"How well we know what a profitable superstition this fable of Christ has been for us"
-- Pope Leo X (1513-1521)
If there is one wish that can come true, then it's that of the total destruction of the Church. The followers discovering they have based their lives on lies, turning against those who govern them.
"The groundbreaking book, The Bible Fraud by Australian author Tony Bushby, reveals to the world for the first time original new information about the emergence of the New Testament and its story of Jesus Christ. It provides historical evidence showing not only vital ancient manuscripts been hidden from the public domain but also other sensitive and associated Biblical material has been purposely withheld or suppressed from the general populace."
Sample:
Two confused stories in the Gospels
JESUS CHRIST HAS CAPTURED THE IMAGINATION OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE around the world for almost 2000 years.Few people know that he represents something far different and the following chapters unravel an entirely new story about the circumstances surrounding the birth and emergence of the Christian religion.
In order to cover this ground it is necessary to consider the New Testament stories from a different perspective.By stripping away their supernatural elements,the earliest church writings relay a confused skeletal outline of the lives of two separate men.This work unravels those stories and shows how the New Testament came into being and what it really is.Until now,this aspect of the Gospel story has never been fully developed and by coordinating new information with surviving records,a reconstruction of the probable course of events that resulted in Christianity today is presented.
What was the church trying to hide? IN 1415,THE CHURCH OF ROME TOOK AN EXTRAORDINARY STEP TO destroy all knowledge of two Second Century Jewish books that it said contained ‘the true name of Jesus Christ.’ The Antipope Benedict XIII firstly singled out for condemnation a secret Latin treatise called ‘Mar Yesu ’ and then issued instructions to destroy all copies of the Book of Elxai.No editions of these writings now publicly exist,but church archives recorded that they were once in popular circulation and known to the early presbyters.Knowledge of these writings survived from quotations made by Bishop Hippolytus of Rome (176 –236)and St Epiphanius of Salamis (315 – 403)along with references in some early editions of the Talmud of Palestine and Babylonia.The Rabbinic fraternity once held the destroyed manuscripts with great reverence for they were comprehensive original records reporting the ‘Life of Rabbi Jesus ’.
Later,in a similar manner,Pope Alexander VI (1492 –1503)ordered all copies of the Talmud destroyed.The Council of the Inquisition required as many Jewish writings as possible to burn with the Spanish Grand Inquisitor, Tomas de Torquemada (1420 –98),responsible for the elimination of 6000 volumes at Salamanca.In 1550,Cardinal Caraffa,the Inquisitor-General procured a Bull from the Pope repealing all previous permission for priests to read the Talmud which he said contained ‘hostile stories about Jesus Christ ’. Bursting forth with fury at the head of his minions,he seized every copy he could find in Rome and burnt them.Solomon Romano (1554)also burnt many thousands of Hebrew scrolls and in 1559 every Hebrew book in the city of Prague was confiscated.The mass destruction of Jewish books included hundreds of copies of the Old Testament and caused the irretrievable loss of many original hand-written documents.The oldest text of the Old Testament that survived,before the discovery of the Dead
Sea Scrolls was said to be the Bodleian Codex (Oxford),which was dated to circa 1100AD.In an attempt by the church to remove damaging Rabbinic information about Jesus Christ from the face of the earth,the Inquisition burnt 12,000 volumes of the Talmud However,many copies survived and today provide opposing traditions about the person called Jesus Christ.
In the mass destruction of Jewish writings,the church overlooked two particular British documents that also recorded ‘the true name of Jesus Christ ’. They survive to this day in the British Museum and are called the Chronicles and the Myvyean Manuscript treasured ancient documents with a very early origin.Supporting evidence was also found on early First Century gold, silver and bronze coins discovered at the site of an ancient mint at Camulodunum (Colchester)in Britain.‘Thus the testimony of the Briton coins establishes clearly and positively the historicity of the traditional ancient ‘Chronicles ’ as authentic historical records.’1
The evidence is compelling,and additional supporting clues are found on a mysterious headstone in Germany,in Vatican art treasures,and in a series of coded sentences in the Shakespearean Plays.Further concealed information was left in the form of specially created statues commissioned by a Catholic priest and positioned in a small hilltop church in Southern France.Coded ciphers were also secreted into the first English-language printings of the Bible and a combination of all clues provides interlocking information and presents a new insight into the origin of Christianity.
Secret ciphers in the New Testament It was the ‘wisest fool in Christendom ’,2 who ‘authorised ’ the translation and publication of the first Protestant version of the Bible into English.He came to the English throne in 1603 and quickly became unpopular because of ‘his disgusting personal habits and his unsavoury character ’.3 He pretended to be a scholar in theology and philosophy,but his learning was shallow and superficial.He wallowed in filth,moral and physical,but was endowed with a share of cunning that his associates called,‘a kind of crooked wisdom ’.4
For his new edition of the Bible he issued a set of personal ‘Rules ’ the translators were to follow and ordered revisions to proceed,although he never contributed a farthing to its cost.Work began early in 1607 and took a committee of forty-seven men (some records say fifty-four,others say fifty)two years and nine months to rewrite the Bible and make ready for the press.Each man received thirty shillings per week for his contribution. Upon its completion in 1609,a remarkable event occurred —the translators handed over the reviser ’s manuscripts of what is now called the King James Bible to King James for his final personal approval.‘It was self-evident that James was not competent to check their work and edit it,so he passed the manuscripts on to the greatest genius of all time ...Sir Francis Bacon.’5
Sir Francis Bacon (1561 –1626)was a man of many talents,a lawyer,linguist and composer.He mastered every subject he undertook;mathematics, geometry,music,poetry,painting,astronomy,classical drama and poetry, philosophy,history,theology and architecture.He was a man of many aims and purposes,the father of modern science,remodeler of modern law,patron of modern democracy,and possibly the reviver of Freemasonry.His life and works are extensively documented,and his intellectual accomplishments widely recognized,particularly in academic circles.At the age of sixteen,he was sent to Paris ‘direct from the Queens Hand ’ and there studied Egyptian, Arabian,Indian and Greek philosophy with particular attention given to the Ancient Mysteries and their Ritual Rites.He personally recorded that, while in Paris,he created a secret cipher system that could be inserted into a document without arousing suspicion.While living in Europe,Francis Bacon was initiated into the mysterious Order of the Knights Templar and learnt a very special secret.Before he returned to London,he travelled to France,Italy,Germany and Spain and at the age of twenty completely devoted himself to the study of law.From his understanding of the secret information he had learned during his initiation into the Knights Templar,he conceived the idea of reactivating various Secret Societies and in 1580 founded the secret Rosicrosse Literary Society in Gray ’s Inn.Later in the same year,he founded the Lodge of Free and Accepted or Speculative Masons,also at Gray ’s Inn.
On 25 June 1607 Sir Francis Bacon was appointed Solicitor-General and Chief Advisor to the Crown.He had presented new ideas to the Government for the Reformation of the church and was officially instructed to commence restructuring the Bible.Research in the Records Office of the British Museum revealed that original documents still exist which refer to important proceedings associated with Sir Francis Bacon ’s involvement with the editing of both the Old and New Testaments They revealed that he personally selected and paid the revisers of the New Testament who completed their task under the instructions of Bacon ’s long-time friend,Dr Andrews. Statue of the editor of the Bible, Sir Francis Bacon. © Photography:Thomas L.Lithgow,Esq.
The first English language manuscripts of the Bible remained in Bacon ’s possession for nearly a year.During that time:
...he hammered the various styles of the translators into the unity,rhythm, and music of Shakespearean prose,wrote the Prefaces and created the whole scheme of the Authorized Version.6
He also encoded secret information into both the Old and New Testament An ancient document recorded that the true history of early Christianity was known to the initiates of the Order of the Knights Templar,having originally been:
...imparted to Hugh de Payens by the Grand-Pontiff of the Order of the Temple (of the Nazarene sect),one named Theocletes,after which it was learned by some Knights in Palestine.7
Regarding the months of editing work applied to the Bible by Bacon,his biographer,William T.Smedley, confirmed the extent of the editing:
It will eventually be proved that the whole structure of the Authorised Bible was Francis Bacon ’s.He was an ardent student not only of the Bible, but also of early manuscripts.St Augustine,St Jerome,and writers of theological works,were studied by him with industry.8
At the completion of the editing,Sir Francis Bacon and King James I had a series of meetings to finalise editorial matters associated with the new Bible. It was at this time that King James ordered a ‘Dedication to the King ’ to be drawn up and included in the opening pages.He also wanted the phrase ‘Appointed to be read in the Churches ’ to appear on the title page.This was an announcement clarifying that King James had personally given the church ‘Special Command ’ for this particular version of the Bible to be used in preference to the vast array of Greek and Latin Vulgate Bibles current at the time.His reason was personal,as King James had previously instructed the revisers to ‘defend the position of the king ’ in their restructuring of the texts.This was seen as an attempt to distance the Protestant Bible from the Catholic version.The Protestant versions of the Bible are thinner by seven books than the Catholic version and the variant churches have never agreed on a uniform Bible.In their translation of 1 Peter 2:13 the revisors changed the phrase ‘the emperor,as supreme ’ to ‘the king,as supreme ’.Because King James ’ Bible was written to support the authority of a king,the later church often referred to it as the one from ‘authority ’,and it later came to be presented as if officially ‘authorised ’.In subsequent revisions,the word ‘authorised ’ found its way onto the title page and later still came to be printed on the cover,giving King James ’ new Bible a false sense of authenticity.
The King James Bible is considered by many today to be the ‘original ’ Bible and therefore ‘genuine ’ and all later revisions simply counterfeits forged by ‘higher critics ’.Others think the King James Bible is ‘authentic ’ and ‘authorised ’ and presents the original words of the authors as translated into English from the ‘original ’ Greek text.However,the ‘original ’ Greek text was not written until around the mid-Fourth Century and was a revised edition of writings compiled decades earlier in Aramaic and Hebrew.Those earlier documents no longer exist 9 and the Bibles we have today are five linguistic removes from the first Bibles written.What was written in the ‘original originals ’ is quite unknown.It is important to remember that the words ‘authorised ’ and ‘original ’,as applied to the Bible,do not mean ‘genuine ’,‘authentic ’ or ‘true ’. |
