage Dirtbag", which is after all part of the GA covers canon ~ there too you've got a girl who thinks she's worthless and geeky, aching after an apparently-unattainable boy who tells her as he asks her to the prom that he's just a dirtbag like her.

Re. "We’re gonna cause a controversy / The way that we talk, the way that we walk", I think this can be placed in the context of general Girls Aloud boasts, claims, almost branding within the songs. There is quite a lot of talk in the lyrics about "us", what "we're" like ~ putting forward a group or gang identity, often assertively. To actually have a song called "Girls Allowed" could be seen as part of this self-reflection, but there's also

"Don't ask how we do it so cool
Don't ask us to break the rules" (Intro)

"We're the tomorrow generation
There's much to be done [...] (Here We Go)

"We text as we talk
We're running as we walk
Cos we surf our little souls away" (Life Got Cold ~ a bit different this one, as it's more downbeat and melancholy)

"'Cos now we're back on top
And everywhere that we go
We're gonna let the beat drop" (Stop)

"We're gift-wrapped kitty cats
We're only turning into tigers when we gotta fight back" (Love Machine)

------------
I’m not sure I’d draw any particular conclusions from solo ballad vocals, myself. Are you saying that that’s where a singer properly proves their worth?

I was suggesting it seems like a showcase, and I thought ~ maybe I'm wrong? ~ that only Nadine had been allowed one all to herself. Performed live, though I haven't seen them do this live and don't know if they do, or would, it would obviously give Nadine a significant solo spot.

And finally, “It’s Magic” is currently my favourite track on ‘Chemistry’ - it takes “Whole Lotta History”s structurally-innovative-without-sounding-like-it thing to a whole ‘nother level; although I know from various comments online that it’s a lot of peoples’ least favourite. I think Nicola’s vocal’s great. Yes, she still sounds like she’s about twelve - if that’s what you mean by ‘feeble’, I can kind of see your point - but I think it works for the song in question.


You are being very generous in your disagreement, which I appreciate! I suppose I meant it seemed insipid and unremarkable to me, though I also agree with you about her voice sounding young ~ not thin or weak, just... well, boring perhaps.

------------

Finally, I forgot to mention my very favourite bit about "Biology", which is the "clock" hand-gesture on "just a matter of time". You will know it if you have the karaoke video! I find it quite hard not to do it (badly) myself whenever I hear the song. There's also the gauchely literal choreography of "zip it up" (perform zipping up trousers) and "bite your behind" (hit your bottom) but they don't quite attain that classic standard.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
17:56 / 23.08.06
Perhaps we can also talk about TONY LAMEZMA's mix of "Biology".

I don't know Tony Lamezma, but this track opens very much like a lighter version of the "DJ Prom Mix" of Sugababes "Push the Button". I'm unaware whether the two have any connection.

It starts with the "Closer" section, jumping right over the Intro and "Why Don't You" ~ gimmicked-up with clubby devices like beats that build and starburst, and multiple layers of echoing vocals. There's a cyber-squidgy texture to the sound, like a Frogger chorus.

Then the single verse, with that space-invader stuff in the background, followed by another round of "Closer" and what I think is a bit of a hoary technique of ramping the beats up faster to a manic climax, which of course breaks like a wave into the next section, "We Give It Up".

What happens here, which is interesting, is the introduction of what I can best describe as a mid-1980s Commodore 64 science fiction anthem ~ a simple shape on keyboards. (P-perhaps some of you remember the game "Shadowfire". No... no, me either. Me either.) But this addition has one notable effect: it continues over this section and "Biology", the chorus, linking them far more closely than in the original.

Then Nadine's intro, more than halfway through the track, interrupted by videogame explosions and another faint, X-filesey keyboard theme in the background. Careful Nadz! We're going into hyperspace... NOW!!!
 
 
miss wonderstarr
18:00 / 23.08.06
Postscript: the outro has an interesting little theme tagged on, too. As the space war dies away, leaving only a shower of dainty sparks, there comes a two-note pattern that I puzzled over for a little bit before realising that what it reminded me of was that key motif in Vangelis' "Chariots of Fire"!
 
 
Janean Patience
16:49 / 24.09.06
Chemistry, I was delighted to discover earlier today, is currently £1.99 in Sainsbury's. In that particular store that's less than a loaf of bread. Get y'self down.
 
 
Dxncxn
10:53 / 27.09.06
A not-particularly-high-quality version of forthcoming greatest-hits-trailing new single “Something Kinda Ooh” is currently on YouTube here.

After a few listens, I like it. I wouldn’t put it up there with their best work, but the “If you’re gonna put a line on me...” and, particularly, “Should’ve known where the man was at...” bits are splendid (Nadine’s phantom “of” in the second case notwithstanding), and the relentless thump of the whole thing is definitely enjoyable. Jury’s still out on Kimberley’s spoken(-ish) bit. (“Kink in the steel”, is it? Not for the first time, I have no idea what that’s about.)

I haven’t yet found a tracklist for the album, ‘The Sound Of Girls Aloud’, which is due for October 30th, although there’s apparently a limited double with a disc of out-takes and demos. This seems to me to be an intriguingly ‘Mojo’ choice - remixes or videos would have been more what I’d’ve expected - but I’d be thrilled if it happens.

The decision to go with a compilation album doesn’t particularly ease my mind where all the rumours of a split are concerned, although, if this is the end, they’ll be going out with a close-to-unblemished copybook, which is kind of appealing also.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
13:19 / 27.09.06
I think that's a winner ~ turbo-powered, again welded together from a few choppy sections that shouldn't by rights fit. Lyrics are the usual appealing nonsense: "something kinda Ooh! jumpin on my tu, tu."

The video looks like a girl-version of Obi-Wan and Anakin flying over Coruscant nightscape, crossed perhaps with Tokyo Drift.

(Nadine’s phantom “of” in the second case notwithstanding),

? I didn't catch what you're referring to here.
 
 
Dxncxn
14:07 / 27.09.06
Just that she sings, as far as I can tell, “Should’ve recognised the plan attack/When he turned and he called me ‘baby’”. Whereas you’d think it should be ‘plan of attack’, if there weren’t so many syllables fighting for space. (Unless it’s ‘planned attack’, I guess. Or the plan itself that’s attacking? Or...there’s every chance I should maybe be getting out more.) On the other hand, I very much like the way they collapse ‘Something inside of me’ into “Somethinside of me”. And the rattling hi-hats in the chorus.

When it came out, Flyboy characterised 'Chemistry' as "perhaps self-consciously sophisticated" (and I can certainly see what he was getting at), but this seems to me like a move away from that. Which is fine. Somethinside of me would be very happy for them to have one last properly huge hit if this does indeed turn out to be the end.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
17:30 / 31.01.07
I don't think anyone has talked about "Money" yet. Hated my first hearing, loved it on listens #2-113.
 
 
Feverfew
18:49 / 31.01.07
Nor, fortunately, has anyone mentioned the new Comic Relief cover of "Walk This Way", and, quite frankly, on one listen, I think that's how it should stay.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
19:31 / 31.01.07
Is it available anywhere?
 
 
Feverfew
17:39 / 01.02.07
Apparently it's streaming on "Perez Hilton", but I can't find it there - it'll probably start getting more and more radio airplay, but for now it's mostly, I think, confined to Radio 1.

From my single listen, all I can think of mentioning is that they seemed to have stripped the percussion right down, leaving it feeling a little blank - and the pace of the song seems, I don't know, off, somehow? It seems to segúe into the chorus without any warning, and it just seems to bamble along without any purpose.

Apparently it grows on you the more you listen to it, so, hey...
 
 
miss wonderstarr
12:59 / 04.02.07
Oh.


I really don't quite know what to think of "Walk This Way" now I've heard it. My first impression is that it's a horrific mess. My more general feeling is that GA really should never cover songs, because as far as I can remember, they are without exception a whole other bad world of music.

I'll give it another shot, but it just sounds like a mutant child of a song.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
13:00 / 04.02.07
PS I found it on YouTube.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
13:05 / 04.02.07
Yeah, second listen isn't much better. What an insane choice of song, though... a rock/rap hybrid? Girls Aloud's raps have been limited to a few, half-successful stanzas of Cheryl talking in the middle of a pop song. Here they seem to solve that generic discrepancy by performing the rap as diva-ish warble or doing it in a flat London accent in the final verse.

Having two bands ~ of five girls and three girls? ~ share a short song with one line each is bound to sound incredibly fragmented. Layering samples over the top... it's just like... dropping a bomb and hoping things turn out OK.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
13:15 / 04.02.07
Maybe the video could save it. If they made it into a hi-camp girl-gang battle, like the promos for "WAGs' Boutique". On third listen, guided by Popjustice forum's in-depth discussion of this track, you can get some enjoyment from Keisha vs Nadine apparently duelling for the showiest ad-lib during the 2nd and 3rd choruses.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
13:23 / 04.02.07
4th listen: with the video. This actually saves the whole thing for me, somehow. It gives so much more sense of dialogue ~ it's the difference between hearing the soundtrack of a film, and watching the fim itself. And they have, pretty much, gone for a girl-gang attitudinous clash, and everyone seems to have understood the way to play it ~ sassy, jokey.

Nadine pwns the whole thing so hard everyone else looks like her backing singers.

****


Gosh what a journey I've been on. Thanks for your indulgence.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
13:32 / 04.02.07
PS Girls Aloud win the dance-off hands down.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
14:07 / 04.02.07
PPS.

 
 
Spatula Clarke
13:10 / 05.02.07
Okay, is it just me or are the singing and riff/sample during the verses in completely different keys from each other? It's like a continuation of the bootleg thing, only without any effort being made to get the two things in tune.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
07:28 / 24.07.07
New single SEXY! NO NO NO is the "Tell Me More" bit from Summer Nights, reworked by broken Barbarella sexbots.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply