|
|
The Fool wrote: Try to 'see'/visualise as you write.
That's it, at least for me also. When you get a picture of something simply focus in for more detail and resolution, then again and again, if nothing comes up then ask yourself about what color is that, what texture, what smell it has, what sound, and what silence, and then again. Sensory details, sensory details. You'll be in a fair trance by then.
If you get a voice, of a character, spirit or whatever, make it talk, and try to keep it on a definite distinctive timbre, tonality, and pacing of its own, so, again, listen carefully until you "recognise it" talking in your innards. The thing here with voices is to keep them recognisable, stable, so to speak, in regards to its qualities (again, timbre, tonality and pace).
By the way, I've never gone for it with magickal ends, but I used to write a lot. If you develop a character, it is essential that you can immediately evoke him through his legitimate "voice", so you won't be hearing things from your nanny but rather from the character itself, whomever, and whenever, he "is".
Another thing to explore is that when we read anything with different characters, ie: X-Men, we spontaneously assign each character a different voice of its own in our minds, although we would be hard pressed to admit it or even recognise it. So, while reading X-Men, go check the voice you have for Wolverine, Beast, Jean, whomever, and boost it in your mind until it deafens you. Images and attitudes of the character will of course storm through your mind. Its a good thing to do. This is precisely -I think- why some authors refer to "channel" the characters they write. I also take it that most of us here have read all of Grant Morrison's available interviews, so go check and you'll find you already have your own "Morrison's coloquial voice".
Let us know how it went Imp. |
|
|