BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Debt of Gratitude. But for what, exactly?

 
 
Tezcatlipoca
08:00 / 17.10.05
A recent(ish) discussion with a friend - the same friend with whom I have a disagreement about the Gordian Knot problem - turned to the state of being born, and whether or not gratitude to parents is due as a result.

Now I personally don't see that gratitude should be automatically given, or is even really relevant here. Arguably, gratitude is due for someone or something that enriches your life in some way, and, given the alternative to being alive, being born can't be really said to enrich your existence.

There is of course the flip side of this argument which suggests that, if you should feel gratitude for your parents bringing you into the world, are they then - by the same rationale - directly at fault if your life isn't working out to be a bed of roses?
(and the rather more extreme end of this argument being, of course, that your parents are directly to blame for you having to live in this world we've built).

There is also the consideration that you are not necessarily the person your parents gave birth to. As you become an individual in your own right, and loose your dependancy upon them, doesn't that then sever your obligations to them, physical or otherwise?

So where do you stand, both on a personal and philosophical level? Should your parents receive your gratitude for giving you your life, regardless of what you yourself have made of it?
 
 
Foust is SO authentic
10:37 / 17.10.05
I think this question is really only relavent if you are suicidal.

If you enjoy life enough to not end it, then you might as well be grateful to the people who gave you the opportunity. After all, you could have been aborted.

Also, pregnancy is kind of a bitch, isn't it? Shouldn't you at least be grateful to your mother for that?
 
 
Tezcatlipoca
11:34 / 17.10.05
I think this question is really only relavent if you are suicidal.

I imagine the suicidal also ask themselves the purpose of their existence, but it doesn't follow that the question then only becomes relevant when one is contemplating suicide.


If you enjoy life enough to not end it, then you might as well be grateful to the people who gave you the opportunity. After all, you could have been aborted.

Putting aside for a moment the statement "might as well", let's take the latter part of the sentence, especially as it seems to neatly touch on one of the major aspects of what I'm asking. You say "to the people who gave you the opportunity". Do you then owe your existence, and your accomplishments therein, to your parents for 'giving you the opportunity'?

On the abortion subject, I'm not convinced that "After all, you could have been aborted" is a relevant statement. If you'd been aborted, the point becomes moot anyway, so I can't really see that it can be used as a valid tool to highlight any error of thinking.
 
 
Cat Chant
12:03 / 17.10.05
If you'd been aborted, the point becomes moot anyway

But doesn't that go for any life-giving or life-preserving action? Say I was drowning, and someone saved me: should I be grateful to them, or just say "Well, if I'd died, I wouldn't have to be grateful: you're just my condition-of-possibility, so the point is moot."

Can we get anywhere by thinking about the idea of gratitude in the first place? My own take on the thread topic is lifted from Diana Wynne Jones's Eight Days of Luke - something like this: children should not have to be grateful for adults for providing them with the means of life, since children are not able to live independently of adults (and that would go double for biological parents, I assume) - but I'll have to get home before I can find the quote.
 
 
Unconditional Love
13:48 / 17.10.05
Maybe your parents or parent worked exceptionally hard to clothe you,feed you, educate you, try as hard as they new how for you, tryed hard to allow you to be an individual when you were ready too, but still kept supporting you even when you had fled the nest.

Unless they have majorly disrespected you, ie tryed to kill you, abuse you etc.

Otherwise you havent got a leg to stand on.

p.s You owe them being able to get to this point to be able to formulate this post, think about that.
 
 
Cat Chant
13:52 / 17.10.05
Nephilim - I think the point of this thread is whether you owe gratitude to your parents simply for giving birth to you (or possibly for conceiving, carrying and giving birth to you, which is a little bit more consistent), regardless of the way they've treated you since that day.
 
 
Quantum
14:35 / 17.10.05
A thought experiment- say I build a house, out of broken glass and diamonds. Then I give it to you- you didn't ask for it, don't want it and can't give it back. Then I tell you how painful it was and how much it cost me, and how you should be grateful I went to such lengths to give you a house made of broken glass.

Should I receive your gratitude?
 
 
Tezcatlipoca
14:39 / 17.10.05
But doesn't that go for any life-giving or life-preserving action? Say I was drowning, and someone saved me: should I be grateful to them, or just say "Well, if I'd died, I wouldn't have to be grateful: you're just my condition-of-possibility, so the point is moot."

I appreciate the point, but it's not quite the same thing, which is probably my fault for badly wording the post. In order to be drowning, you presumably had a life and an individual identity prior to toppling into the water. Not only that, but that in the event you did drown it would have an impact on the world you left behind, to one degree or another.

What I was referring to was the simple variable of born/not born, rather than born then died/not died. Since your never being born doesn't really have an impact on the world, I can't see it suggests - by converse - that your being born is something for which you should be grateful.


Nephilim - I think the point of this thread is whether you owe gratitude to your parents simply for giving birth to you

Spot on, Deva. And Nephilim, although you posted at a slight tangent to the thread, I'd still like to clarify my own stance on what you've said, that being that I am extremely aware of - and grateful to - my parents for the stirling work they put in, both physical and emotional, in raising me at all, much less in raising me to be the kind of person who would pose the type of question with which this thread is concerned.

...but, as Deva pointed out, I'm more interested in whether or not it is expected, or right, to feel gratitude for the simple fact that your parents happened to get frisky one day and, nine months later, you popped into the world.


A thought experiment- say I build a house, out of broken glass and diamonds. Then I give it to you- you didn't ask for it, don't want it and can't give it back. Then I tell you how painful it was and how much it cost me, and how you should be grateful I went to such lengths to give you a house made of broken glass.
Should I receive your gratitude?


Like Nephilim, you've shot just shy of the point Quantum. The point of the thread is to ascertain whether you are grateful, or believe you should be grateful, to your parents for the simple fact that they gave birth to you. What isn't in question is the fact you might appreciate or be grateful for the astounding degree of work they did for you after that event.
 
 
werwolf
07:22 / 18.10.05
i personally don't think that one should be grateful for being alive at all. but that's a bit tricky.

my point of view is that i didn't ask to be alive. i never held out for the opportunity of being born - because only if there was something like a need or want from my side does being born and being alive become an 'opportunity' that i can exploit. i don't believe that there was any 'i'-consciousness before my birth, therefore i could not have wanted for being born which again means that i do not have to feel gratitude towards my parents for giving me life. i never asked for it.
so, you see, imo whether or not you should thank your parents for being alive boils down to the point whether or not you believe that there was a consciousness of you before your birth and whether that consciousness actively pursued being materially born (again) or not.

also, i think that birthing children is always - ALWAYS - a selfish act. i do not believe that anyone in the world has ever had kids out of any other reasons than selfish ones. excluded are of course forced pregnancies (rape resulting in pregnancy, for instance) that could not be ended due to economical or social reasons. but even then the birth of the child is not going to happen for the child's sake. actually, i cannot think nor have i ever heard of a scenario in which birth was given to a child for the child's benefit. to me, that is ridiculous notion. all that hogwash about "but i want me children to experience this beautiful world." or "why deny them the right to live?" and so forth - all bullsh!t as far as i am concerned, for reasons that are quite obvious.

two points why nobody should feel grateful towards their parents for being born.
 
 
Foust is SO authentic
13:49 / 18.10.05
Again, I'm going to question the question. My gut instinct is to believe that everyone's answers will have more to do with justifying their own relationship to their parents rather than any solid theories about gratitude.
 
  
Add Your Reply