For me it's more a sense of that I missed the boat the first time around, so to speak, and there are various elements of the series that interest me and I wonder what other people think of these elements.
Myself, I only discovered The Invisibles in January of 2002, close to a year ago (I had heard about it through accusations it ripped off the Matrix). I didn't have the luxury of reading an issue per month and gradually easing into it, I jumped in full-tilt. Some of the stuff I got at first, like all the Lovecraft/Burroughs stuff, cuz I was familiar with those authors. Then I started to get involved in the occult and chaos magic and stuff, which the comic turned me on to. Now I'm trying to figure out all the 5D/fiction suit stuff. But I think I have a good grasp of the book now, despite my chaotic introduction to it (the order I read the trades in? Apocalipstick, Entropy in the UK, Bloody Hell in America, Kissing Mr. Quimper, Say You want a Revolution, Counting Down to None, and the final 12 issues, which I got in June, though now I have the trade. Needless to say this caused much confusion).
Today I started re-reading the series and it makes more sense now, this time I'm reading them for the first time in proper order, which is odd for me. "Arcadia" makes a lot more sense now: in fact the outline for the direction that the series will eventually head seems to be contained in that story arc (the first time I read it I was lost, except for the De sade bits). |