BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Punitive facial tattooing in history

 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
00:20 / 29.09.02
I'm looking for information on the use of tattooing, especially facial tattooing, as a punishment. I'm particularly interested in finding out if any cultures have routinely used this as a punitive measure against female adultery and/or promiscuity.

I know that this sort of thing was used in nineteenth century Japan (along with lots of other grim punishments), but I can't find many details. Googling has drawn a bit of a blank: I seem to end up with feminist perspectives on tattooing, which, while interesting, tend to focus on Western culture and seem to be restricted to the last two or three decades, while most tattoo sites concentrate on the positive aspects of tattooing and therefore fight shy of discussing its use in more negative contexts.

Can anyone help me out here?
 
 
Turk
02:40 / 29.09.02
Is this to get you hot?
 
 
Margin Walker
16:52 / 29.09.02
I don't know about facial tattoos, but criminals used to be tattooed in Japan. Which is why the Yakuza have tattoos to this day.
 
 
w1rebaby
17:02 / 29.09.02
There was facial tattooing as punishment in Snow Crash, e.g. "RACIALLY INSENSITIVE, POOR IMPULSE CONTROL" on your forehead. (I suppose that's more warning others than specifically punitive, but same effect.) You could work backwards from there, that's all the help I can offer I'm afraid.
 
 
Baz Auckland
12:05 / 30.09.02
I don't know if it's gone now, but the Maritime Museum down at Greenwich had an exhibition on tatooing back in July. They had a bit on this, showing a woman from the South Pacific who had had the name of her crime ('murder' or 'adultury')tatooed on her face by the local missionary.
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
12:16 / 30.09.02
Branding, yes, but I don't know about tattooing. If you recall there's that bit in The Three Musketeers where

spoiler




D'Artagnan discovers Milady's vile secret while bedding her, i.e. he sees the criminal brand on her shoulder. I think this was done for theft (in this case), but it probably applied for other crimes as well.
 
 
Rev. Orr
12:21 / 30.09.02
Not sure about how frequently it was used as a punishment and the only subject I know of was a) male and b) a political prisoner not an adulterer (although he was). Actually, this is no help whatsoever, damn, sorry. Er, anyway, the post civil war Puritan government did brand the letters "SL" for seditious libeller onto the cheeks of at least one offender in the mid 17thC. They were not known for their originality so I would imagine that it was a pre-existing, if rare, punishment.

Apologies for the vagueness. I'll see if I can turn anything up.
 
 
The Monkey
12:55 / 30.09.02
For details on penal tattoos in Japan, try horimono.net

Although the focus of the site is the larger, more artistic tattooing style of Edo-period Japan - now associated with the Yakuza - there is a little section on penal tattooing that includes a couple of scans of crime-marking tattoos both on the face and arms.The site's creator, Alan Tsuda, is an excellent historian, and in addition to his page he also accepts email queries. The bibliography on his page alone should give some clues.

In a lot of contexts you're more likely to find facial mutilation - the removal, mutilation, or branding/searing of the ears and nose - as a punitive marker...as was the case in Medieval Europe, Eurasia, China, and Arabia. Even in Japan the removal of the ears was SOP, like in Yojimbo. Tatu, being labor intensive and even in punitive use necessary of a aesthetic coding system, doesn't turn up a great deal...I'm a little confused as how the Japanese developed the system. I think it might relate to the Snow Crash explanation of penal tattooing: it's fast, communicates specifically what the crime was (lopped-off ears doesn't), but leaves a living body that can help support the feudal structure.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
13:33 / 30.09.02
Thanks, Monkey! That's exactly the kind of thing I was looking for.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
15:45 / 30.09.02
The Greeks learned tattooing from the Persians and used it to mark slaves and criminals so they could be identified if they tried to escape. The Romans in turn adopted the practice from the Greeks and, in late antiquity when the Roman army consisted largely of mercenaries, they also were tattooed so that deserters could be identified.

The Latin word for tattoo was stigma. Among the definitions of "stigma" listed by Webster are "a prick with a pointed instrument," ... "a distinguishing mark ... cut into the flesh of a slave or a criminal," and "a mark of disgrace or reproach."

Tattooing as punishment is mentioned by many Greek and Roman authors.
Suetonius says that Caligula amused himself by capriciously ordering members of his court to be tattooed.

The Emperor Theophilus took revenge on two monks who had publicly criticized him by having eleven verses of obscene iambic pentameter tattooed on their foreheads.

As Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire, the tattooing of slaves and criminals was gradually abandoned. The Emperor Constantine decreed that a man who had been condemned to fight as a gladiator or to work in the mines should be tattooed on the legs or the hands, but not on the face, "so that the face, which has been formed in the image of the divine beauty, should be defiled as little as possible."

Not punishment tattoos but re: branding,

Slaves in Ancient Rome, who ran away and were caught, were branded with the letters "FUG" (for fugitivus or "fugitive") on the forehead. Slaves were also branded with KAL (for liar) and FUR (for thief).

More recently, Morris & Rothman's The Oxford History of the Prison (1998) says that regicides in France would be branded with an "R", a thief with "V" for voleur and those who were to be put into forced labour a "T" for travaux forcés

Don't know much about Japanese punishment tattoos but Tattoo History: A Source Book, by Stephen G. Gilbert says:

The first written record of Japanese tattooing is found in a Chinese dynastic history compiled in 297 AD. According to this text, Japanese "men young and old, all tattoo their faces and decorate their bodies with designs." Japanese tattooing is also mentioned in other Chinese histories, but always in a negative context. The Chinese considered tattooing a sign of barbarism and used it only as a punishment.

By the seventh century the rulers of Japan had adopted much of the culture and attitudes of the Chinese, and a result tattooing fell into official disfavor. The first record of tattooing as punishment in Japan is found in a Japanese history compiled in 720 AD. It reads: "The Emperor summoned before him Hamako, Muraji of Azumi, and commanded him saying: Œ You plotted rebellion, and your offense is deserving of death. I will, however, exercise great bounty, and remitting the penalty of death, sentence you to be tattooed."

After the sixth century tattooing was widely used to identify criminals and outcasts. Outcasts were tattooed on the arms: a cross might be tattooed on the inner forearm, or a straight line on the outside of the forearm or on the upper arm. Criminals were marked with a variety of symbols which designated the places where the crimes were committed. In one region, the pictograph for "dog" was tattooed on the criminal¹s forehead. Other marks included such patterns as bars, crosses, double lines, and circles on the face and arms. Tattooing was reserved for those who had committed serious crimes, and individuals bearing tattoo marks were ostracized by their families and denied all participation in the life of the community. For the Japanese, who valued family membership and social position above all things, tattooing was particularly severe and terrible form of punishment.
 
  
Add Your Reply