BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

 
  

Page: (1)23

 
 
Tamayyurt
16:35 / 04.06.04
Alfonso Cuaron’s HARRY POTTER AND THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN is out today and I will be seeing it tonight. Anybody's seen it early? What did you think? How did the new director handle it? How does it rate compared to the first 2 films? Do tell.
 
 
electricinca
00:40 / 05.06.04
I've been showing this at my cinema since Monday and the general impression I get from the customers is that it is great and probably the best movie so far. It is noticeably different than the previous two with a darker tone, quicker pace and improved acting from the three lead kids.

If you too anal over the books you may be disappointed as there are omissions and it could feel a little rushed.
 
 
Ganesh
00:44 / 05.06.04
Xoc and me are off to see it tomorrow afternoon. I haven't seen either of the first two, but it was my favourite of the books (gave up after the flabby, long-winded fourth one) so I'm hoping it'll be tolerable.
 
 
Tamayyurt
11:59 / 05.06.04
Warning: possible raving spoilers.


Whoa, that was awesome! Definitely the best movie of the lot. C did an excellent job and I really hope he’s signed on to direct the next film (or films). The actors were all great. I loved the creepy feel of the whole movie including (or maybe especially) in the beginning while Harry was still at his uncle’s house. I loved the seedy, speedy double decker bus and I really loved the hippogriff, Buckbeak! The CGI was fantastic and the scene where Harry's riding him around the school and over the lake was just breath taking. I haven't felt like that since I was a kid and first saw The Never Ending Story.
Hermione has really come into her own with this film. The way everyone keeps telling her she's "the brightest witch of her age" is great and really tones down the notion that Harry Potter is at all special. (He may be more powerful, but we get that she's a better wizard.) She's really the one to save the day in this film and she does it with time travel... how cool is that? Not to mention, she punches a whimpering Malfoy in the face.

But I think best of all was the lack of Voldemort!
 
 
Jack Fear
12:19 / 05.06.04
The next film is already in production, and is being directed by Mike Newell of Four Weddings and a Funeral fame.

I think it's interesting how they're passing the franchise off to different directors--and fairly established directors at that, not faceless journeymen like Richard Marquand and Irvin Kershner (who directed The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi respectively): in choosing Cuaron, in particular, the powers behind the series (i.e., Rowling) seem to be interested in what a director can bring to the films.

Because, let's face it--even a stiff, workmanlike adaptation of a Harry Potter book is pretty much a license to print money. That is, these films (like the Star Wars series) are so guaranteed to be profitable that they no longer actually have to be good.

The difference between Rowling and Lucas is that the former sees guaranteed porofitability as an opportunity for experimentation, while the latter seems to see it as an excuse for laziness.

Dream teams for the upcoming films, then? I think Guillermo del Toro could do a bang-up job with Order of the Phoenix--all those creepy laboratories beneath the Ministry of Magic, the general atmosphere of watchfulness and betrayal... it could take the treacherous academy-in-peril atmosphere of The Devil's Backbone to a whole new level.
 
 
Keith, like a scientist
17:11 / 05.06.04
Just a nerdy quibble but Kershner did Empire and Marquand did Return...

Anyway, saw PoA last night and I thought it was an excellent movie and Cuaron's direction seemed very appropriate and well-suited to the story...

However, it didn't "feel" as much like the books to me as Columbus's movie adaptations...Columbus directs things in this very warm and nostalgic way that reminds me of the way I felt when reading the books. Cuaron did an amazing job and I think it's a fantastic piece of direction and movie-making, just didn't feel like I was quite in the Potter world I remember from reading the books. Though, PoA is a much darker book than the first two, so maybe I'm wrong.

Spoilers if you care

Things I loved:
-Lupin: God, I just loved the Lupin character in the books, and Thewlis seemed to do a pretty damn good job with the character.
-Werewolf design: Loved it! So different than typical werewolf depictions.
-Buckbeak: This was an amazing show of CGI and actor/CGI interaction. Loved every second of it.
-Knight Bus: This scene was probably the most fun I've had at the cinema in ages!
-Dumbledore stalling at Hagrid's...so fantastic. Why Dumbledore is the greatest wizard...he planned to use the Time Turner all along.
-Hermione popping Malfoy. That was insane.
-Trelawney: Utter brilliance. Thompson should get an award for this. "Beyond!"
-Cuaron: Overall the direction is just clever and beautiful. I remember one moment where they are using the time motif and show a flower blooming then turning to ice. Lovely.

Things I was disappointed in:
-Lack of Marauder Map explanation: Don't explain who made it, and who made it is important, as it eventually explains that James Potter is a Animagus and is form is a Stag.
-Stag Patronus: Hello? This is crucial. James is a Stag and Harry conjures his dad as his Patronus. Jeez! How much more important to the story can you get?
-Gambon as Dumbledore: He was alright, but didn't feel as much the grand old mystical genius that Harris did.

All I can think of right now.
 
 
CameronStewart
17:41 / 05.06.04
SPOILERY BITS, SO, Y'KNOW...

Yeah, I felt that Gambon, while still really good, just didn't have the depth that Richard Harris did. Harris' Dumbledore really felt ancient and immeasurably wise, I didn't get that as much from Gambon.

I really enjoyed the film, I thought it was miles ahead of the previous two (though it helps that it's based on the strongest of the novels). I completely disagree with the previous poster about Columbus' direction - the first two films felt leaden and dull, this one really came alive.

However, I have one pretty significant complaint, and it's that I never really once got the sense that Sirius Black was any kind of threat - indeed the very first time we see him in the film (apart from the wanted posters) there's only a few brief moments of him being menacing before his true nature is revealed. In the book there's much more buildup - they explain that he (supposedly) killed 12 muggles, and he's a wanted criminal in the muggle world as well; he sends the Firebolt broomstick to Harry before they meet, so it plays as a creepy stalkerish act rather than a kind one; and there's the scene in which he appears in the boy's bedroom, standing over Ron with a knife, and slashes up his bedcurtains (I was so disappointed they left that out - it was the scene I was most looking forward to seeing on film, perhaps they shot it but it was too scary intense for the kiddies). All we ever get is the Fat Lady's painting being slashed up, and I didn't think that was enough. That should have been an "oh..my..god..HE'S HERE!!" moment, and it wasn't. Black should have been terrifying, there should have been a real palpable sense of danger, but the whole thing fell rather flat for me.

Still, I very much enjoyed it anyway, I was entertained throughout.
 
 
Tamayyurt
18:00 / 05.06.04
Okay, one thing that left me confused is the glowing stag that briefly came out of Harry's wand. I have no idea what that was about. Harry was going on about seeing his dad and all I saw was a fucking reindeer, which I guess, from an above post, has something to do with his dad.

Can someone please explain.
 
 
CameronStewart
18:35 / 05.06.04
Harry's dad was an Animagus - a wizard who could turn himself into an animal. His animal was a stag.

Harry's dad was friends with Lupin, Sirius Black, and Peter Pettigrew back when they were students at Hogwarts and they gave themselves nicknames - Moony (Lupin, the werewolf), Wormtail (Pettigrew, the rat), Padfoot (Black, the dog), and Prongs (Potter Sr, the stag). They are the ones who created the Marauder's Map (something which isn't really explained in the film at all).

So, Harry's Patronus, the charm that is conjured from Harry's greatest, happiest memory, is his father's animal form.

They really needed to explain all that a bit better in the film...
 
 
CameronStewart
18:36 / 05.06.04
Oh, and I think Harry talking about seeing his dad was because he saw himself across the pond - he was in both places because of the time turner. Since it's been said that Harry looks so much like his father, he mistook himself for his dad.
 
 
Tamayyurt
04:57 / 06.06.04
Yeah, I got that part. It was the stag that threw me off. Thanks for the info, Cam.

I heard the scene in which Harry and his dorm buddies are goofing around and experimenting with "animal sounds" wasn't in the book and was added by Cuaron because he found the original scene in the book to be dull and unbelievable. (I think in the book Harry shows up and everyone is sleeping and he curls up in bed with a picture of his parents.) Cuaron thought that in a real boys dorm, everyone would be staying up partying all night so he changed it. I loved this scene. I think it works well and found it cool. So, fans of the book, how did you take this substitution?
 
 
wicker woman
06:25 / 06.06.04
Not badly at all, at least for me. I'm a huge fan of the books, and unlike Columbus's stiff, cut-and-dry adaptations of the first two books, the liberties Cuaron takes with the original text do not seem out of place in the slightest, and even add to the movie. If I remember right though, the bit with steam shooting out of Harry's ears was actually 'borrowed' from book 4, when Fred and George start experimenting with making their own candies.

As much as I loved this movie, and as much as it is the best of the three by far, I'll agree with the general sentiment that the details of the Marauder's Map should've been left in. As Lupin was leaving his office at the end of the movie, I kept expecting Harry to stop him and ask how he knew about the map.

The clothing mistake during Peter Pettigrew's morphs was kind of odd, too, considering the amount of detail poured into the other parts of the movie.

In all honesty, despite the M Map details being left out and some other very niggling complaints, I don't feel shy in saying that Cuaron should at least get nominated for Best Director come Oscar time. I haven't felt this happy coming out of a movie in a while.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
14:49 / 06.06.04
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Funfun!
 
 
Cat Chant
15:10 / 06.06.04
Joy. Genius. I love Cuaron.

it didn't "feel" as much like the books to me as Columbus's movie adaptations...Columbus directs things in this very warm and nostalgic way that reminds me of the way I felt when reading the books. Cuaron did an amazing job and I think it's a fantastic piece of direction and movie-making, just didn't feel like I was quite in the Potter world I remember from reading the books

Exactly! We were in a coherent world with three-dimensional characters who weren't repeatedly humiliated or reduced to Harry-prostheses for the sake of the plot! Such an unexpected pleasure in a HP movie!

Loved it, partly because Cuaron actually set it circa 1993/4 (which is when the book is set) rather than putting all the Muggle bits in a sort of weird 1940s/70s hybrid, and made the characters identifiable young adults: in the first two movies they swung back and forth between (a) tiny, passive children looking big-eyed upon the wonders of the world and (b) action heroes threatening adults with weapons. But even without all that goodness, he would deserve Best Director for directing a Quidditch match that didn't suck, and for doing an almost-sympathetic version of Dumbledore (for a review that disagrees on the film, but agrees on the way I see Dumbledore in the books, see here).

It was cute that he cut all the bits where Snape SPITS IN CAPS: I think those are key to Snape's characterization, myself, but it takes quite a lot of work to fit them into the rest of canon, so it made more sense to cut them completely. And he was consistent with the fanon that Black and Lupin are lovers, so that was nice, though I couldn't help giggling to myself as Lupin took Harry on yet another long bracing walk through the grounds in manner of old-skool pederast.
 
 
Catjerome
17:06 / 06.06.04
I also really liked the "boys goofing around in the dorms late at night" scene. It was a bit of filler, but it struck home with me as a realistic thing that boys away from home would do. Plus Ron reminded me of my brother - he also hangs around wearing a balaclava for no apparent reason.


Liked about the movie:
* Much more of a sense of the grandeur of Hogwarts this time around. Enormous pendulum, soaring towers, knights' ghosts crashing through windows, massive lakes - I could be convinced that the place has been there for hundreds of years.

* Lupin - yay! I've only ever seen the actor in *Life is Sweet* - I thought he did a great job here. A few too many one-on-one scenes with Harry, though. If I were Harry I'd be irritated with the number of people taking me aside to assure me that I'm a-ok.

* The werewolf effects. Hooray for a werewolf that really looks like "man crossed with wolf" and not "Liefeld-esque killing machine", for a change.

* Sirius and Lupin ::sings:: sitting in a tree... So slashtastic. That gave me a happy.

* Where Hagrid's cottage is. I like it being slightly away from the school, where he can hide his illegal nasty creatures in peace.

Didn't like:

* Plot holes. I'm expecting a director's cut that will explain to the non-book-readers why Lupin knew how to operate the Marauder's Map, why Sirius knew to seek Peter Pettigrew at the school, and who sent Harry the new broom at the end (unless I'm on crack - there wasn't any kind of "With love from your godfather" note, was there?). And will he ever sign Harry's Hogsmeade permission slip?

* Too many scenes with Harry passing out and then fading back in as Harry wakes up again. But maybe that was canon. I haven't read the book in a while.
 
 
Tamayyurt
17:26 / 06.06.04
and who sent Harry the new broom at the end (unless I'm on crack - there wasn't any kind of "With love from your godfather" note, was there?)

No but Black included one of Buckbeak's large feathers so we all got who sent the gift. My friends and I've never read the book but we got it.

But yeah, a director's cut that explains all the rest would be fab.
 
 
Tamayyurt
17:38 / 06.06.04
I have another question (this one isn't about the content but rather the "making of") from a few of your comments I get the impression that Cuaron is ressponsible for what bits of story made it to the movie (and what bits didn't) not the screen writer is Steven Kloves, same guy who adapted the first two books into movies. But my question is how much control does the director have over the script. Shouldn't all the plot holes and mising info be pinned on Mr. Kloves? Or did he produce another charmless and faithful adaptation, which was later messed about with by Cuaron?
 
 
Catjerome
18:59 / 06.06.04
No but Black included one of Buckbeak's large feathers so we all got who sent the gift. My friends and I've never read the book but we got it.

Oh man, I am so blind - I missed this completely. Thanks!
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
21:22 / 06.06.04
I really loved this movie. It is vastly superior to the previous two films. The last two were entertaining, but didn't have the same sense of wonder that this one had.

It seems as though this was the first Potter film to really embrace cinema as opposed to just putting a direct representation of the text on the screen. The visual element and language of this film is so strong that I really wouldn't want to experience it any other way, whereas I can certainly imagine the first two books being more enjoyable than the film adaptations.

I'm very fond of the three young actors playing Harry, Hermione, and Ron - the producers would be mad to let them go. They really ought to keep them through the seventh film - people in their early 20s play teens all of the time, it would be no big deal. It just would feel wrong for someone else to play those characters, especially Hermione.

I was really happy that there was a lot more Hermione in this film - she's by far my favorite character in the Potter series.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
21:29 / 06.06.04
Oh, I should also mention that the cgi effects in this movie were probably the very best that I've ever seen. Buckbeak in particular was extremely well done, and fit in seamlessly with the live action.

get the impression that Cuaron is ressponsible for what bits of story made it to the movie (and what bits didn't) not the screen writer is Steven Kloves, same guy who adapted the first two books into movies. But my question is how much control does the director have over the script.

From what I've read in Entertainment Weekly, Cuaron shaped the structure of the story along with Rowling and Kloves. It was Cuaron's decision to ditch numerous Quidditch scenes and a few other tangents, as well as reworking the ending of the story. Cuaron wanted to ditch the bit with the divination teacher's prophecy about Harry, but Rowling insisted that it be kept as foreshadowing the for the final two installments.

Cuaron was also the person who convinced Kloves and the producers to edit Goblet down to one film, as they were strongly considering splitting it into two, Kill Bill-style.

So, to answer your question: Cuaron took charge.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
21:31 / 06.06.04
Oh, Cuaron also loved Hermione, so he had a bit more with her added in, though I don't know what it may be since I never read the novel.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
21:38 / 06.06.04

However, I have one pretty significant complaint, and it's that I never really once got the sense that Sirius Black was any kind of threat - indeed the very first time we see him in the film (apart from the wanted posters) there's only a few brief moments of him being menacing before his true nature is revealed.


I agree with this - it probably would have been better for us to meet Black sooner, and before we find out about his true nature. All we get is a bunch of scary posters, which isn't the same.

I was a bit confused that the real villain just got away without anyone going after him - my mother tells me that he's important in the next one, but his relatively uneventful getaway is a bit of an anticlimax.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:32 / 06.06.04
he would deserve Best Director for directing a Quidditch match that didn't suck

Well, which scored about six million points for being about three minutes long. Quidditch is an enormous pod race - the technology exists to stretch it out for ten minutes, but not to tell a director that it's a fucking stupid idea.

Cuaron's approach was always going to be different - a lot less faithful, whereas the Columbus pictures seemed to be pretty much scene-by-scene, with the only excitement being about what had been left out. Cuaron did seem to be trying to work out what worked as a movie, and go with that; the film seemed to be better paced than previosu efforts, for this reason.

So, pros. Better sense of what makes a film, more time spent on other characters, better line readings from Radcliffe, Malfoy's porno-level acting put to better effect - although he's one of those characters hat I'd *like* to see displaying hidden depths, which this very one-dimensional reading is sort of closing down). Hermione once again demonstrates why she shoudl be the star of the fims. Thewlis is *great*; he's so comfy and lovely, although admittedly the country walks and the tendency to give Harry chocolate do make his scenes intermittently and disturbingly like a Werther's original advert.

Cons: Not enough Snape. At all. Not enough *anyone*, in a way - I'd have cut down massively on the Trelawney stuff, once the Grim bit had been flagged up, and spent the time on some other characters - like Fudge, say, or Snapesnapesnape. Sirius Black nerver really threatened - he was too hammy, and then the ending seemed rushed. It also seemed, thanks to Timothy Spall, like somebody had videoed bits of an experimental theatre treatment of Wind in the Willows over some of the dialogue, but there you go...

Also, there was no sense of there having been an actual *term*, which is good, in the sense that the director was not slaving everything to the Malory Towers structure of the books, but made it seem a bit unreal as a a school story.

Oh, and the dementors? Not scary. Which is a problem.
 
 
CameronStewart
23:54 / 06.06.04
>>>I agree with this - it probably would have been better for us to meet Black sooner, and before we find out about his true nature<<<

Well as I say, that's what happens in the book - there's a scene in which he breaks into the castle and gets into the boys' sleeping quarters and (apparently) comes after Ron with a big knife, which, if done properly, could have been absolutely fucking shit-scary in the film, particularly to kids. But that's probably exactly why they cut it...
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
00:15 / 07.06.04
Didn't stop them with the Dementors. Which were a lot like the Black Riders in the old animated Lord of the Rings - and those gave me nightmares for YEARS.
 
 
Scrubb is on a downward spiral
08:29 / 07.06.04
I HUGGLE Professor Lupin! I HUGGLE his big grey cardigan, shiny brogues, facial scarring, collection of jazz LPs, and his uncanny resemblence to David Thewlis!

I thought that this rocked, and was much better than the book. Whereas Columbus gave it a traditional take (locations in Oxford, Harry's perpetual AWE and WONDER, huge explanations for everything, that godawful score), Cuaron managed to bypass this by shifting some of the elements (locations in the Scottish highlands, merging all the terms into one, getting rid of a lot of unneccesary exposition) and making it both darker and funnier. On the other hand Columbus had to set it all up; Cuaron just had to continue the series. Probably best summed up in the tiny birds and animals: a sign of magic and the joy of childhood in the first two films, promptly squished by the Whomping Willow in this one.

Some other brief thinkings:
* Great werewolf, loved the elongated limbs...
*...and great Buckbeak (which my supervisor's daughter worked on, Ithankyerverymuch)
* The great Equity shout-off in the shack at the end
* The latter half did feel very rushed, but I presume that there will be deleted scenes/a director's cut on DVD release. On the other hand, why should the cinema cut be a less coherant version?
* Prisoner of Azkaban is one of the shorter books - God only knows how they're going to cope with the brick-sized Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
12:16 / 07.06.04
You really thought that there wasn't enough Snape, Haus? My feeling after seeing the film was "oh, they must've realized how much everyone loves Snape, and made sure that there was more Snape than usual in this one..."
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:00 / 07.06.04
Dude, four scenes:

1) Potions class
2) Great hall
3) Marauders' map
4) Finale

It's good that he's had something to do, but it's going to make his role in 4 and 5 much more of a jolt...
 
 
CameronStewart
13:14 / 07.06.04
I thought Snape was underused too - every time Alan Rickman is on screen, in any of the three films, I have a huge wide grin on my face, and there's never nearly enough of him.
 
 
CameronStewart
13:16 / 07.06.04
(Oh, and as an aside, a friend of mine spotted Alan Rickman having dinner with David Cronenberg here in Toronto last week - possible collab in the works?)
 
 
Yotsuba & Benjamin!
13:32 / 07.06.04
Loved this as well. And while there was a significant lack of Black menace, I thought any shred of one-dimensionality was completely trumped in the scene in which Black tries to talk down Lupin from his transformation. That was incredibly fucking poignant.

One minor quibble, only because it was my favorite ending in the entire HP saga, I miss Black signing Harry's permission slip. Unless I'm mistaken and that happens in Goblet.

It'd been a while since I read (and re-read) the books, so the whole time I'm increasingly excited as I realize that Azkaban is the book with my favorite bits in it. The stag patronus, the time travel, etc.

They do a much better job, obvs, in the book explaining the map and the stag and unfortunately, a scene which left me in shambles in the book (when you realize it's Harry's patronus and you're suddenly drenched in your own tears) is completely robbed of nearly all its poigancy. But I'll forgive it because AC completely wrangled astounding performances from nearly everyone involved. The aformentioned Black/Lupin intervention was a personal favorite, but let it not be outdone by that really great dorm scene (wow, this is a school and not just a fucking backdrop painting) and nearly everything between Lupin and Harry. Thewlis owns. In his performance management, he really portrayed the book in the way it really was written. There's very little to glean emotionally from the first two movies, but just that Boggart scene says so much so simply to, you know, any little kid watching. I can't imagine how badly Columbo would have botched that scene up with sacchrine pappy crap.

I also love the way AC made the magic magical and not just, you know, an FX demo. I loved the casual magic in the Leaky Cauldron, I loved how he did the paintings (I followed that giraffe around the whole room), and I loved his Quiddich match, not because it was short, but because he really sold it in that quick shot of Hermione et al cheering the game on, much more effectively than Columbo's pained wide shots of a CG crowd. And those goggles were just ill.

And also, I personally miss the Good Use Of An Iris Out in films. Ever since that terrible instance in Attack Of The Clones I've been aching for some quality Iris action. And this film delivered All-Iris Action, baby!

Quick Bits Of Joy:
- Fred & George were so fucking great.
- That housekeeping bit in the Cauldron was SFG.
- Hermione and Ron luv was SFG.
- The WB/logo fx at the beginning was SSSSFFFFGGGG.

Awesome awesome movie.
 
 
Tamayyurt
13:42 / 07.06.04
You know, this is the first Potter Film that I wanted to see again when I left the theater but now, after reading all this, I really really want to see it again!
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
15:02 / 07.06.04
As a Potter newbie who thoroughly enjoyed the film, I'd say that the lack of background on the Marauders' Map isn't a problem, but the lack of explanation for the big glowy stag shape is (I started to wonder whether I'd imagined it looking like a stag). I couldn't help be perturbed by what seemed like an obvious plothole to me: when Harry and Hermione go back in time to rescue Buckbeak, they appear to do the actual rescuing in full view of where their earlier selves were standing on the hill above - I'd have to watch this again for it to be confirmed, but the fact that we didn't get a short of first-time-round H, H & R facing away seemed to confirm this was a hole it was hoped we wouldn't notice.

Still, loved it. My favourite moment in the whole movie was the amazing shot of London rooftops bathed in very orange light as an overground train goes past, rattling Harry's room in the Leaky Cauldron: amazing for a number of reasons. The first because it contradicts the way I'd always imagined Potter getting the train to Hogwarts: all jolly train-boarding and waving to family and stuff... Even though I know he gets that later, it was just a very powerful moment. He's very alone at that point, but it's a good kind of alone as well as a scary kind. Because he's alone in the big city of London, which is scary, but is crucially not suburban petty bourgeois hell with Uncle NotMonty... I dunno, something about it really struck a chord - that sense of being a kid in the adult world too early, and also being in a 'mundane' world which is just as weird as Hogwarts and all the magic stuff in its own way. More thoughts to follow...
 
 
Henningjohnathan
15:05 / 07.06.04
I thought it was terrific scene by scene and the last climactic scene was one of the best uses of... well, you know... since BACK TO THE FUTURE.

However, altogether, I thought it depended more on mood and likability than really strong plotting. I didn't quite buy the actions of the adults.

I mean, they get upset about a scratch from a hippogryph, but they let dementors roam freely on school grounds...?
 
 
Yotsuba & Benjamin!
15:10 / 07.06.04
Ooh! I forgot not one but TWO instances of Whomping Willow Bird-Mashing.

That was so awesome.
 
  

Page: (1)23

 
  
Add Your Reply