|
|
When I was at Uni I fucking hated lectures - unless the lecturer was really interesting and added something new than the book did. Basically my attendance rule of thumb was, if the lecturer was telling us things that weren't in the books and would be on tests and papers, I'd go. If the lecturer was telling us things were also in the book, but put a really interesting spin on things or was a good speaker and I was really interested in the subject itself, I would also go.
If, however, the lecturer was boring as all get out and spoke in a monotone a la the teacher in Ferris Beuller, even if what he was saying would be needed for tests and papers, I'd often try to go, or plan on going, but generally just borrow the notes from a more diligent friend. And if the teacher was boring and everything they were saying was in the book(s), no fucking way would I go.
I'm not necessarily recommending this course of action, as it's not most academically ambitious. That said, I got an "A" in at least one class having never attended the lectures. (To be fair I also failed a class this same way, but I took it second grade option, attended all the lectures the following term and got an A next time).
I guess what I'm saying is, do as I say, not as I do. |
|
|