BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Banishing..!

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
Unconditional Love
15:07 / 14.04.07
Of course the metaphor could have no land lord at all, but what if the consequences of that meant drug addict, alcoholic, non working, non caring person that layed in bed most of the day and didnt give a shit about anything, but getting drunk drugged and fucked as often as possible, without a real care for himself or anybody else.

Some houses and community's need a very firm hand to prosper and mine is one of them, until my eyes are opened to something else that works just as well without degenrating into my former state of dysfunction.
 
 
Haloquin
16:24 / 14.04.07
Wolfangel; And the metaphor is presumably an internal one, not related to external beings that have been there longer than you?

Decrescent Daytripper; Banishing in terms of bad habits... I'm not sure why you have a problem with the idea of clearing out the rubbish you accumulate that contributes to bad habits?

The energy you put into enacting the bad habits, yes, that can be redirected, but if there are patterns you want to ditch totally, not just change, then perhaps banishing those patterns(and the energetic muck accumulated in them) is appropriate...
Banishing in terms of 'clearing away' is a valid type of banishing, just as telling conscious things to clear off. Or at least, last I heard it was.

It reminds me of the phrase; 'banish it from your mind'. Although that does have different connotations.
 
 
Unconditional Love
19:40 / 14.04.07
Yes it is about internal states as much as it is about intrenally perceived relationships to different parts of the self.

Since writing it out thou i wonder if such a rigid dogmatic approach to the organization of selves is not part of the problem, but at present i don't seem to have any other way that doesn't create mental chaos and social and physical decline. Perhaps with time and more internalized mental discipline i will be able to relax with regards to certain areas of my life. But first off i think i need to continue to banish whats unwanted, introduce more acceptable elements and slowly but surely relax my hold over myself as i gain more self trust over parts of myself that have been largely reactive rather than driven by conscious action.

The sunlight and fire metaphor seems most appropriate to illustrate what is trying to be achieved, if one considers these demons as beings like vampires that feed upon your own sense of self dignity and honour and your ability to trust your own judgement.
 
 
Mako is a hungry fish
11:34 / 15.04.07
I like the Chinese five element theory, and think that the phase of metal relates to banishing...

During the Metal phase, energy once again begins to condense, contract, and draw inward for accumulation and storage, just as the crops of summer are harvested and stored in autumn for use in winter. Wastes are eliminated, like winnowing chaff from wheat, and only the essence is kept in preparation for the nonproductive Water phase of winter...

...Autumn is the season of retrospection and meditative insight, for shedding old skin and dumping the excess baggage of external attachments and emotions accumulated in summer, just as trees shed their leaves and bees drive drones from the hive at this time of year. Resisting this energy by clinging sentimentally to past attachments can cause feelings of melancholy, grief, and anxiety, which manifest themselves physiologically in breathing difficulties, chest pain, skin problems, and low resistance...

...Just as Metal is a refined extract of Earth forged by Fire, so autumn is the season for extracting and refining essential lessons from the activities and experiences of summer, transforming them into the quiet wisdom of winter.
 
 
This Sunday
14:51 / 15.04.07
Banishing in terms of bad habits... I'm not sure why you have a problem with the idea of clearing out the rubbish you accumulate that contributes to bad habits?

I guess it just seems to me (a) unnecessary, and (b) a little too on the side of conveniently forgetting. As opposed to just using what you've got and doing something useful (or, barring that, entertaining) with it. I'm not sure I believe in negative feelings or that kind of badness. Frustration, sorrow, or plain old nervousness have their very useful uses. Letting them direct you to unsavory or otherwise unhealthy habits isn't really because of the sorrow or anxiety or whatever, is it? It's how you use the feelings, how you use the situation or ambience, that seems to me important, and I can think of habits, tics or tendencies that should and can be, well, put out of practice, but not a feeling or an idea, per se.

I want to remember all the things I had wrong, not in the sense that I believe them, knowing they're wrong, but that's not banishing them, it's just shifting them from being a belief to the memory or recognition of a belief. Or a tic, habit, reflexive thingy you do, what have.
 
 
Haloquin
17:48 / 15.04.07
That makes a definite kind of sense, and as I said above, I prefer the idea of transmuting energies to just getting rid of them.

I'm not sure that banishing has to involve forgetting, and I wonder if a helpful metaphor is to compare some types of banishing to sweeping out the dust after you've rearranged the furniture. But then sometimes I assume people can't just move the furniture around, I can't speak from experience but I can imagine sometimes it feels necessary for individuals to just remove all their furniture and start from scratch.

Plus i would argue that sometimes certain emotions/feelings are detrimental, not useful, some fears have no genuine use and yet, even though you're working on them, they won't quite go away yet... so you can banish them... knowing that you have a problem, knowing that you need to or are working on it, and yet not being able to deal with it at that moment... or while in that state. Banishing and ignoring the problem, that can't be helpful, but banishing the current emotional state and working on the cause, why not?
 
 
---
20:01 / 15.04.07
Apologies if I offended any banishers with the whole fuck banishing stuff back there, I was pretty drunk when I posted that.

I still stand by most of the post though, and it's also good to see the Chinese 5 Element theory linked here too, think I'm a lot closer to a natural version of that process rather than doing specific rituals for banishing. So people that use that would maybe use the autumn (IIRC) for letting go of as many problems as possible in preperation for storing energy through the winter, then being prepared for the start of a new cycle and the Wood/Spring element of the following year.
 
 
illmatic
07:20 / 16.04.07
Firstly, kudos to Saturn's Nod for an awesome post. I really need to think more on that one before I can respond properly.

but that's not banishing them

Daytripper, no offense intended, but what you've posted in this thread reads to me more like you have a semantic hangup over the word "banishing" more than anything else. We each have our own reading of certain words, and in relation to magic, the word "banishing" connotes a unique set of ideas or principles to you which you object to.

This is why practice and experience are important - because IMO, what you are objecting to isn't actually found in most banishings. When you start to dig a little deeper, banishings aren't banishings at all. Above, I was trying to expand on my experience of using a certain banishing and drawing comparisons with with NLP and anchoring i.e. the ritual I was talking about was more about "changing state" than "banishing". The most widely known banishing in Western magick - the LBRP - isn't a "banishing", IMO. It's a ritual re-affirmation of Christian mysticism and an exploration of qabalistic/hermetic symbolism. Saturn's Nod's post can also be taken as a reinterpretation of the idea of "banishing" - "getting rid of" become a reconnection to one's highest principles.

So, basically, I think you should ground your post in your own experiences, rather than talking in the abstract. What have you tried to banish? When? Have you used banishing rituals drawn from the Western tradition or others? What were the results?

it's also good to see the Chinese 5 Element theory

I agree. I would like Mako to expand on how s/he use this though. Is it simply an idea you find attractive? Or is something that you have actively used in your own life? If so, how?
 
 
This Sunday
08:08 / 16.04.07
Perhaps it is a semantic hang-up, though I would argue we live and breath semantics, or at least information. I'm just putting out there that I've never had a problem or difficulty with not banishing anything, and find the idea a little too work-oriented in that it seems to be effort for itself rather than solving something efficiently. This goes for the classic Lesser Banishing, as well as other forms.

If there's a benefit to the additional effort, great. I'm saying I don't see the benefit in banishing versus just dealing with the particulars - fear, addiction, bitter spirits or flying monks from the 83rd Heaven - on a basis of accepting their existence and state and then setting down very simple groundrules of behaviour or direction.

I was hoping someone would have a clearcut example of a situation where the banishing was integral and entirely the best way to handle/fix.

I'm not giving examples of my attempts at banishing because there aren't any. I've never seen the point. And I think the unpleasant effects could outweigh the only positive effect I can see coming from it, which would be the doing itself. In the same sense that I'm not going to test my theory that shooting blindly into the distance might accidentally hurt someone by picking up a pistol and firing vaguely westward.

If I wanted to test a theory of that shooting being less effective to hit X instead of Y, I would, yes, go try and shoot X. I wouldn't, on the other hand, shoot X if I thought there was a more efficient way to get X, if I thought there was a risk Y would also be hit.

I wouldn't set up a news station and attempt to be the news distributor over the local airwaves if I thought everyone were being served just fine by another form of news dissemination.

So, really, it was just a question of efficiency, that I may've phrased badly. Simply put: Has anyone had a circumstance that required banishing as the most efficient and fundamentally-functional way to deal? Because I haven't and I'm curious as to what particulars would result in such a situation.
 
 
This Sunday
08:08 / 16.04.07
Which has been answered to my satisfaction, if not in the directions I had hoped. So, thanks to those who have commented.
 
 
Quantum
10:46 / 16.04.07
What about banishing for others? I gave some advice to a friend who reckons their house is haunted, i.e. clean up, burn some sage, sweep the dust out the door and put a line of salt across the threshhold, telling it to begone, that sort of thing.
It's my suspicion it's just a spooky seeming wardrobe and not haunted, but in theory that will help if there is something there, and if not it will make them feel better and less afraid of the wardrobe. Since the fear is the problem I figured that was best, but does anyone have experience of banishing for others?
 
 
Haloquin
11:31 / 16.04.07
I have recommended similar things to a friend of mine who tends to chalk up all her spooky experiences in childhood to the mental disturbance she was experiencing and tries to avoid accepting that theres anything real in it in case she heads down the path of madness/escapism again, in her words. In that case if there is anything minor it tends to be cleared and if its just psychological the actions help settle the person involved, I explained this theory to her and she did it and it helped.

The older pagan soc members tend to warn the first years off bothering spirits in places, the Old Building particularly is rather haunted and has apparently retaliated strongly when people have tried banishing it, the impression most people get is that its old, sleepy and grumpy and hates to be bothered, its been there a lot longer than we have and will be here longer than we will. During the halloween magic phase I was taking fairy-dust round campus, I checked with each area as I sprinkled it and the Old Building very firmly said I wasn't to put any near it, so I didn't.

On the other hand, when something was bothering a friend in a different building he asked a couple of us to help, and the other girl, having much more experience than me, apparently, with banishing entities elected to take the lead, so I mostly watched, held the space and swept up the parts I sensed that were causing trouble. She did something very odd, she channeled it through her own body to deal with it. I am very much of the opinion that I don't want to put anyone elses rubbish into my body if theres any other way of dealing with it, but she didn't trust me to hold the space strongly enough and thought it was the best way (we hadn't long met). She was thinking of it as an impression of a person, a memory that the building had, and sent it on to whereever it is ghost-type things go.

Apparently this helped clear the air. But I'm still not happy with how it was done. I got the impression she was taking in too much too fast, I checked, she confirmed, and I held some of what she was channelling through her self, although there was no way I'd hold it in me.

I think what was happening was a general clearing out of emotional/energetic rubbish other people had left behind, which was effecting the people in the flat, but I'm still not sure that the method was good.
 
 
Saturn's nod
12:26 / 16.04.07
When I've moved house I have usually felt like I wanted to do a consecration ceremony with the new dwelling. I think that comes into this because it's about moving away the old patterns and filling the space left with deliberate invocation of the good stuff I'm aiming towards. Does anyone else do that kind of thing as a way of changing a pattern they're manifesting?

I like to do a big ceremony with flower/candle offerings in every room, and circle the space following one wall. I start by going round just sensing what's there, and I gues this would tell me if it was inappropriate to go forward with the ceremony, though I hope I might have caught any indication of a bad mismatch between me and the dwelling before moving in. In my imagination, emotional content from people who previously lived there kindof accretes around the walls and in the corners, like dust would if not cleaned, which I think is similar to what you're saying, Haloquin.

Then after a sensing round, I go round the circuit again and clap, (the sharp noises of clapping seem to disperse the sense of stuck old resonances). Then several more rounds: sprinkling holy water, wafting incense, then declaration of intention with bells and light and so on. I learned most of that from Karen Kingston's space clearing writing, which has some great bits. She's a definite advocate for space clearing and house consecration as a way of changing your patterns.

I guess my conceptual angle is, in the first few stages I am making a clear space - banishing - as I get rid of the previous stuff which might attach to me and provide extra work if I didn't move it on. But what is more important to me is to fill that space with blessing and my intentions so the space supports and reflects my intention in every way.

My sense is, if I didn't positively fill the space with my intentions it would end up being filled with less conscious layers of stuff. I think our surroundings have the potential to assist or detract from our attempts to live in accordance with our highest aims: the more consciously and deliberately I interact with my space the more likely it is to help keep me in my intention.

My husband & I did this for New Year in January - spent three days clearing clutter out and then spent most of a day doing a ceremony to bless us and the house for the new year. Feels like I need to do it again already, perhaps because I've been away so much I haven't felt v connected to the space here. Housework, eh?
 
 
Mako is a hungry fish
01:49 / 17.04.07
Is it simply an idea you find attractive? Or is something that you have actively used in your own life? If so, how?

I actively use it, to the point where I've instilled (or perhaps invited) a metal dragon essence into a metal dragon sculpture I have; it's made from nuts and bolts and scraps of metal that have been ordered into a form with a function. Even if I didn't consciously practice the elemental phases, I'd still practice them as they cover a great deal of life, however awareness of them and their interaction just seems to make things go smoother; for instance, when throwing a party (water) things go better if the place is tidied up (metal) however if this order is applied as the party is in full swing (wood) it will most likely dull the mood.

Banishing is basically about throwing out the trash and getting things in order, as is the phase of metal.
 
 
Mako is a hungry fish
02:15 / 17.04.07
Ahh. Well, I suppose that depends on if they have somewhere to go that they DO belong, and if that's where you're sending 'em. The few times I've been involved in banishing, it was a matter of saying "Not only do you not belong here, but your presence is harmful, and we find it unacceptable. GO HOME!"


Sometimes things that need to be banished are well aware that they don't belong and their presence is harmful, and are actually attracted to this. Sending them back home is like sending a kid to their room, complete with mini fridge and PS3, and provides little insentive for them or their friends to play nice in future; sending them to places where they really don't belong, that are harmful to their presence, can subdue their sense of mischief.

Though it might be more productive to simply make friends with them.
 
 
guitargirl
07:19 / 17.04.07
If anyone has bad luck, I bloody do. Crashed a brand new car, got another, it went wrong, cost me £300 to put right then the "big end" went within 2 days, car now dead. Lots of shit with the boss - resulting in my making a complaint to HR which after 3 month still hant been investigated..plus a whole heap of other crap that I cant even bring myself to post about. Uncrossing? I need shooting.

PS sorry about any typos, just had my nails done yesterday.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
08:18 / 17.04.07
Saturn - thanks for that thought-provoking post, which has helped articulate some of my recent musings on banishing rituals. I think that what you wrote about establishing your relation to a new abode is particularly significant, as it brings up what for me is a key component of the whole banishing argument - our relationship to space. I think it would be fairly obvious to anyone who's ever performed the Lesser Banishing Ritual (or its many modern derivatives) that it is, at root, a structural orientation towards particular kinds of spatial relationships - an "ordering" and establishment of hierarchical arrangements. Also, ook at the number of "introductory" texts that assert that the banishing ritual is equivalent to "casting a circle" - the place in which magic "takes place" - and often, with the implication that magic can only happen within this space. If anything, this reinforces the perceived division between the "magical" and the "mundane" (or the temporal and the spiritual). I would argue that this is a cultural artefact - very much a product of western thinking about boundaries and our concept of "private space" and very much bound up with our conceptions of individuality and autonomy, and highlights the importance of being able to control access to that space (which I think is a major subtext in banishing discourse). If we look at the conceptualisation of privacy, identity & spatial relationships in other cultures, it's often very different to that of the overdeveloped world (there has been some interesting work done on these relationships and their reflection in ritual practices in Balinese culture, by Gregory Bateson, and Hoyt Edge).

I think that one instance where we can look at the ambiguities of our spatial relationships is when we do rituals outdoors. I've never been comfortable (even when I did use ceremonial-style banishing rituals, which I haven't for nearly ten years) with doing them "outdoors". It just didn't seem appropriate. I have on several occasions though, participated in outdoor rituals with others and come away with the feeling that some magicians tend to treat "nature" as a big room. Probably the most ridiculous example I can recall of this was a ritual which was planned so that participants would hide behind trees (I think it was something to do with Robin Hood) yet of course, when we all arrived at the ritual site, there were no trees for miles around and so the whole thing quickly became rather farcical. My suggestion that we either find some trees or call the whole thing off was met with derision.

And Apophenia - I don't think what Descent is saying is just a "semantic hangup". Yes, there are variety of shades of meaning when it comes to interpreting the term. Over the years, I've seen people discussing banishing in terms of "Centering" or "Grounding" "Closing/Opening" and so forth, yet "banishing" - with its strong implication of an imperative command - to expel, or to drive away - forcefully - remains the 'favourite' term.
 
 
Saturn's nod
09:31 / 17.04.07
I like what you've written there about space and boundaries and their relation to culture, trouser.

I wonder if there's a sense in which the foundation of the hermetic LBR etc is that very detached perspective, the mage conceptualised as sealed off from the rest of the world and building a 'power-over'. Perhaps it's the kind of 'modernist' perpective: seems to me it bears the marks of a Victorian ideal situated in a hierarchical power-over context, on a planet seen as full of raw materials and thriving colonial empires, abundant carbon-rich power sources and miles of 'uninhabited wilderness' for exploitation, all of which are a kind of sick joke now I think.

The kinds of worldview I find more useful are those which are relational: acknowledging this world we live in which is full of beings all acting and connecting with each other and spatial: consisting of real spaces which our bodies interact with and which interact with and affect our bodies. I have little time for models which aren't grounded in an understanding of our ecological situatedness as humans. Your example of outdoor ritual, trouser, I think is really important: outdoors we are less easily able to delude ourselves about our controlling position?

Perhaps also the models of the self I use - selves in relation, selves situated with respect to culture and bearing the marks of race and gender conditioning, selves composed of multiple layers of processes which may or may not be congruent - are more suited to the way I use the idea of invocation.

A multiple layered self, in relation with all the local and related beings in the small area of this small planet: unless I was to go for serious sterilization - scorched earth hermeticism? - I need to develop ways of moving forward in the direction I want to go by aligning with others in our common interest, forming coalitions, and having others choose to help, by joining in or leaving alone.

I'm looking at which elements of my living have elements of banishing though: there's an element of removing: I make compost, I cut up old clothes into cleaning rags, I shift stuff out of the house towards others who can make better use of it, whether that's the incinerator or the refugee night shelter. But the major focus co-ordinating this kind of activity is the purpose of living, the purpose served by the way I live: invocation of that purpose makes those elements which are not in agreement find my space less attractive to them. I guess it could be seen as negotiated rather than imposed: at my best I go forward by seeking out whether the paths of this object and me stay together or part here: what the appropriate route for both of us into the global future we share?

Invocation becomes my appeal to the higher power, understood as the best thing which unites us, the call of a beautiful future much better than what we have here. It's the basis for whatever kind of bridge-crossing I find myself doing. My model of conflict, whether it is between me and myself or me and another, is that if used creatively it can be productive and a spur towards finding our unity of purpose - I guess the conceptual frame underneath that idea from the Peace Churches can be seen in the NLP technique of resolving parts.

I'm working on using the reality of our planet's ecology, and the current global crisis, to be useful restrictions to focus my energy and drive forward my efforts to make progress towards the future I want to see unfolding. I want that to be relevant and congruent with all the techniques of self I use: perhaps it is in the engineering of our ideas of privacy, identity & spatial relationships, as you say, that contain the seed of sustainable human civilisations.

My experience so far has been that by allying myself with this sense of life longing it for itself to continue and flourish, I find a big current that I'm in which is goodness and compassionate justice-making. That current bears me up, so that my struggle is only to resolve what is local to me and understand how it too serves and teaches about how this marvelous bright green future unfolds. I've 'done' relatively little to alter my circumstances, but I'm finding myself lifted towards what I study, adore and invoke.
 
 
illmatic
11:03 / 17.04.07
. Even if I didn't consciously practice the elemental phases, I'd still practice them as they cover a great deal of life, however awareness of them and their interaction just seems to make things go smoother; for instance, when throwing a party (water) things go better if the place is tidied up (metal) however if this order is applied as the party is in full swing (wood) it will most likely dull the mood.

Cheers. That's really interesting. Don't know if you've ever looked at Plum Blossom Divination? It's a way of working out hexagrams from your surroundings and can open yourself up to the elemental phases in your life. I've not practiced it that much so far but it's an area I'm studying.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
11:11 / 17.04.07
Saturn
Here's Hoyt Edge's Essays examining individuality in a relational culture (Bali). And this article How do you make yourself a dancing body without organs? - which draws on the Deleuzian notion of "Nomadism" also struck me as appropriate in terms of the relational ethic that you are describing:

"Nomadism occurs when the dancer conceives of his dancing body as a flux, a being with variable and multiple intensities that has neither a me nor a you (desubjectification), neither an exterior nor an interior, but is a multiplicity of fusions which are in a perpetual state of becoming."
 
 
Mako is a hungry fish
14:40 / 17.04.07
I would argue that this is a cultural artefact - very much a product of western thinking about boundaries and our concept of "private space" and very much bound up with our conceptions of individuality and autonomy, and highlights the importance of being able to control access to that space (which I think is a major subtext in banishing discourse).

Sayings of O'Sensei, the Founder of Aikido

The Fundamental Principle of the Circle
A Lecture by the Founder
(Excerpt -- translated by Linda Holiday Sensei)


Aikido technique is structured on circular movement, for harmony is brought about and all conflict resolved through the spirit of the circle. The response of the body, mind and spirit to the principle of the circle is vital to the creation of technique. A circle encloses space, and it is from the perfect freedom of this emptiness that ki is born. From the center of this birthplace, the creative processes of life are joined with the infinite, immeasurable universe by the spirit. The spirit is the Creator, the eternal parent giving birth to all things.
The Budo of Aikido springs from the mastery of the spirit of the circle. The essence if this Budo is to embrace the complementary action of cause and effect and to draw into yourself all things as if they were held within the palm of your hand. You have a spirit, therefore you must realize that each person has a spirit. When the life processes are connected with the spirit and the fundamental principle of the circle is given birth in Aiki, all things are led to completion through the circle. All things are freely created by the circle. The secret of the circle is to create technique by piercing the very center of space.
 
 
Mako is a hungry fish
14:43 / 17.04.07
No I haven't Apophenia, though I will; from the description you gave, it's probably something that I already do anyway, though in a different form.
 
 
This Sunday
14:44 / 17.04.07
May I suggest Eastern Hemisphere thinking about boundaries, perhaps? Not to be too fine-lined about it.
 
 
This Sunday
14:47 / 17.04.07
Nevermind. First read of the morning's always a little skewed.
 
 
Quantum
18:49 / 17.04.07
Saturn's Nod, Trouserian, great posts.
 
 
This Sunday
21:43 / 17.04.07
Trouser, that essay linked above really is setting some stuff up I'm going to have to let marinate into real realizations.

I hate to come off so reactionary here, and am trying to find some value in the value system(s) presented and commonly utilised. Dropping it to a Lesser Banishing Pentagram Ceremony vs sitting down with a cup of tea isn't too far off, but it is off the mark.

Back when I have something useful to add.
 
 
EmberLeo
05:35 / 18.04.07
Apophenia: I think it's unnecessarily alarmist to state that reporting the results of one of the most fundamental of magical exercises ... is akin to revealing one's sexual intimacies.

Not everybody minds revealing their sexual intimacies, for that matter. Sometimes the lack of over-sharing isn't for the speaker's sake. Mostly I avoid giving personal examples if I'm worried I'll be percieved as always going on about myself rather than contributing to a more generally applicable conversation.

In this case I was also reluctant to give answers in the form of examples before I was sure I understood the question being asked.

Te: Just remember to move on when you're done. That's as important as any other part of the process. Maybe the most important part.

Sounds like a variation on the basis of my prefered method for getting rid of internal issues. I'm not sure how it would help get an unfriendly spirit out of my hall?

Daytripper: Banishing should be for semi-aware, mobile thingies.

That's my understanding of the concept as well, and the examples I will give are based on that conceptualization. However, I've noticed that a lot of the same steps are involved in cleansing a place of non-personified gunk as well.

Has anyone had a circumstance that required banishing as the most efficient and fundamentally-functional way to deal? Because I haven't and I'm curious as to what particulars would result in such a situation.

If getting unwelcome spirits out of a medium's body count as "banishing" then yes, several times. In fact, I can't really think of any other way of getting a useful result when the actual desired result is simply for the spirit to get out of it's current location. I can think of a variety of methods, both friendly and forceful, for getting the spirit to depart the medium's body, but I can't think of acceptable alternatives to departure.

Haloquin: And the metaphor is presumably an internal one, not related to external beings that have been there longer than you?

Well, the metaphor of the property manager could quite clearly involve things that ARE external beings, and even ones that were there before you - depending on how they got there, etc.

For example, when I moved into the house I currently live in with my primary SO, there were some ugly things around here that had come in when the previous owners were going through a nasty divorce and custody settlement. We had no desire to live with the gunk, and I had no desire to wait until it starved for lack of similar drama generated by me and my primary, or worse, prompted similar drama.

Sure, the gunk that had been attracted by their divorce lived here before us, and were sepparate from me and my boyfriend. Does that mean it/they had more right to stay than we do? I don't think so. And frankly, the landwights and housewight don't seem to think so either - both the locals and those who had chosen to come with us from the old house.

It was a simple thing to shoo the unhelpful kinds away from the house as part of the larger process of cleansing and warding the place when we moved in. And I'm very clear when I do such things that I'm NOT trying to pick a fight with the true natives - since we moved in only a few miles from where I grew up, I'm pretty comfortable with them. But we ARE going to live here, and anywhat that's willing to work with me on finding a harmonious balance is welcome to stay.

After we (by which I mean me, Seidhjallr, and the Mama of the Umbanda House I'm in - my primary SO is more of a Secular Humanist and chose to not be directly involved) did that thorough cleansing and warding, only two problems remained. Neither is personified, and only one is particularly mutable. The other is simply a sort of... maiasma... psychic graffiti, if you will... left behind in the master bedroom where the previous owners shared a bed during their divorce. (The placement of the bed within the room is pretty obvious given the shape of the room.)

The other is harder to explain, and probably off-topic, though I will go into more detail if requested.

She did something very odd, she channeled it through her own body to deal with it. I am very much of the opinion that I don't want to put anyone elses rubbish into my body if theres any other way of dealing with it

I tend to agree - this is especially true in the case of Healing, with me. I know many who heal by pulling the badness into themselves, and in the long run they seem to have taken on rather a lot of crap to themselves. Some of them bravely - if not downright pretentiously - assert that it is their burden to bear as a healer, but I tend to dissagree.

On the other hand, there's stuff like Sin Eating, and folks who identify with carrion eaters and such have yet another method entirely for dealing with stuff like this, and it clearly DOES work for them when they do it right, so I let them handle it their way, eh?

It's literary, but vivid, and I think potentially functional, so I'll give the example: In Paladin of Souls, by Lois McMaster Bujold, the main character finds herself in service to the Bastard of No Season - the sort of trickster God of all things out-of-pattern. He is, amongst other things, the one who handles demons. She finds out later on that the way he handles them is by empowering (almost posessing) his priests to swallow them whole, thereby passing the demon on to him, after which they're nobody's problem but his.

Mako: Sometimes things that need to be banished are well aware that they don't belong and their presence is harmful, and are actually attracted to this.

This is true, and in at least one example of my direct experience, this was at least partially the case. Due to the nature of the unwelcome being, however, attempting to punish Him would have been very ill-advised, so we simply did our best to protect against His return once we'd gotten Him to leave.

Though it might be more productive to simply make friends with them.

This is true, though it doesn't always prevent the problem. In the other major case of my experience, the being in question fully considered us friends, and we were quite fond of Him. The harm was not entirely understood, and basically unintentional, but the desire to not return to where He belonged was very strong. However, we knew the one who normally guarded Him would keep Him home once we got Him to return there, and that a bit of distance would give Him a clearer view of the problems He was causing, so that was mostly ok.

Autumn is the season of retrospection and meditative insight, for shedding old skin and dumping the excess baggage of external attachments and emotions accumulated in summer

Really? I find this MUCH easier to do in Spring - Spring cleaning to sweep away the Winter depression. Summer isn't when I tend to collect baggage. Autumn is when I am generally trying my hardest to keep holding on to the good things Summer brought me.

Trouser and Saturn: I would agree with pretty much everything you've said there about Western conceptualization of space and ownership relative to the concept of banishing, provided that we can include conceptualizing our own bodies as the space that is home to our identity.

--Ember--
 
 
Mako is a hungry fish
09:16 / 18.04.07
This is true, though it doesn't always prevent the problem.

Though sometimes it changes perspective enough that the problem no longer appears as such, and what was a hindrance is now helpful; its like allowing a spider to keep living in your home, because it will eat the things that normally eat you, or embracing the pain caused from exercise because it will make you stronger. The important thing is the degree to which this can be done, which is reletive to the strengths of the two forces at hand; allowing hundreds of bird eating spiders to make a giant web in your hallway, or exercising to the point of permanent injury, isn't a smart move.

Really? I find this MUCH easier to do in Spring - Spring cleaning to sweep away the Winter depression. Summer isn't when I tend to collect baggage. Autumn is when I am generally trying my hardest to keep holding on to the good things Summer brought me.

To each their own; the important thing is that you have a season, or rather an ability, to do so. Getting rid of attachments isn't always about getting rid of negative things, as positive ones can also hinder the acceptance of the here and now and what is to come.
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply