BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Qliphoth

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
illmatic
08:23 / 28.09.05
I quoted the following extract in the “darkest place” thread:

Fred Fowler: The Problem of Evil

Definitely getting tired of hearing and reading the satanic, evil, and darkside connections which are simply not there in my experience. The relationships are hard to grasp, and even more difficult to explain ...

More serious is the developing view of the darkside as a repository or inventory (a kind of warehouse?) of all the bad shit of our humankind species: the darkside as resident by human impulses and actions to rape, murder, and whatever else we 20th century people think is nasty stuff to do or even to think about. Perhaps it's Christianity (?) mixed up with some pop psychology and magical thinking (no "k")?

For the record: for L and me there is not a thing satanic or evil in the darkside. Such constructs simply have no meaning in this realm. They are strictly dayside, strictly human, and for me strictly bullshit. Oh yes, the USA produced over 20,000 murders last year, countless rapes, and even more countless acts of senseless and sick brutality. How many were killed, and continue to die, in Iraq, S. Africa, Liberia, El Salvador, Guatemala, etc., etc.? I could tell you how many children were abused, that 20% plus of children in this country live in poverty, but I think my point is clear. All of this horror exists in this dayside, human world. In my view, the recognition of all this is so threatening to personality integrity that few are even willing to see it, open their eyes and hearts and minds to their own stink and meanness as a race/species of the dayside world.


What I found particularly interesting about this is that Fowler is positing the qlipoth, as written about by Kenneth Grant, as something other, than simply our destructive, anti-social, nasty side. Something atavistic yes, but more akin to survival urges than sadism. (To judge from what I’ve read about serial killers and the like I think that these kind of sadistic impulses are simply the cyclical product of severe abuse and trauma). Nema makes the same point in her book Maat Magick.

To quote Gypsy Lantern from the same thread:

On this subject, I was looking through Nema's quite odd but at times quite brilliant book "Maat Magick" last night, and there's a lot in that about invoking what she calls the "Forgotten Ones". I think a lot of that material went into the concept of the Archons as represented in the Invisibles. It involves exploring and incorporating the kind of dark material that this thread purportedly deals with. Nema reckons you shouldnt jump into them waters until you've attained knowledge and conversation of yer HGA, as otherwise you're not up to the task. You need to be strong and established in Malkuth, Yesod, Hod, Netzach and Tiphareth - before you should tackle integrating the Forgotten Ones. Considering that Nema, and by extension Kenny G, are pretty much the primary sources for all of the stuff that Grant Morrison has represented in the Filth and in the Invisibles … - it is advice that's perhaps worth paying some attention to.

I can’t remember here exact schema for the Forgotten One’s but if IRC it begins with food, the primal desire to feed ourselves when it’s a matter of life and death and our survival hinges on it. What she seems to be suggesting to me are that these things are in us, as part of our organism or as part of some kind of transpersonal species memory (shades of Jung?), and as such have great power bound up within them.

To follow the HGA comment by GL, I’m aware that in traditional Jewish qabalah one is meant to go down into the abyss on attainment, to share the light you have become with it’s denizens. I can’t remember what exactly this process is called but it’s mentioned in Gersholm Scholem’s work. Will look up reference and post.

So the purpose of this thread is then, is just to put out this idea - that the qlipoth as discussed in the works of Grant, Fallario and others isn’t just taboo sex n’ sadism. The writers mentioned seem to me to be almost “reclaiming” the qlipoth, as a source of power rather than just the “world of shells”. Anyone who’s seen Linda Falario’s Shadow Tarot will appreciate what a creative work this is, far more than wallowing in our angry and anti-social murk. Some obvious parallels come up – Spare’s atavistic resurgence (not that he wrote much about it, most of what we have is Grant’s “versioning”), Phil Hine’s work on Cthulhu, GM’s Filth (maybe). Mishlen Linden spring to mind as well as someone who has provided a practical guide to working with the Shadow tarot stuff.

Another purpose of this thread some this might be for a bit of discussion and sharing of experience, the latter being supremely important in my view as I’m sure that it’s ONLY with some practical experience that any of this will make sense. I’m sadly lacking in the latter but have brushed up against some very powerful imagery in my dreams – dreams of the ocean in all it’s power, waves smashing on the shore, and occasionally, feelings of complete terror directed towards what may be under the surface of the water. Has anyone else had parallel experiences - or worked with the qlipoth or other expressions of these energies in a practical way?

One final point – does anyone know much Crowley’s Liber 231? It’s the work Kenny G based Nightside of Eden on, and is very cryptic to say the least. I don’t even recognise the names of most of the Gods in there let alone grokking the qabalah. Any notes from passing Thelemites would be useful.

NOTE: Can we please keep this thread reasonably sensible and experiential based (I’m looking at you, Wolfangel). As it’s a reasonable taboo subject can we please try and keep it a bit sensible, rather than ribbeting on about THE DARQ. A minimum of wanky formulations and theorising, please (though a little bit is nice). If you can, post about what you’ve done or experienced.
 
 
Quantum
09:21 / 28.09.05
I've a question, not just for me but for any readers not familiar with the Otz Chaim or Kabbala;

The Qlippothic Sephira are the reflections of the Sephira (or dark side, shells or whatever people believe) and so are closely related to each sphere, correct? So there's Netzach and the Qlippoth of Netzach, say. All together they are the Qlippothic Tree. Every sapphire has it's Qlippothic counterpart.

Except Da'ath, right? The Abyss is the chasm of nothingness, Da'ath the sphere of same, so has no Qlippothic counterpart. There's no Qlippothic Abyss, no Qlippoth of Da'ath. This may seem obvious, but to someone with little knowledge of Cabbala the Abyss and the Qlippothic Spheres are similar (spoooky!).

Please correct me if I'm mistaken.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
10:38 / 28.09.05
The way I see it, the Sephiroth can be thought of as receptacles of "divine emanations" from AIN SOPH, that which is above Kether. A bit like cups overflowing. A pyramid tower of champagne glasses being filled from a magnum of the expensive stuff. The Qlippoth are the "shells" in the sense that they are cups that are empty. The Qlippoth of Netzach is what is left when no champagne is in the glass. Dryness. Emptiness. Not a Sephiroth but an empty shell of a Sephiroth. Does that make sense?

Daath is generally considered a broken or damaged Sephiroth, or not really a proper Sephiroth at all. Certainly not a functioning Sephiroth. To carry on the tower of champagne glasses analogy, you could look at Daath as a cracked glass that can no longer contain liquid or function properly as a container. It is incorrect to think of it as an empty cup, shell, or Qlippoth, because it doesn't even have the potentiality to be filled. It is simply an Abyss where something once was.

"My cup is overflowing, I don't know what to do" as a renowned Jamaican scholar of Quabala once sang.
 
 
illmatic
12:29 / 28.09.05
Gypsy, I get the champange glasses thing, and can also see how the sepiroth function re. the psyche, but what about da'ath? What and where is the cracked champagne glass in our internal psychic landscapes?
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
12:41 / 28.09.05
Some possible interpretations:

1. Castaneda's concept of "tonal" and "nagual" might be useful in connection with the concept of Universe A/B. The idea being that one has to strengthen your consciousness (LVX) through working out the dayside before exploring "nonexistence" or the "other world" (NOX or non-dreaming sleep being the medium of communication?)

2. The more one pares down Kenneth Grant's shit the more one sees what his methods are, which seem to largely be dreams and exploration of the state in-between waking and sleeping (hypnagogic) through the Paranoiac-Critical method; this is his way of contacting "nonexistant" realms which he then tries to interpret, via gematria, through the lens of Thelemic and Lovecraftian imagery and mythology.
 
 
illmatic
12:44 / 28.09.05
That is the most rational and sanest interpretation of KG's shit I've ever seen, BiaS. Well done. That's a footlong space of darkness on my bookshelf I could've saved.
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
13:01 / 28.09.05
Heh heh, thanks!

You know you love Kenneth Grant. Much more entertaining than watching reality television. I've got two more to get through but just finished "Outer Gateways" which is where I think he starts to make sense (in tiny flashes inbetween all the "boogedy-boo" gematria goo). I swear, that book will be 30 pages of Lovecraft gematria, 30 pages of extremely lucid arguments about Advaitic doctrine and the problems with Crowley's 0=2 theory, and then a long passage of Kenneth Grant talking about how much he hates rock music! These kids today.

It might even make sense to go so far as to say that the "Nightside" is, well, the nightside—dreams and non-waking consciousness. Invoking this stuff in the "dayside" might be one more way of uniting the dreaming, sleeping and waking states which is one of those "ultimately wicked kewl" goals of esoteric religion. The invoking of these states into waking consciousness is what I think he's talking about through the lens of "the Old Ones coming back" and "Cthulhu rising again from R'Lyeh where he lies not dead but dreaming." That's just the kind of language that gets him off cause he's, y'know, Kenneth Grant.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
13:06 / 28.09.05
What and where is the cracked champagne glass in our internal psychic landscapes?

Well the way I see it is that the concept of Daath is like the Gnostic idea of a fall into matter and the Biblical idea of a fall from grace. It seems to be a metaphor for the gap in our internal psychic landscapes that separates us from the Supernals, or God, or maybe even just the bigger picture. The cracked champagne glass is the landscape that has to be traversed in order to grasp towards a sense of wholeness and union with the Divine, (or the champagne bottle, if you like) that various cultures interpret in various ways.

If there wasn't an Abyss, if the Tree of Life was a complete circuit without a big gap in the middle of it, we might all be little Buddha's in utopia. But it's not. That's not the nature of our universe. There is a flaw. A gap between us and the divine, psychological or otherwise, that creates feelings of separateness and alienation between us and the system or Universe as a whole. Hence Abyss type experiences are those moments of our lives when we feel alone, isolated, lost, hurt, worthless, afraid. You can't tell me that there hasn't been a point in your life when you haven't felt like there's a cracked champagne glass in your internal psychic landscape? The way I see it, that's what the Abyss is, and those feelings are how it manifests in our day-to-day lives. If Daath was a fully functioning Sephiroth and there was no Abyss between us and the Supernals, we would not have these "Abyss" type experiences in our lives and exist in absolute wholeness with the Universe. As it stands, there's a big bloody crack in the middle of the circuit. I think that the work of magick (and I use the 'k' for a reason here) is perhaps about individually creating our own personal thread through the Abyss in order to reach towards the Supernals and create this sense of wholeness. Maybe.
 
 
illmatic
13:33 / 28.09.05
I'm really enjoying this thread, yowsa.

To BiaS: I'll have to see if I can dig out the "how to understand" KG email someone posted on a list a few years ago. Basically, any passage you don't understand, photocopy it, strike out grammatical unecessary bits, and before sleeping meditate on it while performing the XIII degree. Drift off, note dreams, repeat until you have TEH GNOSIS!There may have been more to it than that (but not much more).

You can't tell me that there hasn't been a point in your life when you haven't felt like there's a cracked champagne glass in your internal psychic landscape?

I don't think all KG's darkside stuff is "just" dreams, either, though your interpretation makes a lot of sense. A big influence on me has been Peter Regrove's book The Black Goddess and the Sixth Sense which is very influenced by Kenneth Grant. (Also quite clearly inspired Grant Morrision's ideas about Barbelith). It deals with hidden aspects of our physiology and it's relation to the world ie. the "unconscious" influence of scent on us. Regrove's previous book (with his wife, Penelope Shuttle) was The Wise Wound about menstruation, it's biology, surpression, and the resulting cultural myths. This kind of thing touches vaugely on the atavistic survival aspects I mentioned earlier - I think this is "in" the mix that is Grant's books, somewhere, amongst inumerable other strands.

Gypsy: The last time I read Grant looking for an explanation of this - and it was a while ago so I'm not sure I recall clearly - I felt that daath was connected with ideas of non-existence, which is in turn referenced in the weird mysteries/not-mysteries stuff that comes out of the Wu Wei Wu's material (BiaS has mentioned advaita vedanta above). So, I think there's some sort of connection there as well, in his explication of the mysteries. Not saying your interpretation is "wrong" at all, obviously, it makes a lot of sense.

I think "wrong", "right" and indeed, "comprehensible", and "sane" are all concepts one checks at the door when wading into Grant's material.
 
 
illmatic
13:48 / 28.09.05
Edited to remove my divviness. Redrove was influenced by Grant, not vice versa.
 
 
illmatic
13:51 / 28.09.05
Shit! I've just found that Peter Redgrove is dead. Fuck. What a loss. I'd recommend anybody who's interested in magick, the body, Grant and just themselves to check out the books mentioned above. They are absolutely brilliant.

Damn...
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
13:53 / 28.09.05
Unconscious = I didn't mean to suggest that it's "just" the unconscious, I think most of Grant's project—as is that of most occultism, and this is where we can go wrong sometimes, I think, in how we bring these things into the world—is about using the unconscious to contact something else.

Now, for a left-field perspective on this, read this interview:

http://www.rickross.com/reference/scientology/scien240.html

Many suggestive passages in there, but look especially for the word "tunnel." You may have to take a shower afterward to wipe off the cold sweat.
 
 
illmatic
14:04 / 28.09.05
Unconscious = I didn't mean to suggest that it's "just" the unconscious,

I wasn't reading you as being in any way reductionist, no worries

I think most of Grant's project—as is that of most occultism, and this is where we can go wrong sometimes, I think, in how we bring these things into the world—is about using the unconscious to contact something else

Totally. I'd just add that in my experience this "something else" can often be the body, coming through the wyrd filter caused by it's misuse, our forgetfulness, supression. Redgrove and the works of Nema et al seem to point still further back towards the animal side of ourselves. Which is not to say there's no other "something else" to contact....
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
14:18 / 28.09.05
Yeah, sorry, didn't read you as reading me as being reductionist...

I think you're right about the body but that it may go down even further, to the level of DNA (i.e. atavistic resurgence).

Check out this Laffoley painting:

 
 
Quantum
14:22 / 28.09.05
Having not read any Grant, I'm increasingly thinking I might not bother... especially after BiaS' concise synopsis, there's plenty of hynagogic techniques from paranoid magicians and gemetria has never attracted me that much. Anyone willing to convince me?

Castaneda's concept of "tonal" and "nagual" might be useful in connection with the concept of Universe A/B.

His conceptions of both change through the Don Juan series though. I'm assuming you mean the Tonal as the Sephiroth because they're 'Ordinary', and the Nagual as the Qlippoth because they're 'Non Ordinary' realities? But the Kabbala is already involved in Non-Ordinary reality surely? The Tonal is restricted to Malkuth I would have thought,and a small part of Malkuth at that.

I like the dayside/nightside comparison though, that makes perfect sense to me.
 
 
illmatic
14:24 / 28.09.05
There's an essay about that in some new book I've got - damn, who's it by...?
 
 
Quantum
14:28 / 28.09.05
Though amazing that painting's confused the shit out of me regarding the difference between the Abyss and the Qlippoth and the relation of Da'ath to the flip side of the tree. At the moment Alan Moore's conception in Promethea of Da'ath as a hole in the tree makes the most sense (can't have a dark reflection 'cos it's an absence) but that implies qlippoth as the dark reflection, which this thread is about questioning. Gah.
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
14:30 / 28.09.05
I wouldn't get too confused by it, the original is probably gigantic and there'll be tons and tons of information you're not seeing. More posted for effect.
 
 
Unconditional Love
14:32 / 28.09.05
DAAT
The word daat is usually translated as knowledge. However, when the word is first used in Torah it signifies attachment or union (and Adam knew yada Eve. Genesis 4:1). This is the function of daat to unify chochmah and binah, which it does in two ways. Daat Elyon (upper daat, which is an aspect of keter) transcends chochmah and binah; it is the expression of the ultimate purpose for which all the other sefirot are emanated. Thus daat unifies chochmah and binah in terms of the purpose for which they were emananted. Daat Tachton (lower daat) unifies chochmah and binah in producing and the lower sefirot and channeling the outflow from the higher sefirot into the lower ones. In order to be able to do this, daat must be able to sense the needs and status of the lower sefirot. This is another quality of daat, called hargashah.


Each one of these following seven sefirot also corresponds to one of the seven days of creation. The sefirah of chesed corresponds to the first day of creation, the sefirah of gevurah to the second day, and so on, until the seventh sefirah, malchut, which corresponds to the Sabbath. The nature of each of these sefirot can be understood by examining the seven days of creation as a paradigm of the activity and interaction of these sefirot.


From fithtieth gate publications and seminars.
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
14:34 / 28.09.05
I think conceptions of what the tree is change in each of the four worlds. The Abyss might be the connect between the brain and spinal cord in Assiah, the place where the mind breaks down in the Neither-Neither of opposites in mutual destruction or non-existence in Yetzirah, the jagged hole in one's life process in Briah, and the gateway to "Universe B" in Atziluth.

Maybe. That was pretty off the cuff, but a quick jury-rig to try to weave many of the concepts brought up on this thread together.
 
 
Unconditional Love
14:37 / 28.09.05
hargashah, a prilimary search on this term brings up reference to mensturation and feeling.

i am also bringing up this term ho'arabah wish seems to signify the abyss and has a meaning of something like wilderness.
 
 
Quantum
14:41 / 28.09.05
the original is probably gigantic yeah, isn't his stuff the size of a wall usually, with a gazillion intricate written details laden with significance? Bastard, why can't people make their maps of the (w)hole of existence simple? ;]
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
14:51 / 28.09.05
Or at least put them out in an affordable book...
 
 
Unconditional Love
15:02 / 28.09.05
I've been reading a book on Quantum theories (the ideas, not the math!) On Shabbos, I was commenting to my husband how I saw connections between the ideas in that book and the concepts that I understood of the sefiros, particularly how the world is built in a way that the act of knowing something actually causes it to change. All reality is built not on certainty, but on probabilities. It reminded me of how Keter and Daat somewhat share the same "space" in the Etz Chayim, when one is included, the other is not. We can know, but we cannot know everything, because the act of knowing itself creates limitations.

It seems to me that it is like that with God. We can comprehend Him in a way of "Holy" --in a Godly reality, unmeasured and infinite, our soul entwined in love with Him, or as we see Him manifest within our reality, the Source of wisdom, life, goodness; seeing him in "our terms", which are necessarily limited.

In nusach Ari, there is a line that appears before the Baruch She'amar: "For the sake of the Unification of the Holy One, blessed be He and His Shechina, to unite the name yud-kay with the vav-kay in a perfect union, in the name of all Israel."

It has taken on deep meaning for me. Just as in our world, we live in a reality which is both intrinsically unknowable and exquisitely knowable, so we also understand that we can never truly know God, because Daat itself hides Keter, the Infinite and Holy, where things are not differentiated and bounded.

Uncertainty ( or doubt) is part of all our experience of reality. Yet above it, there is Keter. When we let go, stop quantifying, measuring and looking too closely, when we trust --we experience the Infinite. This too is reality -- in some ways the essence of it: Through trust, we are able to experience the Infinite in a way unfettered and unchanged by attempts to understand it.

... and it is in this place that we truly love God.


by shoshana.
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
15:07 / 28.09.05
That was really cool, Wolfangel.

To simplify what I said about the four worlds... Da'ath might be, progressively, the break in the nervous system, the break in the mind, the break in life, and the break in the universe...
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
15:09 / 28.09.05
Also, the definition of the qliphoth given in "Generation Hex" is "unrefined consciousness."
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
15:17 / 28.09.05
The cracked champagne glass metaphor:

The way I heard it, each of the sephirah was an empty glass; when the divine energy poured in from the en soph, each glass exploded. The remaining shards or shells are the qliphoth and the divine energy, now in the shape of the glass, is the sephira. So you would have a ball of energy for Netzach and several blasted and disconnected fragments hovering around outside of Netzach; that's A'arab Zaraq, the qliphoth of Netzach. These are traditionally reached through Da'ath. It's another way of looking at things; either at the creation of the universe or maybe at what happens to the initiate after the "flash" of divine communication...?

Like all good symbols these things should appertain to any usage at any level...
 
 
Logos
18:25 / 28.09.05
Another way to look at the qlippoth: they are the wax that spilled out of the candle and onto the outside of the lamp. Also, they are the part of the sephiroth which the divine essence was poured into, could not contain, and from which most (but not all of the essence was withdrawn.

As such, they can represent that point at which too much love becomes jealousy, for example, or too much authority becomes arbitrariness. Or, they may not be any of these things, but rather just another ornament for displaying the light emerging from the sephiroth, making it more complex and ultimately more sublime.

Daath emerges not as the "flaw in the middle of things," but functions as a rest in the middle of a phrase of music. It also serves as a receptacle for all of the not-part-of-the-ten-Sephira that were tried and discarded. One theory suggests that the "vessels" made for the trial creations were not completely unfashioned nor put into action, and so were left as "blueprints" in Daath. In other words, God didn't forget about how to make these unused vessels, but didn't activate them as part of the current creation either.

Daath and the qlippoth are "problematic" in the sense that they do not "shine with the light of the Creator", or do not contain the essence of God.
 
 
Ganesh
22:47 / 28.09.05
Having gleaned pretty much all my knowledge of "qliphothic matters" from Promethea, I feel wholly unequipped to comment experientially (or even sensibly) within this thread - but I wanted to say this approach to "the dark side" makes more intuitive sense (and seems more adult) than the usual tired appropriation of Nazi/serial murderer/sexually sadistic imagery. The 'cracked champagne glass' interpretation seems less ambiguous too ie. to an outsider, there's not the same irritating sense of someone self-indulgently wallowing in stuff that fascinates them on an erotic level while congratulating themselves on being a fearless explorer of teh taboooo.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:57 / 28.09.05
Can I just ask for a bit more on en soph?
 
 
Unconditional Love
00:03 / 29.09.05
In Jewish Mysticism, Tzimtzum (צמצום Hebrew: "contraction" or "constriction") refers to the notion in the Kabbalistic theory of creation that God "contracted" his infinite essence in order to allow for a "conceptual space" in which a finite, independent world could exist. This contraction is known as the tzimtzum. The function of the tzimtzum was "to conceal from created beings the activating force within them, enabling them to exist as tangible entities, instead of being utterly nullified within their source" [1]. The tzimtzum produced the required "vacated space" (chalal panui חלל פנוי, chalal חלל, devoid of direct awareness of God's presence.

In Rabbinic literature, God is often referred to as "Ha-Makom" (המקום lit. "the place", "the omnipresent") as the tzimtzum resulted in the conceptual "space" in which the physical universe and free will could exist. Further, olam - the Hebrew word for "world" or universe - is derived from the root word עלם meaning "concealment". This etymology is complementary with the concept of tzimtzum, in that the physical universe conceals the spiritual nature of creation.

It is understood that the concept of tzimtzum contains a built-in paradox, requiring that God be simultaneously transcendent and immanent.

On the one hand, if the "Infinite" did not restrict itself, then nothing could exist - everything would be overwhelmed by God's totality. Thus existence requires God's transcendence, as above.
On the other hand, God continuously maintains the existence of, and is thus not absent from, the created universe. "The Divine life-force which brings all creatures into existence must constantly be present within them... were this life-force to forsake any created being for even one brief moment, it would revert to a state of utter nothingness, as before the creation..." [2]. Thus the biblical teachings: "You have made the heaven... the earth and all that is on it... and You give life to them all" (Nehemiah 9:6); "All the earth is filled with God's Glory" (Numbers 14:21); "God's Glory fills the world" (Isaiah 6:3). Creation therefore requires God's immanence.
In a well known articulation, Rabbi Nachman of Breslav discusses the inherent paradox as follows: "Only in the future will it be possible to understand the Tzimtzum that brought the 'Empty Space' into being, for we have to say of it two contradictory things... (1) the Empty Space came about through the Tzimtzum, where, as it were, He 'limited' His Godliness and contracted it from there, and it is as though in that place there is no Godliness... (2) the absolute truth is that Godliness must nevertheless be present there, for certainly nothing can exist without His giving it life." (Likkutei Moharan I, 64:1)

The paradox is deepened in that the tzimtzum results in a simultaneous perception of the world being imperfect despite God's presence being everywhere. As a result, most Kabbalists see the tzimtzum as a cosmic illusion. Furthermore, since man is an Olam Katan, a "world in miniature", this same process of tzimtzum is said to be replicated within each person.

Taken from wikipedia.

Although not directly related, it does shed light on what is considered to be a space or abyss between the eternal and the finite.
 
 
illmatic
07:14 / 29.09.05
Haus, as I understand it (which is not much) it's a three part model of creation. There's Ain, Ain Soph and Ain Soph Aur. Ain being is the abstract infinte voidness that precedes everything, and Ain Soph Aur being "limitless light" (the light which fills/cracks the sephiroth). I can't recall the exact way in which this is explained in the texts I've read (Dion Fortune being the one that springs to mind), but roughly, it's an allegory for how an infinity negative turns itelf into an infinte postive. This infinity is then limited in form and number by becoming the 10 spheres, (lignt passing through as series of prisms might be a nice analogy, getting darker and darker). It passes from the Godhead (Kether) through to our mundane existence (Malkuth/our world).
 
 
trouser the trouserian
08:12 / 29.09.05
Some observations...

One thing that struck me a few years ago regarding the 'difference' between the 'dayside/nightside tree' is that they could represent two modes of thought processing. After all the 'dayside' tree is linear - structured associations mapped & colour-coded, into which anything and everything can be (and has been) fitted - what might be termed the 'cartographic approach' to ideational processes (familiar to magicians as the tendency to try and join the dots between disparate concepts ad infinitum). The "nightside" however, with it's images of frothing, twisting tunnels collapsing into each other, reminds me of non-linear processes - something that we're less able to conceptualise (and structure) but are no less familiar with on a daily bais. Intuition, dream, vision, intrusive experiences. The magic of the sudden break with linearity.

A prolonged reading of Grant's work (some years ago, admittedly) left me with the distinct impression that his books, particularly Nightside of Eden, are not really aimed at being read literally but aim, rather, to foster a particular ambience in the reader. As Grant himself admits, there is a huge gulf between "magical theory" and an actual magical event, and to some extent one could view "Nightside" for example, as an early, hugely successful hypersigil. Again, it struck me that Grant's exhaustive use of associations (dodgy gematria; dubious 'initiated' accounts of history; idiomatic language) could be read as an attempt to overload the readers' cartographic thought processes until it is exhausted (rather like a reversed zen koan). That Grant privileges non-linear modes of experience - dream, automatic writing/drawing, and the "Paranoiac-Critical" method, is a good clue. Dali described this method in his essay The Conquest of the Irrational as:

"It was in 1929 that Salvador Dali brought his attention to bear on the internal mechanism of paranoiac phenomena and envisaged the possibility of an experimental method based on the sudden power of the systematic associations proper to paranoia; this method afterwards became the delirio-critical synthesis which bears the name "paranoiac-critical activity." Paranoia: delirium of interpretive association bearing a systematic structure. Paranoiac-critical activity: spontaneous method of irrational knowledge based on the interpretive critical association of delirious phenomena."
quoted from this essay

It's as though KG, probably all too aware of the obsessive tendency which occults are prone to, deliberately set out to foster obsessive ideations in the minds of his readers, knowing that obsessions can be very creative, providing one doesn't become lost entirely within the labyrinth. Grant has also admitted (albeit not very openly) that there's a big difference between the perceived 'rules' of magic (what Thomas Kuhn called the 'disciplinary matrix') and yer actual practice.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
08:58 / 29.09.05
Just adding to what Ill mentioned above, from my (very) limited knowledge of kabbalah, the Ain Soph Aur seems (so far) to be very similar, in conceptual intent, to the Tao that can not be named...particularly resonant, being that Kether, as the first and highest sephira, and bridge between the Ain Soph Aur and sephiroth, is comprised of two primary aspects very much like T'ai Chi (Yin / Yang)...

So the three 'aspects' are Being, formless, undifferentiated and the 'isness' upon which everything is predicated, and then the dual aspects resulting from boundary conditions within this Being, creating the Thing and the Not-Thing, from which 'the ten thousand things' can thus be forged.

A little crude, and requiring much more research, but a good start, I think.
 
 
Unconditional Love
09:23 / 29.09.05
Daat
Either the sefirah Keter is seen or Daat but not both. Daat is a gateway to the three upper sefirot. Keter, Hochmah, and Binah are always complete and hold the reward of the world to come. The lower 7 sefirot have their bounty limited and there are obstacles to overcome in traversing them. Daat opens the pathway between the lower 7 and the upper 3. After the path is crossed, the sefirah ceases to exist below and above there is Keter. Daat specifically applies to the pathway Tiferets-Keter, which requires the union of Hochmah-Father and Binah-Mother to open, hence knowledge.


And Adam knew his wife and she conceived.


When father Hochmah and mother Binah join Daat opens for us to enter. The vertical pathway from Tiferets to Keter is the letter Dalet. Dalet means doorway in Hebrew. Daat lies upon this pathway and holds those below from entering above until they merit entry.


From The Kabbalah Manual
Dancing with Angels
Jewish Kabbalah Meditation from
Torah to Self-improvement to Prophecy

an e-text.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply