|
|
I can't imagine that anyone sensible enough to be worth reading would have been that scientific about it.
Here are some pointers though. Some are received opinions, some are, as far as I can make out, facts. Forgive me, no references, but I'm being just as lazy and this stuff can be found in history books:
US War of Independence -- Despite continuing arguments over practice, resulting nation did much to promote the ideas of individual freedom and democracy all over the world.
Colt .45 -- regarded as first mass-produced article with interchangeable parts.
Crimean War -- Modern nursing.
US Civil War -- Working on wounds gave us the first plastic surgery and greater understanding of the workings of the human body. Attitudes to slavery reassessed.
World War II -- Equal pay for women, modernism/socialism in Europe and the motor scooter. Fascism, previously quite popular even in the allied countries, is reassessed.
Cold War -- Educational reform in the US, exploration of space.
Plus loads of infrastructure, e.g. roads, mapping, communication systems, computers etc.
Causality's a tricky thing though -- I mean, could we have discovered any such things without war? Probably. And is it always clear what is a good thing? Or a bad thing? Including the war in and of itself? I'm not talking about moral equivalency, rather, something along the lines of what does a pacifist say to someone who was been imprisoned in Auschwitz? What do I, as a westerner completely dependent on oil and gas technology to supply my food, water, clothing, shelter and heat, say to an Iraqi? |
|
|