BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Bring some order to this Chaos...Please!

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
Tamayyurt
15:51 / 28.11.01
camera time is right...you really don't see and boy witches/wiccans on TV or Movies... The Craft, Practical Magick, Charmed, Sabrina, Buffy... I hate to say this but if it weren't for Harry Potter us boy magicians would be totally ignored
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
15:53 / 28.11.01
quote:Originally posted by Gus:

Now, from my point of view, working with chaos magick is a lot like working with the standard core engine of reality itself. Going in there and modifying the code to see what would happen. Working with a particular tradition is like playing one of the games programmed around that engine and using the point-and-click controls built into it. It's easier and more pleasant, but you're restricted to what the game designers wanted you to do, and you only see the world the way they intended you to see it. Yet at the core they all work the same.

"Magick is the cheat codes to reality."
-The Drummer


While I see your point, I think magic is more creative even when using established traditions than your analogy of playing games. To tweak your analogy it might be more like creating your own graphics program or authoring software of some kind instead of a game. In magic you are using 'software' (i.e. a tradition or style) to create a result of somekind. To 'make something.' This is true no matter what tradition you follow.

In the game playing analogy, Chaotes make games, the rest just play games.

For the sake of my modification to your analogy lets say a graphics program is the final goal.

If you're a good 'programmer' at using chaos magic you might make an excellent program that accomplishes things that Macromedia or Adobe has never thought of and is revolutionary.

If you're a shitty programmer you might make something that doesn't come near what years of R&D Adobe has accomplished for their current version of Photoshop.

When it's all said and done it still comes down to what can you create with the finished software whether it be off the shelf or homegrown.

Unless your goal is to create something that you can sell to someone else.

[ 28-11-2001: Message edited by: Lothar Tuppan ]
 
 
Kobol Strom
16:20 / 28.11.01
I hope I never get represented in the media,it would be far too much like seeing some newly famous actor/director who looks like you.Fuck the media.

Anyway,I just wanted to say that whether I'm powering sigils or flapping about the room scaring the hell out of my ego,it seems that certain (download) 'rules' which are unseen are working and interpreting or annihilating one another-sometimes irrespective of technique.

I'm still shit scared of confrontation with these 'spirits'.I wake up at night having been unable to hold my nerves long enough to speak to them.Such a woos.It doesn't matter if you hold the keys to your own consciousness if you're the kind of person who quakes at the mere suggestion of contact.I need to go on one of these confidence holidays masquerading as an alien abductee,a Betty Ford clinic for ageing wooses.
I'm just worried I won't be able to come back.
My point?Really I just wanted to say that even when you have the software language licked and can program a quantum Mario Brothers,you still need some good old fashioned guts.
 
 
Ierne
16:28 / 28.11.01
I hope I never get represented in the media,it would be far too much like seeing some newly famous actor/director who looks like you.Fuck the media. – kobol strom

Thank.you.kobol.
 
 
Gus
03:35 / 30.11.01
quote:Originally posted by Lothar Tuppan:

In the game playing analogy, Chaotes make games, the rest just play games.


The reason I found games more useful as an analogy was that they create a whole virtual universe, with which you're supposed to interact in a particular manner, yet which is based on a set of invisible rules and equations. I was seeing it more from the point of view of the character in the game, I guess, where you can follow the set story-path and maintain the integrity of the gameworld, but there are ways to do things that don't make any sense in that world because you're cheating and modifying things you're not supposed to know about. I wasn't really considering the player's outside, "real", world and what can be produced in it.

I don't really consider chaos magick superior to the traditions. I know that it has worked more effectively for me than anything else I've tried. Perhaps it is best suited to my temperament. Perhaps my belief in the effectiveness of the system and in its nature as the central, exposed structure of magick itself is what powers it and brings results, in the same way that belief in symbols and deities power other systems.

I do consider it more versatile than most, in that it is not limited to a certain theme or flavor, or by a code of conduct, and thus is easier to apply to any personal needs, rather than toward grand ideals. There are, however, advantages to specializing. Godforms which receive constant belief and direct standardized worship from large groups are no doubt more powerful than the small-scale servitors we create. I've seen the magick of other traditions work, and I've sometimes solicited the help of people working with them for certain areas in which I feel chaos magick is not particularly effective, such as healing.

I think that since it works at a very basic level, influencing events in this directon or that, it is better at influencing big simple things with few options. when it must come down to, say, tracking the movements of bacteria and viruses and modifying the responses of a complex biological organism, it may be impossible to program to a degree that will take all the necessary factors into consideration. The spells and rituals of the traditions thus act like pre-programmed sub-routines that can be called up and which have already been finely honed to deal with such things without requiring detailed knowledge from the casters.

[ 30-11-2001: Message edited by: Gus ]
 
 
cusm
11:36 / 30.11.01
quote:Originally posted by Gus:
I don't really consider chaos magick superior to the traditions.


The thing about CM is, its not a tradition. Its a schol of thought, a study of magic itself. Sigil casting is just one application to emerge from it. You still need to draw on traditions, or create your own in order to actually do magic. Study of chaos will tell you that the tradition you were locked into previously is unnecessary, deprogram you and set you free to decide for yourself what you want to do. You still, however, have to actually do something If you just focus on the chaos and don't go anywhere, you might as well be a Zen master as that's where you're at, and about as useful. Chaos doesn't give you anything but options, the ability to change your tradition.

For that matter, I've come to consider sigel casting to be just another one of the basic tools, like invocation, evocation, enchantment and divination. Its casting, as in spell casting. Want for some fun? Plug that into a current tradition. Set up a circle with physical, astral and invoked components, and then charge the lot of it as a sigel and let fly. Picture yourself and a person of desire within The Lovers trump and cast that off. Scrambling letters is just one way to go about things. Sigel casting itself is as old as magic, and in as many forms. The point of the tool is the energizing and casting, not the sigel itself. The point is to be flexible, remember?

*huffs*

It just seems to me sometimes that this scene really hasn't gone anywhere since Carrol. I mean, how many times can you say the same things?
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
12:39 / 30.11.01
Gus: Thanks for the clarification. I think I was confused by the analogy of creating and modifiying the core engine of a game. Usually programmers do that, not characters within the game.

Cusm: Damn good points!

I think one of the reasons this hasn't gone anywhere since Carroll is that a lot of people want something to believe in. They want answers. Even budding Chaos magicians.

It's very scary to take complete responsibility for what you are creating and doing and it's easier to adopt what someone else says as gospel. This is as true for the chaos 'spirit models' or Carroll's 'Thanateros' or Phil Hine's interpretations of the Cthulhu deities.

So a magician reads it in a book, says 'this is the way reality and magic is' and it becomes a new dogma which in turn becomes the building blocks to the Chaos magic 'tradition'.
 
 
Solitaire Rose as Tom Servo
00:59 / 02.12.01
quote:Originally posted by impulsivelad:
camera time is right...you really don't see and boy witches/wiccans on TV or Movies... The Craft, Practical Magick, Charmed, Sabrina, Buffy... I hate to say this but if it weren't for Harry Potter us boy magicians would be totally ignored


No, we get to be the bad guys. In Buffy this week, the Male magician was akin to a drug dealer...

I swear, I feel like I'm the next movie stereotype bad guy now that they are all done with Germans and Brits.
 
 
Temple Goddess
11:20 / 02.12.01
I half expected to be told to bugger off and maybe thrown a few book titles. I am very grateful for the passionate debate that is taking place. I am learning alot. I have alot of reading to do though starting with this thread.
Just to clarify, Wicca is a matrarichal religion but the understanding is that there is balance. The Goddess and The Horned One.

As for Rev.Jesse, I do not know where you got your dates from but I do know that Wicca is a term that means "Wise One". "Witch" was a slang term coined during the persecutions of the inquisition which happened way before the 1950's. I am no historian, (and by the looks of things, neither are you) but I do know those dates are soooo wrong. I guesss the hermetic tradition began with Crowley?? Hermetic magick has been in practice since the Egyptians and if you tell me that is Thelemic Magick, I have to ask what do you think Thelemic Magick is?
One more thing "Rev.", I am not scared off that easily. Most certainly not by you.
Anyway, enough of that pish posh.
It is so true that the media generates an unfair stereotype about witch's and magicians. I, personally, have never had a wart especially not on my nose and have known quite a good number of male wiccans. Everything in Wicca is supposed to be represented in Dualism. The 2=0 theory of magick.By uniting these opposing yet complimentary forces we arrive at the place of Nothingness or Nirvana or whatever you would like to call that which is beyond conception.
 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
17:32 / 02.12.01
A lot of talk on believing in whatever god or goddess your working with has gone by, and I was wondering this:

What about your belief in just magik? Suppose you don't neccessarily wholeheartedly believe that, say, Baphomet is real and going to help you, but you believe that if you do magik ritual x you will achieve your goal. Would ritual x still succeed?

I ask this because I think my faith in Chaos magik has helped my results quite a bit. I have not yet worked with any god or goddess, and I'm wondering if I'm going to be able to generate the neccessary faith to work with one. Faith that Chaos Magik works is easy for me, I have results to speak for it. But I'm unsure as to whether or not this could cover for a less than rock hard belief in Odin.

I realize this is taking a sharp turn from the current discussion, but I figured that you guys were discussing something akin to this so I might as well ask.

[ 02-12-2001: Message edited by: Johnny the fugitive ]
 
 
cusm
23:18 / 03.12.01
Just a quick clairification:

Wicca != Witchcraft

Wicca is a religion. Witchcraft is magic.

Also, Thelema is not an Egyptian religion. When Crowley wrote his Thelema, he drew from many many sources. He used a lot of Egyptian mythology for the usual reasons: it lent creditability to the tradition, and he thought it was cool. It contains elements based on Egyptian traditions, but really, its its own thing.
 
 
Papess
00:54 / 04.12.01
Didn't Aleister Crowley create the "Book of the Law" by channelling Aiwass, a minister of Hoor-paar-kraat?
I think there is an intrinsic link between early Egyptian civilization and Thelemic laws and magick. They both seem to originate from that same "enigmatic life-source". Both springing up out of nowhere. These are the same beings! Aleister Crowley didn't create Thelema, aliens did. No wait ...we ARE the aliens!!!!!

P.S: Since when was Crowley ever worried about creditbility?
-May Tricks

[ 04-12-2001: Message edited by: May Tricks ]
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
22:40 / 04.12.01
quote:Originally posted by Temple Goddess:
I am no historian, (and by the looks of things, neither are you) but I do know those dates are soooo wrong. I guesss the hermetic tradition began with Crowley?? Hermetic magick has been in practice since the Egyptians and if you tell me that is Thelemic Magick, I have to ask what do you think Thelemic Magick is?
One more thing "Rev.", I am not scared off that easily. Most certainly not by you.


*sigh* After saying how nice it was that people responded by not telling you to bugger off you throw this back at one of the people taking your thread seriously and participating in this 'debate'.

He was referencing not the words witch or wicca but the religion of Wicca as it stands now.

A bit of history from Isaac Bonewits, former ArchDruid and founder of Ar NDraiocht Fein which is one of the largest neopagan organizations.

"Sometime around the late 1930s or early 1940s, a Britisher named Gerald Gardner, according to his later claims (and those of others), came into contact with a British Familiy Tradition group in England. Feeling that their tradition was fragmentary, he began to use his anthropological training to 'restore' what he thought was the original faith. The result was a brand new religion, calling itself 'Wicca', using a relatively new system of group magic (although the 'Key of Soloman' cribs are obvious in the earlier versions), and worshipping a Moon-Sea-Earth goddess and a horned god of the hunt-vegetation-sun. Because this new religion bears far more resemblance to the various 'Neopagan' faiths invented in the 1960s than it does to anything ancient, I refer to it as 'neopagan witchcraft'."

Gerald Gardner is the progenitor of the modern practices that call themselves 'Wicca' or 'neopaganism'. If you follow the practices layed down in any Llewellyn book, or StarHawk, or any practice that has not been handed down generationally within your family, you can trace your practice back to his restoration that occured in the mid 20th century. Or do you think that things like chakras, reincarnation, and a sense of karma are inherently Celtic?

Also, here's the listing for Wicca from Religious Tolerance.org

which has these quotes from Joanna Hautin-Mayer:
"We know tragically little about the actual religious expressions of the ancient Celts. We have a few myths and legends, but very little archeological evidence to support our theories. We have no written records of their actual forms of worship, and the accounts of their culture and beliefs written by their contemporaries are often highly biased and of questionable historical worth."

and

Silver Ravenwolf:
"Wicca, as you practice the religion today, is a new religion, barely fifty years old. The techniques you use at present are not entirely what your elders practiced even thirty years ago. Of course, threads of 'what was' weave through the tapestry of 'what is now.' ...in no way can we replicate to perfection the precise circumstances of environment, society, culture, religion and magick a hundred years ago, or a thousand. Why would we want to ? The idea is to go forward with the knowledge of the past, tempered by the tools of our own age."

Rev. Jesse's history and dates are correct, the info is out there and is actually quite easy to find but there are a lot of neopagan writers that in order to lend their faiths credence do the same rewriting of history that they criticize the major faiths (specifically Christianity) of doing.

Similar with his point about hermeticism. While 'hermeticism' dates way back in the ages, hermeticism as people know and practice it today is a result of the practices and codifications that occured at the end of the 19th century.

For example the Kabbalah of western ritual magic is very different than the Kabbalah of ancient Israel.

Same words used for different things with a claim of ancient truths to help convince people that what they do is strong with ancient foundations.

[ 05-12-2001: Message edited by: Lothar Tuppan ]
 
 
Rev. Jesse
18:16 / 05.12.01
Thanks Lothar.

Cool quote from Sliverwolf. I haven't been impressed by her books, but then I've never read them. Are they any good?

And Temple Goddess is correct, I am not a historian, I am an anthropologist.

How many Wiccans do you know that smoke?

[ 05-12-2001: Message edited by: Rev. Jesse ]
 
 
Ierne
19:23 / 05.12.01
How many Wiccans do you know that smoke? – Rev. Jesse

smoke what? Because (in my experience! only! yours may be different!) many NeoPagans that frown on tobacco always seem to smoke pot...like pot is "healthier" for you or "better for the environment" somehow...
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
20:24 / 05.12.01
quote:Originally posted by Rev. Jesse:
Thanks Lothar.

Cool quote from Sliverwolf. I haven't been impressed by her books, but then I've never read them. Are they any good?


I've read two of her books because my ex-wife was a big fan of hers. Because of this I may currently be a bit biased against the material. Mea Culpa.

That having been said I find that while her material is very 'Llwellyn' there are times that her attitude seems to be "I know this is a Llwellyn book and that you are a Llwellyn audience so I'll do what I can within those parameters."

In some places her attitude is very cool even though her material didn't do anything for me.

The covers to her books are a bit... pop culture and titilating which also makes me shy away from them.

quote:
How many Wiccans do you know that smoke?


surprisingly, I know a bunch that love cloves. And they're not mainly Goths either

Also to Temple Goddess:
I'm not picking on you or Wicca particularly. I think there is a lot of misinformation in the New Age/Occult community over what is and isn't the real histories.

I would have jumped on the bandwagon just as easily if someone was representing the current forms of neo-shamanism (which is really what us current shamanic practitioners practice) as a completely true ancient tradition or Asatru and Rune magic (which I also practice) as a whole, complete, and unchanged system that the ancient Germanic people practiced.

Lots have been forgotten, lots have been restored well, and lots have been restored not so well.

The best thing we can do as modern practitioners is look respectfully to the past without romanticizing or idolizing it and continue to move into the future.

[ 05-12-2001: Message edited by: Lothar Tuppan ]
 
 
cusm
14:27 / 06.12.01
Well put, Lothar.

It is a tricky balance, between what was done in the past and what is more applicable to the present. I should just note the definition of a "dead" language like Latin is (loosely) one that no longer changes. I think the same goes for traditions. I'm more one for the live sort, personally. Learn form the past, not live in it. That sort of thing.

My favorite quote lately, a random line from Bjork heard in a techo mix:

I'm no fucking Buddhist, but this is Enlightenment
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
12:37 / 07.12.01
quote:Originally posted by Johnny the fugitive:

What about your belief in just magik? Suppose you don't neccessarily wholeheartedly believe that, say, Baphomet is real and going to help you, but you believe that if you do magik ritual x you will achieve your goal. Would ritual x still succeed?


Giving the internet caveat of YMMV in my experience if invoking Baphomet (or any other being) is inherent to ritual x then ritual x will be compromised to some degree by your lack of faith in Baphomet. Unless you can convincingly create that faith during the ritual itself. In other words, if during the ritual you can put aside your doubts and really get into Baphomet then you may be surprised with your success which then helps build the belief necessary to continue working with gods, godforms, or whatever term you like to use. You also may feel the 'god's' presence in some way which will also start building your belief.

quote:
I ask this because I think my faith in Chaos magik has helped my results quite a bit. I have not yet worked with any god or goddess, and I'm wondering if I'm going to be able to generate the neccessary faith to work with one. Faith that Chaos Magik works is easy for me, I have results to speak for it. But I'm unsure as to whether or not this could cover for a less than rock hard belief in Odin.


If you are interested in building belief with various entities you could just start off doing simple invoking rituals as a polite 'get to know you' gesture to gods that you are interested in.

Don't worry about whether the ritual will bring you good grades, a good fuck, or a winning lottery ticket. Just have the goal of the ritual to be bringing the god into your ritual space.
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply