BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Random WTF thread.

 
 
pointless and uncalled for
14:54 / 05.11.02
The other seems a little long and this is deserving possibly of being it's own topic.

What in the sweet fucking name of anything that is something is going on with Yorkie.

Once a hallowed product of chunkerous and tasty chocolate goodness it seems now to be reduced to flagrant and pathetic discrimination.

I know that I've been out of the country for a while and that I may have missed something but for the past two months I have seen nothing that will explain the emblazonment on the side of the wrapping that says "NOT FOR GIRLS". What is going on? I misogyny the new flavouring or something or can we now expect Jelly Babies that are not for gays and sherbet dabs being denied to Koreans?

I tried looking for Yorkie in google but seem to be reduced to fan-sites for small yappity furballs that some would call a dog including a rewriting of a Christmas carol to reflect the festive nature of the creature.
 
 
Saveloy
15:34 / 05.11.02
The 'not for girls' campaign was launched last year, I think, with a series of telly ads in which women walked into newsagents disguised as brickies and other macho types in an attempt to 'illegally' obtain the men-only chocolate bar.

There could be any number of reasons for this particular gag, some of which include:

- taking the piss out of previous 'Yorkie = very butch' adverts, in a "yes, we know it was crap, and are therefore as sussed as you, Jo Public" stylee

- responding to recent reports that Mars Bars were to be advertised to appeal more to women

- encouraging women to buy more Yorkies in a "ha, I'll bloody show you!" stylee

- exploiting reaction against recent "men are dim and women are brillliant" trend in advertising

That's all I can think of, off the top of my head.
 
 
that
15:40 / 05.11.02
A thread about this very issuehere
 
 
Linus Dunce
16:04 / 05.11.02
I didn't mind the ad so much, even though it was ripped off from the women-joining-in-the-stoning sequences in Life of Brian. It was just a knowing, updated version of the trucker series.

I think after years of equating consumption of chocolate with femininity (chocolate -- for real women), it wasn't their worst piece of work.

But what reeeeaaally fucks me off (OT but as the choc's already been done ...) are those Archer's ads with the drag queen and the boy go-go dancer and those oh-so-boring straight males with their dirty faces and boring rock music. Commodification/disruption of gay culture/fag-hag-osity, anyone?
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
11:34 / 06.11.02
More fuel for my "line up advertisers and whip them with birch for their insidious crimes" campaign really.
 
 
Linus Dunce
11:51 / 06.11.02
After they've been birched, they should thenceforth have their salaries/commission/etc. sequestered. Any money left over after rent and bills should be spent immediately and completely on purchasing the products in their advertisements. These products should be delivered to their homes. They live the rest of their lives in penury, forced to subsist on their pointless crap, in much the same way they would have us live if they could.

When I am king, anyway.
 
  
Add Your Reply