BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The NEW "Magical arts... Martial arts. Two great tastes that taste great together"

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
illmatic
13:50 / 16.04.04
The whole reality vs traditonal martial arts thing is a debate that's being going on for a while now (since the Gracie's prety much), and a very interesting one it is too. My own take on it is I recognise what train in might not "do it" 100% in a real full on fight but that's not what I'm training for. It has a lot of other qualities in it that I love, which inspire me to keep going. A consciousness of this stops me getting a big head anyway. I'd like to train in some reality based stuff as well, and may do as well if I get the time and opportunity.

IMO, no art is the ultimate - they all have different qualites, weaknesses and strengths - depends on what your goal is.
 
 
BigCedar
15:01 / 16.04.04
Just had to add that I am in no way trying to detract from anyone's personal practice. Anyone who takes the time to develop any physical skills has my respect.

I feel the martial arts world has benefited greatly from mixed martial arts events in that all styles now have an arena to test aspects of their art. Marvelous alloys are being produced through this trial by fire.

Back to thread topic:
When I'm grappling with a superb fighter and I feel a choke or joint lock start to set in. At that moment I have to try not to panic but react with a counter move. Exactly the kind of calmness and focus others have mentioned.
Managing fear can be so transforming.
 
 
LVX23
15:44 / 16.04.04
Illmatic wrote:
IMO, no art is the ultimate - they all have different qualites, weaknesses and strengths - depends on what your goal is.

Yeah, I totally agree. I personally have been drawn to Ninjutsu, but I wouldn't claim it's the ultimate art. It's right for me, is all.

I think what makes this whole topic a bit touchy is the vast amount of politics and ego that often accompanies the martial arts. There are lots of posers, lots of people trying to prove something, and only handful of genuine masters. And for many people it's a very petrsonal and familial belonging. You want to fight to defend yourself and you want to fight to defend your art. It's really tricky to navigate through it all and find a group of people you resonate with. Often it's hard to learn an art without getting caught up in the politics, or at least constantly trying to avoid the politics.

Big Cedar wrote:
I guess you could argue that competition becomes undesirable at some level of "spiritual attainment" but it seems that video taping a pure display of power would also run against that spiritual grain.

I think there's a fine line between a dojo and a church. They're trying to offer a form of attainment, but they still need money to run the business. The Hatsumi videos are made because 1) people want them and, 2)the Bujinkan needs money. From my own experience, Soke Hatsumi is a worthy grandmaster of ninjutsu (in part because he's human, not some ascended master who walks on air). All that really matters is that each of us enjoy and embrace our art and have confidence in and respect for our teachers.

How do you attain a degree of skill with techniques that you cannot practice via sparring?

Well it's a controlled sparring I guess. Block, strike, grapple, throw, submit to tap. The forms and wazas are generally practiced on a willing partner - i.e someone who lets you put on the moves without really resisting. This is just to properly ingrain the techniques. We do a lot of free-form drills which are basically applying any set of counters to a random set of strikes - sort of pulling tricks out of the bag as you deal with an evolving situation. These usually result in a throw and a ground submission, but the outcome constantly varies depending on what works at the time. Sometimes techniques fail and you have to adapt quickly and try something else more appropriate. We also do a lot of 1-step drills which are basically: I strike - he blocks and strikes back -I block and strike back, etc - and we try to get this going as fast as possible while still maintaining some degree of form.

But yeah, all training is somewhat removed from fighting. Least of which is the psychology. I think you just hope that by training you ingrain the techniques so deeply that they become a part of you. It's like when you fall, you automatically try to catch yourself. So when someone throws a blow, you automatically respond with a technique. At this point it's not even a technique, it's just how you react to deal with the situation. The technique can be avoiding the fight entirely.

There's definitely a part of me though that would like to do more free sparring. I've done some in the past and it's a lot of fun and a whole different level of training.
 
 
Lord Morgue
06:56 / 28.04.04
I love a belief system that by its very nature cannot be tested. Like all those psychics who can't do their thing in the presence of skeptics and their disruptive vibrations. Why can't you be more like the Chinese masters and simply claim your art is too deadly for competition?
 
 
Lord Morgue
07:55 / 28.04.04
Back on subject. Anyone use Rune-based systems? There's a martial arts style, no, it's more of a philosophy or way of life, beyond even the philosophical aspects of Jeet Kune Do and Aikido, easiest comparison would be Ninjitsu, not so much in content, but in scope, called Stav, based on the beliefs of the Viking civilisations. I got a good link here somewhere...
http://www.stavinternational.org/intro.html
Opinions? Observations? Comparisons?
 
 
Seth
22:37 / 09.09.04
Daft, daft abstract. Respect to whoever wrote it.

Had a proper nasty experience this evening working the bar. Lottie and I both pegged a couple of customers as being likely to kick off, and sure enough they both caused trouble until the point we decided not to serve them. Being in charge for the evening and far more experienced, I trusted Lottie's judgement to handle things.

Then one of them lost it. He'd already tried to rip the fag machine off the wall, but he then started throwing bar stools and starting on me (which I didn't react to). Lottie had the advantage of being able to reason with them (if a bloke had tried it would have been nasty), but I left the encounter realising that I wouldn't have been able to do anything of consequence had I needed to step in and defend her.

Thankfully I didn't have to. I'd never have wanted to. She was brilliant and brave and totally in control. And I guess I was, too (the taller guy was throwing items and abuse my way and I didn't react in the slightest). Still... it made me realise that there may be a time when I'll have no option but to respond.

So my request is this: I'm a stocky, pretty well built guy, probably not suited to speed. Recommend me a martial art that has a good balance between application in a real fight and spiritual discipline. I have no experience in this area but I'm starting to think it'd be wise to learn.

Aside: A chance to resurrect one of Lothar's threads! Blessings, dude. You rule.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
07:57 / 10.09.04
Wrestling, mate. Possibly Brazilian Jui-jitsu, but almost certainly the kind of control and restraint stuff that immobilises an opponent without actually causing them much physical harm. I was looking on Bob Breen's website for classes on stick fighting earlier this week, and they have a guy there who teaches non-violent restraint stuff, he specialises in teaching nurses how to immobilise and pacify violent patients, and that sort of thing. Maybe something along those lines would be up your street?
 
 
illmatic
09:01 / 10.09.04
I agree with you mate, Lothar ruled (or still rules, wherever he is). I regret never getting to interact with him online.

As to your question, I think it’s harder to answer than you realise. I’ve read LOADS about this over the last year or so, so you get an info dump. Forgive me (or thank me on the off chance you find any of it useful).

I think that the two – spirituality and realism - very rarely meet in Martial Arts simple reason that realism is actually absent to a large degree. I don’t think most of what people train in is applicable to real world fighting to be honest – two reasons there, people like the “mysterious oriental” flash and glamour and, as the majority of people are sensible and don’t go around getting into fights, so their arts never get tested.. The exceptions to this rule are people who deal with violence day in, day out – policeman, bouncers, soldiers and the like. Over the past ten years or so, there’s been an increase on the info available relevant to real world confrontation - “reality based” stuff. Probably the most famous author in this field is ex-bouncer from Coventry Geoff Thompson. All this information shows an awareness of the issues surrounding confrontation which most martial arts don’t teach. I’ll list a few of these below. This isn’t so much practical advice on what art to choose, but what to look for if you want to learn some real self protection stuff. (and I’d add I’m writing it as much for my own benefit as yours, and anyone else who’s interested in selecting an art).

1) Situational awareness and avoidance –cultivating an attitude of awareness so you can slip away from attackers and confrontations before they start, are aware of situations escalating, reading people’s body language so you can tell if they preparing to fight etc. It’s amazing how blind most people are to this stuff.
2) Verbal confrontation – being aware pre-fight “interview” stage and having strategies to deal with this ie. de-escalation, “loopholing” (offering the person giving you grief an “honourable” and face saving way out – “verbal judo”) etc. If a class is focusing on “proper” self protection stuff, it will have an element of this. Ties in with assertiveness issue etc. I think if you’ve got these two things down, you can avoid 99% of confrontation anyway – which is what you want.
3) An awareness of the adrenalin dump – a lot of martial arts falls apart in the real world because it’s practitoners haven’t tested it for real. If someone is actually shouting at you, squaring up to etc. you’ll get the shakes, dry mouth, weak at the knees etc. The more realistic stuff will train with this in mind and put you in “high pressure” situations to induce an adrenalin rush, and see if you can still execute the techniques. Real SP stuff will teach really simple, gross motor, techniques that are easy to execute. The adrenalin response why arts with an element of full contact sparring such as western boxing come highly recommended in SP circles.
4) Pre-emptive striking – Geoff Thompson has stated that the only thing that worked consistently in his 300 plus fights on the door was pre-emption. Most martial arts blocks etc just WONT WORK in a real fight. Best solution is to hit them before they hit you, going for a knock out if you have the skills. Not very nice, but it’s true. Incidentally, this is legal if you feel under genuine imminent threat and you are acting clearly in self defence. It’s not bloody legal if you hit the first person who stares at you funny, but if you’ve “read” someone, and you sincerely believe they are about to launch an attack, striking first is legal.

To a degree, I feel a bit uncomfortable writing all this stuff here, as I’m concerned it might make me seem like a macho nobhead. There’s definitely a side of me that is like this, and likes reading the “my favourite strangle” threads on martial arts message boards. But I sincerely believe that stuff like the above can come in very useful in dealing with, and above all, avoiding confrontation. I’m actually not that worried about myself as I’m a big, reasonable strong guy, and I’ll fucking run a mile rather than have a scrap, but I’m am concerned about the people I care about and would like it if they took an interest in their own safety. Also – big point – a huge amount of what is taught as self defence is fucking crap, to put it frankly and about as much use as a chocolate fireguard. At it’s worst, I think it can give you an false sense of security and actively endanger yourself.

At this juncture, I think I should point out I don’t train this stuff myself, it’s just an active interest (and I will get some training in when money allows). I train in traditional martial arts and I absolutely love it, and am benefiting in so many ways, but I don’t think it’s making me into a hard man who’s completely prepared for a 2am confrontation outside a chip shop. I see my reading in self-protection/reality based stuff as supplementing my training. There’s not wrong with training in most martial arts – they’re f***ing brilliant on so, so many levels – health, fitness, discipline, relating to the body, socialising and yup, spiritual and meditative benefits. I would recommend anyone to train in almost any art – martial arts training is just great full stop – but just be aware that not all of what is out there is relevant or transferable to a real situation.

Anyway, I seem to have run out of steam so I’d better make a practical recommendation. This club is based in St Mary’s in Southampton – and it is a proper self-protection club, that comes highly recommended. It sure ain’t spiritual but, dude, if you can face the fear, three months here and you’ll be able to leather me and everybody else that you know. Possibly I'm trying to live vicariously through you here because I'd love to train there, but lemme know what you think, drop me a PM. Either way, train in something dude, it's so much fun...
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
09:32 / 10.09.04
Great post

I think that the two – spirituality and realism - very rarely meet in Martial Arts simple reason that realism is actually absent to a large degree.

There is that. But I'd add that "spirituality" and "magic" can be found in virtually any activity, if you look at it from the right angle and engage with it in a certain way. Which is one of the ideas that was informing the disguise thread I started. Whilst reality based martial arts are devoid of what we might normally think of as "spirituality" in a traditional martial arts sense, I think it's really down to the practitioner and how they look at and relate to their own training. For instance, you can do a course in cookery and frame the whole thing in terms of magic, so there's no reason why you can't train realistic self protection and personally frame it in whatever terms you like.

Whilst Geoff Thompson's stuff is pretty far from spiritual in a "trad eastern wisdom" sense , a lot of the posts on his website veer interestingly close to magic - when he starts talking about visualisation and intent and so on.

I'd say learn something practical that works in real life, and then look at your training in terms of your own personal sense of spirituality. You will probably do this anyway to some degree as you internalise the practical skills and make them your own.
 
 
illmatic
09:58 / 10.09.04
Agreed. A lot of the SP stuff seems to focus on determination, raw will power, suceeding etc. Real Geburah "balls of steel" type stuff. Which I disagree with a lot of the time actually, as I try and cultivate a less driven, unattached, "let it go" point of view. Having said that, they're qualites you need in abundance if you're unlucky enough to be in a fight.

Geoff T is a very interesting guy to look at, it's interesting how he has metamorphsed from a bouncer into a self help/motivational writer and author. A lot of guys in that area seem to go that way. Some of the sufff is he's written in this area is magic in all but name. Incidentally, if you do read his stuff or watch his videos, he's is (perhaps surprisingly) realy strongly opposed to violence, apart from in the cause of self projection. Probably as he's had so much experience of the real thing. Anyone who's got a interest in practical martial arts should do themselves a favour and read his stuff.
 
 
DecayingInsect
11:39 / 10.09.04
I've worried about this for a while...

obviously MMA/Muay Thai/BJJ/Boxing are going to be the best in any arena but I just don't have the fitness, time, dedication or robustness to do any of them I train Wing Chun, though, which has proved useful on one occasion.

The real issue for me is 'can the average non-aggressive individual defend against street assaults?'

Not 'how can?' but 'can?'.

Awareness, minding your own business and de-escalation are great but unfortunately some people will just walk up and attempt to whack you in the face. This is not a sparring scenario: you may not even see the fists coming, let alone be able to 'block'.

I thought Geoff Thompson's book Dead or Alive was great: putting up a 'fence', psychological/physiological aspects etc. Any reports on his seminars from board members?
 
 
illmatic
13:02 / 10.09.04
Well, I think that depends on how far you take the whole personal safety/avoidance issue. If you're really concerned, you can extend this so as to for instance avoid areas where you think there may be trouble on a busy night, attempt to switch your drinking patterns and those of your friends to quieter pubs and so on - not always possible, I know, but worth bearing in mind. Part of the whole thing is removing yourself from places where there's the possibilty of trouble.

Also, how often do you hear about a completely unprovoked assault with no "interview" stage (that's the aggressive signalling - stares, verbal, "what you looking at?" etc leading up to a fight, for those who don't know the lingo) - not often I'd wager. I don't think you can avoid every eventuality but you can cover a lot of the basis. On this subject I'd recommend The Self Defence Manual by MJ Doughery and Dave Birdsall.
 
 
Orrin's Prick Up Your Ears
13:20 / 10.09.04
All the stuff on self-protection here is valid, I think. Interesting how, in the link to that school in Southampton, one of the guy's main influences (and the foundation stone of all Western self-protection stuff really) was Fairbairns' 'Defendu' from the 1940s, which is simple as fuck and almost entirely based on increasing the chances of surviving (usually behind enemy lines - it was taught and developed for the SOE) through surprise and preemptive strikes to the groin and eyes. It's hard to fight using 'Defendu', but that's not what it's for. The aim is to fuck someone up before the fight starts: it should all be over before they get a chance to hit back. Obviously, it works very well, although the 'cornered animal' mindset was reported to have really fucked with some ex-soldiers when they returned to civvy street.

Does anyone have any experience with Russian Systema? I've got about six months of training in this and a couple of months ago got twelve hours of coaching over a weekend from the former hand-to-hand combat instructor of the Russian special forces 'wet-work' guys. Bodyguards, assassins, etc. Very interesting guy called Vlad Vasiliev. It was very productive, although he fucked up the ligaments in my left knee and I haven't been able to train since!

Systema's totally unique in my opinion. It was taught to real military hardnuts but it's almost entirely based on sensitivity, relaxation, 'gentleness' and improvisation. Its eventual aim is the reduction and control of fear, which is where it shines, I think. There aren't really any 'techniques' as such: through sparring and playing around, at first in slow motion and in a relaxed, friendly manner (conceptualised as 'games' as the Russians believed this provided the fastest model of learning) you just let your body respond to situations in a natural manner and eventually, organically and through experience, you just find yourself doing the right things without thinking about it.

One very useful thing they teach is to use flinch reactions productively. You can train like hell to get rid of these, for years and years, but still find yourself doing them if someone surprises you. Systema will take your body's natural reaction, maybe raising the shoulder and turning away, and let you build your own valid responses around it, which you'll be able to pull off a hell of a lot quicker than some 'move' you have to dredge up out of your training. Another useful thing is their emphasis on de-escalation, smiling while fighting and keeping calm and 'expansive', keeping other options open, rather than turning on that sort of violent 'tunnel-vision' a lot of arts train you to develop, which is really just the blinding effects of fear and adrenaline.

The other interesting thing about Systema is that there's a hell of a lot of spiritual stuff going on underneath it. The training in sensitivity, right from the start, reminds me more of Russia's psi research in the 1970s. We're talking full-on 'energy' training involving channeling 'energy' through your body during meditation (almost like trying to raise Kundalini), sensing auras, 'feeling' attacks from behind, blindfold fighting, healing, or preempting attacks ... you name it. And all of this with a matter-of-fact attitude and taught by people with real hardcore military experience.

One second you'll be standing there taking full-power punches to the solar-plexus and using breathing to control the pain (they're obsessional about breathing - even the Silat I did wasn't as insistent on it) and the next, someone'll be trying to knock you over without touching you. Really, it's fascinating, and the best blend of hard/soft/spiritual I've seen. And the high-level guys like Vlad really can do some crazily wild stuff.

I wouldn't take Systema on its own, personally. I like it, but I think it really comes into its own as a lab for people who already have some skill or toughness from another art. If you train in something very, very sparring-based and physical, such as a good grappling system or/and boxing or Muay Thai, Systema would really fill in a lot of 'street' gaps. Which is why I do it. Plus, you get energy-friendly but down-to-earth training and a ton of weirdo Eastern-bloc psychic practices too. Win-win. It's also good if you do a very classical system but can't get it to work, as the relaxation training can unlock the things your body knows, but fucks up due to the effects of adrenaline and fear on fine motor-control.
 
 
Lord Morgue
13:35 / 10.09.04
I wouldn't recommend Brazilian Jujitsu, wrestling, or any predominantly grappling or groundwork system for streetfighting. Good way to let the guy's girlfriend walk over and cut your throat, even if you're winning.
For the street- Zen Do Kai, Geoff Thompson's "Real Combat System", Taiho-Jutsu, Krav Maga, Dan-Te, Paul Vunak and Larry Hartsell's takes on Jeet Kune Do, maybe Ki Chuan Do and Erle Montaigue's Combat Tai Chi.
Of the pure martial arts, Ukidokan and World Oyama Karate look good. 52 Blocks, if you're lucky enough to find a teacher.
My own preferences run towards WW2 close-quarter combat systems like Fairbairn/Sykes, Applegate, Defendo, and medieval/renaisance combat systems like La Vedera Destreza.
 
 
Orrin's Prick Up Your Ears
14:16 / 10.09.04
BJJ's always worked for me - what can I say!

I'm not a knockout puncher (most people aren't, even with training), so I'm never going to win that way, but the ground control from my grappling means that I can stay on top and pounding if I want, and if I'm on the bottom, which happens, it's most likely I'll turn someone over than get pounded myself. That comes from cross-training in Pancrase and MMA with ground striking.

It's not all about submissions and I've never seen a fight where being on top, maybe with a knee on his stomach so you can get up quick, controlling an opponent's limbs and pounding him with your elbows wasn't a good position. A decent wrestler can stay there all night and you're not getting him off. That's why it's a good skill to learn. Hell, ground and pound seems to be the primary strategy of traditional jiu-jitsu, Silat, 'ninjutsu', you name it.

Mind you, my most recent experience of street violence - being suddenly beaned in the head in a bar while so drunk that I didn't even know who'd hit me - make me agree with you that in most circumstances of violence, grappling is pretty unnecessary. But, I'd argue that other fighting skills you can learn won't really help you either ... getting wankered in a sports bar wearing leather trousers and a pink tiger-striped t-shirt was the problem, not any lack of training on my part 3
 
 
illmatic
14:44 / 10.09.04
Ouch.

I kind of agree with regards to the ground fighting stuff, it's good to have the skills in case you need them (I have none), but the ground is the last place you want to be in a fight. Far too easy for someone to play football with your head. Everything I've ever read indicates - get up quickly! Having said that, I'd still love to train in BJJ, if the week suddenly expands to allow me extra hours.
 
 
Orrin's Prick Up Your Ears
14:59 / 10.09.04
Oh, props on the 52 Blocks by the way! Great looking stuff, although it's almost impossible to find any solid info on it apart from Doug Century's 'Street Kingdom' and the old John Steven Soet 'Martial Arts Around the World', with Dennis Newsome demonstrating it as 'Jailhouse Rock'. He taught some to Mel Gibson for the first Lethal Weapon movie, oddly. Always thought that if Mike Tyson did Silat, it would look like 52 ... all Cus D'Amato peekaboo boxing with intricate, unfolding 'flowering hands' blocking with the elbows.

However, Newsome refuses to teach anyone white and most of the other guys who know anything are dead or in prison. Certainly, nobody in the UK has a clue about it, although I hear some of it is visible in breakdancing guys doing 'Uprocking', which I've been meaning to check out for ages.

It's interesting, 'cos after I started doing boxing training and tried figuring out ways of incorporating my Silat into sparring with boxers in Pancrase, it felt very natural to work much tighter than classical Silat, from a tight boxing guard and working Silat parrying and trapping from boxing-style bobbing and weaving. This isn't a new idea and I've seen several guys doing 'dirty boxing' or 'street boxing' systems that look damned close, particularly Rodney 'Chico' King's 'Crazy Monkey Boxing', which you can learn in this country from guys affiliated with the Straight Blast Gym (a progressive JKD school that ditched all esoteric systems, Wing Chun, Kali, Silat, etc, completely in order to concentrate on Muay Thai, boxing, BJJ and wrestling).

Oh, the best info on 52 blocks is definitely Stickgrappler's page, www.stickgrappler.tripod.com/
 
 
Lord Morgue
01:34 / 11.09.04
You can see some good uprocking and capoeira in the Robert Wise film "Rooftops".
Actually, I believe Tyson has been trained in 52 Blocks, that's where he gets the peekaboo guard, armbars, elbow strikes, all the bullshit he does that has nothing to do with boxing.
 
 
Orrin's Prick Up Your Ears
03:44 / 11.09.04
Peekaboo guard comes from Cus D'Amato - he taught it to all his fighters. But I've heard that Tyson did some 52, although there's 1st hand sources that I can see - you probably got the info from the same sources I did, I guess. Certainly, it wouldn't be a surprise as Tyson was raised in Brooklyn, the home of the 52, and would have been streetfighting in the late 70s, early 80s. The dirty boxing in his early fights is pretty gnarly too, although I've seen similar stuff from a lot of fighters (it doesn't scream 'martial arts' although it's nice).

Thanks for the heads-up on the uprocking film. I'll see if I can get a copy.
 
 
Orrin's Prick Up Your Ears
03:45 / 11.09.04
Peekaboo guard comes from Cus D'Amato - he taught it to all his fighters. But I've heard that Tyson did some 52, although there's no 1st hand sources that I can see - you probably got the info from the same sources I did, I guess. Certainly, it wouldn't be a surprise as Tyson was raised in Brooklyn, the home of the 52, and would have been streetfighting in the late 70s, early 80s. The dirty boxing in his early fights is pretty gnarly too, although I've seen similar stuff from a lot of fighters (it doesn't scream 'martial arts' although it's nice).

Thanks for the heads-up on the uprocking film. I'll see if I can get a copy.
 
 
grant
16:29 / 01.04.05
Here's an interesting post from an NLP forum that a friend forwarded to me. It's about boxing and hypnotic/NLP trances:

> Hi Jørgen,
> Don’t know whether this is of any interest or
> not, but I thought I would share some
> observations. I used to work and live with
> quite a famous boxer (at least in the UK/Arab
> world) called 'Prince' Naseem Hamed, during
> fight prep out in the USA. Naz was renown for
> his dramatic fights, successfully defending his
> world title about 16 times I think, mostly with
> his hands down by his side, due to his
> tremendous reflexes. I think that out of all
> the people that I have met in person, Hamed,
> along with Bandler and Grinder strike me as the
> most 'trancy' in that there seems to be more
> than the usual going on, however you interpret
> that.
>
> The last time he fought (a few years ago now),
> we were preparing in Sheffield and one day
> after sparring I said to him, "Naz, I don't
> think you will go unconscious in the ring cause
> you're already unconscious when you walk in."
> He asked me to expand on the comment and I said
> to him, "well, you slow down your perception of
> time dramatically, you have the widest
> peripheral vision, and you don’t miss a trick -
> they’re unconscious phenomena.” He just laughed
> and went off into the steam room with his
> trainer.
>
> Several minutes later, I heard a cry from the
> steam room, “That c**t knows something!”, and
> then Naz emerged and went on to tell me
> something that he had not remembered in years.
> He said that when he was young that he used to
> pray to see the punches coming slower and that
> peoples hands looked so big he couldn’t miss
> seeing them. Being a Muslim, he would pray 5
> times a day - and boy did he go into an altered
> state. I remember walking past his room in Palm
> Springs and waving to him through the window
> and he didn’t notice that I was there. I have
> walked into the gym when he was sat right down
> at the other side talking to reporters and even
> though his head didn’t move I knew he had seen
> me walk in. The guy always notices if you have
> new shoes on or something, and in conversations
> late at night we would just lose track of time
> - in fact, his worst trait outside the ring is
> probably that he has no sense of time.
>
> I was also listening to a CD set by Bandler
> recently and he mentioned Naz. He said that he
> had seen this boxer on breakfast TV and that he
> fights on many different levels. Bandler said
> that he went into trance and watched what Naz
> did and noticed how Naz generated fear inside
> himself, generated fear in the opponent and
> anchored it. Personally, I think these are
> eloquent examples of hypnotic/altered state
> phenomena in someone that has no NLP training.
> I remember reading Turtles by John Grinder and
> liked the idea of ‘demons within a framework’.
> Naseem is the nicest guy outside of the ring,
> yet people were moving up and down weight
> classes to avoid his ferocity within the ropes.
> Contrast that with Mike Tyson, who’s demons
> spill over into his personal life and wreck it
> - there seems to be no appropriate container
> for his aggression. Have you ever noticed how
> the press ridicule Lennox Lewis for talking
> about himself from the 3rd person. I met Lennox
> and he was nice as pie. Perhaps he found a way
> to separate the man from the fighter, and keep
> his demons contained for the context that they
> serve best?
>
> Life on those training camps certainly changed
> me. I noticed that when I returned back to the
> UK that I would throw shots with an accuracy
> that I didn’t have before spending 8 weeks at a
> time watching the boxer perform each day. My
> punches were harder, and a friend of mine that
> used to box amateur said that he couldn’t even
> throw combinations like the ones I was doing
> when he was local champion. Yet, I had done
> little in the way of boxing training on those
> camps.
>
> Before heavy weight training in the squat and
> deadlift I go into an altered state that gives
> me a lot more power (used to use caffeine
> before, but I have no need for it now). I tend
> to kick my legs out a few times, just before I
> start and look upward with at a 45 degree
> angle. I watched a DVD of some of Naz’s best
> fights a few weeks ago, and there it was, the
> same leg kick and upward look, and I wasn’t
> consciously aware that I learned this from him
> until then. Again, these are all observations,
> make of them what you will.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Thomas Shillaw
 
 
Chiropteran
18:05 / 01.04.05
Thanks for posting that, grant.

~L
 
 
01
04:09 / 02.04.05
Martial arts and their magickal nature.... hmmmm there must be something going on. I've recently come back to this board after a long hiatus from it, to be greeted by a re-post of a thread that I participated in almost four years ago. Groovy. I guess time really is just a figment of our imagination, or our perception of it anyway...


Lothar posted:

I even had a out of time experience in Kung Fu class a couple weeks ago. I had missed a few days early on in the week so I ended up going three days in a row. On the last day, I was so exhausted that while practicing a new form I saw the form as one object in time instead of a series of techniques strung together. This was triggered by the various sounds connected to the various techniques. It was cool and also very disconcerting.



I dig this. I read an article in some science mag a few years ago about this physicist that surmises that time really is just a big cosmic hoax. Each "moment" as he calls it is eternal and non-static and our consciousness just travels throught the gagillions of these prearranged frames. That soccer ball that you kicked through your parents' window as a kid? It's still crashing through the pane and always has been and always will be.

But I'm not sure if I'm completely sold, leaving room for some other idea that comes along and yanks me by the krishna knot but nonetheless it is a cool notion and totally fits into the idea of the kung fu form or kata being one entity. Also reminds me of climax in the Invisibles where humans and everything else were revealed to be these "billion armed and legged timeworms." I'm sure this idea has been around for a long time and Morrison put his neo-cool spin on it, I just don't know which philosopher(s) also write about it. I really have to read more than just comic books.

So now it's four years later, I'm further along in my training, hold a black belt now and would like to throw some of these snippets into the mix;

Visualization. This really is the key. Especially when doing repetitive, draining techniques. I remember reading on this board years ago about how the ancient Okinawans could crack the bamboo armour of the Samurai with their bare fist. When I start getting tired, I imagine that I'm one of the peasants defending myself against a bas ass katana weilding Samurai. Hell, even visualization worked for Tom Cruise in Last Samurai...

Speed. My Sensei says that speed beats power every day of the week. Often times I'll envision the Speed Force from the Flash comics, believing that I'm tapping into it, becoming one with it and it works. Not to toot my own horn, but I've been told I'm one of the fastest in class. When told to speed up in class, I'll try to beat my Sensei's count, paying attention not to take off before he utters his first syllable but ideally want landing before he's said the entire word. Thank you Barry Allen.

Speed comes from a combination relaxation and tension heavily favouring relaxation. The blurb above about Naz praying five times to Allah to be able to see his opponents punches in slo-mo is brilliant. Meditate on something that much and it'll happen.

Relaxation. Essential. Like mentioned above the more that you can relax your body and especially your mind, the better martial artist you'll be. The more I train, the more I realize that my training is more about letting go and being open and calming the mind especially in tense situations. Lately we've been doing two on one sparring and I find the mind takes off like jack rabbit trying to evade a pack of coyotes. Keeping a handle on technique is very difficult. On the other hand, I've found that I am way more relaxed when facing off against one person than I was previously. This gives you so many more options do deal with him or her. Also during sparring I've tried not to use just one technique and become more reactive to an attack. Letting what ever technique that wants come out of me do its thing. Sometimes however this has to be pushed aside to work on something new.

Yoga has also been incredibly helpful, both physically and spritually. I do the hot yoga (an offshoot of Bikram) and it is truly amazing. I recommend it to everyone. It is an exercise in focus as well as relaxation. Not to sound like some new age crackpot trying to take your money with his new self help book, but (I can't believe I'm about to say this...) the power of intention is truly powerful.

-Anthony Robbins
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply