BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


US and Israel in a huff after being accused of racism.

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
sleazenation
12:52 / 04.09.01
this from the BBC USA and Israel withdraw from racism conference after Israel is accused of racism

This just beggars belief.

[ 04-09-2001: Message edited by: sleazenation ]
 
 
Dee Vapr
13:14 / 04.09.01
Does it really tho? My impression was that the US didn't even want to be there in the first place, and I was surprised Israel / Palestine turned up, the sitch being as it is at the moment, on the brink of war..
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
15:50 / 04.09.01
It's not too surprising, I think: Palestine and other arab nations trying to use the conference to muster support against Israel on a level which isn't solely territorial; Israel gets in a huff, unsurprisingly; the US walks out from sympathy with Isreal, and probably also to avoid the issue of potentially expensive reparations for slavery.

It's also not surprising that the European nations which are least in favour of making a full apology (which might lead to financial reparations) are those which were most involved in empire-building and slavery: the UK, the Netherlands, Spain and Portugal (though some of those in favour also had empires or at least overseas possessions - not sure where the line is on that one - Belgium, France...)
 
 
netbanshee
20:54 / 04.09.01
The only decisions I see happening here are bad ones...not that they shouldn't try or anything. It just sucks how many dimensions this disagreement encompasses. Someone has to lose footing somewhere and that's the last thing that's going to happen.

We need to consult an outside party...anyone know any space aliens? But knowing how they work, they'll probably resolve to use their death rays before we do...
 
 
autopilot disengaged
09:01 / 05.09.01
the US didn't wanna be there anyway - 'cause they're worried civil rights groups are going to push for reperations - for the slave trade.

and as for israel - remember when they wanted to make torture legal? oh, how we laughed...

they both need to be brought to heel - but who's genuinely got the power to do it?
 
 
autopilot disengaged
09:05 / 05.09.01
oops: just realised i've ripped half yr entry off, macavity. uh: consider it highest form, flattery etc.
 
 
Cherry Bomb
09:05 / 05.09.01
It's just another reason to be completely humiliated by an administration that DIDN'T ACTUALLY WIN! the spot in the first place. At this point, it's like, "What did my idiot king do today?"

Still love the photos making W look like a complete moron that appear in the paper practically daily. Thanks, AP!

Just know, if you ever hear anyone related to that administration say again, "I speak for the American people," as in, "Most Americans SUPPORT the death penalty," I here at home am saying, "No you fucking do NOT! You do NOT speak for ME! Stop SAYING that!"
 
 
Molly Shortcake
09:05 / 05.09.01
While were at it why don't we make all the decendants of the African tribes (who, by the way, originated the African slave trade) pay restitutions to the decendants of slaves?

It's alot easier than dealing with institutional racism and notions of radical otherness and projection. People might actually have to admit that they themselves are racist!

Israel and Palestine are killing each other over fucking BEDTIME STORIES. Let em.
 
 
Jackie Susann
09:05 / 05.09.01
quote: Israel and Palestine are killing each other over fucking BEDTIME STORIES. Let em.

Suggestion: Have SOME idea what the FUCK you are talking about BEFORE you post.

Clarification: Israel has illegally and viciously occupied Palestinian territories with the support of the world's largest military superpower for decades. Palestine has no remotely comparable political, military or economic power, which is why you see so much news footage of Israeli soldiers shooting at Palestinian kids throwing rocks.

Just saying they're 'killing each other' obscures the power relations; saying, 'over bedtime stories' obscures the geopolitics of occupation. Saying we should let people who don't share our religion - coincidentally enough, nonwhite people - kill each other, is at least morally outrageous, if not outright racist.
 
 
Jackie Susann
09:05 / 05.09.01
Oh, and Kooky, I think we can challenge you for most hysterically bumbling, ineffectual, conservative head of state. Two news stories tonight reported that John Howard can't get international leaders (Bush and Megawati) to return his phone calls.

Of course, Australia being utterly insignificant in global politics it hardly matters, but still.
 
 
No star here laces
09:05 / 05.09.01
I think being utterly insignificant in global politics is one of australia's best assets. The mandate of rich, powerful nations to form some kind of international police force is deeply suspect in the first place.
 
 
Jackie Susann
09:05 / 05.09.01
Considering how insignificant it is, Australia manages an awful lot of fucked up shit. Quick, top of my head list: attempted indigenous genocide. Training Indonesian troops. Mandatory indefinite detention for refugees. Etc.
 
 
autopilot disengaged
09:05 / 05.09.01
is Megawati a transformer?

he sounds POWERFUL.
 
 
grant
13:10 / 05.09.01
I just realized something last night: the vast majority of American Jews are Democrats, and this move is definitely going to curry favor for the currect prez among the mainstream Jewish voters here. Interestingly political.
 
 
Molly Shortcake
20:07 / 05.09.01
Did I ever say I was white? I'm not, the name is a joke. And I stick by the bedtime stories.
 
 
nul
20:41 / 05.09.01
Clarification: Israel has illegally and viciously occupied Palestinian territories with the support of the world's largest military superpower for decades.

The Israelis might say that the Palestinians have been viciously occupying their soverign territory for hundreds of years, and that they, as the Jewish inheritors of their ancestors, have every right to reclaim their lost lands.

But that just sounds bloody crazy and we would all laugh at them.
 
 
Jackie Susann
09:31 / 06.09.01
Ice Honkey - did I say you were white? No, I said you were ignorant and that your comments were offensive and borderline racist.
 
 
the Fool
09:31 / 06.09.01
quote:Originally posted by autopilot disengaged:
is Megawati a transformer?

he sounds POWERFUL.


She's a big lady...
 
 
PingPangPong
09:31 / 06.09.01
It is disgraceful that the U.S pulled out of the U.N conference on racism because Israel was labelled a "rascist" state. Sorry, Israel the truth certainly does hurt.

It is also ironic that it was the U.N., who in 1947 set up a plan to establish a Jewish state to the detriment of the Palestinians, who had resided there for hundreds of years.

Since 1945 there has existed global realisation of the horrors of the concentration camps and how Jewish human rights were violated. In the year 2001 could the Israeli government attempt to exercise empathy with the suffering of the Palestinians. How can the Israeli's who were once oppressed now turn into the opressors?

Since the U.S, is a major finacial supporter of Israel, they could persuade Israel to change it's wicked ways. No, instead the Bush administration who has no real electoral backing from American Jews, leaves the U.N conference hand in hand with Israel.

Has the U.S. forgotten it's own treatment of it's minorities, notably the African-American population? Was there any consideration of this minority in the U.S's decision to pull out of the U.N convention. If only the African-Americans had an ally status in the Middle East,then perhaps they would be given more respect.

The Republican government 'won' the election with a small minority. Aware of this, Mr. Bush promised to take the other Democratic half of the population into consideration and try to bring the country closer together. Obviously he wasn't referring to the African American population.

Shame on the U.S government!
 
 
YNH
02:26 / 07.09.01
Yah, this is only the third time Zionism has been defined by an international caucus as a racist ideology, and every president since Roosevelt has supported Israel...

Ice, Bananapants was right; your bedtime stories theory is hot air. Foul, thick, and hot.

nEtbanshEE: Reagan did suggest, before a similar UN body, that aliens would solve everything by bringing nations together in defense.
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
02:26 / 07.09.01
Before everyone jumps in to condemn the Israelis as dreadful racists out of hand, it might be worth looking a little more closely...

quote:Originally posted by PingPangPong:
It is disgraceful that the U.S pulled out of the U.N conference on racism because Israel was labelled a "rascist" state. Sorry, Israel the truth certainly does hurt.


What was the reason? I thought it was the equation of Zionism with racism that was the problem... and in that case we can almost certainly blame the current (very right-wing)Israeli regime rather than the Israeli people... and though the Israelis seem to be feeling very persecuted at the moment, let's not forget that until 1947 they were persecuted - it can be a difficult mindset to drop, and I can quite see how it must feel to some Israeli Jews as though they're facing the whole of the Arab world rather than a few poor and badly equipped Palestinians. That's not to say that the current Israeli position deserves anything like support; just that it might be easier to reach a conclusion in this matter if one side isn't portrayed as being completely evil.

quote:It is also ironic that it was the U.N., who in 1947 set up a plan to establish a Jewish state to the detriment of the Palestinians, who had resided there for hundreds of years.

It was a genuine attempt to provide the Jewish people (who, lest we forget, had been roaming for centuries with no homeland - a way of being which laid them open to all sorts of abuses, much like the Romany peoples). It's unfortunate that since the original settlement was made, Jewish Israeli settlers have encroached on the Palestinian territories (and that deserves nothing but condemnation), but the original settlement provided a reasonable solution for one of the most politically sensitive areas on the planet.

quote:In the year 2001 could the Israeli government attempt to exercise empathy with the suffering of the Palestinians. How can the Israeli's who were once oppressed now turn into the opressors?

Again, it's because the Israelis still see themselves as being the oppressed.

quote:...the Bush administration who has no real electoral backing from American Jews, leaves the U.N conference hand in hand with Israel.

I think it would be very dangerous for any American administration to appear to condemn Israel, whether that administration was Republican or Democrat. I also think that the U.S. was using it as an excuse.

quote:Has the U.S. forgotten it's own treatment of it's minorities, notably the African-American population? Was there any consideration of this minority in the U.S's decision to pull out of the U.N convention.

Of course there was a consideration - it's just that it was a largely negative one. The U.S. government doesn't want to have to apologise to its African-American citizens for their former enslavement, because (given the current success of claims for financial reparations for damages inflicted on Jews by businesses during the Holocaust) it might lead to major payments to the African-American population - and given the Bush tax-cut promise, it's hard to see where that money is going to come from and how it could get support from Republican voters. The U.K. government is similarly reluctant to make an apology for fear of reparation payments.

I think it's shameful that these kind of considerations have more bearing for some governments than the question of whether to apologise for the subjection of human beings on a racial basis, but unfortunately that's how these things happen...

[ 07-09-2001: Message edited by: Macavity ]
 
 
autopsy of a rockstar
16:11 / 07.09.01
quote:Originally posted by Macavity:


I think it's shameful that these kind of considerations have more bearing for some governments than the question of whether to apologise for the subjection of human beings on a racial basis, but unfortunately that's how these things happen...
[ 07-09-2001: Message edited by: Macavity ]


:::shrugs::: Yep. These things
happen
 
 
YNH
16:35 / 07.09.01
Autopsy, would you mind providing a hint of warning next time? I'm all for being shocked, but I was expecting an article, not blood soaked photos.

quote:Originally posted by Macavity:
What was the reason? I thought it was the equation of Zionism with racism that was the problem... and in that case we can almost certainly blame the current (very right-wing)Israeli regime rather than the Israeli people...


I think it had more to do with the draft that condemned Israel for it's actions, since the forties, toward Palestine. Note that most other nations agreed with the Arab states. Are there examples of compromise and support for Palestinian positions on the Israeli left? The Israeli people certainly don't deserve the blame, but neither do they deserve to be there in the first place.

quote:It was a genuine attempt to provide the Jewish people (who, lest we forget, had been roaming for centuries with no homeland - a way of being which laid them open to all sorts of abuses, much like the Romany peoples). It's unfortunate that since the original settlement was made, Jewish Israeli settlers have encroached on the Palestinian territories (and that deserves nothing but condemnation), but the original settlement provided a reasonable solution for one of the most politically sensitive areas on the planet.

The original settlement provided a "reasonable" halving of the state of Palestine, the top half becoming the new "Israel," and the bottom remaining Palestine. What you see on your map today was supported by the US against most UN drafts, provided "buffer zones" between the new "Israel" and its Arab neighbors, and robbed Palestine of approximately 30% more land; leaving them with the least fertile and most dangerous territories. Today, even these are contested because rocks don't exactly measure up to Lockheed Martin fighters and bombers. The Israeli people "settling" in these Palestinian areas are worthy of our condemnation, as surely as [The Flyboy] would be for moving into my kitchen flanked by armed guards.

The US has always supported Israel. Indeed, most of the time, it's the only nation doing so. If Israel had decided to leave the room for any reason, the US would have followed. Conveniently, it also gives us an out from discussing our own shitty policies.

Can we talk about why we're so supportive? About how having an ally in oil country is a business decision?
 
 
netbanshee
04:19 / 08.09.01
...it's like I stated above..it's like the OJ Simpson case but this one matters. Too many reasons cloud clear judgement of any honest outcome. When beliefs are in opposition and the rest of the world wants their fair share, who do you turn to? Obviously not anyone else...but the problem is..hey let's still kill each other. It's ridiculous, even someone who has a moral issue is taken advantage of...blah...it's like Sparta vs. Sparta. I'm sure someone has plenty of accomodations for a better future but do you honestly think anyone will listen?
 
 
Ganesh
07:32 / 08.09.01
Watched a spokesman for the Native American Nation in Canada interviewed on BBC World, at the conference. Amusingly, his name was Matthew Coon Come...
 
 
Molly Shortcake
05:44 / 09.09.01
Several of you are under the preposterious impression that I posted racist comments. Did I ever mention race? Not once. I refered to nationalities, not races, thought it was rather obvious myself.

Mr. Bananapants, I was responding to Cherry Bomb. She infered I held white life in higher regard than non (even though I made no mention of race, I'm confused here) which implied I was white.

Let em kill each other - that's not racism, it's anti humanism at it's finest, don't look for an apology here, there isn't one.

Bedtime stories?

The African tribes who refuse to use condoms in the face of AIDS. Their shamans and witch doctors deemed them black magic, incompatable technology. Overpopulation is a major problem in Egypt, the masses don't care, more children = better social standing/wealth. The right of return, the prophecy of the Zionist state, the jyhad, whatever. Panic interference, a common responce of fundamential ideology in a postmodern world.

There's this bullshit, liberal, humanist notion that every society is capable or 'deserving' of survivial, when in fact, many societies do everything in their power to self destruct. Change your narritives or perish. Societies have to transform themselves. You can lead a horse to water....

There's absolutely no dialogue on racism and there never will be, until white liberalism, conservative denial and victim mentality are put aside.

[ 09-09-2001: Message edited by: Ice Honkey/Turbo Shark ]
 
 
nul
06:04 / 09.09.01
Ice Honkey/Turbo Shark is offically my favorite Barbelither.
 
 
Little Miss Anthropy
06:55 / 09.09.01
You mean because he makes as little sense as you do?
 
 
Jackie Susann
08:50 / 09.09.01
No, it's me who hasn't been clear enough. I didn't mean to suggest you're a racist, and I'm sorry if I did. What I hoped to convey with the phrase 'borderline racist' was that your arguments are close enough to overtly racist ones - like, "Let them bloody arabs kill each other and be done with it" - that they could easily be read that way. Similarly, choosing Egypt as your example of a country where people are dying but entrenched power structures keep refusing to provide adequate prevention measures/information - when the same is true of the US - is close to overtly racist arguments.

Calling middle-eastern countries ideologies 'bedtime stories', claiming that justifies utter indifference to the lives of people living their, and not (apparently) applying the same standards to first world cultures like your own - it might not be racism, but it's close, and it's definitely nationalism of a fairly miserable kind.
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
13:16 / 10.09.01
I didn't mean to give the impression that I Israeli incursions into Palestinian territory were justified, whether they took place yesterday or fifty years ago. I don't. I also thought I'd made it fairly clear that I was aware of the disparity in military equipment between the Israeli army and the Palestinians. I was trying to see what the Israeli motivation might be, as entire polities don't generally rise up against their neighbours for no reason at all; and it's generally less than helpful to condemn a polity out of hand - it tends to lead to more trouble rather than any sort of solution. Whether there is any solution in this case remains to be seen.

Teela: do you know anything about the Israeli Arabs? I was wondering what treatment they receive under the Israeli governments - what their position is regarding the current conflict (are we allowed to call it a war yet?)

My comment that 'that's how these things happen' was not intended to refer to the actual conflict, but to the way in which governments are often swayed by financial considerations rather than considering the rights, or wrongs, or facts, pertaining to any given situation - in this case the question of reparations.

Sorry if I sound peevish, but I get annoyed when my wishy-washy liberal comments get taken the wrong way...

As for the bedtime stories, I completely agree with Mr Bananapants.
 
 
Jamieon
13:35 / 10.09.01
quote: Let em kill each other - that's not racism, it's anti humanism at it's finest, don't look for an apology here, there isn't one.

The "em" you refer to are not a couple of blokes slugging it out, but millions of people. This isn't something to be smug about, it's not a space provided for you to demonstrate just how much you don't give a shit, it's real life. And real lives are at stake. Talk about fucking "bedtime stories".....

"A bunch of people get blown up by a suicide bomber? Fuck it! Who gives a shit? It's time the white middle class establishment woke up to what's really going on, man: the real world's full of death and war and cultures desperate to self destruct - stop romanticising everything! Yeah!"

You seriously need to remember that the rest of the world exists and is made of flesh and feeling just like you.
 
 
netbanshee
15:08 / 10.09.01
...I think that the heading "bedtime stories" is very appropriate to any and all ideologies, no matter how serious the struggle is or who it's relating to. It's all relating to where they've come from...one telling another their oral and historical traditions. That's all my beliefs are as most likely yours are too.

Killing people over ideas is facism at it's finest, where the true human values that are really at stake are glazed over nicely by everyone who regards themselves a an authority. I mean...this is real life Starship Troopers...which side are you gonna pick? I feel sorry for the people over there and ashamed at countries like the US who go under the mediator guise just to keep those oil lines open...
 
 
Molly Shortcake
16:08 / 10.09.01
I admit, letting them kill each other is absolutely horrible in reality, but only mildly distracting in an abstract sence.

I don't take media seriously. As far as I know, everything I see on the television is completely made up.

What else can you do when two soverign groups, hellbent on killing each other for decades, have conflicting ideologies that grant each of them a legitimate claim of space and superiority? Moderation on both sides hasn't worked, fundamentialism has prevailed. Violence is an integral part of their culture, it's not just going to suddenly stop.

Both sides constantly ask the U.S to intevein and they consistently ignore it's recomendations, painfull to all. No one's going to be happy here. Neither side will accept the fact that peace takes sacrifice; physical, mental and spiritual. Isreal refuses to stop building new settlements, Palestein won't give up the right of return and they constantly fight over control
of sites sacred to both of them.

All those things I posted are every bit as applicapable to the United States or any other 'first world' country. We'll have to change our narritives or self destruct also. The 'third world' dosen't have a monopoly on fundamential ideology by any means. The U.S is full of fudamential materialists, christians and whatnot, but we're not in a civil war or falling apart at the seams, not yet anyway. Netbanshee can attest to my ever constant, real life attacks on American fundamentalism.

Certainly, no society that asks for help from a able one should be denied. Culture is a very tricky thing, you can only plug holes in a damn for so long, ultimately the only lasting change will come from themselves.

Anthropologists are the best solution for these types of problems. They can most effectively figure out what sorts of narritives are most likely to be accepted by a foreign culture and how to impliment new technologies.

The fact still remains that many societies are going to fall apart (violently or otherwise) regardless of outside intervention and good intentions. It's not 'good' or 'bad', it's the same as it's always been.

On the bright side, it's very possible to save people, not intact societies, as long as other ones are willing accomodate, if not accept them.

[ 10-09-2001: Message edited by: Ice Honkey/Turbo Shark ]
 
 
nul
16:56 / 10.09.01
You mean because he makes as little sense as you do?

No, because he makes posts rather than witty one-liners. Yes, that must be it.
 
 
Molly Shortcake
20:54 / 10.09.01
An exerpt from Salon

The horror, the horror

Civilian massacres like My Lai and No Gun Ri are inevitable in the exceptionally ruthless Western way of war. So why can't we just face up to it?

Hanson would be likely to see the Korean refugees' ordeal -- being shot at and blown up by the very forces that were supposedly sent to save them -- as an example of "cultural crystallization," where "insidious" and "murky" elements of Western culture become "stark and unforgiving in the finality of organized killing." That's a fancy way of saying that the stories Americans were telling themselves, true or untrue, when they came to Korea -- about who they were, why they were in this war-torn Asian nation, and who they were dealing with -- were the driving force and underlying structure of the nationwide massacre in which No Gun Ri was only a bloody blip.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply