to apply any hard and fast rule to existence and to reality makes fools out of anyone too slow to let go and experience the question 'why':
because for all of the postulates that goes forth -- none of them ever comes vaguely close to the 'why' as the 'why' must be seen as a true
verb ---
because no one can truly say -'....well tommy: we exist on this great celestial body called earth because....'
why artists exist:
why the shaman exists....
because the 'why' becomes an ongoing experience and does not mean we
need to list a bullet point list of what represents 'true reality':
if bill gates could sit with bob marley --- and we were all flies on the wall listening to them: could either of us truly say with any pure
certainty who was more in 'reality' than the other....
the 'why' only represents a small key ---and that small key un-locks other doors that keeps and often times hide other keys until the 'why' becomes only a matter of referential points but the terrains are never truly defined as having a true fixed point inside of any given space:
...stand on the busiest street in new york city and try to tell me that nothing ever changes and that everyday on that busiest street un-folds the same thing day in and day out:
the 'why' lies in the pursuit of not hard and fast 'answers' but in the harder and faster need to let go and become both the navigator and the waters that we have chosen to enter:
as for the somewhat bland debate about 'free will' which becomes a bit like masturbation in that yes it feels so good to debate but then in shooting your load what do you really have: the art of freedom comes only through the chosen art that in the pursuit of the pursuit there lies the 'answer' and there lies the 'why' ---
and that in free will we invoke that art of pursuit and in return that art of freedom and the art of the chosen art.
i seek no 'answer' and i yearn to never arrive at any 'conclusion':
because to remove from any vital body a vital part and assume that the other vital parts will pick up the slack as the vital body collapses and dies under closer scrutiny or to consider the vital part as being the centre of the vital body without taking consideration towards the importance of all the vital parts that works towards an integrated rhythm that keeps the vital body vital becomes paramount to believing that on a sunny clear day there should exist no shadows at all at all:
...i don't believe in the 'why' of existence as i believe in the seamless questions and in the endless pursuit of existence.
This appears to be an attempt to respond to this thread, which Archon666 seems to have placed in a new thread, presumably by mistake. I'll move to have it locked - archon666, feel free to copy it into the other thread, although if you do I might kindly suggest trying to make it a bit more comprehensible for those of us who have not been initiated.
Other possible resources on the tangential question of free will:
