BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Homeland Security Act: Contact Congress NOW

 
 
8===>Q: alyn
13:44 / 16.11.02
Okay, this is something irritating that I don't usually do, but I feel the circumstances are extraordinary. My chief source on conspiracy news has forwarded me this. So, those of my fellow Americans at the Switchboard forum, this one's for you:

The Homeland Security Bill as it now stands has had additions which were placed at the last minute so representatives did not have time to read the entire 480 pages. In addition to the concerns brought up by William Safire (see below)* this bill also contains provisions to eliminate or reduce a manufacturer's product liability, two of which relate to vaccines. According to the new bill, a broad range of items, from drugs to life preservers, could escape liability lawsuits if the head of the homeland security department designated them as "necessary for security purposes." Also, there is a provision in that will allow the Secretary of HHS to call for universal smallpox vaccination if there is a threat of bioterrorism, with NO EXEMPTIONS.

Please make the calls ASAP and circulate this message to your lists.

Call your Member of Congress & your Senator toll free via the Capitol Switchboard at (800) 839-5276.

Or contact your Member of Congress at http://www.house.gov/writerep

Contact your Senator at http://www.senate.gov/index.htm

To contact the White House president@whitehouse.gov

If you wish to read the actual bill (all 484 pages) click on the link below:
http://www.house.gov/rules/homeland.pdf


*This "see below" is in the text I was sent, but the William Safire article is completely separate -- ie, nowhere below. I can post it here if anyone's interested.
 
 
gravitybitch
16:01 / 16.11.02
Ummm... How about a link to the Safire article? If one exists?
 
 
MJ-12
18:47 / 16.11.02
from NY Times
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
15:24 / 18.11.02
NYT articles expire too fast. Here's the text:


You Are a Suspect By WILLIAM SAFIRE

WASHINGTON — If the Homeland Security Act is not amended before passage, here is what will happen to you:

Every purchase you make with a credit card, every magazine subscription you buy and medical prescription you fill, every Web site you visit and e-mail you send or receive, every academic grade you receive, every bank deposit you make, every trip you book and every event you attend — all these transactions and communications will go into what the Defense Department describes as "a virtual, centralized grand database."

To this computerized dossier on your private life from commercial sources, add every piece of information that government has about you — passport application, driver's license and bridge toll records, judicial and divorce records, complaints from nosy neighbors to the F.B.I., your lifetime paper trail plus the latest hidden camera surveillance — and you have the supersnoop's dream: a "Total Information Awareness" about every U.S. citizen.

This is not some far-out Orwellian scenario. It is what will happen to your personal freedom in the next few weeks if John Poindexter gets the unprecedented power he seeks.

Remember Poindexter? Brilliant man, first in his class at the Naval Academy, later earned a doctorate in physics, rose to national security adviser under President Ronald Reagan. He had this brilliant idea of secretly selling missiles to Iran to pay ransom for hostages, and with the illicit proceeds to illegally support contras in Nicaragua.

A jury convicted Poindexter in 1990 on five felony counts of misleading Congress and making false statements, but an appeals court overturned the verdict because Congress had given him immunity for his testimony. He famously asserted, "The buck stops here," arguing that the White House staff, and not the president, was responsible for fateful decisions that might prove embarrassing.

This ring-knocking master of deceit is back again with a plan even more scandalous than Iran-contra. He heads the "Information Awareness Office" in the otherwise excellent Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which spawned the Internet and stealth aircraft technology. Poindexter is now realizing his 20-year dream: getting the "data-mining" power to snoop on every public and private act of every American.

Even the hastily passed U.S.A. Patriot Act, which widened the scope of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and weakened 15 privacy laws, raised requirements for the government to report secret eavesdropping to Congress and the courts. But Poindexter's assault on individual privacy rides roughshod over such oversight.

He is determined to break down the wall between commercial snooping and secret government intrusion. The disgraced admiral dismisses such necessary differentiation as bureaucratic "stovepiping." And he has been given a $200 million budget to create computer dossiers on 300 million Americans.

When George W. Bush was running for president, he stood foursquare in defense of each person's medical, financial and communications privacy. But Poindexter, whose contempt for the restraints of oversight drew the Reagan administration into its most serious blunder, is still operating on the presumption that on such a sweeping theft of privacy rights, the buck ends with him and not with the president.

This time, however, he has been seizing power in the open. In the past week John Markoff of The Times, followed by Robert O'Harrow of The Washington Post, have revealed the extent of Poindexter's operation, but editorialists have not grasped its undermining of the Freedom of Information Act.

Political awareness can overcome "Total Information Awareness," the combined force of commercial and government snooping. In a similar overreach, Attorney General Ashcroft tried his Terrorism Information and Prevention System (TIPS), but public outrage at the use of gossips and postal workers as snoops caused the House to shoot it down. The Senate should now do the same to this other exploitation of fear.

The Latin motto over Poindexter"s new Pentagon office reads "Scientia Est Potentia" — "knowledge is power." Exactly: the government's infinite knowledge about you is its power over you. "We're just as concerned as the next person with protecting privacy," this brilliant mind blandly assured The Post. A jury found he spoke falsely before.
 
 
Yagg
04:53 / 19.11.02
http://www.darpa.mil/iao/index.htm

They have a Latin motto and a corporate logo. And the SCARIEST FUCKING LOGO EVER! Part of me wonders if this isn't just a hoax to scare the shit out of conspiracy theorists. I mean, the eye-in-the-pyramid scanning the globe? PLEASE! Like some Shea and Wilson shit!
 
 
Perfect Tommy
18:17 / 20.11.02
Did what I could, Qalyn.

I imagine lots of this being shredded by the Supreme Court, but I'm also addicted to having my hopes smashed on the rocks.

On the plus side, there might be a lot of new jobs in spying on one's neighbors...
 
 
Yagg
21:49 / 20.11.02
"I imagine lots of this being shredded by the Supreme Court, but I'm also addicted to having my hopes smashed on the rocks."

PT may be quite right about the courts.

I have a friend who already contacted his senator and was told exactly that. There were a lot of resevations about this on both sides of the aisle, but nobody expects it to go very far before the courts basically castrate the motherfucker. The sooner the better.

Of course, I would have asked, "Uh, if nobody liked the idea, why didn't anyone stop it?"
 
 
Yagg
01:57 / 21.11.02
Here's more fun and games from Fox news:

WASHINGTON — A massive database that the government will use to monitor every purchase made by every American citizen is a necessary tool in the war on terror, the Pentagon said Wednesday.

Edward Aldridge, undersecretary of Acquisitions and Technology, told reporters that the Pentagon is developing a prototype database to seek "patterns indicative of terrorist activity." Aldridge said the database would collect and use software to analyze consumer purchases in hopes of catching terrorists before it's too late.

"The bottom line is this is an important research project to determine the feasibility of using certain transactions and events to discover and respond to terrorists before they act," he said.

Aldridge said the database, which he called another "tool" in the war on terror, would look for telltale signs of suspicious consumer behavior.

Examples he cited were: sudden and large cash withdrawals, one-way air or rail travel, rental car transactions and purchases of firearms, chemicals or agents that could be used to produce biological or chemical weapons.

It would also combine consumer information with visa records, passports, arrest records or reports of suspicious activity given to law enforcement or intelligence services.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is home to the Pentagon's brightest thinkers -- the ones who built the Internet. DARPA will be in charge of trying to make the system work technically.

Rear Adm. John Poindexter, former national security adviser to President Reagan, is developing the database under the Total Information Awareness Program. Poindexter was convicted on five counts of misleading Congress and making false statements during the Iran-Contra investigation. Those convictions were later overturned, but critics note that his is a dubious resume for someone entrusted with so sensitive a task.

Aldridge said Poindexter will only "develop the tool, he will not be exercising the tool." He said Poindexter brought the database idea to the Pentagon and persuaded Aldridge and others to pursue it.

"John has a real passion for this project," Aldridge said.

TIAF's office logo is now one eye scanning the globe. The translation of the Latin motto: knowledge is power. Some say, possibly too much power. "What this is talking about is making us a nation of suspects and I am sorry, the United States citizens should not have to live in fear of their own government and that is exactly what this is going to turn out to be," said Chuck Pena, senior defense policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Pena and others say the database is an even greater violation of privacy rights than Attorney General John Ashcroft's nixed proposal to turn postal workers and delivery men into government tipsters. No matter what protections Congress requires, Pena fears a database big enough and nimble enough to track the entire nation's spending habits is ripe for abuse.

"I don't think once you put something like this in place, you can ever create enough checks and balances and oversight," Pena said.

But proponents say big business already has access to most of this data, but don't do anything with it to fight terrorism.

"I find it somewhat counter intuitive that people are not concerned that telemarketers and insurance companies can acquire this data but feel tremendous trepidation if a government ventures into this arena. To me it just smacks of paranoia," said David Rivkin, an attorney for Baker & Hostetler LLP.

The database is not yet ready and Aldridge said it will not be available for several years. Fake consumer data will be used in development of the database, he said.

When it's ready, Aldridge said individual privacy rights will be protected. But he could not explain how the data would be accessed. In some cases, specific warrants would give law enforcement agencies access, he said. But in other cases the database might flag suspicious activity absent a specific request or warrant, and that suspicious activity could well be relayed to law enforcement or intelligence agencies.

"I don't know what the scope of this is going to be," Aldridge said. "We are in a war on terrorism. We are trying to find out if this technology can work."
 
 
Perfect Tommy
02:27 / 21.11.02
Yagg, you'll like this:

If you're like me, when you saw the IAO logo, you started giggling. Because, like, c'mon--every X-Phile, Invisibles reader, and Freemason-hater, every last conspiracy nut on the planet, will pee their pants upon seeing that logo. They will open their closets and pee ALL of their pants after seeing that logo. It can't possibly be serious, right?

I first figured, 'hoax.' So I double-checked to make sure DARPA was a real DoD agency (I didn't realize it used to be ARPA, which I'd heard of--ARPANET turned into the Internet, I'm sure you all know). Okay, no hoax. I printed it out to show to friends in a class later.

One of these friends started talking about just how much it would cost in resources to try to keep everything under surveillance at once; he was telling me that there had been an NSA effort to track World Wide Web activity--basically, save all the pages--and the drives they were expecting to hold four years of data filled up in one and a half.

(Yeah, this is hearsay... please correct me, but stay with me til the punchline.)

So on the one hand, we have an organization which is absolutely begging to be seen as the New World Order/Ministry of Information, and on the other, we suspect that such an undertaking of mass information collection is improbable or impossible because of the rate at which the internet grows.

So... what if the idea is to appear to be an omniscient Big Brother?

When people think they're on camera, they modify their behavior--the camera doesn't have to be turned on. So what if the idea is to create the illusion of total surveillance, so that people behave? Or, even better, what if the illusion is that surveillance is unbiased, if invasive, when in actuality the surveillors just concentrate on the "bad guys", i.e., people who look vaguely Middle Eastern?

Please tell me where the holes in this theory are, because I'm finding it so hilarious that it simply must be true!
 
 
fluid_state
03:54 / 21.11.02
I think you're totally on to something there, PT. Right after sept2001, there were a bunch of news articles, blogspots, and the like reporting on the dissident crackdown(ie: College students questioned by, well, MeninBlack, by the spin of it; Overheard diner conversations leading to arrests). It seems more like a fine piece of scare propaganda, capitalizing on the BigBrother-1984-BraveNewWorld meme. The choice of logo for DARPA is high comedy for the rational paranoid.
 
 
rizla mission
10:42 / 21.11.02
I think if (more likely, when) this database comes about, it would be cool to encourage completely law-abiding citizens to take flying lessons, buy one-way tickets to places (what the hell is with that anyway?), move large sums of money randomly between bank accounts etc. as a protest, until the feds are swamped with masses of completely meaningless 'suspicious behaviour'..
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
11:16 / 21.11.02
Hm. My immediate suspicion was that they've already got the monster db and are just seeking to make it admissable in court. Publicizing it otherwise just lets the 'vaguely Middle Eastern types' know that their cover is compomised and they'd better change their methods. Which I imagine they do on regularly anyway. I mean, do you really think they're still buying one-way tickets? I don't know what else they're hoping to track. You can make any number of nasty bio-weapons with a dead sheep and a plastic tarp, and, famously, bombs out of household chemicals. Who's going to put a surplus russian warhead on their Visa card? I think this hasn't got a thing to do with law enforcement --
Poindexter, for one, clearly has a cavalier attitude about the law -- but everything to do with social control.

such an undertaking of mass information collection is improbable or impossible because of the rate at which the internet grows

Why so improbable? They're not trying to make sense out of a big heterogenous mess of web pages, they're following little numbers around a well-known and orderly banking protocol. Your credit card company does it already.
 
 
Ethan Hawke
12:07 / 21.11.02
All of you should read James Bamford's Body of Secrets: The History of the NSA.

The NSA (The National Security Agency)'s mandate is the intereception and decryption of "SIGINT" - signals intelligence. That is, any transmissions on the electromagnetic spectrum from a foregin national (it's currently illegal to intercept US citizen's communications without a court order - currently).

Among lovelly tidbits in the Bamford book

- *Project Northwoods (around page 80 or so) - this was a plan, drawn up by the joint chiefs of staff (who were mostly eisenhower admin holdovers), which possibly made its way to Bobby Kennedy, who was AG at the time, to foment domestic terrorist incidents and blame them on Cuba, in order to have a pretext to invade Cuba. Repeat - the top leaders of the military in the 1960s wanted to kill american citizens in order to start a war on communism. This project was apparently squashed, as we never did invade Cuba, did we.

-*The U.S. has had knowledge for many years that Israel purposefully tried to sink one of our spy boats during the 6 days war. The U.S.S. liberty was attacked by Israeli figthers and PT boats, and many american lives were lost. Bamford claims Israel wanted to make sure no one had evidence of their massacres of Egyptian POWs in the Sinai. Bamford stops just short of implicating specific figures who are now and have been very, very high-ranking members of the Israeli government.

-*The NSA used to receive a copy of every telegram sent in the US.

-*During the late 90s, NSA officials used to impress visitors by playing them tapes of Osama Bin Laden's satellite phone calls to his mother. Bamford prints OBL's number! After the cruise missle strikes, OBL wouldn't go near the phone any more.

-What i gathered from the book - Conspiracy theorists are right, that every malfeascant plan they think the government is up to, the government would like to do. However, execution falls very, very short. Body of Secrets is a litany of failures - double agents were constantly selling our secrets, sensitive materials constantly captured by Vietnam, N. Korea, cuba, USSR, etc. Machines go obselete and break down all the time. the NSA can't hire the best and brightest, because they can't compete with the private sector. "Echelon," while it exists, runs on antiquated computers and there's so much info coming through, it's impossible for the gov't to keep a handle on it.

even if the DARPA project above (DARPA coordinates very closely with the NSA) suceeds in creating such a database, by the time they're done, the technology will be obsolete, data retreival, unless you are particularly targeted (in which case, you'd have little protection now; this wouldn't change things very much) will be unweildly, and basically, you know, some jerk-off will be running the system.

I love big brother.
 
 
grant
13:39 / 21.11.02
Wow. That U.S.S. Liberty thing... that's creepy as hell.
 
 
Perfect Tommy
15:56 / 21.11.02
...nobody expects it to go very far before the courts basically castrate the motherfucker. The sooner the better.

Of course, I would have asked, "Uh, if nobody liked the idea, why didn't anyone stop it?"

--Yagg

That one's easy: Voting against the Homeland Security Act smells of political suicide (incoming political ad: "In 2002, Senator Soandso voted *against* stopping terrorists--why does Soandso like terrorists so much? Vote Otherguy for senator"). But this way, the congressfolk can vote for the bill to show their concern for a secure populace, and leave it to the Supreme Court justices--who don't have to run for reelection--to bring it back into line with common sense and reason. Having cake + eating cake.
 
 
grant
18:20 / 21.11.02
Should cross-ref to the IAO Laboratory thread here.
 
 
Yagg
02:40 / 22.11.02
"That one's easy: Voting against the Homeland Security Act smells of political suicide (incoming political ad: "In 2002, Senator Soandso voted *against* stopping terrorists--why does Soandso like terrorists so much? Vote Otherguy for senator"). But this way, the congressfolk can vote for the bill to show their concern for a secure populace, and leave it to the Supreme Court justices--who don't have to run for reelection--to bring it back into line with common sense and reason. Having cake + eating cake."

PT: That's kinda what I was thinking, but you put it into words better than I could have.

I'm still thinking that, as you said, the logo might indicate that this is part of some kind of giant bluff. I mean, I was quite the X-phile for awhile there, although purely for entertainment purposes. That's why it made me wonder whether to laugh or go into hiding. Turns out I'm doing neither. I'm convinced there is some psych-warfare angle to the whole thing. "If they think we're watching them, they'll behave." Making a list and checking it twice, just in time for fucking Christmas.
 
 
fluid_state
05:03 / 22.11.02
the NSA can't hire the best and brightest, because they can't compete with the private sector
"Echelon," while it exists, runs on antiquated computers and there's so much info coming through, it's impossible for the gov't to keep a handle on it.

Hmmm. One of the things that keeps occuring to me is the changing of the playing field, in this respect. I think the US govt has realized that their best resource is the private sector; That they know that if the job is to be done right, they have to pay "outsiders" through the nose to do it. Said outsiders are largely dependent on government contracts to the point of being functional govenment employees. This segment of corporations has (recently?) realized that their bread/butter (oh, lots of rich, creamy butter) is the new "Homeland Security". I don't think that the "poor, underfunded government computers" idea is a reality anymore. This is an off-cuff idea, mostly fomented by the fact that I havent interviewed for a position in the last two months that didn't have some connection with the U.S. military (and I'm Canadian). All private companies, doing quite well, capitalizing off the security psychosis, and all small fish. I'm assuming they're emulating the larger ones.
 
  
Add Your Reply