BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


A pressie for Sav - engineers reclaiming the limelight from architects...

 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
13:29 / 01.11.02
fab article in last week's observer about Cecil Balmond - the visionary engineer:

"There is a common thread linking Anish Kapoor's gigantic, vertigo-inducing sculpture at Tate Modern with James Stirling's monumental Staatsgalerie in Stuttgart, Toyo Ito's lighter-than-air garden pavilion at the Serpentine, Daniel Libeskind's proposed Spiral for the V&A, and just about everything that Rem Koolhaas has ever built. None of them would have been possible without Cecil Balmond. "

what is the relationship between engineers and architects?
 
 
Saveloy
15:22 / 01.11.02
Cor, excellent, cheers for the heads-up, Bengali! I've found another article in Wired and it looks like you can download excerpts from the book here.

I've been thinking idly about this recently, but not enough to post anything helpful just yet. It was prompted by some comment I either heard or read somewhere that St Paul's Cathedral (I think) was initially dismissed by some critics for being "mere engineering, not architecture." Mere engineering! Interesting that Balmond has experienced the same thing:

"Remembering his education in Sri Lanka, he recalls that 'engineers were looked down on, which shocked me'. He tells the story of one of Britain's most famous engineers, Thomas Telford. 'He was in a coach which broke down. He got down, fixed the problem, and then wasn't allowed back inside, having got his hands dirty and revealed himself as an artisan. That summed it up for me.' "
(from the Observer article)

I'll try and think of something relevant to say, over the weekend...
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
23:33 / 01.11.02
on the 'mere engineering' point, from the same article:

"Its (the book's) glimpses of a hidden order of things, of the occult properties of numbers and shapes, suggest it could be the next Brief History of Time - but with pictures. To hear him talk about it, you might for a moment think that is exactly what he had in mind. 'The way that DNA grows looks like random chance, but out of random that is unknowable; there is a knowable, a certainty; tributaries from the random come into the basin of certainty.'

But then he remembers he is an engineer, and engineers, as he says, 'must deal with reality in its crudest sense'."
 
 
e-n
10:38 / 04.11.02
bengali,
In answer to your question as a software engineer who did two years of that "building stuff" in college we always thought that the architect designs hoe they want the buiding look.The structural engineer makes sure the thing stands up and doesn't break any laws most of the time.
That's the basixc explanantion but a lot of my class mates are designing themselves so the line is a little blurry.
 
  
Add Your Reply