BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


What's his hand doing under that table and why is he videotaping it?

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
aus
14:04 / 16.08.02
 
 
Ganesh
14:15 / 16.08.02
Videoing himself wanking?

(Afraid I've exhausted my daily supply of innuendo.)
 
 
aus
14:16 / 16.08.02
...and your daily supply of imagination, apparently.
 
 
w1rebaby
14:20 / 16.08.02
He is re-enacting the Voigt Kampf test scene from Blade Runner. Obviously. With limited props. Let me tell you about his mother.
 
 
aus
14:27 / 16.08.02
Both of you have failed to answer the second part of my question. I'll have to mark you down for that.

Ganesh, you get one point. Please try to provide your answers in a more assertive tone of voice - "Videoing himself wanking" is not a question.

Fridge, two points. I'll give you an extra point if you tell us about his mother.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
14:29 / 16.08.02
...but at the angle the camera is pointing, it wouldn't be able to record what's going on UNDER the table!

It looks like he's videotaping those cd cases....
 
 
Loomis
14:33 / 16.08.02
Forget the camera. I'm more concerned about the antics of the invisible man sitting at the other computer.
 
 
deja_vroom
14:34 / 16.08.02
He's videotaping his cd cases reflecting his face twitching from the petit mort he's enduring... It's sort of an statement about music. Trust me.
 
 
Ganesh
14:39 / 16.08.02
I guess all this afternoon's talk of latex-clad submission has temporarily sapped me of assertiveness. Doesn't everyone video themselves wanking, though? What do you show the folks at Christmas?
 
 
Bill Posters
14:40 / 16.08.02
Videos of them wanking.
 
 
aus
14:40 / 16.08.02
But why?

Flux, two points. Well observed.

Loomis, no points. I am not concerned about your mortal concerns. The invisible man sitting at the other computer is off-topic. Please discuss the invisible man in another thread.

Imperador, seventeen points. I am a demigod and am therefore empowered to bestow points arbitrarily.
 
 
aus
14:45 / 16.08.02
Ganesh and Bill, my apologies for not seeing your posts prior to posting the points for Flux, Loomis and Imperador.

Ganesh, I can't give you any points for your temporary sapping. I'm interested in results, not excuses.

Bill, off-topic. Minus one point. Please don't allow Ganesh to distract you.
 
 
Loomis
14:47 / 16.08.02
I don't see his headphones plugged into his machine. Perhaps that lead just goes down to a little microphone. Is he receiving directions from his little lord and master?
 
 
aus
14:54 / 16.08.02
So you're suggesting the hand under the table is holding a microphone?

Hmmm... could be. One and a half points for your wild guess.
 
 
deja_vroom
15:02 / 16.08.02
What we're supposed to do with all these points you're giving, anyway? What do we win?
 
 
aus
15:05 / 16.08.02
The esteem of your family, friends and community, and I think Ganesh is offering a videotape of himself masturbating.
 
 
aus
15:10 / 16.08.02
Imperador, the questions of what you can do with the points and what you might win is off-topic. Minus two points.

Auszilla, your answer to Imperador is off-topic. Minus four points.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
15:38 / 16.08.02
He's watching a dvd where a banquet is in progress. The guests are enjoying an appetizer of raw oysters. The entrée consists of boiled dog.

The smug set of his jaw indicates that his Voigt Kampf readings say he's a lesbian and not a replicant, fridge. Lucky boy.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
15:52 / 16.08.02
Which means, in answer to auszilla's disingenuous questions, that he is "diddling" (Saxist term) or "flicking the bean" (bearism) through those uninspiring corduroys, excited by the virtual aphrodisiac effect of the briny, phlegmy oysters.

He is filming it all in the hope of fifteen seconds of fame on the next run of V Graham Norton.

nul points :-)
 
 
gridley
16:07 / 16.08.02
If I'm reading his face correctly, Zocher, isn't there something about his expression that suggests the hostess of the party has just made the radical move of serving a pinot noir with the boiled dog as opposed to the traditional herb brandy, a choice which seems to both fluster and delight him.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
17:01 / 16.08.02
Ho ho, gridley, your wine-fu is incomparable.

Mmmmmmmm, Pinot noir... Is that the white wine they make from black grapes by gently coaxing the pulp out of the grapeskin with soothing words, instead of applying the feet of vintners and peasant boys? No must, fewer tannins, no errant toejam... Surely that would be inclined to diminish a true oenophile's fluster and delight?

Me, I'd opt for Chien, sorry Chenin Blanc, with boiled dog.
 
 
gridley
17:32 / 16.08.02
Ah! Chenin blanc! The great white grape of the Loire Valley, of course! King of Vouvray, Saint of Savenièrres, Sole Survivor of the Massacres at Montlouis, Anjou & Saumur! YES!

And I would gladly share a glass of it with you over the plate of raw oysters, but not, I fear to say, with the sheer gameyness of the Boiled Dog. My palette, alas, is such a sensitive, dainty thing that I'm afraid it would be overpowered by the bulling flavor of dog without some stonger spirit to cleanse it. And for that, alas, I require the traditional brandy.

Cheers!
 
 
deja_vroom
18:15 / 16.08.02
I'll bring the census-taker liver.

*pffhpffsslshhhspffhh*
 
 
grant
19:25 / 16.08.02
He's watching the output of his camera, run through a set of psychedelic video filters and uploaded live and streaming to the web. The camera is focussed on the back of his boyfriend's head.
 
 
Sax
20:39 / 16.08.02
He's using the hand to hold down a struggling woodland mammal he has trapped in his trousers. The laptop is connected to the animal and sending electric impulses into its brain, making it jerk spastically and effect a very pleasant sensation downstairs.
 
 
primaeval soup
20:45 / 16.08.02
The guy’s name is Peter.
For some time now, Peter has been increasingly unhappy – what’s the point in life if you have to live in a world without magic? When you’re a kid, you read comics and C.S. Lewis books and whatever, and part of you thinks *this is the way the world is!!* Then you grow up, and it gradually sinks in to your consciousness that No, the world is more like Eastenders.

Peter loves *Pokemon*. A part of him, very small and very weak, liked to fantasize about having his own personal, real pokemon. And another part, a part that he can barely admit to himself (never mind to anyone else! Jesus!), liked to imagine that it was possible that *his dream could come true*. But that part was on the verge of dying... Peter's melancholia had -- slowly and without any huge fuss -- become despair.

Then, a friend of Peter’s turned him on to *The Invisibles* -- there Peter learnt about Chaos Magic and all sorts of mad stuff – was this possible? Could it be true? Was the world like this after all?
After studying quantities of Carroll, Hine, Crowley, and some old grimoires that described methods of creating homunculi and familiars, Peter took the plunge. If it didn’t work, he decided, he’d kill himself. But maybe, just maybe, it was all *true*…

He connected a video camera to his laptop, and had the laptop display a live image of a space on the table -- this space was where the “familiar” would manifest. He then had his laptop overlay an animated image of his favourite pocket monster over the live image of the table. Next, Peter put on the headphones and played the chaos mantra he had prepared earlier. And finally, staring at the laptop image, Peter began to masturbate, so as to create the necessary “gnosis”…
Maybe…(Uhh – Mm – )
Just *maybe*… (Hh – Mmn – Oh God –)
It was all…(Godohgodoh – )

*true*
 
 
Mourne Kransky
21:18 / 16.08.02
Ooh, that was eerily good, Old Evil.
 
 
aus
00:03 / 17.08.02
ZoCher, as promised, I'm giving you a point for desperately saving yourself from accusations of threadrot.

Gridley, minus eight. Aside from being off-topic, dog is always boiled in beer and served with a fine import like Crown or VB.

ZoCher, you undid yourself by maintaining the wine nonsense. Minus 16, making a total of minus 15. And think yourself lucky.

Gridley, I think you know what you did. Go sit in the corner for 5 minutes and minus 32 points for a total of minus 40. Yes, I'm stern but fair.

Imperador, you're allowing yourself to be led astray. If Gridley and ZoCher jumped off a bridge, would you follow? I'll let this pass for now only because I liked the sound effects. You still have 15 points, but be warned.

Grant, I'll give you two points because you didn't suggest "videotaping himself wanking", another point for the use of psychedelic video filters, and another three points for at least implying an answer to my question of why the video.

Sax, two points for imagination, three points for explaining the laptop, and minus 564 points for abuse of woodland mammals. If you had suggested the consensual involvement of a woodland mammal you would have scored more.

Old Evil, was that autobiographical? 23 points for effort, 3 for explaining the video, 3 for explaining the laptop, 3 for explaining the headphones, 3 for mentioning The Invisibles, minus 2 for falling back on the old masturbation standby. That's a total of 33 points.

ZoCher, please raise your hand and address the class.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
14:49 / 17.08.02
Can we use this thread for general discussion of the 'Us/Them' thread? I'd like to say that in spite of being mean to the dirty ravers, Rage wins some kind of trophy for this, categorised as US & THEM:



Just love the way it seems to sum up the contradictions that I imagine are present in most Barbelithers lives (ah, but are they really contradictions, I hear you ask? ahhhhhhh...).

See, this is what I like about that thread: contrary to what Jack's "mirrors" post (WE ARE ALL ONE, WE ARE ALL ONE - do you see?), it actually tends to end up exploding the US/THEM dichotomy in a variety of fascinating and often hilarious ways. Last time around, when there was a separate thread for each, it was particularly great the way the same images started cropping up in both threads...
 
 
aus
16:57 / 17.08.02
Can we use this thread for general discussion of the 'Us/Them' thread?

The answer is "no". Minus 64 points for being off-topic, and a further minus 132 for using the word "dichotomy", which I understand to mean surgical removal of the dich.
 
 
ill tonic
17:18 / 17.08.02
Yeah Fridge, I wanna hear about his mother.

(I know minus points for me...)
 
 
Ganesh
17:20 / 17.08.02
Actually, if we're at home to Mr Pedant, surgical removal of the dich would be 'dichectomy'.

(Okay, -5000 points to me for cheeking the teacher...)
 
 
aus
18:24 / 17.08.02
NG, I'll let that one go considering I made the same request.

Ganesh: OK, so "dichotomy" is mere cutting of the dich rather than complete removal, but we're not at home to Mr Pedant. Minus 256 points.
 
 
gridley
12:17 / 19.08.02
Gridley, minus eight. Aside from being off-topic, dog is always boiled in beer and served with a fine import like Crown or VB.

beer with dog... yeah... ok.... I didn't realize this was a junior varsity competition...
 
 
aus
12:53 / 19.08.02
"Junior varsity"? Minus 512 for off-topic, minus 1024 for inverted snobtrolling. Just because you didn't learn anything at school doesn't mean the rest of us can't benefit from an education.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply