|
|
I enjoyed it... but it was by far the weakest of the four. I think a lot of it had to do with the setting- with the first three, it was our own modern society we were watching collapse. This time, it was an invented, "post-Dead" society that was under threat. I spent too much time wondering what had happened in the intervening years, whereas in the first three, there's the immediacy.
Also
MILD
SPOILER
ALERT
The ending wasn't as hopeless as I like my zombie moving endings to be, really.
END
MILD
SPOILER
ALERT
On the plus side- Asia Argento. And, well, zombies, obviously.
Don't get me wrong- it was a very good film, and I'm looking forward to seeing it again. I just don't think it was quite worth the 20-year wait. As Bae says, the stakes are higher now, with some great zombie movies being made by a new generation... but these were proper Romero zombies, like I've been waiting for.
And yes, the satire was far too heavy-handed this time. The idea that the rich fuck over the poor was pretty much the entire premise, leaving little room for interpretation.
Overall, though, I have to say I enjoyed it a great deal. But it did seem a little short. |
|
|