BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


WHAT? That CAN'T be the end!

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
The Strobe
10:53 / 04.04.04
I think that's a very fitting ending, jack74; it's essentially the way the book finishes, despite having an entirely different ending shoot-out (which is much larger, involves way more of the cast who were mainly relegated in the film, is where Vincennes really gets killed and where Bud White is not only shot about a thousand times but also has the living shit kicked out of him - and it's only after this that he summons up the strength to beat Deuce Perkins to death).

The point is that he survives an inordinate amount of violence, and believe me, it's more inordinate in the book. I mean, his jaw's wired shut, his entire body's broken; he's alive by the skin of his teeth. The important thing is not whether he should have lived or not, but the fact that Lynn joins him; she'd give up everything she has and move to Arizona to live with a disabled ex-cop.

The book is a bit more morally awkward at the ending, in that Dudley Smith gets away with it; the shoot-out doesn't involve him. Exley's parting line to White (in the car) is "I swear I'll get him for you" (IIRC); White's sacrifice isn't going to go unnoticed. It's a bit harder in the film because Exley shoots Smith in the back; the revenge happens within the timeframe of the movie. Ellroy leaves many events to happen after the novel has ended simply because life's like that, and he doesn't really make pretty pictures of things.

I think it still works in the film, even if it's slightly less relevant, as the ending is more about the Lynn-Exley-White triangle: the damaged guy (in so many ways) emerges to be the preferable choice to Mr. Squeaky-clean - and Exley knows this and understands why. I'd love the book to have been filmed verbatim, but it's physically not possible - there'd be too many lawsuits for a start.
 
 
Benny the Ball
11:01 / 04.04.04
Sadly never read the book (I'm a very slow reader and have a pile Ellroy novels collecting dust as I struggle to finish off a few more before I get to them) and when I posted thought that someones would say that it is true to the book. It wasn't so much the essence of the end, just the way it was shot - that was the problem I had with the whole film, it was like three directors had worked on it - the first third was flat and uninteresting, the next third was fantastic and the ending (in style, not essence) seemed tacked in. It just jarred me as a viewer enough to make me dislike the ending. I haven't seen it for a while though, so maybe it's time to re-evaluate it. Or read the book.
 
 
Gary Lactus
16:12 / 04.04.04
Just as an aside, Jack, you really should put those other books down and get with the Ellroy.
 
 
Haus of Mystery
19:51 / 04.04.04
Seven.

A HEAD. IN A BOX. SHE WAS PREGNANT.

Nasty for nasty's sake? You betcha.
 
 
The Strobe
20:26 / 04.04.04
A HEAD. IN A BOX. ON ANTIBIOTICS
 
 
nedrichards is confused
21:32 / 04.04.04
Fight Club. Because I loved the book ending *sooooooo* much. He's in a mental asylum and can't trust himself to leave because all the nurses, cooks etc. keep whispering 'We'll get you out Mr Durden' to him.

Just the right combination of 'is he just crazy' and 'or is he just crazy but also a terrorist mastermind 'fo real'. Much better than him making out with little miss spikyhear after being shot in the head in bullet time slo mo.
 
 
spiral
20:55 / 13.04.04
I've been disappointed by the endings of Charlie Kaufman's films, to what were otherwise great movies.
 
 
Spaniel
10:28 / 14.04.04
Re Adaptation: surely that was the point.
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply