BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Stupid Creation Questions

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
Saveloy
14:00 / 18.06.04
Photography

Is there a proper technique for doing panoramic montage thingies - where you take several photographs which make a larger scene when stuck together - without mucking up the perspective?

Take a look at this example here:

Tower

This was done by standing in a single spot (in front of the middle of the assembled picture), turning to the far left and taking the first pic; turning a bit to the right and taking another pic, turning a bit more etc etc.

Now, this has had the effect of distorting the picture - the hand rail near the bottom shows it best. In reality the handrail is completely straight and would, if the scene had fitted into one shot, run parallel with the bottom of the picture. It curves away in the montage because with each turn the photographer was seeing it at a different angle.

SO - would it be possible to photograph the same scene (in sections) without introducing distortion (or at least minimising it)?

I'm guessing that one way might be for the photographer to move sideways from left to right and always point the camera at the centre of the subject, so that there is always one focal point. Or would that just cause distortion in the other direction?
 
 
Grey Area
14:33 / 18.06.04
Trying to visualise things in my mind, and so far I can't think of any method of taking a panoramic view that doesn't involve distortion. There are special cameras out there that swivel the lens in an arc close to 180 degrees, but if all you have is a normal 35mm, then you're going to have to live with distortion in one form or another.

The technique you described as a possible alternative seems to me to result in a (somewhat) 3-d view of the photographed object...not really a panorama unless you focus on a dot on the horizon and want a panorama of a wedge-shaped chunk of scenery between yourself and that point.
 
 
Grey Area
14:37 / 18.06.04
whaddaknow, there actually an International Association of Panoramic Photographers, whose site provides links to members' sites. You might find some technical tips on these...
 
 
Saveloy
14:46 / 18.06.04
Wow, excellent! Cheers, Grey Area.

[typed up before I saw your link]:

You're right, in fact it's probably the worst method of all, now I think of it - an object at the centre of the picture is, if you move far enough to each side, going to end up having two of its opposite sides in the picture at the same time. I'm going to have to try this anyway just to see what it looks like.
 
 
William Sack
10:18 / 23.06.04
I want to paint the wall of a children's bedroom as the sky, i.e. blue with fluffy white clouds and maybe an aeroplane with a vapour trail. Now sky seems to be lighter near the horizon and gets steadily and seamlessly darker the higher you go. Is there any straightforward way of doing this with a roller and emulsion? Would a uniform blue look just fine? Any other tips or ideas, artistic or practical, for my wall?
 
 
Grey Area
15:00 / 23.06.04
I's suggest trying this on a piece of wood or a wall that you're going to paint over or suchlike, as I haven't tried it (but I think it'll work):

Start from the top and roll down. The roller will lose paint as it rolls (might have to start with very little paint on it). Therefore, as you approach the horizon, you should be leaving less paint behind. Every so often, roll sideways with next to no paint on your roller, blurring the streaks into each other without adding paint to the layer. This should result in a darker blue at the top, and a lighter blue towards the horizon.

As stated, I'd recommend trying this somewhere else. Or maybe as a first attempt that you can then paint over in a uniform blue if it doesn't work and you've got no other suggestions on how to do it.

Making clouds: Get a bin-bag or shopping bag, crumple it up, dip in white paint and stipple onto wall. You'll get a lovely crumpled texture.
 
 
Ethan Hawke
15:46 / 23.06.04
Can i use masking tape (or any other kind of tape) with oil paints in order to get crisp, straight lines? Can I put the tape down over surfaces that have already been painted?
 
 
Linus Dunce
16:54 / 23.06.04
Todd -- Yes, you can. Do not use any other kind of tape but masking tape. Anything else will be too sticky and will indeed pull paint off from underneath.

Do not overload your brush or the paint will seep under the tape, ruining your lovely straight lines. Remove the tape before the new paint has completely dried but not while it's still wet if you see what I mean. And even though masking tape is not very sticky, wait as long as you can before putting it on top of previously painted areas.
 
 
Linus Dunce
17:00 / 23.06.04
Actually, you used to be able to get a water-soluble rubbery mask that you would spray onto the surface. Then you would make your lines with a razor blade and peel off the bits you didn't need, paint your painty bits and then peel off the remainder of the mask. Hey presto! I think that would work very well with layers of oil paint.

I bought some years ago from a custom car supply shop. Maybe it's still available. I needed to borrow a decent spraygun to apply it but you can hire those.
 
 
Sax
18:07 / 23.06.04
A question for those who are published (or those who aren't but know the answer): what's "industry standard" royalty percentage on a first novel?
 
 
grant
14:05 / 25.06.04
Cash: I've been a painter before (of the "walls" variety, not the "pictures" variety) and the only way I know to really do what you're talking about is to paint a uniform blue, then use a wash of white paint, probably diluted by more than half with water.

What you could try is painting a white line at your horizon and smudging it upwards with a wet rag as you go. OR you could dilute the white even more and rag it on (meaning: dunk rag in paint and smear it over the wall), paying more attention to the horizon and less to the upper reaches of the sky.

Grey Area: that method you describe simply won't work. Rollers, decent ones, hold too much paint, and when they run out, it's never uniform -- always blotchy, with lines of unpainted stuff in regular patterns among the painted stuff. And, because there's not that much paint there, it tends to dry quickly. With a little work, this might make interesting cloudy patterns, but another problem is with the edges of the roller being so nice and even. Lots of straight lines.

The plastic bag thing might work, though. (I'd just use a crumpled rag with undiluted white paint, then smudge around the edges with a torn paper towel, but that's because I'm used to how they work.) Might also be interesting to mix a little yellow or orange into the white for clouds reflecting sunlight.
 
 
William Sack
12:13 / 29.06.04
Many thanks Grey Area and Grant. Project Sky has slipped down the to-do list but I'll let you know how it went when I get round to it.
 
 
aluhks SMASH!
02:54 / 30.06.04
if I need high quality scans made of 11x14 black and white photographs, where should I go to get this done? And what would be a reasonable amount to expect to pay per print scanned?
 
 
Grey Area
10:24 / 30.06.04
For scanning from negative, I've used these people before: Filmscanning.co.uk. The cost per scan is OK, and postage and packaging is £5 per order, so it's not too bad. The likes of Jessops might offer a similar service at a cheaper price, although with these things the rule that you get what you pay for is a solid guideline.
 
 
Grey Area
10:31 / 30.06.04
A gear question from me: I bought myself a Tamrac Expedition photo backpack on Ebay. Now I discover that there's not enough dividers in there. Does anyone have
a) Some spare dividers lying around that they want rid of?
or
b) Any idea of a store that might sell dividers? Tamrac have told me they don't sell replacement dividers, and Jessops are useless.
 
 
lekvar
10:36 / 30.06.04
Linus- Are you talking about Liquid Frisket? I know you can also use rubber cement to the same effect, and cheaper, too...

My question:
Once upon a time an artist showed me how to lay out a standard piece of bristol board for use with comics, thereby eliminating the need to buy those packs of pre-printed sheets with the bleed, live area, page borders, etc. Unfortunately that was one of the pieces of information I drank away in my 20's. Does anybody have the measurements, reduction percentage, or a link to a template?
 
 
Ethan Hawke
12:25 / 01.07.04
Update: Blue painter's tape, the kind you can buy at the hardware store, worked wonderfully. I can't believe I've lived without it. I'm told you can buy it in 1/2" and 1/4" widths as well, which I should certainly get. Thanks for your help.
 
 
wembley can change in 28 days
11:01 / 06.07.04
Question: Live video feed from a digital still camera

So. I have an idea for my Antigone that I want the Chorus to be on a TV monitor, but I don't have a digital video camera, nor do I have the funds to get one. However, many of my friends have digital cameras, and many of these seem to have A/V outs. Does this mean I can hook it up to a TV monitor or video projector and have a character act on-screen? I'm planning on having the camera set in one place, so no worries about tripping over cables. Will the image quality be good? How will I pick up sound? Any other considerations?
 
 
grant
19:14 / 06.07.04
Depends on the camera. I've got some kind of Canon that will record mini-movies (like 2 minutes max or something), and has an onboard mike for grabbing sound. The picture's not too bad, either. I think live-wise, the picture would move just as smoothly as it does on the camera monitor/view-screen. Look for latency, though -- there may be a half-second or so lag between the time the chorus moves and the movement of their image on-screen.

Even if you had a digital video camera, though, I'd recommend miking your chorus separately with something halfway decent placed up close to them. Camera mikes tend to be not that great, and for whatever reason, we like to have sounds up close even when pictures are far away... like far enough to get more than one person on your TV screen.

Also, with many digital camera models, power might be a problem -- you don't want to run out of batteries halfway through a performance, and I don't think any cameras have a plug for power from the wall socket.

Design-wise, it'd look really cool if you had a whole bunch of TV screens, each with one member of the chorus on it. That'd be awesome.
 
 
lekvar
06:26 / 07.07.04
Wembly-
My assumption here is you're talking about a live feed to a monitor instead of a pre-recorded one. Most digital cameras work as webcams if you can find the appropriate software for your OS of choice. The next step would be to tweek the settings so you have as little latency as possible (most webcam software seems to have some kind of throughput function). The quality will depend on the camera, but assuming your audience will be more than 5 feet from the monitor I don't think that'll be a huge issue.
 
 
Squirmelia
10:25 / 06.08.04
This is quite a stupidly paranoid question - I'm just wondering how damaging to household implements making papier mâchè might be. A book I own says to use a food processor to get it to a good pulpiness - I don't actually own a food processor, but if I bought one, to use with food, would using it for this damage it?

A website says:

"To make a pulp, soak some torn up newspaper in water overnight. Drain, and then boil in some clean water for about 30 minutes, until the fibres start to break up. Sieve the pulp and throw away the water. Beat or whisk the pulp to break up the fibres. Mix the adhesive into the pulp until it forms a clay-like consistency."

Again, is boiled newspaper a scary substance that will mean I should no longer use my saucepans or beating implements for food, or will any remainders just add flavour?
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
13:29 / 06.08.04
I've never heard of any sinister tales associated with newspaper pulp (and it should be v easy to clean out of pans etc. when it's still wet and sloppy). I dunno about your hypothetical food processor, mind.
 
 
dsalvatore
01:49 / 21.08.04
Squirmelia--As long as one cleaned the food processor before using food in it again, there'll be no problem. But soaking the pulp works just fine too. The only time you need to get it as fine as a food processor makes it is if you're making "paper clay"--in which case I've found it works better to use tissue paper than newspaper.
 
 
John Octave
21:11 / 26.08.04
Here's a question:

What's the ratio of words to the final printed page in a standard novel? Stephen King says 2000 words amounts to about ten pages, but that can't be right, can it? There has to be either more words or fewer pages in that ratio, right?

I'm just trying to get a sense of how much I'm writing and my output seems unusually high according to King's figure.
 
 
grant
17:29 / 27.08.04
Well, you could just count the words on a page of a novel and work it out from there....

>>>>

I have a question I asked on another board that I'm going to repeat here.

1. In my household, there is a baby who goes to daycare. She often brings back respiratory infections.

2. I never get enough sleep, which compromises my immune system, which means I tend to get bronchitis/laryngitis more often than I would like (moreso after doing my own soundproofing with dusty, dusty acoustic tiles last year, and moreso after picking up the pneumonia from the Chongqing smog last Christmas). Lately, my colds head straight for the throat.

3. I've been singing with a band lately.


What does a person in a situation like this do to preserve/maintain any kind of voice right now?

I ask mainly because I have a practice tonight and woke up talking like Don Corleone. (Why do you come to me now, on the day of my daughter's wedding?) Singing on Wednesday night after the mike stopped working might have been ill advised.

Any other vocal tips and exercises are also appreciated... as well as links to online voice-as-instrument resources.
 
 
John Octave
22:53 / 27.08.04
Heh. Counting words in a book. Why didn't I think of that? (Well, possibly because I'm a lazy bastard.) Thanks for the lateral thinking; I've got my answer now.
 
 
Squirmelia
17:52 / 02.04.05
Art Techniques

At a local exhibition, I saw some lovely pictures made with encaustic wax (coloured wax that is melted). Does anyone have experience with it and have any tips on using it? Should I buy an iron or a stylus? There are various websites that exist, such as Arts Encaustic that I've found and seen various places in the UK that sell the iron and stylus, etc. A nearby library has the book Encaustic Art, How to Paint with Wax, so I might order that.
 
 
Olulabelle
11:24 / 03.04.05
I went through a stage of making Encaustic wax pictures when I was a teenager because someone gave me a kit, and also because my Mum's a candlemaker we always got to muck about with wax as children. Encaustic wax pictures are fun to make, but I recall I found them fairly limiting and I only made lots of hilly landscapes and trees. I had a little iron but I think a stylus might be more useful.
 
 
Jackie Susann
23:03 / 26.08.06
If you have a story where the narration is pretty much like limited third person, but in different chapters it follows different characters, would you consider that to be limited third or omniscient?
 
 
Alex's Grandma
14:01 / 27.08.06
Limited third, I'd say - omniscience usually has a wider range (like following 10 characters, not 2 or 3) and sometimes a "dear reader" type authorial voice, like in Middlemarch or Vanity Fair.
 
 
Princess
17:48 / 07.09.06
The novella. Turns out I was writing one (this actually did come as a shock), are they really as unnatractive to publishers as the internet tells me they are?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
17:51 / 07.09.06
I think most people who get novellas published do so after they've already sold some bigger books, and as part of collections and anthologies. Jack and others will know more than me, though.
 
 
Jack Fear
18:33 / 07.09.06
Depends on what kind of story it is. The general mainstream/"literary" short-fiction market in general has contracted considerably, and has grown particularly hostile to longer works. Most of the remaining magazines that focus primarily on fiction are genre magazines—fantasy, SF, mystery, horror—and many of them feature a novella or two in every issue.
 
 
Princess
18:41 / 07.09.06
Literary fiction. Shit. Now, where to find another 50,000 words...
 
 
Jack Fear
18:45 / 07.09.06
How long is this draft? It might be easier to cut 3,000 than add 50,000...
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply