BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Online language

 
 
Fist Fun
16:29 / 14.01.02
"To be inferior when it comes to language is frequently to be discounted"

Dale Spender

The above quote was published in 1979. At about the same time Usenet was slowly blossoming into a force for global communication. A new type of communication. Staggered pseudo-immediate debate.
How do you feel language interacts with this relatively new form of communication? Does it flourish or does it become distorted?
Does the sheer quantity dilute any possibility of quality?
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
16:48 / 14.01.02
Some people can't express themselves. This hinders communication (and possibly ideation).

Others are too able with words, and hence deploy them almost like a Chinese Room, a perfect pattern without substance - to the same effect.

So what else is new?
 
 
Fist Fun
17:55 / 14.01.02
quote: So what else is new?

Two examples of newness would be flaming and trolling. What do we have to compare? A face to face heated discussion, an enraged exchange of letters? The new online method of communication varies in its immediacy and closeness. The nearest I can think of would be an exchange of insults, or ideas on a toilet wall.
 
 
SMS
00:00 / 15.01.02
If I were having an interesting conversation with a friend and somebody I'd never seen before came up and tried to sell me something, or started cursing me out, or just speaking like Elmo, this would be a real life troll.

There's a piece of me that wishes this would happen just once.
 
 
Fist Fun
05:40 / 15.01.02
"In a world where language and naming is power silence is oppression, is violence"

Adrienne Rich

How is the truth of this statement affected by the internet age?
 
 
Gho5tD4nc3r
16:02 / 15.01.02
Remember that language is alive. In the same way you can trace genetic lineage and so trace how groups of people moved and interacted over the ages, you can do the same with language (in fact language and genetics closely follow, and it is only when there is a mass displacement of people from culture that this isn't so). So is this good or bad?

Well we have effectively put everyone in one room, so with more people and minds then there is more diversity which is good for the language "gene" pool. The only down side could be gain of homolinguality when language conforms and loses diversity because the exchange and selection of words becomes faster then the rate of change in language. Of course with such rapid exchange new words/terms/concepts can spread faster than ever and I'm all for this.
 
  
Add Your Reply