BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


If these are true im going to the states and live off my court cases

 
 
Saint Keggers
16:35 / 30.08.02

The "Stella" awards rank up there with the Darwin awards.

Stella Liebeck is the 81 year old lady who spilled coffee on herself
and
sued McDonalds, winning millions of dollars. This case inspired an
annual
award - The "Stella" Award - for the most frivolous lawsuits in the
U.S.

The following are this year's candidates:

1. January 2000: Kathleen Robertson of Austin Texas was awarded
$780,000 by
a jury of her peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler
who was
running inside a furniture store. The owners of the store were
understandably surprised at the verdict, considering the misbehaving
little
bastard was Ms. Robertson's son.

2. June 1998: A 19 year old Carl Truman of Los Angeles won $74,000 and
medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a Honda
Accord.
Mr. Truman apparently didn't notice there was someone at the wheel of
the
car, when he was trying to steal his neighbor's hubcaps.

3. October 1998: Terrence Dickson of Bristol, Pennsylvania was leaving
a
house he had just finished robbing by way of the garage. He was not
able to
get the garage door to go up since the automatic door opener was
malfunctioning. He couldn't reenter the house because the door
connecting
the house and garage locked when he pulled it shut. The family was on
vacation. Mr. Dickson found himself locked in the garage for eight
days. He
subsisted on a case of Pepsi he found, and a large bag of dry dog food.
He
sued the homeowner's insurance claiming the situation caused him undue
mental anguish. The jury agreed to the tune of $500,000 dollars.

4. October 1999: Jerry Williams of Little Rock, Arkansas was awarded
$14,500
and medical expenses after being bitten on the buttocks by his next
door
neighbor's beagle. The beagle was on a chain in its owner's fenced-in
yard.
The award was less than sought because the jury felt the dog might have
been
just a little provoked at the time by Mr. Williams who was shooting it
repeatedly with a pellet gun.

5. May 2000: A Philadelphia restaurant was ordered to pay Amber Carson
of
Lancaster, Pennsylvania $113,500 after she slipped on a soft drink and
broke
her tail bone. The beverage was on the floor because Ms. Carson threw
it at
her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.

6. December 1997: Kara Walton of Claymont, Delaware successfully sued
the
owner of a night club in a neighboring city when she fell from the
bathroom
window to the floor and knocked out her two front teeth. This occurred
while
Ms Walton was trying to sneak through the window in the ladies room
to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge. She was awarded $12,000 and
dental
expenses.



7. And the winner is: Mr. Merv Grazinski of Oklahoma City. In November
2001
Mr. Grazinski purchased a brand new 32 foot Winnebago motor home. On
his
first trip home, having joined the freeway, he set the cruise control
at 70
mph and calmly left the driver's seat to go into the back and make
himself a
cup of coffee. Not surprisingly the Winnebago left the freeway, crashed
and
overturned. Mr. Grazinski sued Winnebago for not advising him in the
handbook that he couldn't actually do this. He was awarded $1,750,000
plus a
new Winnebago. (Winnebago actually changed their owners manuals because
of
this court case, just in case there are any other complete morons
buying their vehicles.)
 
 
Tryphena Absent
16:52 / 30.08.02
The US needs Ling Wu to exist.
 
 
Jack Fear
16:57 / 30.08.02
Fuck Ling Wu--we need Judge Dredd hearing some of these cases.



Case dismissed.
 
 
Ray Fawkes
17:03 / 30.08.02
I can't seem to find links or reference to news sources to back up any of these entries. I'd be surprised if a single one of them (with the exception of Stella Liebeck) is true.

Furthermore, you seem to have accepted a misrepresentation of the Stella Liebeck case, as many do. To wit:

Ms. Liebeck suffered second degree burns from the coffee she spilled, and subsequently spent seven days in the hospital undergoing skin graft surgery and recuperative therapy. She was nearly immobilized because of the nature and location of the burns, and had to be cared for by her daughter, who lost weeks of pay. Ms. Liebeck originally asked McDonalds to pay her out-of-pocket expenses (about $2000) plus the lost wages for her daughter. They gave her $800.

When she took the case to court, it was discovered that McDonalds had received over 700 complaints over the span of 10 years about scalding hot coffee, had learned that their standard coffee temperature was capable of causing second degree burns within seconds, and chose not to serve the coffee at a cooler temperature.

It was a jury that decided to award her $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages, and $160,000 in actual damages. The judge reduced the total to $640,000.

Hearing a case of negligence can understandably raise a jury's ire - especially coming from such a ubiquitous corporate giant. It's no surprise that they award huge damages when it seems that the suffering is disproportionate on the part of the victim.

Or - sorry. "Ha ha, America is so litigious...those stupid, lazy Americans will go for a fast buck any way they can." How boring.
 
 
Ganesh
17:11 / 30.08.02
Judge Judy would sort 'em out. Her cases are real, her rulings are final. This is her courtroom; this is Judge Judy.

For the title of her autobiography alone - 'Don't Piss On My Leg And Tell Me It's Raining' (I think) - the woman is my hero...
 
 
Persephone
17:12 / 30.08.02
Well, I will throw these bits into the cauldron: the coffee was so hot, the lady suffered third-degree burns to her, er, private parts. Third-degree burns! And McDonald's had received numerous complaints previous to her case & had done nothing about the temp of their coffee. And, lastly, upon appeal the judgment was greatly reduced (to something in the hundreds of thousands, I think.)

I just wonder about these stories. Last year we filed suit against the builder of our house, which in heavy rain would spew water from, like, various electrical appliances, and believe me that's the scariest thing ever. That stupid lawsuit was just about the hardest work I've ever done, and I got absolutely nowhere and nothing. So I ask myself sometimes, is this "easy living off lawsuits" meme just a fiction? Who made it up? And cui bono?
 
 
moriarty
18:13 / 30.08.02
Sorry, Ganesh. It's "pee" not "piss." Lessens the impact somewhat.

And Judge Joe Brown is the Hammer of Justice!
 
 
Ganesh
18:19 / 30.08.02
You're taking the piss, aintcha?
 
 
w1rebaby
18:50 / 30.08.02
well, we can have it both ways - there can simultaneously be people who go uncompensated, people who are rightly compensated and people who get money for being idiots

The latter certainly wouldn't happen without legal representation being based on cash. I'd love to see how much money the actual plaintiffs got out of the settlements, after lawyers' fees.
 
 
aus
19:05 / 30.08.02
Typically, working on a contingency fee (as is often the case in personal injury litigation in the USA), the lawyers get a third.

More here.
 
 
Persephone
19:28 / 30.08.02
Oh hell, of course you're right fridge. Don't tell my bosses at the Bureau of Negative Capability what I said. Plus that reminds me I didn't end up with nothing, I ended up less $1,000 in lawyers' fees.

*angry sob*
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
20:12 / 30.08.02
Fact - the largest number safety instruction labels on a product available to the general public in the world is in the US. You may be thinking that this is something mechanical, possibly a whirling death machine but you would be wrong. It is the humble ladder.

The most recent label attached to this ladder was bought about by a lawsuit sought against the manufacturers of this otherwise harmless object (TLC matches withstanding).

It seems that having owned a ladder from said manufacterer for a number of years a farmer put it to use one crisp early-spring morning in the mid-west. Seeking to do a little repair work to the side of his barn he rested atop a handy pile of frozen manure. As the day grew warmer the manure defrosted and the support to the ladder was compromised. The result being that the ladder fell to the ground taking the farmer with it. The farmer sustained a broken wrist and sued for lack of safety instructions on the ladder. After winning the manufacturer placed a brand new label on all ladders destined for sale in the US warning of the dangers of frozen support.

I have heard of some of the previously mentioned suits in a manner that inclines me to believe that there is some truth behind them.

I am also inclined to believe that Americans in general are either incredibly retarded or vulnerable to ambulance chasing and the potential rewards of litigation at the expense of their dignity. This being the nation that gave the world Jerry Springer.

It's not refered to as the nation of litigation with no back up at all.
 
  
Add Your Reply