My openings and middle are reasonably good but my endgame is never brilliant
A good endgame seems to require a lot of memorization of specific situations. When you start getting decent at chess you go and learn a few funky openings, then you play with these for a while and see what type of middle games you get, and your general skill level gets better, and that's about the position I got to.
But endgames seem to involve memorizing that when player x has pieces a, b, and c and player y has pieces d, e, and f, then player x will win, or that player x's aim should be to neutralize y's piece f, or that if x gets piece a into a certain part of the board, that it's either draw or win. I was too lazy to learn that stuff so even if you have reasonable ability, if the other person knows these facts and can put all their energy into a specific aim, they're going to get you most of the time.
Reading all this stuff in chess books is really interesting though, and then you find yourself in your room with a book and a chess board for hours on end, which is possibly not the point of a two player game, but still ... |