|
|
I'm just not understanding what's wrong with a band who makes music that someone, anyone thinks is 'powerful' and 'moving'. Isn't that part of the point of art, to get some kind of emotional reaction out of people? I would think that the fact that the music speaks to some people so strongly is enough. Why be elitist about it? You don't have to like it, but I can't see putting it down because it resonates with people. If some people aren't as "enlightened" about it and don't force some ironic distance between themselves and the music, why is it a problem? Sincere, achingly earnest, hardworking, populist people deserve their sincere, achingly earnest, hardworking, populist bands.
One of my least favorite music critics, Ann Powers, once wrote something about U2 that went something like this: "some people know a little bit about music, and they love U2. some other people know a little bit more about music, and hate them to the core of their being." I think this is your point of view about this, and it does make some sense, but it's just so disgustingly elitist. |
|
|