|
|
It seems to me that you guys are glossing over hundreds of pages of characterization in order to hold up this populist viewpoint of a "Fascist Ultimate Captain America". He is, without a doubt, a pragmatist, but a fascist? Or, crypto-fascist? What's a crypto-fascist? A fascist who uses code? Or, um, a fascist who makes maps? No, that would be a carto-fascist.
I don't know, I'm clearly unschooled in the globo-political arena of 20th Century Warfare, so I'm just going by what's in the book (I agree that Bendis' Ultimate Weltunschung is more in line with this fascist take, but even that he can't decide on. First Nick Fury tells Pete his life is over at 18 and then, to facilitate a smoother cross-over later on, he has Fury backpedal, coming off like he doesn't even know what he was talking about).
And Louise, I don't doubt that I was severely wrong about the dates (see above), but I get the impression, from, you know, the book, that what American government wanted or didn't want to do in WWII was quite different from what Captain America thought was necessary. He has always been, at least in my mind, a symbol of what America stands for (Democracy, um. Some other stuff...), and not a faceless lackey of the American government.
He's a lot like Michael Moore in that respect. I suspect season two will have a distinctive, "Dude, Where's My Country" sentiment. Then again, we'll probably be seeing most of that sentiment in Morales' unleaded Captain America, already in progress.
And enough with this "worth the wait" bullshit. Go back and read E Is For Extinction. Doesn't the fact that parts two and three came out so far apart bug the hell out of you? Doesn't it just completely disrupt the flow of the story and undermine what Grant and Frank were trying to do? Ugh, I know. It's such a drag.
Wah. Wah. |
|
|