|
|
The Smart Mob is, to my mind, a potential form of democracy, that is, Mob Rule.
(Current favourite quote: "Democracy is best defined as the process of democratization.")
The Mob that is in constant internal communication, that does the decisions concerning itself fluidly, organically, continuously, would be an ideal form of organization, especially if you are trying to organize some sort of rebellious or insurrective activity.
Unfortunately, a lot of insurrection is still hierarchical in nature, partly because then it is more easly controlled and bent to serve particular interests, partly because that's just the way we're used to doing things.
For example the demonstrations in Gothenburg last summer.
AntiFascist Action set up a secret "communications centre" which, using very simple technology, sent out SMS's to people around town, telling them to converge on the Hvitfeldtska school which the police had surrounded.
The people in the "top secret centre" were arrested and sentenced to long prison sentences for "inciting a riot". Absurd statements (the police were the ones who incited the riot!), but lent a certain amount of credibility by the fact that you could draw up a supposed hierarchy with these people at the top of the communications pyramid.
A Smart Mob would have been so completely networked, that when the police were just beginning to surround the space, other people in the vicinity would be aware of this and able to react accordingly. The decisions would be based on the twin principles of consensus ("let's do it") and exodus ("I'm outta here!")...
This would be the ideal. Anyone who has been involved in any mass-level organizing knows how far we are from this... |
|
|