|
|
I finished this last weekend and gave it to my kid sister to read. My biggest beef with the genre fantasy in general is its fixation on returning kings and other Christy paraphernalia* and I was worried all the way through about the Raven King, but it was handled pretty skillfully. Whoever said the book had a clutter of characters was being a party-pooper. In fact, Clarke had a really cool, oblique way of introducing characters and foreshadowing plot points. For instance, did anyone else realize at the end, or maybe not "realize" but suspect, that the gentleman with the thistledown hair had usurped John Upglass's throne, and the whole deal was Upglass's way of getting it back? Still Christy, but with sort of a nod and a wink.
More on dissertationy topics later, maybe, after I've had a chance to read the linked articles.
*cf Alan Watts on the absurdity of democratic societies worshipping tyrannical gods. One of the reasons I enjoy George R.R. Martin's Fire and Ice series so much is its unsentimental approach to this stuff. I mean, it sort of goes the other way, setting up your expectations specifically to knock them down, but it's fun at least. I think a lot of books that are clearly fantasy but aren't metaphorically Christy get put on a different shelf at the bookstore. That is, the difference between genre fantasy and, say, magical realism, is that genre fantasy is Christy. |
|
|