BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Cryptozoology: Bigfoot "inventor" dies; son claims it was all a hoax.

 
 
grant
13:19 / 06.12.02
From The Seattle Times:

(excerpts - see link for full story)
Bigfoot is dead. Really.

"Ray L. Wallace was Bigfoot. The reality is, Bigfoot just died," said Michael Wallace about his father, who died of heart failure Nov. 26 in a Centralia nursing facility. He was 84.

The truth can finally be told, according to Mr. Wallace's family members. He orchestrated the prank that created Bigfoot in 1958.

Some experts suspected Mr. Wallace had planted the footprints that launched the term "Bigfoot." But Mr. Wallace and his family had never publicly admitted the 1958 deed until now.

"The fact is there was no Bigfoot in popular consciousness before 1958. America got its own monster, its own Abominable Snowman thanks to Ray Wallace," said Mark Chorvinsky, editor of Strange magazine and one of the leading proponents of the theory that Mr. Wallace fathered Bigfoot.

Pranks and hoaxes were just part of Mr. Wallace's nature.



Ray L. Wallace, 1918 - 2002


"He'd been a kid all his life. He did it just for the joke and then he was afraid to tell anybody because they'd be so mad at him," said nephew Dale Lee Wallace, who said he has the alder-wood carvings of the giant humanoid feet that gave life to a worldwide phenomenon.


and

Chorvinsky believes the Wallace family's admission creates profound doubts about leading evidence of Bigfoot's existence: the so-called Patterson film, the grainy celluloid images of an erect apelike creature striding away from the movie camera of rodeo rider Roger Patterson in 1967. Mr. Wallace said he told Patterson where to go — near Bluff Creek, Calif. — to spot a Bigfoot, Chorvinsky said.

"Ray told me that the Patterson film was a hoax, and he knew who was in the suit," Chorvinsky said.

Michael Wallace said his father called the Patterson film "a fake" and said he had nothing to do with it. But he said his mother admitted she had been photographed in a Bigfoot suit. "He had several people he used in his movies," Michael Wallace said.

and

As for Meldrum's claim about authentic footprints, Chorvinsky said: "Jeff Meldrum is not an expert in creating hoaxes. I was a professional magician and special-effects film director; anything can be faked."

Michael Wallace said family members knew about his father's hoax but never let on.

"The family just sat back and grinned," he said. "He didn't mean to hurt anyone."

To them, it was just another one of Mr. Wallace's jokes. Like the time he dropped a powerful firecracker down the chimney of a bunkhouse while loggers played cards inside. Or the time he convinced his crew that wild cats with bushy tails were living in forest treetops.
 
 
Lionheart
13:57 / 06.12.02
Oh, cool. He must've been an immortal genius. I mean, if Bigfoot is all a fake then this guy faked the Yeti sightings in Asia for the past bunch of centuries, the bigfoot sightings in russia in the last 2 centuries and...
 
 
Shortfatdyke
15:33 / 06.12.02
Um, yes - I have a book on Bigfoot sightings back to the late 1800s. I think Mr Wallace and family are hoaxing about being hoaxers.
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
15:40 / 06.12.02
Alan Moore has something to say about this kind of thing -- in the prologue of From Hell and an issue of Tom Strong, to name the first two that come to mind.
 
 
Lurid Archive
19:02 / 07.12.02
The existence of evidence which could not have been faked by the putative hoaxer does not demostrate that he was not, in fact, a hoaxer. Piltdown Man, anyone?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
19:11 / 07.12.02
Bigfoot's become a catch-all name for every large, hairy biped, though. Just because one of the family's gone doesn't mean they all have.
 
 
Tezcatlipoca
06:17 / 08.12.02
Hmmm..it seems that the family's claims are a little on the exaggerated side, since it appears that Ol' Man Wallace only faked that particular piece of footage (which...er...has been contested ever since it was made, hasn't it?).

I don't think anybody can reasonably make the leap of logic that this admission destroys all the centuries of sightings of Yeti, Sasquatch, Wendigo, etc.
 
 
gentleman loser
21:11 / 08.12.02
Oh boy, another guy trying to cash in on the fact that he "invented" Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Whatever. It's been done to death. Hairy humanoid sightings are as old as recorded history, just like UFOs. People have been "exposing" the Patterson film as a hoax for decades. Am I supposed to believe this doofus's son just because he says it's true? I think not.

This guy may have hoaxed some stuff. I have no way of proving that. A lot of Bigfoot "researchers" will believe any nonsense you tell them and that's a huge problem since most serious scientists won't touch this topic with a ten meter cattle prod. I don't blame them. I won't be entirely convinced by anything less than a corpse.
 
 
Tezcatlipoca
07:50 / 09.12.02
I don't blame them. I won't be entirely convinced by anything less than a corpse.






 
 
grant
13:04 / 09.12.02
Here's Loren Coleman's response to the case.

Bear in mind, Wallace is the guy who coined the term "Bigfoot" - and he didn't claim to fake the Patterson film, but did claim to have sent Patterson to one area of the woods where Wallace could then run around in a suit....

On the other hand, a fella on the public radio Friday evening said Wallace may have been a prankster, but he was also genuinely interested in Bigfoot research.

Anyway, among other things, Coleman has this to say:

The confession is all over the papers and airwaves. Never mind that the original Jerry Crew cast doesn’t match the Wallace fake foot. Never mind that we all knew Wallace was a prankster. Never mind that Wallace wasn’t able to put one over on any of us in 44 years. The media is constructing a new world of Bigfoot myth making in December 2002. We would be foolish to ignore that this is, however, for the moment, a media-driven traumatic event to serious Bigfoot studies.

It began with an obituary and a reporter's talk with a grieving family. What happened next was a flood of badly written items, flowing forth faster than the speed of your cable modem. The original Bob Young/Seattle Times words was hastily and harshly rewritten by wire services and electronic outlets, facts were minimized to make sensationalized copy, and outcomes have melted Ray Wallace's alleged 1958 hoaxes and family films into his being responsible for the 1967 Patterson-Gimlin footage (even though that was never said).

Why is the testimony of an admitted liar, now being feted by a skeptical magician as the truth, having the newspapers believe it all?
 
 
grant
13:49 / 02.10.03
And now, on the other hand, the BBC are reporting on new evidence that Bigfoot exists, and is a large, unidentified primate.

Investigator Jimmy Chilcutt of the Conroe Police Department in Texas, who specialises in finger and footprints, has said he believes he is certain around six footprints found - claimed to have been made by Bigfoot - are genuine.

He added that one 42 cm (18-inch) print found in Washington in 1987 has convinced him.

"The unique thing about this cast is that it has dermal ridges - and the flow and texture matches the ridge flow texture of one from California," Mr Chilcutt told BBC World Service's Discovery programme.

"The ridges are about twice as thick as in a human being."


There's much more at the link, including a comparison between the prints and the feet of howler monkeys.
 
  
Add Your Reply