BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Guerilla Marketing

 
 
Margin Walker
20:34 / 01.08.02
(I don't know if this belongs here or in the Head Shop or in Conversation, but feel free to move it, Mods)

From The Wall Street Journal: Sony Ericsson Campaign Uses Actors To Push Camera-Phone In Real Life:

In a campaign set to start Thursday, the U.S. arm of Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ltd. will take "guerrilla" marketing to a new level. Its goal: to get consumers to pay attention to the new T68i, a mobile phone that can double as a digital camera.

In one initiative, dubbed Fake Tourist, 60 trained actors and actresses will haunt tourist attractions such as the Empire State Building in New York and the Space Needle in Seattle. Working in teams of two or three and behaving as if they were actual tourists, the actors and actresses will ask unsuspecting passersby to take their pictures. Presto: instant product demonstrations.

A second stunt will involve the use of "leaners" -- 60 actresses and female models with extensive training in the phone's features who will frequent trendy lounges and bars without telling the establishments what they're up to. The women are getting scripted scenarios designed to help them engage strangers in conversation. One involves having an actress's phone ring while she's in the bar -- and having the caller's picture pop up on the screen. In another scenario, two women sit at opposite ends of the bar playing an interactive version of the Battleship game on their phones.

So far, so good. But do the actors then identify themselves as working on behalf of Sony Ericsson? Not if they can help it. The idea is to have onlookers think they've stumbled onto a hot new product. Sony Ericsson, which plans to spend $5 million on the 60-day marketing campaign, says it's all in good fun and just an effort to get people talking.

Consumer activists, though, aren't amused. "It's deceptive," says Gary Ruskin, executive director of Commercial Alert, a nonprofit organization founded by consumer activist Ralph Nader, when told about the campaign. "People will be fooled into thinking this is honest buzz."

Even marketing executives disapprove. "It is reprehensible and desperate," says Paul MacFarlane, co-owner of the Experiment, a small ad firm in St. Louis, that has done work for Southwestern Bell and Anheuser-Busch. "They are trying to fabricate something that should be natural."

Sony Ericsson responds that most consumers won't be offended. "How many times do people that you don't know come up to you and talk to you?" asks Jon Maron, director of marketing communications at Sony Ericsson, which is a joint venture of Telefon AB L.M. Ericsson of Sweden and Sony Corp. of Japan.

"It's very natural, especially in a club or restaurant." He adds that the actors will confess that they work for the company if they are asked directly.

Peter Groome, president of Omnicom Group Inc.'s Fathom Communications, the marketing firm that created the plan, also defends the tactics. He insists that the campaign isn't "undercover" selling because the actors will simply demonstrate the product, not give a sales pitch.

Still, the company has gone to great lengths to train its actors to avoid detection. "If you put them in a Sony Ericsson shirt, then people are going to be less likely to listen to them in a bar," Mr. Groome says.

Other components of the promotional campaign are more commonly used buzz initiatives. One involves "Phone Finds," in which the company will place dummy phones around cities so that consumers can accidentally stumble on them. The screen on the phone will direct the finders to a special Web site, where they will be able to enter a contest to win a free phone. The new phone with camera attachment, priced between $300 and $400, will hit stores next week.

Less covert buzz marketing strategies have been around for years, but their use surged during the dot-com boom. Many companies that couldn't afford expensive TV ads hired young marketing firms to convey their messages in attention-getting ways.

As concepts became more elaborate and intrusive, they began to be referred to as guerrilla marketing or stealth marketing.

Among the companies that have used such buzz marketing: Cadbury Schweppes PLC, Jim Beam Brands Worldwide Inc. and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, for its Mini car.

Faced with the ad recession, some traditional agencies have also embraced the concept. For instance, Young & Rubicam, a unit of London's WPP Group PLC, opened a U.S. division called Brand Buzz and is rolling out the unit to its European offices.

But there are limits. Veteran marketers warn that advertisers who are trying to generate positive word-of-mouth about a brand or a new product will do better in the long run if they are honest with consumers.

David Lubars, president and executive creative director at Publicis Groupe SA's Fallon Worldwide, says promotional campaigns that are perceived as dishonest could backfire. "If the consumer finds out after the encounter, they are going to be mad," he says.


Do you think this will work? Along with some companies tagging their corporate logos, this seems like one of those memes that may pay off big. Supposedly similar campaigns from The Truth have been sucsessful in curbing the rate of teens smoking, so who knows?
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
16:11 / 03.08.02
This has been done over here already I believe, one was some sort of improvision piece for a particular product, the other was getting actors to act drunk in pubs to promote awareness of what happens when you over indulge. It sounds daft, not to mention expensive and hard to quantify in terms of how successful it is.
Also, actvertisers can only get their message over to a small group of people in the pub. I would have the costs for even getting the message out to a small part of society were much vaster than a TV ad or magazine placement.
 
 
bio k9
18:30 / 03.08.02
If someone hands me one of these things anywhere near the Space Needle Im going to take it and run.
 
 
Turk
04:20 / 05.08.02
Pah, who needs an Ericsson T68i mobile phone when you could stay in and watch so many great channels through a Sky Digi-box. It's amazing, more movie and entertainment channels than you can shake and stick at, oh and boys, just consider all that LIVE sport!
Nobody wants to be a square and miss out on latest series of Friends, Scrubs, all those other quality shows. Wow, and that's just the start of it friend.
 
 
Shortfatdyke
07:34 / 05.08.02
i heard of people being employed to get talking to people in bars in this country and advertise a product. seems quite insidious and my more wild imaginings involve realising that someone you've been friends with for years has been hanging around purely to push a product at you. as lada says, it sounds like a waste of resources compared to other methods.

i'm often asked to take photos of people. i rarely take notice of the camera i'm given to use, as i'm too busy restraining myself from being arty.
 
 
Fist Fun
08:04 / 05.08.02
It does sound like an expensive way to address a small audience. However when you think about the whole tipping point theory (communicators, mavens) it could work in a meme-type way. Targeting tourist attractions means a possibly global audience that could take the message back home, reasonable affluence (they can afford to go on holiday) and quite possibly a receptive mindset capturing people in a relaxed location where they are open to new ideas and looking for stories to bring home. Insidious definitely, might be interesting to see if ti works though. I think we have another tech-type boom, as unlikely as that seems at the moment, then there will be much more online stealth marketing with blogs and such.
 
 
sleazenation
08:36 / 05.08.02
Of course the reason that this topic has been placed here could be to see how much consumer resistance there is to guerilla marketing in our demographic...
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
11:55 / 05.08.02
My being against it is totally in favour of the big businesses, I just don't think it's worth their money. Not when they could be using that money to advertise bulldozing the rest of the Amazon or building a huge McDonalds in Antarctica or flying around the world finding puffins and drenching them in crude oil. I am big businesses pal.
 
 
Eloi Tsabaoth
15:59 / 05.08.02
Of course, rival corporations will end up hiring their own guerilla cells to disrupt their opponents:

Coke Guerilla: Wow, this rum and coke is so delicious and refreshing!
Punter: Really?
Pepsi Guerilla: Let me try. Ack! Oh my god! It's like licking a weasel's bottom!
Coke Guerilla: Not it isn't! Your tastebuds are just damaged by... crack!
Random Passerby: C'mon guys, why not settle your differences over a refreshing Holsten Pils...
Punter: Is anyone in this bar just here to get pissed?
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
12:45 / 06.08.02
LOL. Perhaps people will now have to wear the signs that they previously put up on their doors, something along the lines of "I do not wish to be disturbed by anyone trying to sell or influence me in any way to buy a product." Then there will be a register you can join and these guys will have to check with it before even opening their mouths in your hearing.
 
 
Shortfatdyke
12:57 / 06.08.02
there's a photo in one of the broadsheets this morning of a man streaking at a rugby match in australia - with the logo of a mobile phone company painted on his back. apparently the company are going to 'get into trouble' for the stunt but it's still on the front of at least one newspaper so they've got the advertising they wanted.
 
  
Add Your Reply