BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Seriously, what's the story on JD Salinger?

 
 
8===>Q: alyn
13:45 / 03.11.02
A friend sends me this message:

So I'm searching for a cheap pair of binoculars to take to the next Hornets game, and I get this:

If you like Magnacraft Compact 4x30 Binoculars. you may also enjoy:

The Catcher in the Rye
Paperback, Reprint, 1991
J. D. Salinger
$1.89 (Save $4.10)


What is this meme that ties Catcher to stalkers? It's obviously more than Mark David Chapman -- half.com's algorhythms have put the two together independantly... or have they? Has half.com been co-opted in a scheme to produce psychopathic killers? Is it coincidence? Did Salinger craft Catcher with these ends in mind? What gives?
 
 
Linus Dunce
17:04 / 03.11.02
The binoculars are useful for examining the roofbeam.
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
18:15 / 14.07.08
Now I will update this topic for posterity.

JD Salinger worked for a joint British/US counter-intelligence unit in WWII, did you know that? Probably if you've read For Esme With Love and Squalor, it's not such a surprise. Did you know that his commanding officer was Henry Kissinger? Both men spoke French and German, and were interrogators. This was the same division, the CIC, that recruited Klaus Barbie and other Nazi scientists after the war.

Uh, as to a subtextual connection between lone gunmen and Catcher in the Rye. The book is narrated by Holden Caulfield, a neurotic, slightly delusional middle class teenager; it is written in the first person. But frequently, the narrator flips that around, and begins referring to himself in the second person, which is a natural enough conversational shift. People do that for emphasis, when they are trying make the description of some experience really impactful to their audience. However, and while I don't have the statistics handy to back this up it is supported by the text--if you have a copy handy you could check it yourself--in Catcher in the Rye these shifts are always clustered around Holden's paranoid, psychosexual, masochistic fantasies. It shifts quite rapidly between Holden's general malaise and detailed, instructional fantasies of murder and suffering.

So it seems possible that Catcher in the Rye speaks in a particular way to violent paranoid schizophrenics. Maybe it makes them violent? Mark David Chapman, famously, but James Earl Ray, who was not what you'd call an avid reader, also owned a copy. Salinger himself is kind of a lunatic, and certainly had some nefarious connections at the time he wrote the book.
 
  
Add Your Reply