It's all very well to say what *you* would do if attacked, but other women might reasonably react differently, no? It all rather depends on the circumstances, doesn't it? To claim that women who don't physically fight their attackers... -- what? will die? Are more likely to die?
I never said specifically physically fight. But, if one is being physically beaten it is best to physcially fight. Absolutely. Should a woman rely on the mercy of her attacker? No. That is bollocks. That is what women were taught ages ago and it only serves to get them killed and injured (weakened, damaged, deformed, in comas...). So a woman can choose not to fight "physically", especially in the case of firearms, but don't ever stop fighting for your life. That is my point, because yes, if you don't fight you are definately more likely to die.
It just so happens that very recently I had to fight for my own life. Had I just talked to him and didn't actually use physical force or strategy, I would be dead. I am sure that would have made some people very happy, but I am still alive because I refused to let him overpower me completely. I was a hassle for him (not passive) and I hurt him back as much as possible. Had I let him take me to the second location because I didn't want to make him angrier by fighting him, I wouldn't be writing this post to you today. His aim was to torture and kill me.
I assure you that if a woman, or a man, chooses to just go along with an attacker and not fight verbally, strategically and physically for their own life, they will definately be injured, and quite possibly dead. Fight for your life actively. |