BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Magick--a means to change your life?

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
6opow
19:29 / 08.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Mordant Carnival (in, "For Mify"):
You could try something a bit less material if you like- most of my sigils are not for actual things but to help me develop the traits I want- confidence, sociability, motivation. (sounds nu-age and barf-inducing, I know, but it works.) You can't beat a sigil for that.


This is something that I've always been torn about: magick as a means for self improvement. I mean, of course the ideal of magickal pursuit is for an empowered self, but I wonder at the necessity for doing sigils in order to accomplish this.

Now, I certainly think that we are better to use sigils for these, "...less material" things than we are for, say, a bag of crisps (sorry, simply can't let that one go), but I am hesitant to build up the Self through sigilization. Same goes for servitors: I have never created one, and not because I doubt their "reality," but because I've never felt that there was really a need that wasn't merely a want of my ego.

Without further carrying on, thoughts?
 
 
Mordant Carnival
19:56 / 08.08.01
Certainly, you don't need to use sigils for self-improvement. It's just easy and convenient to do so. There are plenty of other things you can do that are as good or better.

When I've used sigils for this sort of thing, I find that one of two things happen. Either I find myself pushed towards the kind of activities that will help me acheive my goal, or I experience a sudden and dramatic shift in my personality. I had one recently when, sick to death of suffering near panic every time the doorbell rang, or when the gas bill came, or when I had to start a new temp booking, I sigilized for stress control and confidence. My other half got a shock, I can tell you. Several times a day for weeks afterward I lived with a constant refrain of "Wow, what the hell have you done? What's got into you? WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH THE REAL CARNIVAL?"

(He's got used to the idea now. Now I just have to deal with: "I need XYZ to happen. Will you do a spell for me?" )

[ 08-08-2001: Message edited by: Mordant Carnival ]
 
 
Kobol Strom
20:00 / 08.08.01
I think that as you go down the road towards self-realisation you would probably need sigils less and less for self-improvement.Its when shit happens outside your control,thats when your mental constructs are really tested,but they improve with use too.Change is a good thing for a developing mind as is facing up to real life problems and putting the ego to one side.It takes time.

Also,sigils are,in themselves, only one way of causing a change to occur in any context that you can will.So then, assuming that the process is in itself arbitrary,as long as you want to improve and become stronger,faster,better than before and get results,then the six million dollar question is,as you say,not the 'How' ,but the 'Why'.
There are plenty of methods towards self-improvement,some as obvious as a good nights sleep,and some are completely off the planet,as a quick perusal of t'internet shows.To be able to answer your question,I think it would depend on what stage you are at with your magickal work.
Its not fair to ask that,I guess,without putting my money where my mouth is.At the moment I'm a sunny day chaoite,tendencies for improvisational magic,kundalini energy experiences,strange dimensional entities in the night,prophetic and pathetic dream diaries,working with meditation and astral projection techniques(terrifying and strangely exciting),bike riding,chocolate chip cookies and milk.Im thinking at the moment to create a sigil to ward off astral plant-suckers while I sleep.I have a normal day-job.

[ 08-08-2001: Message edited by: kobol strom ]
 
 
Ierne
13:52 / 09.08.01
godog: I'm not sure I'm catching your drift.

If "the ideal of magickal pursuit is for an empowered self", why not use sigilization for self-empowerment if that is the mode of magick one is most comfortable with? Why shouldn't it work just as well as any other magickal method in affecting the deeper mind and activating change?

Watch out for the "High Magic"/"Low Magic" booby trap.

Saying "Now, I certainly think that we are better to use sigils for these, "...less material" things than we are for, say, a bag of crisps (sorry, simply can't let that one go)..." smacks of elitism. Now, you are indeed entitled to your personal opinion and your personal path. As are all those who gleefully sigil for chips. We each have our own way of working magick; no one way is "better" or "superior".
 
 
Annunnaki-9
14:47 / 09.08.01
I think as far as magic goes, there are some forms that are better than others, namely the ones that work. And one shouldn't be so timid in recognizing one's ability in a sphere of success, it's not 'elitist' if its true. That whole self-belittling thing is a legacy of medieval Christianity's confusion between 'pride' and 'arrogance.'

A big problem I used to have with Chaos magic is that it is so dammned goal orientated- the proverbial 'bag of crisps.' Slightly older forms, like even Thelema and Golden Dawn, which are the foundation from which c.m. has sprung (and decidedly left the nest), had not only a goal-orientation ('theurgy' loosley translated as 'miracle working'), but also an essential 'informative' element, perhaps called 'gnosis.' Yes, gnosis as a term is used in c.m., but the word means 'know' on greek, pretty much the opposite of the gnosis moment in c.m.

Chaos magic in its complete scepticism has edited out that part of magic that deals with receiving knowledge from some unseen quarter. Hell, most (not all) don't even use divination techniques!
 
 
Mordant Carnival
15:26 / 09.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Theo Kalypso:
A big problem I used to have with Chaos magic is that it is so dammned goal orientated- the proverbial 'bag of crisps.'...

Chaos magic in its complete scepticism has edited out that part of magic that deals with receiving knowledge from some unseen quarter. Hell, most (not all) don't even use divination techniques!


Yes, indeed. Chasing after material prizes is all good fun (hell, I do it all the time) but speaking purely for myself I think I'm ready to try and extend my reach a little, hence all the self improving baloney and my on-going attemt to rewire my temporal lobe for use as a communications device.

Still going to want the odd bag of crisps, tho'...

 
 
Stephen
07:09 / 10.08.01
Been thinking about this a lot lately, come to the hypothesis that Chaos Magic, despite it's punk ethos, is very much rooted in what I call the Doctor Faustus archetype, y'know, the rich dilletante alchemist-magician who has time and resources at hand to engage in his grand occult experiments. Probably because it's got it's roots in the Golden Dawn/Thelema current which is very much of that tradition.

So despite all the focus on results (be they the bag of crisps or knowledge & communication of yer HGA) it always somehow comes over as a bit shallow and self serving. Maybe even 'masturbatory' in more than one sense of the word.

I found that it gets a bit dull after a few years. It's great in that initial rush of enthusiasm, but after awhile it can begin to feel like a bit of a dilletante pursuit. Like those mad old blokes who would build weird buildings in the countryside just for the sake of it, and cos they've got nowt better to do.

What I've been drawn towards lately is trying to connect the modern forms of chaos magic up to what I think of as the forgotten british shamanic tradition, which has got lost along the way under a barrage of Doctor Faustus wannabes in flash capes and 300 quid wands. Basically the 'cunning man' archetype, the person in the village who can sort shit out and serves the community by walking between the worlds and speaking with spirits, providing divination, healing, sorcery, etc.. to people around him who need it.

I'm interested in taking that role and make it relevant to the circumstances and time period that we find ourselves living in. For instance, what do you consider to be your 'village' or your 'community' in the 21st century? I reckon our definition of these terms would be radically different from the definition that a 16th century rural cunning man/woman might employ. So if you're going to take on that role you need to update it accordingly. We're not interested in historical re-enactment here, if it's not relevant to the life you're living then you're doing something wrong.

For instance, you could even consider Barbelith as the community that you serve as a shaman, that whole 'divination by proxy' thread was more or less along these lines, and I'm quite interested in the possibilities of this.

Using magic to benefit the people around us, rather than pursuing increasingly abstract goals and gradually dissapearing up our own arses (which could be considered the abyss of abominations all magicians must eventually face). You get lots of magicians who spend months of their time engaged in highly complicated and specialised rites designed to bring in a new aeon or achieve a higher level of existance or some similar grand scheme. Which is all very well, but really I have much more respect for the magician who's just used his sorcery to conjure up a packet of crisps to feed someone who's hungry.
 
 
grant
15:30 / 10.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Ghost Doctor:
What I've been drawn towards lately is trying to connect the modern forms of chaos magic up to what I think of as the forgotten british shamanic tradition, which has got lost along the way under a barrage of Doctor Faustus wannabes in flash capes and 300 quid wands. Basically the 'cunning man' archetype, the person in the village who can sort shit out and serves the community by walking between the worlds and speaking with spirits, providing divination, healing, sorcery, etc.. to people around him who need it.


I'm with you there, man. That's really coool.
 
 
Mordant Carnival
15:50 / 10.08.01
Yeah, Ghost Doctor, I see where you're coming from.

For myself: I suppose I was attracted to magick initially out of a sense of powerlessness (hey, I was only about 14 or so) and I think that's a pretty common motivation, tho' I doubt most people would admit it. Divination and, later on, ritual magick offered me a sense of control that I badly needed back then, and which I just couldn't have found anywhere else.

As I got older and was able to take over the reins of my life a little more, I became more interested in magick as a proactive force rather than a reactive one. I also became interested in the ways in which I might use magick to help other people. Again, I think this was partly down to a sense of powerlessness; I felt unable to help people I cared about any other way.

Just lately, as I've said, I've begun to broaden my outlook. This isn't all about oh-look-what-a-flashy-little-chaoist-I-am, it's more about finding out what magick can do for everyone. At the back of my mind, my ideal magick-user has always been the old dear at the end of the village who does the births and the laying-out (think Nanny Ogg rather than Dr Faustus ).

Yeah, capes and cool props are a good laugh, and I'll always want to dress up and play Big Scary Ritual Magickian, but in the end I know that's not where it's at for me.

I'm drawn to chaos magick not because of the "wank your way to free money!" aspect but precicely because you don't need a 300 quid wand- you can make all your props out of whatever comes to hand (see my Electrickery ritual for an example.) I also like the fact that I'm not being asked to belive in gods, demons, aliens or man-eating lizards, or generally having to subscribe to somebody else's dogma.

DIY Magick. You can't beat it.
 
 
Von Neumann Drum Machine
16:07 / 10.08.01
My wand is worth far more than 300 quid. To me, anyway.
 
 
nul
16:44 / 10.08.01
I'll give you a twig with a crystal superglued to it for 300 dollars. Only 20 dollars more for the blessing fee. Real bargain. Limited time only.
 
 
Kobol Strom
16:53 / 10.08.01
I've just been reading about people who suffer from Temporal Lobe epilepsy,and the Psychologists who tested them.(Which wasn't the title.)I find that,almost universally,I could fit into their hypotheses concerning activation of the temporal lobes in order to produce mystical sensations and auditory hallucinations.Oh,the fun.Aliens in the middle or your trance?No problem,its all just the result of shizophrenia,lesions or psychosis,or a combination party pot pourri of all three,here,let me turn this dial...past life experiences?Yes,sir..coming right up.
My point is ,that these conclusions are all based on a house of cards made from sketchy empirical evidence.And for me,that falls way shorter than the benefits of a truly open mind.They can't even prescibe the right drugs.
Chaos Magick?Yes its scary,yes its fun,but no,I'm not in it for the leather trousers and fake tan,I have neither.I just want some answers,and then I can come back to 'consensus reality' between the hours of x 'til y and I don't give a rats ass what I happen to be wearing.So,I agree with Ghost Doctor,that magickal pretensions are a waste of space,and would put it to you that scientific pretensions are an even bigger pain in the arse.Or maybe Its that 'lesion' of mine acting up again.

[ 10-08-2001: Message edited by: kobol strom ]
 
 
Stephen
06:23 / 13.08.01
quote: Chaos Magick?Yes its scary,yes its fun,but no,I'm not in it for the leather trousers and fake tan

Will post more later, but just wanted to say that is a fucking brilliant line.
 
 
Tucker Tripp
06:23 / 13.08.01
I wholeheartedly agree with GhostDoctor and others (I really like your shaman description). I am interested G.Dr. Do you think that these "personal discoveries" are necessary in determining your individual shamanic communities or behaviour? Or is it possible to in some formulate a set of rules, attitudes or exercises (or combos) for becoming shamanic in this way? (or something else entirely)

What I'm really saying is that you seem to be a bit jaded with chaos magic, and I see where you're coming from. Therefore, do you thinnk that the only way to magical discovery is through personal/ individual path?

I know I sound dogmatic here and I don't mean to but is shamanism able to be structured and documented as are other forms of magic?

The reason I harp here is because I find my own expereince to be a plodding slow one as a reach a new level of self(or lack of)-understanding, I seem to platau for a while pondering when my next "step" will take place.

Ok here it is: Does the dogmatism and documentation (ruleifying) of good practice in some way begin to be the demise of the usefulness of "death" of that practice?

If interest is there... The floor is open
 
 
Stephen
10:45 / 13.08.01
quote:do you think that the only way to magical discovery is through personal/ individual path? is shamanism able to be structured and documented as are other forms of magic?


I think that if you're working within a shamanic framework, then the stuff you're doing is directly informed by communication with the spirits.

If you're doing it properly, the magic starts to take over and it's working you, not the other way around.

You can draw comparisons with the indigenous shaman who wanders off into the wilderness and returns with a system of magic that he's learnt directly from the spirits.

There's certain things you can pick up from books, and from studying the formalised systems of others, that can be used as a jumping off point but any dogma you take on seems to just be a means of accessing the appropriate conditions for the magic to start working.

For example if you're working shamanically with, say, the Norse Gods, then there'll be certain ways of approaching and interacting with them that they respond best to, but it's ultimately all about personal experience and the relationships you develop. If you read in a book that Thor likes offerings of real ale, but he turns up in a dream and asks for whisky, then you go with what the God says over what the book says.

Similarly, Al Crowley wrote shed loads and developed a highly specialised sophisticated system of magick but often his most interesting work is the stuff that sprung up from 'beyond' and was often in direct opposition to his conscious objectives and ideas about magic.

Ultimately the Shamanic role is a far more demanding road to walk than that of the average dilletante Chaoist. It's probably a bit of a vocation, and whilst everyone on the planet can concievably benefit from a bit of sigilisation etc, I'm not so sure that everyone is cut out for the walk between worlds/drive yourself mad/return intact routine that the shamanic gig can often involve.

I do think that there's probably a lot of people on the chaos magic path who arent entirely fulfilled by what CM has to offer. I think it only goes so far. There's probably people with the shamanic 'calling' who have responded to the CM current because of it's immanent practicality and relevance to the modern world, but may not yet be working under the shamanic job description simply because that role doesnt really exist in our society anymore.

Which is why I'm interested in where this could go and where you could conceivably take it. Marrying the modernism and practical approach of chaos magic with the 'cunning man' tradition of serving the community, whatever that might mean in the 21st century.

One of the annoying things about the CM current is the whole 'leather pants and fake tan' brigade. The Chaoist tendancy to view themselves as a kind of leather clad tattoed army of evolved beings who are inherently 'different' and 'superior' to the lowly non-magician. It leads to big groups of magicians running around together like a pierced up self help group, each one re-inforcing each others delusions of grandeur. Each one spouting the same mish mash of Robert Anton Wilson, Genesis P Orridge, Pete Caroll and others.

I don't think this kind of elitist exclusionist behaviour is going to make any difference to anything in the long run. What would be interesting though is a revival and an upgrading of the cunning man role so that it serves the needs of 21st century culture and society, but is also informed by the post modern methodology that the CM current sparked off.

[ 13-08-2001: Message edited by: Ghost Doctor ]
 
 
Mordant Carnival
15:30 / 13.08.01
YOU COMPLETE AND TOTAL BASTARD! HOW DARE YOU!!!

I've never had a fake tan. Ever. I mean, peircings, yes, tattoo, yes, assortment of leather/PVC clobber, sure, but a fake tan? What a horrible accusation!

But you have a point. There does seem to be a certain contingent that suffers from chronic arseholeism. (Put me off CM for years). And yes, I agree unreservedly that shamanism (is a way tougher path than chaos, simply because it does take you over. A shaman can often find functioning in society incredibly difficult.

The thing is, tho', we just can't all be shamen. I for one simply don't have it in me.

Instead, I like to focus on the stuff I'm good at- invention, exploration, a certain "scientific" bent. Also, I find that having a foot in both camps means that I can offer support to people who are living a more magickally attuned life than me, and therefore may need their freinds to fulfill a caretaking role at times.

As for seeing myself as an 'evolved being', superior to lesser mortals around me... oh, please. If there's one thing CM has taught me it's this: We've all got this huge, huge, potential in us to be something greater than the sum of our parts. All of us. It so happens that I am the kind of flukey swine that lucks into opportunities, so I've had the chance to recognize that potential in myself and at least start to work on it. Far from making me look down on others, I'm starting to see my fellow human with a new respect.
 
 
Ierne
16:30 / 13.08.01
I've having a very rough time with the bitchy elitism permeating this thread.

So far I've read that Chaos Magick is "too goal-oriented", it "edits out that part of magic that deals with receiving knowledge from some unseen quarter", seems "a bit shallow and self serving", or "a bit of a dilletante pursuit." Let's not even discuss the bullshit about leather pants and fake tans.

What a judgemental crock of shit!!!

Magick consists of various processes by which one can modify one's internal & external environments. It does NOT require belief in one/ many godheads, nor does it require a mandate to help one's communitiy. Guess what? It doesn't even require the use of divination techniques!!!

It really makes me angry to read people whinging about "big groups of magicians running around together like a pierced up self help group, each one re-inforcing each others delusions of grandeur. Each one spouting the same mish mash of Robert Anton Wilson, Genesis P Orridge, Pete Caroll and others..." and then in the very next paragraph "I don't think this kind of elitist exclusionist behaviour is going to make any difference to anything in the long run." Ghost Doctor... read over that post and tell me you aren't being elitist or exclusionist.

It isn't anyone's place to judge another person's path, or where they are in relation to your path. If Chaos magick does not work for you, fine. Move on.

BUT DO NOT BE SUCH AN ASS AS TO PRESUME THAT WHAT DOESN'T WORK FOR YOU WON'T WORK FOR ANYONE ELSE!!!

Happy Monday.

[ 13-08-2001: Message edited by: Ierne ]
 
 
Mordant Carnival
17:45 / 13.08.01
Ierne: Face it. Everyone just hates us. We're the magickal equivalent of the lone Goth sitting in the corner of the pub who no-one'll talk to.

I've been trying to be as even-handed as possible regarding some of the comments on this thread, since there do exist C-mages who are materialistic, elitist and all the usual stereotypes. It's a shame, but CM sometimes seems to attract the same sort of dickwads who used to Tip-ex upside-down pentacles on their T-shirts and walk around claiming to be "black witches." They've stopped embarassing the wiccans, sadly, and come over to embarass us instead. Hopefully they'll find somethign else to latch onto in a couple of years time, but till then we're going to have to put up with them.

That being said, I do think that some of the comments being made here are pretty harsh. I know I've not been posting long but I haven't seen any exclucivity on this board from the CMs towards other paths. I certainly haven't sat here bitching about wiccans, say. I know passions tend to run high on this kind of subject, but can we all at least try to agree to differ and respect each other's paths?

My first foray into magic was on the wiccan road; later certain people in my life tried to push me into shamanism. I experimented with various forms of ritual magick, and drew a succession of blanks becase the ideas I was being asked to accept just weren't right for me. I even gave up magick completely a couple of times (with disasterous consequenses, I might add).

So now I'm a chaos magician. Not because I'm some sleek and lazy dilletant out for a fast buck but because it just feels right to do this. At this time in my life, it's the only thing that makes any sense to me.

That doesn't mean I don't respect other people's way of working. It just means I've learned to respect my own.

PS: As an aside- just where are all these marauding, fake-tanned, leather-clad hordes? I haven't even clapped eyes on another chaoist in over two years.
 
 
Annunnaki-9
17:56 / 13.08.01
Now who is judging who?

Choas Magic, which incidently, I have more or less abandoned after taking what useful bit I could from it, IS goal orientated. The magus has a desire, whether it's for an internal change or an external one, sigilizes it, seals it, and waits for results (O.K., O.K., forgets it and doesn;t wait for what he has forgotten). The problem is that there is no questioning as to the nature of the desire. A 'bag of crisps' might be a fine desire for a starving man (though there are better maens of nutrients), but for a 350 lb. computer operator, it can be downright self-destructive. This is why I'm personally more concerned with the 'gnostic' elements of magic.

I won't enter into the 'shaman' debate. I don't really feel much of a member of any community, but I do understand and respect that sort of thought. Base urges are transcended in favor of aid to the group. A 'bag of crisps' for the tribe!

I give you leave to call me elitist.
 
 
Mordant Carnival
18:10 / 13.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Theo Kalypso:
Now who is judging who?


Erm. I don't know. Care to clue me in?

I thought I was just responding in as construtive a manner as possible to comments I felt went a wee bit to far.

And I think I'll give calling you 'elitist' a miss until you say something to warrent it.
 
 
Mordant Carnival
18:13 / 13.08.01
...And can we all shut up about that bloody bag of crisps? It's just getting surreal now. Feeding the tribe with a 35 gram bag of Cheese and Onion? I think I feel a Monty Python sketch coming on...

[ 13-08-2001: Message edited by: Mordant Carnival ]
 
 
Kobol Strom
18:32 / 13.08.01
does no-one care about my astral plant-suckers?
 
 
Mordant Carnival
18:42 / 13.08.01
quote:Originally posted by kobol strom:
does no-one care about my astral plant-suckers?


I'll send you some astral weedkiller if you like.
 
 
Kobol Strom
18:54 / 13.08.01
You don't have to kill it,just tranfer it to
someone else,like Uri Geller.
 
 
Ierne
18:57 / 13.08.01
...just where are all these marauding, fake-tanned, leather-clad hordes? I haven't even clapped eyes on another chaoist in over two years. – Mordant Carnival
I was going to ask if this was a strictly British phenomenon. I've not seen anything like that in NYC. Sounds very 80's glam-metal to me!

Now who is judging who? – Theo Kalypso

The point I was/am trying to make, Theo, is that judging other peoples magickal choices is a very petty thing to do. I should think we have better things to do...like work on our magick.
 
 
Mordant Carnival
19:03 / 13.08.01
Hey... didn't this used to be a thread b4 we turned it into a bitchfest?

Has anybody got anything to add on the actual topic of using magick (whatever flavour) for self-imrovement?
 
 
6opow
19:24 / 13.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Mordant Carnival:
...And can we all shut up about that bloody bag of crisps? It's just getting surreal now. Feeding the tribe with a 35 gram bag of Cheese and Onion? I think I feel a Monty Python sketch coming on...


...or perhaps a biblical story about fishing (you know, casting your hand into the bag and always drawing out one more chip)...
 
 
Mordant Carnival
19:30 / 13.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Ierne:
[QB]...just where are all these marauding, fake-tanned, leather-clad hordes? I haven't even clapped eyes on another chaoist in over two years. – Mordant Carnival
I was going to ask if this was a strictly British phenomenon. I've not seen anything like that in NYC. Sounds very 80's glam-metal to me!


I thought it all sounded rather sexy.

Except for the fake tans, of course.

[ 13-08-2001: Message edited by: Mordant Carnival ]
 
 
6opow
19:38 / 13.08.01
OK. I didn't start this thread to get us all pissed at one another. What I wanted to know is to what extent is sigilization necessary to build up the Self.

I'm a very "middle path" sort of person, and this is likely why I am torn on this issue. I can see the merit of creating sigils to get things you want, but I can also see the merit in not creating sigils. The issue here is not whether chaos magick is less than other forms of magick, but rather, if the mere act of being is itself magickal, to what extent are props, spells, and the like required to live a magickal life?

I can agree that the role of a shaman, in the sense that they are seeking to assist a community, is a good one: magick as a form of Self knowledge leads to the increasing expansion of self into the realm of the previously seen "other"--the others are the self! Thus, helping a community is equivalent to helping the Self.

However, ya' gotta' drink from the well before you can quench the thirst of an other. So, perhaps CM is a means to wheel up the bucket...

There is so much going on in this thread that I can not address it all at this time. I think Kobol is onto something with the idea that as we become more self-aware we use the props less.

[ 13-08-2001: Message edited by: the godog ]
 
 
Kobol Strom
20:22 / 13.08.01
I've been having flshbacks to dreams I had about 2 years ago,(20 months ago)whilst I'm at work concentrating on something else. Heres the twist,those dreams I had a year ago,where I was travelling through various mind realms.(Of which there are sometimes maps,see Tree of Life.)I feel,bizarrely,the same sense of developement that I did back then,as if my mind is remaking unconscious connections that previously led to positive results in the past,to lead me to a state of mind useful for the present.I feel that cm is making me much more adaptable to life,and I can feel the past efforts undergone in dreams almost two years ago,still bearing fruit today,ticking away at the corner of my mind,like a hydrogen clock.
At the moment I'm intuiting (if there is such a word),how to send power from my surroundings in through my right hand chakra (imagine small tornado in palm of hand),into my heart chakra,and whatever.The results are very surprising,are linked with cm,and recquire no props.I've only been practising for about a week,and I've been walking around with my right hand splayed open like some kind of peristalsis hand clapper.Has anyone heard of this?Its a technique shown to me in the middle of a hypnagogic trance,several years ago,where you use the perception of 'tingliness' in the palm of your hand as the activation of the whirlpool,that then pulls in any electromagnetic(something) energy from the tips of the fingers,or the surrounding air.But then you use your imagination and your will to send it to other areas of your body that you feel might need it.Try sending it to your heart and see if anything happens.TV static(here he goes again) has helped me visualise this 'tornado',and its the damndest thing.I'll bet theres some psychological reason for it,I'd be interested to know.Is this all bs?Can you guys get it to work,right now?Do you think creative visualisation is important with your magickal work?With improv in particular?
 
 
Mordant Carnival
20:42 / 13.08.01
I can't speak for any of the other CMs, of course, but I'm not that pissed. I just feel that it's important that we should all show respect and not badmouth each other's paths. It's a shame we got into that because in between the shallow comments about appearance (and what's wrong with facial peircings, I'd very much like to know? ) there were some good points being raised about the place of magick both in a person's private development and in society generally.

Now, I freely admit to using the magickal techniques of my path for personal material gain. I understand that other people may feel that this is not how they want to work, and that's completely cool. However, having seen how much this is frowned upon, I have to ask (and I'm serious here, no messing nor nothing), what actually is wrong with this? Not trying to become the next Richard Branson here, just making sure I don't end up on the dole again or in some evil minimum wage shithole that fucks with physical health and mind in equal measure. Having been severely skint many times in my life I can tell you that poverty didn't do jack for my spiritual growth- more the reverse. I see nothing wrong in shoreing up the material foundations of my life so that I can concentrate on the important things, rather than having to worry about where my next rent check is coming from. How does that assist my community?

As to using magick to aid others: depends on your relationship with the world around you. Some people feel that it's disempowering to have another work spells on your behalf, and I guess that's a valid veiwpoint. Personally I'm not inundated with useful skills so if I didn't have magick to help people out I'd be as much use as a chocolate teapot.

As to kobol strom and godogs points re: props, etc.

Well, seems to me that props in a magickal context are just that- props. Things that prop you up; crutches, if you like.

I only dig out my old Aquarian Press tarot deck (12th b-day prezzie. Oh, the nostalgia!) on special occasions coz I just don't need it much these days. Not that I know what's going to happen, but that I often know what's going to happen regarding a specific event.

When I do use it, I riff off the cards rather than following them slavishly, picking up impressions and following where they lead me. One day I fully expect to acheive the same thing with magick, but at the moment I'm just not advanced enough to acheive much without a suitable focus.

Ultimately I hope to do without physical props etc, and use pure visualization.

[ 13-08-2001: Message edited by: Mordant Carnival ]
 
 
Mordant Carnival
20:48 / 13.08.01
quote:Originally posted by kobol strom:
Do you think creative visualisation is important with your magickal work?With improv in particular?


Important? No. Vital.
 
 
Wyrd
09:14 / 14.08.01
Hi folks, interesting topic, and one I've seen on this board before.

In my opinion there is nothing wrong with being goal-orientated and looking to change one's personal circumstances. I personally don't let it overshadow everything else, but it's a legitimate way of working magic. Chaos magic has never been a large part of my own personal magical toolkit, but it's a useful one, and I don't have any problem admitting that.

The shamanic path, as Ghost Doctor pointed out, is very difficult. I would not recommend it, to be totally honest. But then that has something to do with the fact that I'm currently going through one of the difficult patches that is inherent in that kind of system (well, my brand of that kind of malarky).

Everyone has their way of doing things. I think it's very easy to look down on people in the leather-trousers and big talismans brigade, but hell, if they are confident in doing that, and it helps their life, then hell, that's grand. How many of us started out being excited by magic in that way, of seeing the potentials and getting carried away with ourselves? It's part of the process, of growing and developing. Some people stay in that stage, of loving the glamour, and hell, again, that's great for them. Some of us turn into jaded occultists and find that kind of act irritating. Who's right, who's wrong? No one.

In the end, what matters to me is results. Someone can wear a lot of leather and look fabulous, and still be a force to be reckoned with. Actually, certainly with shamanism in a tribal setting, there was always a major theatrical element to a shaman's work. You adapt your methods for the job, well, that's what I do.

I think the world needs the witches, the cunning wo/men, the shamans, the Wiccans, the Druids, the Chaotes, and the ritual magicians - why not, the more the merrier. At least they are attempting to connect with the powers in the universe, some more successfully than others.

Enough rambling...
 
 
Wyrd
09:31 / 14.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Mordant Carnival:
However, having seen how much this is frowned upon, I have to ask (and I'm serious here, no messing nor nothing), what actually is wrong with this? Not trying to become the next Richard Branson here, just making sure I don't end up on the dole again or in some evil minimum wage shithole that fucks with physical health and mind in equal measure. Having been severely skint many times in my life I can tell you that poverty didn't do jack for my spiritual growth- more the reverse. I see nothing wrong in shoreing up the material foundations of my life so that I can concentrate on the important things, rather than having to worry about where my next rent check is coming from. How does that assist my community?


There's a very interesting saying from South America - "Never trust a skinny shaman".

While I'm all for not allowing material possessions to dominate your life, they do have their place as well. Some people go for the hermit aestheic and that works for them, but it does seem to make some people think they have the moral high ground.

I've seen a lot of pagan friends struggle with the problem of money. They find it hard to charge for their services, they usually give way more than they ask for, and this means they scrape by. Perhaps some people like the martyr complex. My attitude is rather pragmatic. If I don't eat properly, pay the rent, etc. then I'm doing something wrong, not right.

In the end, if you charge the right price (be that through barter, money, services) you are showing that you value your own gifts. It also allows people to show their appreciation to you, which is an important aspect of the relationship as well. I've generally found that the good people tend to under-charge if anything. Western society seems to think that we should go around in hair-shirts if we are working with "spiritual gifts". I've seen some people get around this by saying that they are charging for their time, not for their gift, but I think that's a bit of fancy footwork to get around feeling uncomfortable charging money at all.

Unless your spiritual traditions forbids you to accept money (and some do) then I think you'll find that most of your Allies/Guides/Spirits will give you the big thumbs up to be paid (in whatever currency) for your work - if they even care about that, some of them don't.
 
 
Wyrd
09:42 / 14.08.01
quote:Originally posted by the godog:
The issue here is not whether chaos magick is less than other forms of magick, but rather, if the mere act of being is itself magickal, to what extent are props, spells, and the like required to live a magickal life?

I can agree that the role of a shaman, in the sense that they are seeking to assist a community, is a good one: magick as a form of Self knowledge leads to the increasing expansion of self into the realm of the previously seen "other"--the others are the self! Thus, helping a community is equivalent to helping the Self.


I think there is a false separation being made here between the individual and the community.

Self-improvement and self-development is always good because that benefits the community. It often leads the person out from changing him/herself into an interest in changing his/her community. The two are interlinked.

I've said it before: to know yourself is a very important job. If you don't sort that out you won't be able to help anyone else. It's also an on-going process.

All positive changes rippble out and effect the weave of life (risking sounding a bit twee here).

Props and spells are all tools. You can pick them up or you can leave them on the table. They are not the point at all. Everyone has a magical life. The important thing is to live it.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply