|
|
except, of course, you'd have to queer it up big-time. tkae your usual Captain Kirk hetero action, but then throw in some randy space dykes, Vulcan slave boys in positronic neutrino-beam bondage collars, and omnipotent aliens who capture the crew and subject them to strange probes. maybe have the ship's doctor be a hermaphrodite.
Um... No?
I mean, come on. Why does every sci-fi show have to be "queered up?" "Doctor Who" has gotten queer enough for the whole genre at the moment. Can't us heterosexual guys have some fun without the camp faction wanting to crash our party? (It wasn't ALL about the outfits, folks!)
Besides, there are plenty of OTHER ways to make an old clichéd genre interesting besides throwing in bits gay culture. At this late date queerbending has become a bit of a clichéd genre in itself. (Batman, Flash Gordon, and half of all fan fiction.) Hey, I want the gritty BSG-esque take on "Barbarella."
Well, now that this message seems like a hopelessly anti-queer-culture rant, or the deluded musings of an idiot who didn't see the irony of the previous post, let me get down to the issue.
In the mid 60's, "Star Trek" was a reaction against everything that Roddenberry thought was ridiculous, stupid and entrenched in science-fiction TV. The silver suits, the rocket trails, the evil one-eyed space monsters, the lingering legacy of "Buck Rogers" that had nothing to do with science, or, as he saw it, science-fiction.
Flash-forward to 2005, and now "Star Trek" is the problem legacy, heavy with conventions that seems just as ridicuouls and stupid from our eyes. The technobabble solutions. The alien cultures who are "just like us, but...!" The stiff characters with no personal flaws. Guys on a bridge pointing at screens. Whole dramatic moments that turn on whether or not the sheilds are gonna fail. It's dull and predictable and no wonder nobody's had any new ideas on how to fix it. How would you fix "Buck Rogers" in 1965?
The only way to repair Star Trek is to let it rest long enough so we can see why it failed. Then come back to it with fresh eyes and fresh perspectives. New ideas will come when we find the cracks in the genre we never knew needed patching.
Personally, I'd dump the military aspect. Make the show about a civilian guy in a personal space ship kicking around the Federation, just trying to make the monthly payments and struggling with his own sense of heroism.
Make the galaxy seem strange and vast possible to our sheltered Western eyes. Make the computers buggy. (Why was there never an I.T. guy on the Enterprise?) Make the engineer a mystic. (We're talking about bending the laws of the universe, here!) Make aleins truly foreign, but truly alluring. (Is there a reason we got Orion green women during the sexual-revolutionary 60's, Picard sleeping alone in the 80's, and cold hardbody posturing in Trek-2000?)
Make the smart characters cool again. Make your writing staff take psychedelic drugs. Make it a show that opens people's minds to wonder and possibility instead of just mucking them in two-sided moral quagmires.
Wait until the culture has gotten to a place where it needs the Final Frontier again, because then we can really imagine a new frontier again.
And when that time comes, throw "Star Trek" away, because someone out there will be bursting to do something so completely original it will blow everything that came before it out of the ether.
See. How easy is that? |
|
|