BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Magick--a means to change your life?

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
6opow
09:42 / 14.08.01
Wyrd, you have good points, and wrt the thread as it concerns magickal practice, there is not really one I'd be inclined to take you task on. That said, I don't understand how you figure that:

quote:Originally posted by Wyrd:
...there is a false separation being made here between the individual and the community.


...when I say that magick as a means of Self knowledge yields that the self is the other. In other words, I've stated that the community and the individual are part of the same whole: I'm not making a distinction, I am asserting a unity!
 
 
Stephen
09:42 / 14.08.01
quote: So far I've read that Chaos Magick is "too goal-oriented", it "edits out that part of magic that deals with receiving knowledge from some unseen quarter", seems "a bit shallow and self serving", or "a bit of a dilletante pursuit." Let's not even discuss the bullshit about leather pants and fake tans.

What a judgemental crock of shit!!!


Now hold up just one fucking second.

Read my post properly before you start bad mouthing me and putting other peoples words in mouth.

I've never claimed chaos magic is 'too goal orientated', on the contrary, that's one of its strengths.

I've never claimed that Chaos Magic "edits out that part of magic that deals with receiving knowledge from some unseen quarter" either.

What I said, in answer to Synth's post, was that there is a certain point where the particular system/methodology you're working with (whatever it might be) becomes less important, and the magic itself starts to take over. It working you rather than you working it. I'd raise an eyebrow Roger Moore style at any magician who hasn't had experiences like this.

My comments about CM seeming "a bit shallow and self serving" and "a bit of a dilletante pursuit" are my own opinions on the matter which I was expressing. Sorry for having an opinion. I was under the impression that this section of the message board was for discussion of ones experiences and opinions relating to magic.

If you look back over my initial post that these quotes are taken from, you'll notice that I preface my comments with "I've been thinking about this a lot lately and come to the hypothesis that..."

I've got increasingly bored with chaos magic over the last few years and I don't personally think it's quite the be all and end all of occult paths that some would have you believe. I'm not dissing it. But I've personally come to the conclusion that it doesnt go quite far enough for me, and was expressing this opinion.

I wasn't saying "Chaos Magicians are all cunts" and neither was I prescribing my own particular shamanic path to everyone. I actually stated that I don't think shamanism is for everyone. The point of my second post was to throw out the idea that it might be interesting to upgrade the shamanic role to the 21st century world by marrying it with some of post modern methodology that sprang from the CM current.

Perhaps I should endeavour to tow the party line more for you in future.

quote: Let's not even discuss the bullshit about leather pants and fake tans.


Methinks the chaos magician dost protest too much.

Somebody else came up with the "leather pants and fake tan" line, but I continued it because I thought it was funny. I thought it was an amusing and disparaging exaggeration of some of the 'characters' that fill the chaos magic 'scene'.

I'll admit to maybe having gone a little too far in that last paragraph, and should have expected the knee jerk reaction. Chaos Magician bashing is the new Wicca bashing.

quote: It really makes me angry to read people whinging about "big groups of magicians running around together like a pierced up self help group, each one re-inforcing each others delusions of grandeur. Each one spouting the same mish mash of Robert Anton Wilson, Genesis P Orridge, Pete Caroll and others..."

Why is that? Touch a nerve did it?

Seriously though, all I'm trying to do here is offer up some criticism of what I see as the 'Chaos Magic Lifestyle' (TM), which is a fairly irritating phenomena. The Barbelith forum and the people who post to it are not my target here. I'm thinking specifically of some of the attitudes you come across on Chaos Magic web communities like the Z List.

Mordant summed up the particular 'type' I'm on about:

quote:It's a shame, but CM sometimes seems to attract the same sort of dickwads who used to Tip-ex upside-down pentacles on their T-shirts and walk around claiming to be "black witches." They've stopped embarassing the wiccans, sadly, and come over to embarass us instead.

It's the comfortable self satisfied contingent who have read Robert Anton Wilson and have therefore learnt all they need to know about how reality works. Affecting the 'bad ass magician' pose without ever actually doing anything beyond a few sigils. Chaosphere T Shirts and Ouranian Barbaric as suit & tie and corporate lingo.

I'm not having a go at goths either. If you're a magician who likes piercings and PVC, that's cool. I like 'em myself. All I'm trying to do is put the somewhat predictable uniform, attitude and rhetoric that has attached itself to the CM current, under the microscope. There's something about it I'm uncomfortable with and I can't quite put my finger on it. There is a certain unspoken 'we have the best post-modern path and are superior to the common herd' kind of vibe that you often pick up on CM mailing lists, and I have certain problems with that sort of thing. Interesting the somewhat over the top reaction I provoked by even suggesting that CM might not be perfect.

quote: Magick consists of various processes by which one can modify one's internal & external environments. It does NOT require belief in one/ many godheads, nor does it require a mandate to help one's communitiy. Guess what? It doesn't even require the use of divination techniques!!!


I didn't say any of that either. Point to the quote where I stated that magic requires a belief in certain gods, use of divination techniques, or a mandate to serve ones community.

What I said was: I think there are probably a lot of people on the chaos magic path(attracted by its immanent practicality), who have the shamanic 'calling' but find it difficult to assume the full role because it doesnt really exist within our society anymore.

The point of my post was to raise the idea of updating the role of the village shaman and adapting it to serve the needs of the various 'communities' that exist in 21st century society.

I was throwing an idea out for discussion. Granted I probably went a bit far by finishing my post with a snipey attack on some of the crap ideas and attitudes that have attached themselves to CM when it became a 'scene' rather than a loose methodology. But I like to stir shit sometimes. Sue me.

I certainly wasnt claiming half the things that you've just accused me of, and I'm a bit confused as to where you got it all from.

quote: Ghost Doctor... read over that post and tell me you aren't being elitist or exclusionist.

To an extent. The first part of my post was answering Synths post about shamanism and how it relates to the structure of magical systems. Then I wrote a bit about the updating of the shamanic role thing, then I ended with an admittidly unneccessary attack on some of the things about the chaos magic 'scene' (as observed on CM mailing lists I used to hang out on) that I'm uncomfortable with.

I was trying to point out some of the tendancies I've observed amongst chaos magicians that have lead to my dissatisfaction with it, as an adjunct to my post about where this dissatisfaction has been leading me of late. I certainly wasnt telling everyone to quit CM and become a shaman. It's not for everyone. I suppose I can see how my snipey remarks about the pierced up self help groups could get peoples backs up a bit, but that was my intention really. I wanted to criticise certain tendencies that dont often get criticised. CM, in its post modernism, often seems to position itself almost above criticism.


quote: BUT DO NOT BE SUCH AN ASS AS TO PRESUME THAT WHAT DOESN'T WORK FOR YOU WON'T WORK FOR ANYONE ELSE!!!

The only 'path' I came anywhere near criticising is the lazy one that takes elements of various trendy authors and assembles them into an off the peg counter cultural world view, wanks over sigils, has a certain kind of wardrobe, and comes to assume this makes them evolved beings equivalent to the first fish who walked on land.

This kind of thinking and behaviour is actually fairly common in CM web communities. I'm not saying everyone. There are some very cool and interesting people inhabiting those regions, but there's also a lot of pretentious dicks who give CM a bad name by turning it into some kind of scene or movement, rather than the excellent DIY methodology that it is.

This is really a seperate issue that shouldnt have been tangled up with my other point about 21st century shamanism, and I accept total blame for that as I went off on a bit of a tangent cos I thought the 'fake tan' line was funny.

Let me repeat again. I don't think all Chaos Magicians should ditch their leather pants and become shamans. I'm interested in shamanism in the 21st century, and I'm interested in taking a critical look at chaos magic and some of the various aspects/attitudes that have somehow got tied into it. I certainly don't think all chaos magicians are guilty of these tendencies, I work from a chaos magic perspective myself, some of my best friends are chaos magicians, etc...

quote: Happy Monday.

Happy Tuesday.

[edited to remove excessive and unneccesarry swearing]

[ 14-08-2001: Message edited by: Ghost Doctor ]
 
 
Wyrd
09:42 / 14.08.01
quote:Originally posted by the godog:
[QB]...when I say that magick as a means of Self knowledge yields that the self is the other. In other words, I've stated that the community and the individual are part of the same whole: I'm not making a distinction, I am asserting a unity! [QB]


Indeed quite right - sorry about misreading your post, it was late at night!
 
 
6opow
09:42 / 14.08.01
S'allright. Wyrd, I gotta' say that much of what you write about magick I agree with. I was wondering, have you checked out "The Internal and the External" thread lately, I have been looking forward to your input--although I can't remeber what I last wrote there...
 
 
Ierne
14:23 / 14.08.01
Ghost Doctor:

You seem to be under the mistaken notion that my post from yesterday referred to you and you alone. It did not. It referred to the thread in general. All quotes were taken from various posts that came previous to my posting.

You also seem to be under the impression that I am defending Chaos Magick from the marauding hordes of naysayers. This is also incorrect. My only intention was to bring up certain judgemental attitudes that magicians tend to throw at each other.

In the interests of keeping this short (as others wish to stay on topic) I will not comment further on your smug, supercilious response.

Sorry for having an opinion.
 
 
Mordant Carnival
15:36 / 14.08.01
Off topic (Surprize! Surprize! Surprize! ) I don't feel that the web communities Ghost Doctor mentions are necessarily representative of CM generally. I have nothing against them, of course, but the web being what it is any small faction will tend to come across as a bit hooray-for-our-side-ish and cliquey.

And Ghost Doctor: Of course you're entitled to your opinion. It's good to get plenty of differnet veiwpoints. But perhaps if you re-read your posts in the light of what's been said here you might see how your comments could possibly be interpreted as: "Chaoists are all a bunch of posey gits, I'm playing hard ball and you lot aren't even in the game."

When you come out with stuff like this:
quote:
The only 'path' I came anywhere near criticising is the lazy one that takes elements of various trendy authors and assembles them into an off the peg counter cultural world view, wanks over sigils, has a certain kind of wardrobe, and comes to assume this makes them evolved beings equivalent to the first fish who walked on land.


You kind of compound the whole thing.

Now I've tried to be fair here, but I'm starting to feel genuinely aggreived (spelling? sorry). Responding with "Oh, well, the truth hurts!" isn't really an argument; if somebody accuses you of something you haven't done it's kind of natural to get upset, n'est pas?
 
 
Kobol Strom
16:02 / 14.08.01
quote: to upgrade the shamanic role to the 21st century

I think its definately worth trying to take on culture in any way possible,and manipulate it in every way,to help bring about changes.Stating the obvious.One of the classic ways you can manipulate other peoples perceptions of you,is through appearances.I think its only reasonable to assume that as changing beings,its natural to move around through cultural spheres like the highly evolved bubble popping chameleons we are,either by our fabulously realised nature or [Insert current model of awareness here].It would be nice if everybody wore what the fuck they like,but most people are just too damned scared to express themselves,including me.I'm sorry my comment led to the consequences of disapprobation: the 'fake tan' line (ouch) -lacked the usual kobol quality,could have been aimed at any sub-group,was not based on personal experience and I really am sorry if anyone was offended.I like leather,I wear leather trousers when I'm riding on a motorbike,so I am a total fashion hypocrite.The point I was trying to make was
quote: I just want some answers,and then I can come back to 'consensus reality' between the hours of x 'til y and I don't give a rats ass what I happen to be wearing
Im not saying if you're a leather CM that you're a fake.I could have picked wands and magic markers and pissed off whole another sub-group(maybe).I made a clumsy remark.Sorry.
But the proof is in the pudding.At the moment Kobol Stromm is wearing black Levis,Doc Marten Boots,A green t-shirt that says 'Simon' on the front (not my name),and listens to Public Enemy.What does that say?-Sod all.And no-one relly cares.Vive le difference.

quote: I can agree that the role of a shaman, in the sense that they are seeking to assist a community, is a good one: magick as a form of Self knowledge leads to the increasing expansion of self into the realm of the previously seen "other"--the others are the self! Thus, helping a community is equivalent to helping the Self.


I had a waking vision on Sunday morning.I woke up from a clear experience of having a gold needle inserted into my forehead.In the vision I was a homeless person being mugged by a crazy old man with a grudge against homeless people,and when I was awake,on Sunday afternoon,I went around my home town trying to find this old guy,and failed.I don't know if this willhappen,or already has happened,or is going on right now.I thought about going to the police,for about a nanosecond.It takes guts to be the wild man of the village,and more power to anyone who trys it out.It might be a good idea to wear leather troos,to help protect you in the face of it.Even a fake tan has its uses,like,if you're trying to blend in at the local gym -Needs must when the devil pumps iron.Can anyone think of a way to investigate this 'mad old guy' vision?Maybe it means nothing.

[ 14-08-2001: Message edited by: kobol strom ]
 
 
Mordant Carnival
17:10 / 14.08.01
kobol strom: You raise some interesting ideas (as always ). Go forth unto the "community" thread and commence to blow our tiny minds some more!

[ 14-08-2001: Message edited by: Mordant Carnival ]
 
 
FinderWolf
18:34 / 14.08.01
I just posted about over in the "Squabble-In" thread, but it occurs to me that this derailing of topics and occassional arguments/heated debates or disputes is all part of the natural chaos (*wink*) of human thought exchange.

For every derailment that just becomes something silly, there is a tangent that is incredibly interesting and often gets its own thread. For every name-calling festival, there is an intelligent debate and discourse.

And let me state for the record, that I am currently in the midst of using magick for this very purpose: personal change, liberation, further integration of the psyche, attracting more healthy things and patterns to my life, discarding old beliefs that are no longer serving me. I'll be sure to report the results here when they become manifest.

The Phil Hine booklet Condensed Chaos, linked here in a separate thread, has some great things to say on this subject.
 
 
FinderWolf
18:54 / 14.08.01
Oh, and Kobol Strom, * I * care about your astral plant-suckers! Let me know how that goes!

I'll never forget when I went to a Ph.D. three times over for a (psychological) therapy session -- she was into lots of 'paranormal' stuff -- and she told me about little entities, little sucker-type things on the astral plane that will leech onto when you're weak and drain your energy as you sleep. I had that bizarre, surreal feeling, a mixture of disbelief and open-mindedness, thinking "well, this woman is an incredibly knowledgable, wise, experienced woman, well versed in medical science as well -- I doubt she's crazy."

Read Michael Crichton's little-known autobiography TRAVELS for a terrific account of an open-minded but skeptical seeker into the unknown. He does lots of cool stuff.
 
 
Kobol Strom
19:17 / 14.08.01
Thankyou,I will make a note to get a hold of that one.I have to say,I'm encouraged by the thought of other people experiencing astral suckers at night,I used to have a recurring dream where I'd be flying along,then I'd encounter telegraph wires,which were electrified and very painful,I couldn't 'breakthrough' them.Then,later,I went up to one of the wires in a dream,and fucussed a red 'super-man' beam from my eyes,melting the wire into two,I then reconnected the circuit - behind my head,I hear a warbling scream,and a big leech slithers off into the ether,end of recurring dream.But the plant suckers are different,for one,they were present during a trance state and not a dream,also they seem to have left,for now,by themselves.I think a protective bit of magick might be in order so they don't return...but then again,they are pretty harmless,and who is to say,we aren't feeding off of them?

[ 14-08-2001: Message edited by: kobol strom ]
 
 
Mordant Carnival
04:24 / 15.08.01
I just thought you two should know that you are seriouslyweirding me out here.
 
 
Stephen
06:28 / 15.08.01
quote:You seem to be under the mistaken notion that my post from yesterday referred to you and you alone. It did not.

Look, 60% of your post was made up of direct quotes from my preceding post, misinterpreted and appearing to accuse me of claiming a whole load of spurious stuff. You then proceeded to write 'BUT DO NOT BE SUCH AN ASS AS TO PRESUME THAT WHAT DOESN'T WORK FOR YOU WON'T WORK FOR ANYONE ELSE!!!'.

Hmmm. What on earth could I have taken offense at.

quote: ) I will not comment further on your smug, supercilious response.


I think I was fairly restrained in that post given all the hair pulling and bitching that went on over nowt. I dont get what your problem is.
 
 
grant
14:36 / 15.08.01
quote:Originally posted by HunterWolf:
I'll never forget when I went to a Ph.D. three times over for a (psychological) therapy session -- she was into lots of 'paranormal' stuff -- and she told me about little entities, little sucker-type things on the astral plane that will leech onto when you're weak and drain your energy as you sleep. I had that bizarre, surreal feeling, a mixture of disbelief and open-mindedness, thinking "well, this woman is an incredibly knowledgable, wise, experienced woman, well versed in medical science as well -- I doubt she's crazy.


I reviewed a book a while back called "Entity Possession" on just this sort of thing. Done by an MD psychologist (I seem to recall he was Australian, but that could be wrong).
The "entities" described read a bit like servitors - not quite complete minds, more like complexes who invade healthy psyches like parasites.
Book was put out by one of the Inner Traditions imprints.

Aha! A quick search turns up this wonderful page! Samuel Sagan is his name.

quote:
quote:Case study 1.1 Thirty-two year old woman, secretary.
What can you perceive? -It's red, it's angry. It's as if I've been taken over. It's something that I've been fighting all my life. It inspires hatred. It's madness, but not madness fromthe body. Maybe it's my dark side. But it does not feel like me.

When did you feel it for the first time? -Now, actually. But I have always known it was there. [The client is crying, with her fists clenched.] I feel that it could make me kill, and I mean it. It fills up my body with hatred, it's sheer destruction.


He also wrote that cats seem to be attracted to the "negative" spaces that entities breed in. Avoid your cat's favorite cold spots.
 
 
Mordant Carnival
15:47 / 15.08.01
Guys: This is really fascinating. I've got a few comments/questions regarding the kind of things you're describing here; I wonder, though, if a new thread might be in order as I'm not sure how this topic relates to "Magick- a means to change your life."

Anyone care to kick off the "Astral Entities" thread?

 
 
Wyrd
17:26 / 15.08.01
quote:Originally posted by kobol strom:
But the plant suckers are different,for one,they were present during a trance state and not a dream,also they seem to have left,for now,by themselves.I think a protective bit of magick might be in order so they don't return...but then again,they are pretty harmless,and who is to say,we aren't feeding off of them?


Hmm, probably because they're getting fat and you're getting thin!

There's a whole variety of astral vermin I'd guess. If you think about the likes of physical creatures like mosquitoes and leeches, why wouldn't there be astral equivalents?

I hate to use a Star Trek-ism, but if you "modulate your shield frequencies" you'll probably get rid of the blighters. Most things like that are attracted to a specific kind of energy, and it's a case of not supplying them with an all-you-can eat, energy buffet they can access.

As you say, some of these things are relatively harmless, and it's easy to block them out when you know they are around.

[ 15-08-2001: Message edited by: Wyrd ]
 
 
Tucker Tripp
01:59 / 16.08.01
I think you liked using that Star Trek Phrase

Sorry to get you in trouble G.Dr
 
 
Mordant Carnival
04:03 / 16.08.01
Been considering the original "Magick--a means to change your life?" topic and I can't help coming to the conclusion being a regular user of magick (whatever path) will inevitably affect your lifestyle and personality, whether you set out to acheive this or not. This is down to two things:

Firstly, magick requires that you make at least some small changes in the way you live your life, even if it's just putting aside time for meditation.

Secondly, once you have been practicing for a while, there's a tendancy for you to find that you are being gently pushed into new directions, new courses of action, which end up having an effect on the self. Sometimes this is subtle, sometimes more dramatic, but eventually it happens to just about every magick user.

Comment/criticsm, anyone?
 
 
FinderWolf
13:50 / 16.08.01
>> .... and I can't help coming to the conclusion being a regular user of magick (whatever path) will inevitably affect your lifestyle and personality, whether you set out to acheive this or not.

Makes perfect sense to me. I sense some tiny changes happening in me already, and I've only been doing it for a little over 3-4 months.

>> Secondly, once you have been practicing for a while, there's a tendancy for you to find that you are being gently pushed into new directions, new courses of action, which end up having an effect on the self. Sometimes this is subtle, sometimes more dramatic, but eventually it happens to just about every magick user.

Yep. The old adage "thoughts are things," and we create our own reality via our thoughts. Desire becomes manifest in reality through intent, attention, and practice.

I'll have to post soon about my recent DIY type experiments with sigil magick lately.......it's been interesting.....I just haven't had time to really post anything in detail yet.
 
 
adamswish
19:52 / 16.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Mordant Carnival:
Has anybody got anything to add on the actual topic of using magick (whatever flavour) for self-imrovement?


Been thinking about this recently and i think i would be happier sigilling for the stenght to change my situation rather than have my situation changed. That way not only do i have the satisfaction of knowing that my desire becoming reality is partly down to myself and my efforts in gaining it, but I also still enjoy the journey between states.

So rather than using chaos-magic (or any other kind) to gain material goods or a new way of life I would ask for the personality traits (sic) that will aid me in the gathering of my desire (ie motivation, self belief, that little bit something extra when I'm knackered and depressed).
 
 
6opow
06:32 / 17.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Mordant Carnival:
Been considering the original "Magick--a means to change your life?" topic and I can't help coming to the conclusion being a regular user of magick (whatever path) will inevitably affect your lifestyle and personality, whether you set out to acheive this or not.


Mordant, I must say that I agree with you completely. If nothing else, magick typically requires that we reshape our way of seeing the world. It seems that to change our worldview is to alter the way we live in the world, and this requires that we become that which we were not before. Thus, magick is a means to change an individual's life. I think my original question could have been better formulated. I was wondering to what extent we ought to rely on things like sigils in order to effect change in our lives. In other words, how much does sorcery have to play a role in the life of a would-be magician?

From what I've seen in this post (aside from the virtual fisticuffs), I think that there is not a final answer to the question, but rather it appears to come down to personal preference. I tend to think that "less is more," but then that is merely my way of seeing things. However, I do think there is the wisdom of Delphi to consider (beyond only knowing one's self), and that is, "nothing in excess." Now what I mean by this is that perhaps it is best not to use magick if magick is not necessary. I tend to think that the magickal will is best kept in reserve for when it is really necessary--it appears to make it much more potent. But perhaps this is merely my experience of things, and is not shared by many.
 
 
Mordant Carnival
15:31 / 18.08.01
quote:Originally posted by the godog:

I was wondering to what extent we ought to rely on things like sigils in order to effect change in our lives.


I don't think it's smart to rely too much on sigils. For a start, they have one important limitation: you can't sig for an obsession. If something preys on your mind constantly, your sigil to achieve it will be a dud. Therefore if a certain trait is buggering your life up on a daily basis you'll probably have to look to other methods to change.

I find magick useful for changing aspects of myself because it seems to bring insight, new ways of looking at a problem, better understanding. I have found that a single spell can assist me as much as a whole shelf full of self-help books. (This is powerful stuff we're playing with, people!)

quote:
Now what I mean by this is that perhaps it is best not to use magick if magick is not necessary. I tend to think that the magickal will is best kept in reserve for when it is really necessary--it appears to make it much more potent.


I can see how this might be the case for you, and for plenty of other people. For myself I like to do a lot of small workings on a regular basis, just to "keep my hand in," if you will. Obviously I can't speak for other people who may have had totally different experiences from me, but I find this is a good way to stay motivated- I get through the hard work by bribing myself with the odd bag of cri- oh, gawd, they've got me at it now....
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply