|
|
"Depends how important penetration is to their sex lives, I guess"
V. Good point... guess I'm making (inaccurate?) presumptions about penetration being the norm/focus for vanilla hetero couples...
am I right or wrong, people?
Also, your point above about many people's pref.s not requiring or being very interested in penetration is a useful one. If condoms are that unbearable, do other stuff instead... if you are into penetration, use barriers (at least. I've had the odd preg. scare, due to not being on the pill, so I haven't that double protection. but as i've said, it's a case of risk assessment/balance for me...)
and er, whisky, no offence but, this:
"Femidoms, the cap, and the various other methods I haven't tried them, but I doubt they can be as convenient."
Comes across as a bit dim; if you haven't tried them, how do you know how convenient they are...
And surely, faced with issues of contraception and STD prevention, the condoms='I don't trust you not to have a STD' implication isn't that important? STDs have *very* variable incubation periods and, for guys engaged in het.pen. sex (how's *that* for an abbreviation. ), there are several for which women are asymptomatic carriers... unless you know you're someone's only partner, doesn't all this stuff come into play? And maybe someone with whom one is in a trusting relationship who is bothered by this precaution-taking needs to sort out their priorities? Isn't the implication of 'i am taking every care of myself and you' a worthwhile thing to have.... If someone I'm doing penentrative stuff isn't v. concerned about this stuff with me, this would worry me as to their previous history etc... think I can cope with the apparent 'lack of trust' thing.
Actually realising that the Pill would be ridiculous in my case, as chances of me remembering to take it are infinitesimal... can barely follow my own cycle...
TMI? |
|
|