BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Repellent universe, dark energy in Invisibles

 
 
Gabby Jay
18:22 / 03.12.02
Seeing this article in The Economist made me think of King Mob's statement in (I think) Vol. 2 that the Christian fish symbol is really a model of the universe where we inhabit the 'reality' created by the overlap of two bigger circles/realities.

The Economist article basically says the universe is 70 percent "a mysterious substance that has been dubbed dark energy," 25 percent "dark matter, a different but equally invisible stuff," and just five percent is occupied by the "ordinary atoms" that compose reality as we know it. It goes on to say that relatively recently, over the last few billion years, the dark energy has caused the expansion of the universe to accelerate.

So, where would the Outer Church be? In the dark matter? Since we experience a reality where matter and energy are variations of the same thing, could dark matter be just matter, while dark energy is just energy. Then, for argument's sake, for dark matter to become energy it would have to move through our reality (I realize 'our reality' isn't the best phrase for it, but I can't think of a simple term for the matter/energy we're made of). I know that when dark matter and normal matter come in contact, they supposedly destroy each other, releasing a lot of energy ('normal' matter seems like a bad phrase too, since it's only five percent of the universe). Does that mean the Invisible College is located on the edge between our atoms and the dark energy? Is it a good sign that the dark energy is increasing in power/quantity and accelerating the expansion of the unverse, or do I have things backwards?
 
 
dlotemp
21:55 / 03.12.02
(warning: the following comments are not from an actual scientist. )

Gabby -

Good topic but I think you might be confusing some concepts. From what I understand, Dark Matter is not necessarily anti-matter, which is the substance that disintegrates in contact with matter. I haven't seen any good articles on dark energy so I can't comment on that.

As to the question about where the Outer Church is located, there are two theories that I know of and neither involves the dark matter/energy directly. 1) The outer church is located on the edge of one of the two higher dimensions that intersected to form our universe. BTW, string theorists have indeed proposed that our universe was created by the collision of two higher universes. 2) the Outer Church is a meme the lives on the conceptual/iconic plane of human consciousness.

In general, expansion or retraction within the universe is both bad in the long (million of years) run. It's preferable to have an equilibrium.

I hope that help, but I'd appreciate comments from others.
 
 
Gabby Jay
14:58 / 04.12.02
Obviously I'm no scientist either, but I thought it was fun to try to make the theories from the article agree with King Mob's. It's hard for me to really conceptualize dark matter and antimatter, so thinking about the differences between the two makes my brain hurt. I agree with you that the article doesn't provide much of an explanation for dark energy.

Also, why is it preferable to have an equilibrium? Isn't some sort of change in one direction or the other inevitable over the course of trillions of years?
 
  
Add Your Reply