BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Girl model sites - disturbing

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
Mercury
22:22 / 15.08.01
sorry to barge in, but we're talking about two different problems here, right? Parents (ir)responsibility and Web sites.

Now me, I had no idea this thing was going on until I read this thread. I just looked at the child super model sites and it seems like a well established net business. And it got me thinking that getting this thing off the web doen't eliminate the problem. It makes it harder to search and destroy, and it probably would cause for some more insidious way to keep doing business. This thing isn't just about to stop cause the sites are closed. Worse than that, it would tend to mask the problem. If it isn't there, then it doesn't happen, and we will all sleep in a better world. Right.

- Mercury
 
 
bio k9
20:51 / 18.08.01
quote:Originally posted by Mercury:
I had no idea this thing was going on until I read this thread...it got me thinking that getting this thing off the web doen't eliminate the problem. It makes it harder to search and destroy, and it probably would cause for some more insidious way to keep doing business. This thing isn't just about to stop cause the sites are closed. Worse than that, it would tend to mask the problem.
- Mercury


I saw a TV program about internet child porn a while back and the authorities and psychologists interviewed all said the same thing:

Having this type of pornographic material readily availably on the web helps pedophiles to believe that what they are doing is OK because other people are doing it too. The web has taken a lot of the risk out of being a pedophile because it is no longer necessary for them to make a trip to a dimly lit back alley shop for their obsession, they can just point and click from the well lit comfort of their own home. they now have a sense of community as its easier than ever for them to swap pictures and messages with other like minded individuals.

And while Im sure that its easy for watchdog groups to keep an eye on the people that visit these sites they also have to figure out who is looking at them and why. The link at the beginning of this post probably contributed two dozen hits to that site.
 
 
Rage
02:56 / 03.09.01
This part is kind of irrelevant, but why come down on someone who says that some people shouldn't breed, hoping to be reassured that their statement was an attempt to wind someone one? Are opinions that differ from the masses of the barbelith collective thought of as "attempts to wind someone up" here?

I just like to be objective. Here's some more objectivism:

It's just a website. There are plenty of "illegal" sites that feature naked 10 year old girls sucking horse dick. Money is made. It's all about money, as the guy himself said. "I'm money hungry," said the guy.

It's not like WE'RE paying to see these pictures. What other people want to pay for... it's their own business. So WHAT if people are sexually turned on by little girls who are provocative looking? Can they HELP this? Do they CHOOSE this? Are your reactions not similar to conservatives who say that being turned on by someone of the same sex is preverted? You're arguing against the taboo. Are you attempting to wind someone up by arguing against the taboo, by the way?

quote: they now have a sense of community as its easier than ever for them to swap pictures and messages with other like minded individuals.

Are you attempting to wind someone up? Can someone please point out that our message swapping gives us a sense of community, and that those with taboo sexual desires need this sense of community as much as we do?

[ 03-09-2001: Message edited by: Rage ]
 
 
autopilot disengaged
02:56 / 03.09.01
rage: we're all consenting adults. big diff.

as to whether paedophiles choose their orientation or not - well, so far as i know that's still pretty indeterminate. i'm certainly not in the 'kill 'em all' brigade, but, y'know - adults wanting to fuck children will tend to provoke a reaction.

anyway: that's a whole other thread -

the argument against these websites is all about the rights of the minor. and if a parent isn't going to protect their kid from being fetishized as a sex object, who is?
 
 
autopilot disengaged
10:16 / 03.09.01
and while i'm on the subject - wanted to leave it, couldn't...

you're making one big leap for mankind in comparing homosexuality with paedophilia. in a gay relationship, both partners know what they're getting into, choose what it turns into - AND NOBODY GETS HURT.

children, on the other hand, do not know about sex, have no life experience to make sense of it, and have bodies which cannot yet handle it. not only would it be physically painful, but it could quite easily cause lasting damage.

look. i'm liberal. i believe in free speech. but some taboos are there for a reason.

if you want to start a debate on paedophilia as a whole - start a new thread. i, for one, would contribute. but this thread is about the particular rights of the children being pushed into the limelight.

and, yeah. it's WRONG.
 
 
Rage
23:58 / 03.09.01
Ok, I'll start a new topic. Good idea. I've been wanting to have this debate for a while, actually.
 
 
000
07:41 / 07.09.01
“This is definitely not kiddie porn in any form," said Webe Web spokesman Evan Gordon. "None of our sites have naked children."

Meanwhile some of these sites link directly to child porn and show children engaging in sexual acts.
Also peadophile sites link to them and they needed permission to do so.

quote: Rothkoid
A similar trend's happening in music


Not just in music. Movies and fashion as well, they have even lowered the age for kids were its legal for them to work as of 14 years again.

quote: Rothkoid
I don't know why the increased demand for youngsters is only making headway now.


This trend is going on since a few years and was REINTRODUCED by the fashion scene trough the junkie look models, this look showed you vulnerable skinny models, so the people got used to seeing vulnerable faces. When the people got used to that they lowered the age of the especially female models and since last year, the girls they use in certain fashion magazine like Vogue are young as 10 to 12, they use this age group for big campaigns and lately also to promote beauty products and makeup, check the Maybeline ads the oldest is 14 years old.
When I say reintroduced I mean reintroduced, this peadophilian display of power was at his height at the end of the 70s (around 1976) it started when David Hamilton was already very popular but after his movie in 1977 “BILITIS” it started something that went beyond the normal. Remember that Brook shields was hot at that time. she was 11 years old “LOLITA”. Then things got out of hand and in 1978 you had little girls and I mean little girls age 2 to 5 years all dressed up heavy makeup hair all puffed up doing evening wear shootings for Vogue. These girls were used for jewel ads, campaigns, fashion and were even displayed wrapped in fur with heavy evening makeup showing naked shoulders as low as above there nipples, they looked like little hookers. It was really grotesque. Vogue got sewed for doing this and in the beginning of the 80s it was forbidden for little children to appear like that in fashion magazines they were not allowed to make high amounts of money and were only allowed to work during the day and ONLY during their school holidays. I wonder if they would do this again.

quote: I can't really imagine any mainstream/established modelling agency compromising their reputation like the internet one mentioned.

Sorry to bust that bubble, they did in the late 70s and they are doing it since halfway 90s, it’s the big clients who ask for these kids and if the agencies don’t follow up they loose these clients and with these big clients they loose the catalogues who bring in all the money. Yes they can say no but most say yes.
All these big clients are companies, catalogues, warehouses and magazines and they are owned by men, you can do the math now can you.

quote: I'm wondering, too, how Li'l Amber would feel about it all, when she reaches college age. Happy? Proud? – Rothkoid
Probably numb. Like most people whose parents put them in sexually compromising situations during childhood for money. Ierne


She is not a victim, look at the photos you can see a girl who has only one thing on her mind and that is that she wants to be a top model, its written all over her face and the way she holds herself in front of that camera is sickening mature. She is not told how to pose, she is posing herself.
Why things like this can happen is because most little girls want to be either movie stars, singers or model. We have Mattel to thank for that when these fuckers came with Barbie. Lots of little girls wine so long and drive many parents up the wall and wont stop unless mummy takes them to an agency. Almost every agency has a group of very young girls just in case a client or catalogue ask for one. And of course you have the kids only agencies.
About 80% of little kids look cute or pretty and could be models and with all the media input these youngsters get, about 60% of the girls want to be a model.

quote: by Anaconda Jones The parents should be shot. This is the problem with letting just anyone breed.
In the sense of my thoughts, absolutely. And that just letting anyone breed causes many children to suffer so yes it’s a problem. ( no matter how you attackme on this one you wont change my opinion)
quote: by The Flyboy Please reassure me you're just trying to wind someone up...
I am just stating my opinion and if this winds somebody up, sorrry.
quote: by Johnny Mother At least the above 'girl model' sites are vaguely honest about their malicious intent, this site boasts fully-nude girls aged from about 8 to 18 all for 'arts sake'.
Why do you think Arts have been subsidized by governments especially in the western world and its the church who started to subsidize arts. Why do you think they started ages ago with paying for painters to decorate the walls and ceilings of big churches? So they could look up and see their object of lust, little naked painted child angels. Taboo’s can only be broken when the art scene jump’s on a taboo. Calling perversity art can make this perversity accepted in the end. But when it comes to peadophilia this luckily doesn’t work that well, they have tried and tried as they are trying now again. Why doesn’t it work that well? Because luckily most people when they get a child they wanted this child and the child is received with love and all those who do so will do anything to protect their child. These people are of the protecting mind, what they have created they will protect. Men preying on little children remain the absolute enemy of little children for they are of the destroying mind.
quote: by I quote the The Mirror when I say "Ban this sick filth now!"

AMEN!

quote: by GRIM What if access was restricted to young boys rather than dirty old men?

Dirty ‘old’ men used to be young boys at one time.

quote: by Thrasher If that pic that grant posted is a pic of a little girl then i retract the theoretical sinario that i posted before

Look at you fashion magazines and at you makeup ads or designer ads some girls are just 9 years old , the problem with all the growth hormones and the use of milk in about every thing plus the use of high doses of minerals that enhance growth, is that we have girls menstruating already at 7 years the average age in the western and westernised world is 8 years and the youngest child that they know of to menstruate is 5 years old. This means that the body of these young girls mature faster and as our behaviour changes because our body changes as of the moment of menstruation you will have these girls looking like 16/18 when they are just 10.

quote: by ELLIS But if those pictures on artforums (some of which are disturbing in themselves while others are just plain nudes with no sexual overtones) were placed in an art gallery instead of an internet webpage, would it be considered art?

Yes. This happened 2 years ago in Holland, in some gay art gallery in Amsterdam there was a series of nude pics from little kids dating back to the first days of photography, it was definitely peadophilian art, but it was one photo that drove the police right in their arms. It was a picture of an nude adult man , cut below his chin and above his knees. He had a hard on pointing happily at the camera and holding a little boy in his arms while cupping the buttocks of this little boy. Court case and all, the photo and 9 other photos were taken out but had to be replaced again because of the fact of freedom of arts article xxx in their law books

quote: by Anaconda Jones This lumped on top of some of the other parenting related disasters that have been in the news lately make me wonder about the future of the human race.
This wondering will keep you awake.
quote: by Mordant Carnival Christ on a bike- how can anyone even consider doing this? It's almost as creepy as those evil kiddy pageants.
Tell me about it, especially these nasty greasy saliva spitting men who sponsor and earn from these pageants, but still they would not be able to do this if these mostly fat ugly 3-D still believing that Elvis is alive minded women would not enrol their children.

quote: It's not like people are naive about pedophilia these days.
That is the whole point, most people are naïve about what peadophilia is and how they look like and were they are working and what makes them tick. With every new bust there is a new truth thrown in the mainstream to dilute the people. As to how serious this crime is, the people never get the real stories and the punishments are also confusing for in most countries the punishments are nothing. Then every time a case shows itself to be able to wake people up, the story kind of disappears. Now ask your self how is this possible, and then remind yourself what you need to do, need to have and who you need to be in order to be able to make a story disappear from the mainstream. Only if you have some influence power and money will you be bale to make a story disappear, especially one like that.
quote: I have this nightmare vision of two parents watching their sprog in the paddling pool, exchanging a glance, and- kerCHING! Cartoon dollar signs apper in their eyes. Or maybe they born with dollar-sign eyes, I dunno.
It’s a very REALISTIC vision and with more people loosing their jobs and with poverty growing in the western societies this might just be the only way for people to make some cash and be able to live in the future. And the saddest thing is can you blame them then? If ‘selling’ their child so the whole family can eat? No. Is it acceptable? NO! Absolutely Not.
quote: by HI GANESH It's all child abuse, sexual or otherwise - and we all know parents who fuck their children are far, far more common than the semi-mythical 'sex beast'...
Absolutely, “Call me crazy” by Ann Heche one nice example. “My mother was a good Christian mother she did not question her husband my father. We always went to church on Sunday, we were this perfect white blond blue eyed family, always nice and always HYPOCRITE, we were big fat liars” On Larry King Live

quote: by Anaconda Jones So, not arguing with everyone's right to bear children, what are the ethics and responsibilities of parenthood?
To cherish live and to realize that a child is not property. To protect, guide and to learn this new human the difference between good and bad, and to realize that all that a child sees and hears outside but inside of the house as well, will influence the child and will define his/her future, not to fight the child but to help and make a child understand for the parent has been a child her/him self and the child has yet to enter the world of the mature.
quote:What is society's role in child rearing?
Societies role is to stay on track with the fact that not every body is to be trusted and to keep its eyes open to these flaws in human DNA and to never forget that humans are by far the most destructive beings on this planet , societies role would be to demand effective punishments for child abusers and to realize that a real sexual preference can not be changed and as such society should start to demand that no men can be alone with little children for men are programmed to hunt and as such they posses the natural capability to destroy and as women are the ones who bare new live they are programmed to nurture for they create. This means that there should be a law stating that in all professions were one has to work with little children not one man is allowed to enter these grounds. For all men who work with children on this board I am not trying to offend you but the fact remains that sexual perpetrators are mostly men ( more than 90%) and as such one has to take this in consideration and ban all men from these grounds, just in case. May I remind you that hardly anybody can recognize a rapist let alone a peadophile, and no they are not your typical dirty old men, young boys from the age of 8 years can and have raped little children the age of 2 or 3 years, very peadophile was a child ones as well.
quote:Should the government EVER step in?
They are doing so already since they introduced marriage as a law, since they came with orphan homes, since they came with schools, since they told the people its OK for men to punish their wives as by marriage the woman became/becomes a man’s property. It’s the governments who are to blame for most of the abuse and sexual abuse of women and children. It’s the governments who have been telling the people to go out and breed like madman while in the mean time complaining about overpopulation. What is wrong with this picture? In some countries like Germany-Belgium etc they are paying money for people to pop children why is that? Bad economy, unemployment, not enough resources and space, long waiting lists for medical care, not enough money for medical care, not enough schools or teachers and still they are telling the people go and breed and they pay for this.
It’s the government that say we need to protect our children and live is precious and yet they don’t or hardly do, punish the sexual/abusers of our children. Child labour every were, child slaves who work for western companies, child sex tourism that has been booming since 1996 and the market is still growing. But the best example is that governments are filled with paedophiles and that they subsidize peadophilian clubs yearly in Holland- Danmark-England-are paid by the Vatican in Italy etc as long as we have a male dominated society you will have sexual perpetrators preying on women and children. And as long as the people keep on believing the lies of the suits, they will be able to do this.
quote:What is the place of a child in society? Does a child "belong" to the parents in such a manner that they should be able to do what they please with it? Profit from it, no matter how unethical it seems? Which seems to be where we came in.
The place of a child in society is to make sure we don’t extinct and it’s the child that makes us humans grow. It’s the child that keeps us awake and it’s the child who reminds us of what is good or bad, right or wrong. It’s the child that forgives and gives grownups new changes every time again, it’s the child who is suppose to reflect that we have learned from our past mistakes it’s the child that is suppose to show progress of humanity.
A child never belongs to its parents but our system has progressed in such a way that the need for guardians has disappeared for as the governments say clear and loud “the parents are responsible for their children” parents can even go to jail for what there child does. So this being the case its no wonder that parents think that they own their children and that they can do whatever they want with their children.
The laws clearly state that no profit can be made of the back of a minor, not by its parents and not by others, yet it’s the governments who have lowered the age as of when you can start to work and in some countries its legal for kids to work as of 14. Its almost pedo heaven.
quote: Who from now on will keep her mouth shut.
Please don’t, keep on asking and never stop wondering.
 
 
Ganesh
14:25 / 07.09.01
I know it's highly incidental (and deeply pedantic) but could we, perhaps, spell 'paedophilia' correctly?

Thankyou.
 
 
deletia
14:30 / 07.09.01
Paedant.

(Sorry, couldn't resist)
 
 
Ganesh
14:31 / 07.09.01
 
 
grant
15:23 / 07.09.01
Actually, standard spelling in America is "pedophilia," just as it's "archeologist" and "ameba".
 
 
Ganesh
10:27 / 08.09.01
Yeah, but not 'peadophilia'.
 
 
MJ-12
13:07 / 08.09.01
that involves vegetables
 
 
Ganesh
13:30 / 08.09.01
Apparently John and Norma Major were confirmed peadophiles.
 
 
Sax
15:45 / 08.09.01
A joke for anyone out there still watching Spitting Image by 1995.

Or did Steve Bell do it first in If?
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply