BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


We3 to be a movie?

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
15:39 / 09.06.05
It's also worth pointing out that although New Line were brave in funding the LotR trilogy the end result is fairly different to the books, thankfully the end result works on it's own terms as a story.

Where Grant went wrong with We3 was by not including a cybernetic pig with a streetwise attitude. Hopefully his script will make up for this and then Danny DeVito will have a part to play.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
15:15 / 10.06.05
If only the ficsuits still had limitless lettering, 'cybernetic pig with a streetwise attitude' would surely have been snaffled up by now.

Oh, wait, the form would make nonsense of the content. Howabout 'Cyb3rn3t1k P1G ][ Str33tWiZ3 4TT1TUD£'?
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
09:30 / 12.06.05
I think it would make a great kid's movie. It'd be the most disturbing kid's movie since Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

I wonder if they'll keep the punctured eyeballs and stuff?
 
 
H3ct0r L1m4
16:59 / 12.06.05
if there's a slight chance Mistah Morrizun writes the script or is hired in a consultancy / producing capacity for this movie it might be good. it worked for Mignolla on HELLBOY [not a movie I like too much], but that only translated well in general because director Del Toro managed to keep away the producers asking for Hellboy to turn "back into human" when the sun rose.

whoever said Moore is a loony for not wanting Hollywood money should read that recent LYING IN THE GUTTERS column that explains it all. the Bearded One has no full ownership of those book's copyrights so DC licences them as they will. and come to think of it, he's more than right - see what has been made so far of those comics.

if anybody read this newsarama interview with Tha Mozz will be reminded of:

NRAMA: Also in terms of their communication, given the fonts of their “speech,” it’s clear they “sound” different as well – can you describe the sound of their voices using real-world sounds? Are they like Stephen Hawking’s synthesizer, or something different?

GM: A bit like Stephen Hawking but much creepier even than physics' freakiest fillozzifer. Imagine the words mangled and wrestled into electronic life by little brains and humming processors.


and:

NRAMA: The language that the three use – can you explain how they communicate a little? From their speech, or looks like they use as many verbal shortcuts as they can, to express fairly linear thought – is that accurate?

GM: Pretty much. Dogs are 'better' at communicating in ways humans understand than cats or rabbits, so the dog is the one most obviously trying to wrestle with human concepts and express them in simple language. The cat is interested only in her own worldview which has her at the center of the universe and is generally trying to express only one simple idea - 'Outta my face!', as Stephen Budiansky puts it in The Character of Cats.

I read up on human attempts to communicate with animals, i.e. teach animals English, which in most cases, come across up as brave attempts by animals to communicate with humans - chimps and dolphins will bend themselves backwards trying to approximate an understanding of English, while humans generally refuse to think like animals or to make any effort to learn and use animal languages as animals use them. The mistake is to imagine that animal sounds and signals 'translate' into human words. They don't. Anyone who's spent a long time in the company of animals will know that animal communication is
just what it is. The sound or signal can always be directly connected to some external event.
 
 
yawn - thing's buddy
09:28 / 13.06.05
Having bought the chris cunningham DVD compilation of his video work, I can safely say he is the man for the job. Also, I reckon yer man Quitely has clocked his work and been inspired in places by what he saw.

Somebody send him the trade.
 
 
Haus of Mystery
11:46 / 13.06.05
Cunningham would be a good choice - never happen. Terminal apathy. Him and the twin been working on a 'Neuromancer' adaptation for ever, which now looks like it'll never appear.

>threadrottage< I once plotted and drew about ten pages of a comic fully inspired/totally nicked from the Squarepuser 'Come on My selecter' video

Re: WE3 movie. Don't think I'll waste any time getting excited about this. If it does manifest it'll no doubt have a bullshit human angle that totally scuppers the point. If I'm wrong I'll eat a large slice of humble pie, with my hat for pudding.
 
 
louisemichel
12:07 / 13.06.05
Alan Moore is not a loony because he doesn't want movie-money.
He IS a loony.
that's all.
But good for him, because that way, the pencilers have more money. And that's the point. They, the creators, deserve that money. And Frank "don't call him Vince" Quitely and Grant "Grant" Morrison deserve that money too.
 
 
yawn - thing's buddy
12:27 / 13.06.05
Neuromancer is a bit mair vast than we3 tho, macgyver, naw?

reckon the cunning one could handle it.

tho, I'm sure you are right.

oi - are you not cumin up to see the meme buggerer in glasgow in the next few weeks? if ye are, gonnae pure bring some o yer coamics, pure shift them in FP?
 
 
Krug
06:10 / 15.06.05
Yes Cunningham would really be perfect.
 
 
Malio
18:48 / 19.06.05
Here's a short article from today's Sunday Times. Since I can remember non-UK Barbeloids having problems with links to this site in the past, here's a quick paste...

The Sunday Times - Scotland

June 19, 2005

Killer pets set for silver screen

Karin Goodwin

THE Scots comic book writer who relieved Batman of his trademark cape and made the X-Men’s Magneto a drug addict is now poised to bring a group of killer pets to Hollywood.

Grant Morrison is in talks with New Line Cinema — the film company behind The Lord of the Rings — to turn one of his most bizarre comic strips into a Hollywood film.

We3, the story of a group of pets kidnapped by the government and transformed into robo-assassins, is set to follow in the footstep of other successful comic book adaptations including Sin City, The Hulk, Spiderman and Batman.

Drawn by the acclaimed comic artist Frank Quitely, who is also from Glasgow, We3 is a violent and bloody reworking of The Incredible Journey, the 1963 Disney film in which three animals — a cat, a dog and a rabbit — have to find their way home after becoming separated from their owners while on holiday.

However, Morrison has introduced a sinister edge to the heart-warming tale. His story, published earlier this year by DC comics’ Vertigo division, starts when the killer pets are to be “decomissioned” by the government. The animals — which have been hard-wired into military battle suits — escape and embark on a dark and violent journey to find their owners.

The movie, which is expected to have a multi-million-pound budget, will be produced in association with Angry Films, which released Batman Begins in America last week. Morrison will write the script for the film, in which actors will star alongside the computer generated animals.

“It’s such a simple story that I’m sure it will appeal to everyone from kids to grannies,” said Morrison, who has pitched the film as “The Incredible Journey meets Terminator”.

“It is the classic story of animals on the run but this time the entire US army is after them.”

While in captivity the animals have been trained to speak, heightening the pathos of their situation. “They all try to express themselves in words, but they have very simple needs. The dog worries, ‘am I a good dog?’, the cat doesn’t want to be there and the rabbit just thinks ‘feed me, feed me’. They are a hopeless bunch and the dog has to try to hold them all together,” said Morrison.

“I want it to be a real weepy. I think it’s got the potential to be the next ET.”

We3 was in part inspired by a New Scientist article last year about an American military experiment to create “remote-controlled rats” for use in combat. Morrison added: “It is also allegorical. Life is used as biomass in war. I don’t preach but that is the subtext.”

Comics are enjoying a golden period, reflected in the success of film spin-offs and a series of exhibitions of comic book art at some of the country’s most prestigious galleries.

Scotland has produced many successful comic writers including Mark Millar, who created Wanted and worked on Superman, and Alan Grant, who wrote Batman strips.
 
 
The Falcon
19:51 / 19.06.05
Scots comic book writer who relieved Batman of his trademark cape

When? That time in 'Gothic' when it ripped off?

Oh, these newspapers.
 
 
Jack Fear
23:07 / 19.06.05
KIDS! Play this fun game! This article contains an average of one distortion, misstatement, or out-and-out factual error per every 1.5 paragraphs. How many can YOU find?
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
00:27 / 20.06.05
“I want it to be a real weepy. I think it’s got the potential to be the next ET.”

Ah heh heh heh.

“It is also allegorical. Life is used as biomass in war. I don’t preach but that is the subtext.”

Ooh hoo hoo hoo hoo!

Comics are enjoying a golden period, reflected in the success of film spin-offs and a series of exhibitions of comic book art at some of the country’s most prestigious galleries.

Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
 
 
lonely as a cloud...
12:26 / 20.06.05
"...one of his most bizarre comic strips..."
Um...really?
 
 
FinderWolf
12:55 / 20.06.05
yeah, clearly the newspaper has never read The Invisibles.

but...

>> Morrison will write the script for the film

sounds good to me. plus the same production company that did Batman Begins? This just might be decent after all...
 
 
Mystery Gypt
20:10 / 22.06.05
the same production company that did Batman Begins?

one of the many random mistakes in the article. angry films has had nothing to do with any aspect of batman begins. they are however doing morrison's "Sleepless Knights", and batman is the "Dark Knight", so you can see where the confusion could easily come in.
 
 
Jack Fear
18:58 / 11.12.08
Hey-o, it's on! Coming soon, from the director who brought you...

KUNG FU PANDA.

.

.

.

.

.

Oh, God. Oh God oh God oh God.
 
 
Jack Fear
19:00 / 11.12.08
(also; who wants to bet that is indeed the real Don Murphy, leaving such a classy comment in that Beat thread?)
 
 
iamus
00:23 / 17.12.08
To be taken with a pinch of salt. He was bandied about a while back and may be using that to trade on at the moment.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
02:08 / 17.12.08
The Kung Fu Panda connection's worrying (not that I've seen it - perhaps it's a heartbreaking piece?) but equally, it shouldn't be that hard a film to manage, if they can make the animals sympathetic. Which, post Wall-E (again, I haven't seen it) seems reasonably do-able. The cinema-going audience looks to be ready for sad, lonely, techno-violated innocents who don't say very much.

Apart from that, all they have do is follow the script, which Morrison's said is better than the comic (he says a lot I know, but still ... ) plus the series of storyboards that the art in WE3 pretty much is, and then amp up the violence and the pathos. Which isn't usually a problem in Hollywood.

I'm not sure I'm particularly looking forward to this, unless Morrison's done something about the ending, but if that is 'the', not just 'a' Don Murphy in the link, at least he seems passionate. And comic book adaptations have come on a lot in the last few years.
 
 
CameronStewart
15:28 / 02.01.09
So does anyone else think that the We3 film may have a bit of an uphill battle for credibility now that this is coming out?
 
 
Mistoffelees
16:23 / 02.01.09
Youtube says the "video is no longer available".
 
 
Poke it with a stick
21:14 / 02.01.09
Looks like it may be back now but be thankful you didn't see it. It isn't pretty. Think Cats and Dogs without the charm and sophistication.
 
 
wicker woman
06:19 / 03.01.09
Shouldn't that trailer belong in the stuff-likely-to-burn-your-eyes-out thread in Convo?
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply