BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


* So When Would You Call The Police?

 
  

Page: (1)2345

 
 
Shortfatdyke
06:43 / 07.01.02
i expect most barbefolk distrust the police on some level. but when would/have you called them? i am quite a mass of contradictions on this myself, called them when i got mugged, called them when i got burgled, didn't when i got raped (which was political in a way, as the offender was female, tho i regret it to this day)..... would anyone here never call the police? (i mean for political reasons, not cos the house is full of dodgy substances!)

[ 07-01-2002: Message edited by: Tom Coates ]
 
 
Sax
07:17 / 07.01.02
Hmm. Depends. As distrustful as I am of the police, I think they should be made to work for their money. I suppose I'd call them if my house was burgled (it would probably look suspicious on me if I didn't), I wouldn't if my car was broken into (what's the point?), I possibly would if I was assaulted (but not if I was involved in a drunken brawl - again, it would be too much hassle directed at me), I would if I saw someone else getting assaulted and couldn't intervene myself.

The whole have-a-go-hero thing takes on a different perspective when you consider the 31-year-old father of two in Halifax who was stabbed to death with a screwdriver last weekend when he tackled some kids breaking into his father-in-law's car. Now that was a time to call the police if any - granted, they would probably have turned up half an hour after the car was screwed and the criminals had got away, but if anyone's going to be threatened with a screwdriver, it might as well be a police officer trained in the proper arrest techniques.

As a rider, my neighbour's house alarm went off for about three hours the other night and I didn't call the police. I figured it was either a fault, or someone else would call the cops if there was a problem.

And I once called the police "a pack of rancid cunts" for picking me and my friends up at 4am when we were walking off an acid trip, and keeping us in the freezing cold street for two hours "checking if we had tattoos", but that's another thing altogether.
 
 
Fist Fun
08:39 / 07.01.02
Why do you distrust the police? As a corrupt institution or as corrupt individuals? Could you ever trust the police? If not then how do we enforce state-defined justice? Is trust necessary?
Personally I trust the police in the same way I trust most other British institutions.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:42 / 07.01.02
quote:Originally posted by Buk:
Personally I trust the police in the same way I trust most other British institutions.


Me too. Although I suspect we mean quite different things.
 
 
Fist Fun
08:44 / 07.01.02
Well, yes. The ambiguity was deliberate.
 
 
Shortfatdyke
08:46 / 07.01.02
on a personal level, i have seen them behave abysmally on demos. the recent story an ex-flatmate told me of policemen harrassing a black couple, stopping only to move on to my flatmate and her girlie, do not inspire confidence or trust. also, a policeman tried to make me hit him when i was having a 'mad' episode, some wierd macho thing.... so as individuals and as an institution really.

"is trust necessary?" - to a certain extent, yes, i think so. i should have reported being raped, but it was by a woman during an sm scene and i did not have enough trust in the police to go and tell them. with most institutions you deal with them on a 'business' level, but many crimes are personal violations so it's a bit different perhaps.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:46 / 07.01.02
Buk: ah. Okay, sorry if that came off snide. I suppose I ought to contribute something more than just a throwaway piece of cynicism...

The truth is, I don't know when I'd call the police, because I haven't been put into a situation in which I'd need to consider calling them since my views on them have been substantially altered (ie, in the past year and a half or more). Like sfd, this has been partly through seeing them at demos (I don't want to bore the people who've heard it before with my 'I-was-in-Oxford-Circus-on-Mayday-for-the-likes-of-you' memoirs, but will do if asked - anyway, my own experience is completely insignificant when contrasted what any of us could see, even on mainstream TV, even of the relatively restrained British police's behaviour). There's nothing like seeing a large group of state-sanctioned, heavily armed individuals looking at you like you're utter fucking scum and thinking "hang on a minute - I'm not doing anything 'wrong', am I? I'm not a 'criminal'? but these people could do whatever they liked to me, couldn't they, and who would stop them, and who would care?", to give you a new perspective on the relationship between the public and the police...

To answer one of Buk's questions, I think that "state-defined justice" is a contradiction in terms, certainly as long as we're talking about the definition of 'state' that's applicable to all of us, and probably even in abstract, idealistic terms.

And the question of 'trust' is a bit of a misleading one. I trust the police to do their best to fulfill their primary functions. The primary functions of any nation's police force are to act as a piece of state aparatus, to maintain state instituions and to protect property from the majority, as Chomsky put it, or to stop people what don't have things from taking 'em from those what do, to quote (badly) a character in Conrad's The Secret Agent. This is done primarily through the threat of violence.

I expect this to go down well with the "some of my best friends are in the Met" contingent...

But my point is, it's very easy for me to come out with the kind of political theory above, and I do think that it's valid and true: however, what my own personal response would and will be should my flat ever get burgled, or should I get mugged on the way home, etc, has not been tested. And it will probably still be to call the cops. Next question: is it possible to take the dimmest view possible of the police as an instituion and yet still want to fall back on that institution when it suits you? Hmmm...

[ 07-01-2002: Message edited by: Flyboy ]
 
 
Shortfatdyke
08:46 / 07.01.02
flyboy - in answer to your question: perhaps sometimes one has little choice. i don't like a lot of things about the way the police operate, but i do acknowledge the need for the institution. most of the time, with burglaries, car theft etc, it is just a procedure you need to do to get a crime number and make an insurance claim. i should add that when me and my ex were burgled, the video and some jewellery were taken, almost certainly by a drug addict. my ex remarked (and meant it) that she would have given the video away if someone was really that desperate, rather than have such a scary intrusion. i had a bike stolen once - didn't bother with the police - but it would've been a lot easier to deal with if i could believe the person who took it had kids to feed etc. in reality they probably had more money than i did....

btw - i wanted to go to the mayday protest, but kept away because i knew there would be trouble (the media made certain of that). my health makes it impossible for me to be trapped for hours by the police and it makes me furious that this is the case......
 
 
bitchiekittie
10:12 / 07.01.02
I was at my parents house one day not too long ago and I got in a fight with them. my stepfather punched me lightly in the face, and after having vowed to never let another man hit me again (Id just recently left a 4 year abusive relationship and my stepfather was violent to me my whole life), and not wanting to fight back, as my daughter was in the house with us, I called the police from their neighbors house (said neighbor was a witness to some of the childhood abuse). I sat and waited, and found out my stepfather told them he hadnt hit me, Id called in the midst of a temper tantrum. my mother had seen the whole thing and didnt deny this (this is a routine, a really great way to grow up - especially when your bf strangles you in front of your daughter and mother and she still defends the man). the police, most likely because of my mothers acquiescence and my lack of marks other than some redness believed him.

next time Ill just fucking stab the bastard. calling the police usually complicates things and solves nothing, only adds to your frustrations, so in a violent situation (where I personally am the victim, not speaking for witnessing a violent crime) I think its most likely best to take matters in your own hands. logical, reasonable? perhaps not. but certainly something Ive learned is in my best interest. I seem to continue getting my ass kicked by men when I do it the "right" way

[ 07-01-2002: Message edited by: lucky kittie ]
 
 
Tom Coates
10:19 / 07.01.02
I've called the police when my flat gets broken into. My position in a nutshell is that police remain a necessary evil - in that they have a function, but are inevitable the tool of an agency that I won't always agree with, and hence their powers must be circumscribed and their position basically reviled. They should be compensated for having the hatred of all good thinking people, and given new identities after ten years of work.
 
 
Fist Fun
10:25 / 07.01.02
Flyboy: Some interesting points there. Would you really hesitate to call the police if your home was burgled? What about a murder?
I take your point about policing demonstrations but what alternative do you suggest? No police or security? Are there different rules for anti-capitalist demonstrations, BNP rallies, football crowds? Who decides and who draws the line? Should a political demonstration be treated differently than other mass gatherings? I know football references don't work well on the 'lith but pick up today's paper and read about the crowd violence during the Leeds v Cardiff game. Should there have been a police presence?
quote:I trust the police to do their best to fulfill their primary functions. The primary functions of any nation's police force are to act as a piece of state aparatus, to maintain state instituions and to protect property from the majority
Well, that is why I used the term state-defined justice. I understand and agree to a certain extent with this sentiment but it isn't entirely accurate. I think there are many areas of state-defined justice which overlap with a wider view of justice. Take, for example, apprehending civilian murderers within a state.
 
 
Cherry Bomb
13:36 / 07.01.02
My god, bitchie, that sounds awful. Keep in mind, however, that the law is in general not on the side of the victims of domestic violence, rape, etc. I'm not excusing what happened to you or trying to paint you as the victim here, rather just advising to look at the framework in which you are operating. Also as I have experienced and recovered from a year-long abusive relationship , if you need someone to chat with feel free to PM me, OK?

Moving on to topics at hand, however: In general I don't trust the police. And though by no means would I want to denigrate the heroic actions of the police officers and firefighters who lost their lives on September 11, I'm a little uneasy with canonizing ALL police officers as "heroes" due to those actions.

I just have seen time and time again that those who are paid to enforce the law also act as if they're above it. I can't tell you how many times I've seen a cop turn on his lights to go through a red light or make an illegal turn or pass someone, and then turn them off IMMEDIATELY after making their traffic maneuver.

It's also been my personal experience that cops don't like it too much when you question what they're doing, even if you have every right to do so.

I don't really even know if we NEED police. I certainly don't think we need as many as there are, at least on my streets.

But when would I call the police? Well I guess if I were robbed, or in a life-death situation, I don't know.
 
 
Fist Fun
14:01 / 07.01.02
quote:I don't really even know if we NEED police.

I can understand the sentiment behind that, but I just don't grasp the reasoning. Maybe I just need my mind opened. I'm not having a dig Cherry but that statement seems to verge on parody. It seems like you are saying that there should be no apparatus to apprehend criminals/prevent criminal acts. Which I assume means that there should be no law that would classify someone as a criminal.
Can you justify that?
Let's even go back to Plato's ideal state. Run by philosophers, populated by commoners and policed by warriors.
 
 
Haus about we all give each other a big lovely huggle?
14:10 / 07.01.02
The...um...police state, you mean?
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
14:19 / 07.01.02


[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: StrWM no problems/potus ]
 
 
Fist Fun
14:22 / 07.01.02
Ok, limited knowldege of Plato and this is beside the point but wasn't it a philosopher state? Wouldn't a police state be a timocracy as defined by Plato? I'm 99.999% ignorant on this so am happy to be corrected and maybe I should just edit out that reference to Plato.
 
 
bitchiekittie
14:52 / 07.01.02
thanks cherry

you made a great point - the laws tend to favor the criminals more readily than victims. christ, how many times have we read about some asshole robbing someone or some place and suing someone over his subsequent injuries, whether it be an accident or the fault of the actions of the home/business owner or the police?

as with any other reviled profession, I believe that there are people who became cops because they fully intend to make a positive difference, and truly believe that they CAN do so. and Im sure there are many who do. unfortunately, the three problems are that A) their hands are tied in many matters - they are fettered with strict guidelines, red tape, and stupid laws, as well as the common human mistakes that we all make B) there are a lot of goddamn assholes misusing the power they are given, screwing up the real “good guys” and C) there isnt enough real access (or is there any at all?) to reprisals for cops who do offend and abuse their power
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
15:13 / 07.01.02


[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: The Puppet King/potus ]
 
 
Haus about we all give each other a big lovely huggle?
15:18 / 07.01.02
The Platonic state is basically oriented around the rule of the "men of Gold", philosophers discharging their duty to the state even though they would much rather be philosophising. This rule is enforced through a comparatively small force of "men of silver" - the warrior class generally translated as "Overseers" or "Guardians". These protect the borders of the ideal city-state, and the lives of the "men of bronze", the stout yeomen who till the land.

Problem with this happy paradigm being that it is founded on the suppression of freedom of thought, democracy, individuality, art, poetry and social mobility. The rulers lie to their subjects, because they know what is best for those subjects. They suppress any new thoughts or social change, because they believe that their civilisation can only change for the worse. Not exactly Dixon of Dock Green.

Or is it?

[ 07-01-2002: Message edited by: The Halfway Haus ]
 
 
John Adlin
16:01 / 07.01.02
I would't bother calling the Police ever if there was a man in the house waving a knife at me.
Ok so I''m a big bloke with 11 year Martial arts training violent situations don't bother me (i'm actually probably better trained to deal with a knife weilding junke than your average copper.)

My take on this is. And this attitude is formed by my dircet dealings with the Police, not "I heard this from a freind of a freind." My data and therfore my attitude/argument is formed by firsthand experice.
Unfourtunatly the town where I live has a large contingent of drug addict habitual criminals. the type of idiot that holds up the local Video retal shop at 10.30 am guarentted to get away with......whatever float's in the till about £20. Not robbing the pace at 10pm where they could get a days takings-but thats another point.
These Habitual Crimainls have nothing, no house of their own, no job, no car etc etc ect. In short they have nothing to loose.
If a taxpaying (remember we pay their wages) feel that because the system has failed them and they feel the need to take the law into their own hands. The the Police come down on these peple with the full force of the law.
Why? Becasue there people have someting to loose. Status, Job in relation to Crimianl Records, prospects, credit rarings etc.

SO the system is weighted in favor of the habitual offender who knows the intracies of the law better than the average joe.

When would I call the Police?
When I though their presecence in a situation would be a help not a hinderance.

I know Coppers. When you join you are brianwashed into a certain midset that sets you apart from other memebers of the community.
The sort of people that WANT to be cops should never be allowed to be cops.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
16:49 / 07.01.02
I've never really had issues with the police, but being a straight white male who very seldom breaks any laws would explain a lot of that, I'm sure.

I've never been of a mind to characterize all police officers as being corrupt bastards, though... I think it's generally a mixed bag of sadistic bastards, unemployable losers, and a few people genuinely interested in the common good. But nevertheless, it's good to remember that at least in the US, police departments will turn AWAY people seeking jobs in law enforcement for being TOO intelligent.

Would I call the cops? It depends on the situation, I've never quite been in a situation in which that would be an option. I know I'd feel odd about just having cops around, because they tend to sorta frighten me.
 
 
Cherry Bomb
16:52 / 07.01.02
Buk, I said specifically, I don't know if we need police because I don't know if we do. Or if we don't. Yes, I realize it's important to have some security against threats to the people et. al, but I do wonder - and mind I have no way of knowing - I do wonder if some trust in the people's ability to police themselves would eliminate the need for a group designed specifically to police the populace. I'm pretty big on the "live and let live" tip, and I know there's no way I could personally be a police officer.

HOWEVER, I realize the above is a very utopian worldview and may not be able to practically applied to real life. That doesn't stop me from wondering if it could work, but I don't know the answer.

In general, no, I don't trust the police, and that has largely to do with my own personal experiences with them. I'm just being honest.

That said, I would never make the blanket statement "All Policemen Are Bad And You Should Never Trust Them Ever." Because I HAVE also met some very interesting, very altruistic policemen as well.

Oh, I'm a bit under the weather today so bear with me if this isn't the most articularte argument.

[ 07-01-2002: Message edited by: Cherry Bomb ]
 
 
Not Here Still
17:35 / 07.01.02
Personally, I'm with the mighty Morrison on this - there is no 'us' and 'them.'

'They' (ie: the police) could well be 'us' - and who are 'we' anyway?

To stop being a hippy mystic for a second;

I've been on protests, and hated the police on them.

I've been robbed; I've woken up in my own home and found it had been broken into while I slept; and I sure as hell called the police, and was glad when they turned up.

I've had friends end up with criminal records, and narrowly avoided them myself, because of some of my lifestyle choices; and I've hated the police.

I've seen protests where the police have saved people from further injury, and I've like the police.

I've heard policemen discuss the first thing they saw in work that day - a child' teddy bear covered in blood, and I've pitied the police.

And I know of at least one policeman who can, fairly certainly, have been said to have been implicated in one of the most sickening criminal cases I've ever seen. And I want to kill the bastard sometimes.

So what?

I think some posters here may be working from the 'swing' concept - that 'I believed this, and it's not true - so the opposite must be.'

It's not the case. There are no easy answers, the world is grey not black and white.

So yes, I'd call the police. I pay the bastards' wagesa, after all.
 
 
Ierne
18:32 / 07.01.02
I think some posters here may be working from the 'swing' concept - that 'I believed this, and it's not true - so the opposite must be.' – Not Me Again

Maybe some are...but there are others who are speaking from their experiences with the police. It can be difficult to reconcile one's experiences – especially if they have been negative ones – with more general theories of how/why cops are sometimes necessary.

I'll use myself as an example. I understand on an intellectual level that not all cops are corrupt. I happen to know a (lesbian!) cop personally, and she is (as far as I know) an honest & upfront person on & off the job. In the past I have known relatives of friends who were in the police force. I am also aware that policework is very demanding, grueling and extremely dangerous.

This doesn't change the extremely negative personal experiences I have had with the NYPD in my 31 years of law-abiding life. The constant harrassment due to being the wrong gender/race in the wrong place at the wrong time. The awareness that filing a complaint against cops for sexual or racial harassment will get me absolutely nowhere and may make me even more of a target. The people I've known who've suffered far worse than I have, i.e. beatings, sexual attacks, having drugs or weapons planted on them.

It is unfair to judge the entirety of the NYPD by my personal experiences, agreed. That doesn't stop me from feeling nauseous – from fear – when in the presence of a police officer.

Seriously, if I had to call the police for any reason, I'd make sure I wasn't alone in the house. For what little good that may do me, at least there would be a witness to the goings on.
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
18:34 / 07.01.02


[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: The Puppet King/potus ]
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
18:43 / 07.01.02
quote:Originally posted by The Puppet King/potus:
My sentiments exactly.

The entity of the police should be treated like a single person. They have a fairly overall character.


Like black people? Or the hivemind in "Invasion of the Body Snatchers"? I am confused...
 
 
bitchiekittie
18:44 / 07.01.02
I dont know about treating them as a single-minded entity....I think rationalizing it that way will eventually end up getting your ass in a heap of shit – treating people who have power with that suspicious lack of respect is bound to be at least somewhat risky (not to mention the fact that I dont think any person should be treated like that - its only a skip away from other forms of bigotry). rather I think its simply best to treat them as you would any stranger with a gun - assume that they have a very real potential to be dangerous, be wary, and then still give them the modicum of trust necessary to get along
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
20:35 / 07.01.02


[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: The Puppet King/potus ]
 
 
Shortfatdyke
02:20 / 08.01.02
[slightly off topic here]

me too, kittie, me too cherry! - 10 years with an abusive fucker. let's form a club....

[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: shortfatdyke ]
 
 
Disco is My Class War
03:23 / 08.01.02
quote:Originally posted by The Puppet King/potus:

With the police you can prevent unfair treatment by modifying your behaviour a bit.


See now, that's precisely the problem. Did you read Iernes post? Isn't it self-evident that the police will probably harass some people regardless of how they 'modify their behaviour'? Isn't the violence of the state that we are expected to regulate our behaviour (with respect for property, but also a whole lot of other things) ourselves -- a bit like what Foucault called the society of control?

I'm not sure if I could call the police. For a while, the mere sight of a police uniform made me feel physically sick (after Melbourne counter-globalisation protests, in which I got pounded maliciously). However the police are also people -- entrapped in the state just as much as anyone is, in some ways. In fact, you could argue that they are far more 'trapped', since their function is as a specific violent tool of the state.

In terms of crimes against my person, I don't know. A part of me feels that forcing the legal apparatus to deal with crimes like rape and sexual violence and abuse is a responsibility, as an activist. Part of me also feels that it would end up being intrusive and pointless. I am lucky never to have had to deal with a sexual situation violent enough to call rape. My mother called the cops on my dad when I was about fifteen, and really I don't think it helped in the slightest. She would have been better off calling a friend; there was nothing the cops could do, anyhow. And it was obvious that they believed his story -- 'She's hysterical, I never hit her, maybe I slapped her once but not hard, officer, look how crazy she is, she hates me' -- than hers, which was true and quite rational.
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
11:18 / 08.01.02


[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: The Puppet King/potus ]
 
 
Haus about we all give each other a big lovely huggle?
11:51 / 08.01.02
That sound, ladies and gentleman, was the sound of a point being missed.

I think Rosa might be suggesting that to think to yourself "Hey, I'm a great judge of human character! I can avoid being hassled by the police as long as, you know, I stop dying my hair purple. And smoking dope. And being gay." is not necessarily *really* being the winner and cleverest of all. It's a bit like outsmarting the taxman by always making sure your taxes are payed well in advance.

[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: The Haus of Rain ]
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
12:07 / 08.01.02


[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: The Puppet King/potus ]
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
12:12 / 08.01.02


[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: The Puppet King/potus ]
 
 
Haus about we all give each other a big lovely huggle?
12:23 / 08.01.02
...thus one might question the unexamined supposition that a certain attitude will invite mistreatment by the police, apparently without considering that being a white straight man may actually have answered most of the "shall we disregard this person's validity" questionnaire before even opening your mouth.

[ 08-01-2002: Message edited by: The Haus of Rain ]
 
  

Page: (1)2345

 
  
Add Your Reply