BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Discordia

 
  

Page: 1(2)3

 
 
trouser the trouserian
13:48 / 06.09.04
Well here's the old Circle of Chaos Eris ritual by "Paula Pagani" (aka Ray Sherwin). I really like the second "Eris" chant and have used it on a number of occasions in group workings devoted to her what done it.
 
 
Nobody's girl
14:02 / 06.09.04
No, I just often express an opinion that is contrary to the consensus opinion. Apologies if contrary opinions are off limits in a thread about discord. My mistake.

Not at all, I was baiting you dear. Worked didn't it?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:10 / 06.09.04
Well, that depends. If by "worked" you mean "I didn't mean that really, and so by responding to it you have shown how WEAK and STUPID you are", then, no. It didn't work. It only sent out a message that you are more interested in getting a rise out of people than speaking to them. Believing that people are sincere is not a weakness. Listening to them again after it is made clear that they are not may be.

If by "worked" you mean "I picked that fight purely to show how WEAK and STUPID you are when you responded to it, and, since you responded to it you are WEAK and STUPID", then, no. It didn't work. It showed only that if you criticise people on Barbelith they will often respond to that criticism.

I'm not sure what the other options are. Perhaps if you work out whether you actually meant that GL enjoyed pissing on other people's chips and go from there, there may be a way for you to have won Big Prize. However, it strikes me that your comment was little more than a move to go from discussing Discordianism to discussing GL. If you find GL a more interesting subject, I can only suggest you start a thread on him. Perhaps in the Conversation.

Fnord.

Moving back a bit.... the point that Bob Dobbs (and by extension Discordianism) is a bit pricy to pursue... is this the case? I do get a sense that a lot of the Discordian/Subgenius stuff is basically accessorising rather than ritual practice. What sort of purchases might one expect to make, since the Principia Discordia is online?
 
 
charrellz
15:51 / 06.09.04
I haven't known much about Eris untill the last couple of days, and I can't get enough. Chaos has been a big part of my life and how I think for years, and Discordia just seems to really speak to me (a real clincher was opening my copy of Edith Hamilton's Mythology to look for images of Eris and seeing the previous owner had circled "...goddess of Discord, Eris.." - hooray synchronicity).

I'm gonna start really working her into my workings in an effort to get a genuine relationship going. Eris is just the push my magickal life has been missing for the last two years. I'll keep everyone posted on my progress.
 
 
Charlie's Horse
00:18 / 07.09.04
Blessings and luck, Charrellz - I think you're the only poster thus far to even mention personally bringing Eris into active workings. Keep us posted. And watch your ass. She's crafty.

Haus - I think you've a good point about the accessorising. I mean, several books on Bob Dobbs, all in the $10 plus range, and for what? The knowledge that We mighty few Yeti-descendents shall triumph over the Pinks on X-Day? Different strokes for divergent peoples, but when a book makes me ask, 'Did L. Ron Hubbard write this shit?' - that's when I prefer not to use it in a ritual. Go figure.

The Church of the Subgenius has a certain 'occult kitsch' flavor. I was a lil' more excited about Discordianism until I met some Discordians - spouting out quotes from the book and "I believe nothing" (because that's the preface to Quantum Psychology and it just makes sense, man) as they write a new book: Robert Anton Wilson: Genius or God?. Arrested developement, comfort zones, and other things mentioned before, righteously so.

At least Eris' literature is cheaper, if not completely free. Regardless, it feels less like an occult manual and more like a badge - you know, two people meet, they both have these books, and they know that they can exchange certain jokes, passphrases, and 'wacky' beliefs, as opposed to swapping ways to change themselves and the world. This isn't just a problem in Discordianism or the CoS, but it seems particularly prevelant there.

I've always found these two religion/jokes a taste airless. Like working through the void of space. That's fine if you want to be an astronaut, but I'd rather be in some corner cafe, air thick with the cloying incense of coffee grounds, tobacco, conversation - me sitting in a dark corner sipping tea, smiling at my shadow knowingly.
 
 
Lord Morgue
10:09 / 07.09.04
Peter Garrett up the front chanting "Oils! Oils!"
Can you picture it? I don't think you can.
But as a Mistral employee once told me
you're only as good as your fans.

Each man destroys the thing he loves
the fisherman caught in his own net
it's scary but it's true
you deserve the fans you get.
 
 
Chiropteran
18:20 / 07.09.04
I would be the first to agree (if I had gotten to the thread earlier and y'all hadn't beaten me to it) that, for the most part, the Discordians of my experience have been a pretty lame bunch - the Monty Python-fan analogy is especially apt (and in fact these are many of the same people...).

But, at the same time, I wouldn't say that Discordianism and Erisian magic should be completely dismissed on account of all the annoying Popes running around. At the right time, in the right doses, the touch of Eris can be quite something.

My favorite explicitly Discordian story actually happened to a good friend of mine ("D"). He was on a long bus trip with another college friend, but for whatever reason they had to sit separately. So, D (extremely clean-cut, not at all the freaky type to look at) spends a few hours next to a middle-aged, paunchy, "good-ole-boy"-type businessman who spends most of the time talking about home brewery. Nothing at all remotely unusual passes between the two for the entire busride. At the station they say their goodbyes and go their separate ways. That's when D's friend says, "Hey, that guy you were sitting with gave me this to give to you." A mimeographed copy of the Principia Discordia. Fnord, indeed.

That's one of those moments when Universe warps just a little bit, and you can hear Eris laughing softly in your ear. Sorta like when my old manager (who had never engaged me in conversation before in two years of working for him, nor ever expressed any interest in esoteric subjects) walked up to me one day and started talking to me about the Law of Fives. Same thing happened to another friend of mine at her job, under similar conditions (IIRC). Little injections of weird where you don't expect them.

I think that the best, most fully-realized expression of Discordian values that I have yet seen is Rob Brezsny's The Televisionary Oracle (the full novel is online at his site). While I think the name Eris might be dropped once or twice, it is not explicitly tied to MAL-2's legacy -- but upon reading it, suddenly Discordianism made sense to me again in a completely different way than before, and I saw how -- taken deeper inside than the usual wacky in-jokes -- it could actually be a viable and uplifting way of interacting with Universe. And the plot of the story revolves largely around the breaking out of comfort zones and the real discord (though not strife) that arises when one feels their boundaries begin to shift.

Good book. :|

Anyway, to sum up: Discordianism? Tired, overplayed, done-to-death, and dumb-and-not-in-a-good-way. Except when it isn't.

~L
 
 
Lord Morgue
08:37 / 09.09.04
Actually, the Subbies are quite upfront about their mercenary ways. As they say- "Slack cannot be earned- it must be BOUGHT!" Unless, as they suggest, you simply borrow someone else's Book of the Subgenius and don't give it back.
 
 
Bard: One-Man Humaton Hoedown
04:58 / 20.09.04
Though the First:

Eris didn't quite start the Trojan War. Rather, she was kept out of the wedding because Hera didn't like the idea of inviting chaos to such an occasion. This is "The Original Snub". Eris wasn't happy about this, and decided to...well, I'm unsure here. She intended to cause chaos but, like all forms of chaos created by an outside course, the ensuing events were caused by others and, thus, unpredictable. That's why it's chaos. In the case of Eris, she presented a situation that showcased the incredible pettiness of the Olympian gods, rather like divine satire.

Then again, she's not exactly portrayed as a nice, cute, or funny figure in the Iliad, IIRC. Eris is the celestial shit disturber, she exists to turn order into chaos, to tear down the existing systems.

Thought the Second:

Here's a bit of a weird, counter-logical look at the "Original Snub":

The apple is made of gold. Gold was held by alchemists to be the purest metal, it is sometimes the symbol of the spirit, of the highest order of being. The apple is often portrayed as being a symbol of fertility. "To the fairest". Perhaps its an invitation, through chaos, for ascension. An allegory saying that transcendance is reached through chaos in the middle of material things, by ignoring what is seen and instead seeing what is implied.

...alternativly, a golden apple is one damn heavy fruit to bean an annoying deity over the head with. Just something to consider.
 
 
---
06:07 / 20.09.04
Thanks Bard, that's got me thinking in a different way.

I think whoever decided to wage war to get Helen back was the actual cause of the war aswell wasn't he? I'm sure there could of been other ways.

Maybe the apple was there as a lesson to the Gods that if you try and keep chaos and spontaneity out of things your in for a surprise.

I guess she has a tree full of apples waiting for the new world order if it really exists. The idea of chaos being an inherently bad thing needs to pass, especially in our current setting. If there's balance then creativity flows possibly as the positive side of chaos, but if it get's blocked and you get things like what we have them like now (computers running nearly everything, economy and strict rigid systems.) then Gods and Goddesses like Eris are surely always at hand to force change and manifest chaos in a more negative way simply to balance the flow. I don't know if the present system will be completely ripped up or just drastically changed, but in order to restore some type of harmony i'm sure Eris and co will do whatever has to be done.

I'm positive that the more rigid the present governments are with their growing rules, the bigger and more popular Eris will be, and people will come up with many rituals and workings in order to manifest her principles.

It's probably a story with the moral that if we (As a race) try to exclude something (Spontaneity) instead of just allowing it to be, then fine, but at some point something's going to explode in order to restore the balance.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:53 / 20.09.04
Maybe the apple was there as a lesson to the Gods that if you try and keep chaos and spontaneity out of things your in for a surprise.

Eris in Greek myth isn't spontaneity. She isn't wearing a pair of antlers on your head and saying "fnork". She is strife, the force that pulls things apart, the thing that gets people killed. Which, incidentally, is where the divine satire goes - lots of mortals suffer horribly, men are killed, women are raped, and Peleus and Thetis, to whose wedding Eris was not invited (no idea where you're getting Hera from, Bard) are punished: their son Achilles dies at Troy, far from his homeland. Orestes, following a path laid out for him by the murder of his father, Agamemnon, as a result of a) his wife's love affair with Aegisthus in his decade-long absence and b) Agamemnon's defilement of the priestly Cassandra, kills their grandson. Eris isn't satirising the pettiness of the gods: she's instantiating it, and in a manner that has nothing to do with unpredictability. If Proclus is to be believed, Zeus and Themis plan the whole thing, and Eris is just a patsy. It's all about the manifest will of Zeus...

The Judgement of Paris is not really mentioned much in the Iliad, nor is Eris. Although the word eris is used quite a bit, it is almost entirely in its abstract sense - Eris is personified in Book 4 and Book 11, I believe and in both cases is not about spontaneity or indeed chaos but the killing of men - she goes onto the battlefield.

If we're going to start handling source texts could we be a bit more careful? Otherwise you'll leave very obvious fingerprints all over them...

Speaking of which:

I think whoever decided to wage war to get Helen back was the actual cause of the war aswell wasn't he? I'm sure there could of been other ways.

Attempts to resolve the conflict without gratuitous bloodshed do indeed take place several times, both through embassy and through single combat. Although it covers only a brief period of the war itself, I think a read of the Iliad would be quite instructive, as it also represents the entire conflict in microcosm. Paperback versions are available for not very much money at all, and discussion to support the reader can be found here and here. I'm sure lots of people would be happy to help out in any way they could.
 
 
---
09:47 / 20.09.04
Thanks Haus, so even if she is strife, i think the lesson of that whole thing is that if she'd of been able to go to the wedding a lot of mortal lives would of been saved. In not even giving her the chance to be there (she could of been made to leave if she caused trouble?) things ended up a lot worse.

I'm not sure, i doubt i'd want strife turning up at my wedding, but by not giving that person the chance..........i just try and see lessons in stories like that and that's all i can see. This doesn't seem right. I'm now thinking that it's the fault of Athena, Hera, and Aphrodite for arguing over the apple in the first place.

This just seems crazy though, can you honestly see those three arguing over who is the best looking? That's why i try and look for the possible moral and meaning of such a thing, because it's just so strange. It's so strange i can't believe it anymore. Little kids would maybe argue over such a thing, but Athena, Hera and Aphrodite? They should have accepted their looks and not tried to be the prettiest, that's probably the moral right there, that if you're going to succumb to vanity on that level then trouble will follow.

I'm happier with this, thanks for pointing that out Haus.
 
 
---
09:52 / 20.09.04
-quickrot-
About the Iliad : i had it once from the library but didn't get to the end, same with Virgil's Aeneid. Also read some of Euripides, i'd go into the library and sit reading parts of it. I intend to read them all the way through if i get to them again.
-endrot-
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:24 / 20.09.04
Odd that you think that Athena, Aphrodite and Hera competing for the apple was vanity, but not that bowling it in there in the first place out of spite in order to set in motion events that lead to the ruin of Troy was not...

OK... first up, the apple wasn't to "The Prettiest" it was

τ&eta καλλιστη

(There should be an iota subscript on the two finishing etas, but unicode struggles with Ancient Greek accents)

καλοσ is a difficult word to translate entirely. It does mean "beautiful", but that's only one of the meanings - it is also connected with ideas of being morally good, of being noble, and also of being genuine. You'd call silver kalos if it was not adulterated.

So, it was a prize for the godess who was not only the most beautiful, but the most successful at being a goddess. In a timocratic society, such a goal is not only admirable and worth fighting for, but is possibly the only goal truly worth fighting for.

You're trying to think of Athena, Aphrodite and Hera as girls, comprehensible to your language and culture. They aren't. Neither, I very much suspect, is Eris, which is why the worship of Eris in the antlers-and-fnord sense seems to me a strange bedfellow with the idea of the Eris of antiquity, who is a rather different sort of being. The idea that one could eject her "if she caused trouble" rather shows how incomplete these conceptions are.
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
17:17 / 20.09.04
1. Eris is not strife. In some Greek mythology she is the mother of Strife, but she, herself, is not strife.

2. Discordianism, like any group of people, has a lot of idiots in it and stale, hackneyed ideas. For examples of this, see the OTO, GD, and the bulletin board you're looking at. This doesn't invalidate the group/organization/forum itself. How many sigil-related threads have we had in the Temple? Exactly. But still, some good can come of it.

For places where Discordia is alive, funny, and not stale there's always the Devia Discordia , this page from the Babylon Project, and DADA Worldwide .

It's not all stale.
 
 
---
18:00 / 20.09.04
OK thanks Haus, i'll throw in the towel on this one for now. There's no point in me making the thread longer with ideas that i haven't done the proper research for so i'll get back to the garden/apple/goddess/war problem hopefully when i've read up on the subject.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
18:39 / 20.09.04
1. Eris is not strife. In some Greek mythology she is the mother of Strife, but she, herself, is not strife.

Can you instantiate this in any way? You know, in the context of Eris being the Ancient Greek word for strife? Strife not being a common word before the cocking English language existed. Stop trying to sound learned and learn.

For future reference. Eris, personification of Strife. In Hesiod, represented as two deities, one a creature of malice and the other, borne of Nyx (Night) and Chronos (time), who drives men to better each other in a wide variety of fields. Homer, who seems to speak of only one Eris, has her as the brother of Ares, and so the daughter of Zeus, and associates her with the battlefield. As you might note, neither of these Erides makes a lot of sense in the apple-lobbing environment, which is possibly why she doesn't really crop up in that capacity in the Iliad.

Eris, daughter of Nyx, is listed in the Theogony (Hesiod) as the mother of Toil, Forgetfulness, Famine, Fights, Falsehoods, Pains and various other allegorical entities. But not of strife. Because she is Strife.
 
 
charrellz
20:26 / 20.09.04
It's true that the greek view of Eris is pretty dark and generally not nice; however, I think most people prefer the modern interpretation found in the Prinicpia Discord. I think most people here follow a rather post-modern view of choosing godforms and methods, so what's wrong with doing that in this situation? If we can use Buddhist meditation techniques without following any of Buddha's teachings, why can't we ignore the Greek version of Eris and use our own. Just because the Greeks were 'victims of indigestion,' why do we have to be aswell?

I whole-heartedly agree that alot of the sillyness is stale and just plain annoying. I'm very fond of the phrase, "Don't blame an idea for the people who believe in it."
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
20:46 / 20.09.04
Christ. Every time I think we've got belly-low...

After looking into it, you're largely correct. Obviously the place I read that she was the mother of Strife is not a common (or necessarily accurate) reference, although some Greek Myth considers her "Mother of strife" (ie a personification of strife) and others "Mother of Strife" (a separate deity.)

Still, I'm largely wrong and willing to admit it. You're right, but there was no need to take such a sarcastic, insulting tone with me. I'm quite surprised to see that coming from you, Haus, as I thought you were an informative and helpful type.
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
21:07 / 20.09.04
She is strife, the force that pulls things apart, the thing that gets people killed. Which, incidentally, is where the divine satire goes - lots of mortals suffer horribly, men are killed, women are raped, and Peleus and Thetis, to whose wedding Eris was not invited (no idea where you're getting Hera from, Bard) are punished: their son Achilles dies at Troy, far from his homeland.

Even Hesiod disagrees with you on this point, as it is clearly stated that there are both positives and negatives to Strife.

"(ll. 11-24) So, after all, there was not one kind of Strife alone, but all over the earth there are two. As for the one, a man would praise her when he came to understand her; but the other is blameworthy: and they are wholly different in nature. For one fosters evil war and battle, being cruel: her no man loves; but perforce, through the will of the deathless gods, men pay harsh Strife her honour due. But the other is the elder daughter of dark Night, and the son of Cronos who sits above and dwells in the aether, set her in the roots of the earth: and she is far kinder to men. She stirs up even the shiftless to toil; for a man grows eager to work when he considers his neighbour, a rich man who hastens to plough and plant and put his house in good order; and neighbour vies with is neighbour as he hurries after wealth. This Strife is wholesome for men. (my emphasis) And potter is angry with potter, and craftsman with craftsman, and beggar is jealous of beggar, and minstrel of minstrel."

Not unlike the Creative/Destructive sides of the Eristic Principle in the Principia Discordia, I just realized.
 
 
---
22:08 / 20.09.04
I don't think he meant it in a bad way Tom, i'm sure it's something to do with the probable fact that Eris is known to be Strife if you've read up on your Greek, something which i've not done either.

I agree with Charrellz aswell, we don't have to take things so literally when it comes to the modern interpretation of Eris, i'm just a bit of a history buff so i like to read up on these things, that's why i decided to leave it for a bit. It's good to see that positive reference too Tom, it means that i might not have been so far off the mark with my posts further up. When it comes down to it, each God, Goddess, Demon and Demoness serves a purpose that helps us to reach a goal so there's always something positive in each one of them. I just met an otherworldy Lady who i'm pretty sure confirmed this aswell, she was cool and possibly a relative of Eris herself.
 
 
Bard: One-Man Humaton Hoedown
23:20 / 20.09.04
Haus:
(no idea where you're getting Hera from, Bard)

According to my Classic Myth prof, at least, the wedding was organized by Hera for Peleus and Thetis.
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
07:04 / 21.09.04
Hang on, Tom TT - didn't Haus say there was a more benign Eris in Hesiod a couple of posts back? Ground already covered?
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
07:27 / 21.09.04
Well, I just read through every post Haus made on this thread again, and fail to see the post you're talking about. It's possible I missed it, but I couldn't find it. It's possible my brain turned off while reading, but I think you might be confused with another poster.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
07:30 / 21.09.04
I'd be interested in hearing where your Classics prof got that one, Bard... it may well be true, but it's not a version I can nail down. Possibly it's in a scholiast to the Cypria, but it doesn't make a lot of narrative sense - why would Eris punish Peleus and Thetis, when it was Hera's fault. Hera gets what she wants out of the war - the death of Paris and the destruction of Troy.

Tom Tit Tom: Generally, I am a helpful bundle of nice. However, one thing that does irritate me is lazy scholarship, especially *irresponsible* lazy scholarship passed off as knowledge.

although some Greek Myth considers her "Mother of strife" (ie a personification of strife) and others "Mother of Strife" (a separate deity.)

And you're still trying. Which Greek Myth? Where are your sources? And why the capitals? I am going to try to explain this again very slowly to demonstrate why I doubt your contention. "Eris" *means* strife. It is the Ancient Greek word for strife, as "phthonos" is the word for envy, or "deimos" is the word for terror. The Greek myths are not written in fucking English. So, "Eris, mother of strife" would be written as something like "Eris, Eridos mater" - Eris, mother of Eris. Do you understand? So, I see this as you trying to save face. If you can actually come up with a citation, then do so. Otherwise, stop trying to muddy the issue. Accept you were wrong - not "largely" wrong, just wrong - and get over it. Otherwise someone like Rob Frost is just going to believe whatever he has been told last, and is going to end up getting into terrible trouble.

Again, the Hesiod. You're misreading Hesiod in an attempt to make it seem that the person you are correcting is somehow unreliable. It's an ego-saving manoeuvre, and not a useful one. Two Strifes - Erides - one the battle-strife, one the daughter of Nyx that might be translated as "competitive instinct". Since the story of the apple is part of the cyclic epics (the Cypria, in fact), the Strife involved, we can assume, is the sister of Ares. Thus I think apple-Eris-bad we can assume is the *unwanted* Strife on account of the not being wanted at the wedding.

Ancient Greek as a language is highly focused on antithesis. What you have in the Works and Days is:

ouk ara mounon eên Eridôn genos, all' epi gaian
eisi duô: tên men ken epainesseie noêsas+,
hê d' epimômêtê: dia d' andicha thumon echousin.
hê men gar polemon te kakon kai dêrin ophellei,
schetliê: outis tên ge philei brotos, all' hup' anankês
athanatôn boulêisin Erin timôsi bareian.
tên d' heterên proterên men egeinato Nux erebennê...


The "ouk ara mounon" in the first line means "*But* not only" . "All'epi gaian" means "*but* (also) upon the Earth". That is the first balance. The second and third use "men" and "de", which are untranslatable emphasis marks expressing thesis-antithesis, sometimes indicated by "on the one hand... on the other hand"... "ten men"-"he de" (this one/that one) "he men gar" "ten d'heteren" (for this one/but this other one).

Two Erides - and I should point out that this distinction crops up in one piece, and seems forgotten by the Theogony, where Eris is back to being an absolute pain, and a unity, represented as the daughter of Nyx. One might, if one were trying to look at things in a slightly more complex way, see Hesiod in the Works and Days as speaking of divine Eris (war-strife) and human eris (the compulsion to do well in contest with one's peers), which, since it is bordered by the time one has to work and the end of work brought on by the arrival of night, is the child of Chronos and Nyx.

However, that is unnecessarily complex for now, I suspect. So, where's the problem? The problem is that you don't know what you are talking about, and are not ready to accept that, or indeed to use the source texts once you are driven to them as anything other than a figleaf for your previously-displayed complacency. And Eris is a dangerous deity. If you lot don't know the language, the history or the culture of a goddess whose major exploit involved not antlers or rotating bow ties but genocide, how on Earth are you going to worship the nicer, newer Eris safely?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
07:51 / 21.09.04
Also, interestingly, the Evelyn-White translation, which you are using above, translates "monoun een Eridon genos" as "one kind of strife alone". However, "Eridon" is a genitive plural - which again argues against the reading you are putting on it of their being only one Eris with "positive and negative aspects". Again, go to the original.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:01 / 21.09.04
To address Charrelz excellent question - I'd suggest a difference between using Buddhist practices and deciding to summon Kali having read the pamphlet entitled "Kali is Way Kool" by the Kool Kali Kollective and nothing else. The Kali in "Kali is Way Kool" may attempt to belittle and downplay the Hindus who came up with the name, as the alternative is lots of tedious research, but that does not alter the fact that Kali is not purely and simply the smiley dayglo funbundle who helps the kids to rescue their pets in "Kali is Way Kool". There is more going on.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:05 / 21.09.04
I think K-C C is referring to this paragraph, TTT:

For future reference. Eris, personification of Strife. In Hesiod, represented as two deities, one a creature of malice and the other, borne of Nyx (Night) and Chronos (time), who drives men to better each other in a wide variety of fields. Homer, who seems to speak of only one Eris, has her as the brother of Ares, and so the daughter of Zeus, and associates her with the battlefield. As you might note, neither of these Erides makes a lot of sense in the apple-lobbing environment, which is possibly why she doesn't really crop up in that capacity in the Iliad.
 
 
Seth
08:28 / 21.09.04
I haven't laughed this much reading Barbelith in ages. Surely it's supposed to be the crazy Discordians that have us in stitches, not the snarky classicists?
 
 
Seth
08:34 / 21.09.04
I think most people here follow a rather post-modern view of choosing godforms and methods

While it's not worth conducting a census, I'd point out that there are many people here who certainly don't favour this view, as well as those who, taking the merits of that approach, see it as being far more complex. Personally I like my conception of YHVH as the God of Kinder Surprise, so when people mention that this is at odds with Judeo-Christian texts I tend to counter with, "Well, let's agree to disagree."
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:07 / 21.09.04
Incidentally, I confess that I had assumed that TTT had *read* my citation of Hesiod, "Works and Days" above before quoting the exact same passage, so that would be why that sounded a bit peremptory. But honestly.
 
 
Bard: One-Man Humaton Hoedown
17:50 / 21.09.04
I'd be interested in hearing where your Classics prof got that one, Bard... it may well be true, but it's not a version I can nail down. Possibly it's in a scholiast to the Cypria, but it doesn't make a lot of narrative sense - why would Eris punish Peleus and Thetis, when it was Hera's fault. Hera gets what she wants out of the war - the death of Paris and the destruction of Troy.

I'll ask her during office hours tonight, Haus. As to why she'd punish Thetis and Peleus...I wouldn't really consider it punishing them. I'd think it would just be to make a point, via chaos, that she should have been invited. I mean...it's celestial gate crashing. I'm not really sure you NEED a specific target.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
17:52 / 21.09.04
You wouldn't consider the death of their son and grandson punishment?

Wow. Are you living in Alabama?
 
 
betty woo
18:18 / 21.09.04
Brief interjection on the original thread focus, before y'all get back to the classics:

I've done a fair bit of work with the Discordian paradigm, although I'm a bit reluctant to acknowledge that in public, mostly for the reasons that Mordant/Haus/etc have mentioned. I find it to be a useful frameset for working with both order and chaos, and the constantly shifting balance between the two. Most of my workings involve trying to reset the balance between Aneristic and Eristic energies in my life, or delving into one aspect in order to determine places where its opposite is being masked (since both principles are apparent, rather than actual).

I've done invocations of Eris in the past, but I've gotten (slightly) smarter since then. Mostly I'm interested in placating her these days; Eris is typically a route to either a/ get what I asked for in the most painful and circuitous method possible or b/ get slapped hard for not being precisely clear about intent and desire.

Also, I get a sick joy out of encoding passwords for the office with mentions of her. Giving a nod to Eris as I log in each morning tends to make the day just a little more unpredictable.
 
 
SteppersFan
20:04 / 21.09.04
I do like discordian stuff and have an abiding affection for "bob"* but I do find it all terribly intellectually demanding.

Back to nappies.

* speaking of "bob", did anyone see the golf? Fucking fantastic! Monty's a star! Every time I drive a flailer off the garage roof into next door's garden I think of him...
 
  

Page: 1(2)3

 
  
Add Your Reply