BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Synchronicity: Complement to "Useful Techniques" thread

 
 
—| x |—
06:13 / 30.07.02
Over there, in that thread, Panda says:

"Synchronicities - I used to experience these very frequently a few years ago, at what was a very magical time in my life, but not so much these days. Is that the norm? can you be more in synch with things in year, and less in synch the next?"

Seems to me that tapping into the synchronicities of your life, or better, life as is, is magick or the root of magick. Way back in the day when I was first exposed to TOPY thinking and the legacy of Psychic TV et al. with their magickal 23 I was bedazzled by how often this mysterious number actually did manifest in life, if only I was attentive to it. A few years later I came across a book by E.E. Rehmus in which he defines 23 as the number of synchronicity. This I found intriguing for what did he mean?

Seeing as I have been thinking and working with synchronicity now for about twelve years, I would like to share a few insights with y'all, my gentle readers. First, the twenty-three thing seems as a tool, training wheels if you will: a way to cause yourself to become attentive to synchronicity in your life. Over the years I have come to recognize that there is nothing in this world which is not a synchronicity (similar to how everything is magick). For example, the "fact" that the sun rises everyday appears to me to be a synchronicity that occurs with regularity. I mean, isn't it somewhat strange that each and everyone of us experiences this occurrence each and everyday. I think that what tends to happen is that we start to take these wonderful synchronicities for granted and merely start looking at them as everyday occurrences, and this is how we become disenchanted with the wonder of the world.

This is in part due, I feel, to the driving force behind the Spectacle Society: we are always looking for the next big event, and damn, it simply isn't anything at all if it isn't bigger, louder, wider, phatter, and more wicked than the last big event. So the simple synchronicities that weave a life, any life—your life—together get washed away by the hunt for the next mind blowing event.

See, the thing is, and I think that certain indigenous peoples in North America feel this way, or did at one time before white people devastated their culture, we have to meet everyday as fresh, as brand new. We need to wake each day reborn so that the sun’s appearance in the sky is a huge synchronicity that we share with the other people in our lives and not merely the same old scientifically explainable fact of life. We need to re-enchant our lives and reawaken our child-like sense of wonder at the simple things that we come to take for granted. The search for twenty-threes becomes the search for any meaningful correspondence between seemingly unrelated events: why is the sun hanging in the sky to greet you every time you get out of bed (assuming, of course, you wake up sometime during the day and that it is not cloudy)? Choose your own adventure.

Which brings me to my second point: you do get to choose your own adventure, because this is what interpreting synchronicities (and interpretation in general—more or less) means: you see the connection, so you get to tell yourself a story about what the connection means and what value it has in your life. Of course, the story you tell will never be completely original. The meaning and value of the correspondence you see might come from your religious or cultural background, it might lay in the authority of Crowley or the tribe of elders to which you belong. The meaning and value might be generated within the context of your favorite movie, book, or comic, and it might simply stem from the depths of the psyche. Regardless of where your meanings have originated from, the important part is that you seek to manifest meaning and value in your life. Put differently, as magicians we create the meaning and value of the synchronicities we experience, and we have the courage to stand on our interpretations of the correspondences: to know, to dare, to will.

The third thing I‘d like to share (to round off this little post on synchronicity with a equilateral trinity in harmonic correspondence with {0, 1, 2} = modthree). The twenty-three training wheel device serves to show, if you really want to see, to what extent the individual can shape and mold his or her reality. As I’ve noted above, first it gets you to seek out patterns of meaningful correspondence, then it gets you to create a meaningful and valuable interpretation of the created correspondence, but isn’t this simply creating the life you live as you live it? Put differently, an individual who decides to walk a magickal road in his or her life is taking on the responsibility of a god/dess—his or her own creator. I’ve noticed that what occurs with the magickal will is that reality manifests in such a manner that the internal desire matches the external world; that is, the psyche aligns itself with the material world to give rise to synchronicity. Put differently still, to look for twenty-three is to create the opportunities that reveal twenty-three to you.

Anyway, to answer Panda’s concerns from my own perspective: Yes, I know that synchronicity comes and goes in my life; that is, it is more present at some times than at others. However, I feel that my being is always in synch with the realities that make up the {internal, external} world, but it is merely my interpretation of those realities that might be out of synch. Put differently, we are always dancing the dance that is danced, but sometimes we feel the beat stronger than at other times: it is not that we are missing the steps, but only that we are not attentive to the dance. You are never out of synch, but your interpretation most certainly can be.

m3 = MMM = 444 = 0 (mod3)

 
 
Wrecks City-Zen
19:24 / 30.07.02
Synchronicity is the true language of the universe.

Great topic.
 
 
Sebastian
20:29 / 30.07.02
Beautiful. Thanks Mod, you've my reading for the day. I'll comment and highlight on my favorite lines from above.

Over the years I have come to recognize that there is nothing in this world which is not a synchronicity (similar to how everything is magick).

This is not dissimilar to the notion of magickal consciousness or magickal awareness that Grant M. describes in his brief course on chaos magick at his site.

For example, the "fact" that the sun rises everyday appears to me to be a synchronicity that occurs with regularity. I mean, isn't it somewhat strange that each and everyone of us experiences this occurrence each and everyday.

Okay, Mod, then you are already watching us from The Other Side. Keep in touch. Drop a line from time to time.

what tends to happen is that we start to take these wonderful synchronicities for granted and merely start looking at them as everyday occurrences, and this is how we become disenchanted with the wonder of the world.

I presently think there are zillions of dollars invested all over the world in precisely turning every human being out of his track through this mean. you know, if you manage to get an individual out of his own "adventure", then you can program it for himself, and extensionally for the entire specie, so better start looking for those "adventures" that you know are already written for you.

why is the sun hanging in the sky to greet you every time you get out of bed (assuming, of course, you wake up sometime during the day and that it is not cloudy)?

Its interesting that you mention the Sun and cloudy days, because I have always been much aware of the collective relation there is between the weather and the people of the region. Here in Argentina we have recently gone through a lot of social turmoil, anxiety, uncertainty, violence and despair, especially in past December and January, and believe me, although it went unnoticed, the highly unsual weather we had was incredibly synchronised with the gloomy collective mood of the day and of the week, to an extent that linguistic metaphors about both of them were closely matching each other.

you see the connection, so you get to tell yourself a story about what the connection means and what value it has in your life. Of course, the story you tell will never be completely original.

I think Joseph Campbell has brought the sequential pattern of this universal story in his book "The Hero with a Thousand Faces".

as magicians we create the meaning and value of the synchronicities we experience, and we have the courage to stand on our interpretations of the correspondences: to know, to dare, to will.

Yes, I have written about that here, I think that's the spirit and the challenge, assign meaning and enact it.

You are never out of synch, but your interpretation most certainly can be.

Thanks for that punch, I was needing it.
 
 
the Fool
22:16 / 30.07.02
I was really skeptical about the 23 thing when I began. Now it just appears everywhere, but not when I actively look for it. And I think Mod3 is right in calling it a 'signpost'.

It just happened again. I looked at the coke bottle on my desk, a phone number ending in 23.
 
 
ciarconn
00:20 / 31.07.02
A bit tricky, the 23 sinc. I focused on a Nine-multiple of nine sinc, and it worked too
 
 
the Fool
00:32 / 31.07.02
I think any number will work. As long as you buy into its significance. Initial belief structure construction.
 
 
cusm
12:17 / 31.07.02
Aye, I get 7s for that sort of thing. Though lately, 9s have been more apparent. Numbers mean what we want them to mean, they're just words. The syncronicity triggers on what we understand.
 
 
Wrecks City-Zen
20:05 / 01.08.02
23

I disagree about any number working in this system. I mean, look at William Shakespear's obsession with it!W the 23rd letter of the alphabet.He was 46 (2x23) when he was approached to *ahem* write the Psalms in the King James Version of the bible. ( Proof is found in Psalm 46 {2x23} by counting 46 words from the start of the verse and 46 words from the end...what do ya got?)

'Ni' in Japanese is "two"
'San' is 3

Nissan would be 23.

I could go on for days....
 
 
Kobol Strom
20:38 / 01.08.02
23 days!

I used to think that 23 was like the binary 1 and 0 ,with 2 and 3 more accurately representing the root code of abstracted consciousness.
The mind is self aware,but in order to pull this off,it is necessary to make internal mental relationships conform to an abstract understanding of how data can be arranged.The binary model (or pictograhical model of binary states) eventually needs to be able to factor the existentialism of 1 and 0,and the only way to do this,is to abstractify the single unit(producing 2 relationships),and further abstractify the single unit.Therefor the Binary '1' shares the same value as the binary 0,but also contains an extra packet of data that says,'I am not zero'.If this process is sequential,beginning at a non abstract understanding of the zero,and continuing without interuption, then you might never realise that you can explain the 1 and the zero to consciousness by using two factors for zero,and then 3 factors(2 shared) for 1. So,an aspect of human mental programming might therefor turn up subliminally in a shared cultural belief system,as the repetition of a symbol,or related mathematical relationship in nature.Thus,everywhere you look in society,theres a 'trend' towards 23, as if society is reflecting its innermost processes by the nature of its abstracted programming.
Anyway,that was before I discovered Mario 64.
 
 
6opow
06:17 / 05.08.02
Let’s pick up on “synchronicity as the language of the universe.”

I understand this sentence, at least, I understand what it means to me. I tend to think that this sentence is “true.” This is to say that I think that the things which exist, or perhaps existence itself (if we can think of existence as being a “thing” ), is entirely synchronous. What does that mean?!?

Hmm…good question. It is kinda’ like everything that appears to be in a discrete state of isolation from everything that it isn’t actually is dependent on all those other “separate” things for its being. I think this might be akin to certain schools of Buddhist thought. If we take the concept of interdpendent co-arising to mean that discrete things are empty, but it is the relations amongst things which give substance to being, then we might think that it is the relations amongst parts which gives rise (or ruse?) to substance. These relations, it seems, must be synchronous with one and other in the sense that there can be no relation which occurs in spacetime which isn’t tied up or entangled with any other relation. I think that this line of thinking gives us creation ex nihlo, or something from nothing, or anything and everything from nothing. And doesn’t this seem like magick?

If we think about the universe as a structure of information, or as information in a structure, then we can further understand what it might mean for synchronicity to be the language of the universe. It is kinda’ like all these apparent bits talk to one and other, but in order for the bits to understand each other, then the language they speak must by synched up in a very precise and efficient manner: there can be no room for miscommunication when an electron “tells” the nucleus it orbits its velocity or position as the nucleus in turn speaks to the electron telling it where it is. Perhaps the four fundamental forces of physics, like the four directions, the four suits, the four elements, the four letters in YHVH, all come together as aspects of the same force expressed in slightly different ways (slightly different relative to our understanding of these things). Hmm…there seems to be chains of communication in any act or any being. For instance, my fingers are a mixture of various bits which are communicating in a manner which allows for the bits to stay together as fingers. In turn, these bits are communicating to the bits that are communicating amongst themselves in order to stay together as the keyboard that I type away this late night rant on. Together my fingers and the keyboard create a synchronicity which then allows certain strings of symbols to appear on the bits held together by certain communications which makes up my screen. In turn, more bits located I don’t know where are communicating in such a manner that they hold together a server. It becomes a conspiracy of vast proportions simply for me to post this message up to this thread. It is YHVH only knows how many seemingly discrete bits all working in a synchronous manner which then allows for you to read these maddening thoughts of mine.

But you will read these thoughts through an interpretation. Perhaps our language is a barrier against real communication, where “real” communication would be the free flowing of information in such a manner as synchronicity is all there is: only being and not interpreting. I do not think that the keyboard nor my fingers stop to ask “what does this mean” as they caress one and other to form these strings of symbols on my screen; however, it is myself who asks (and you to) “what does this mean?” The sun rises in the sky relative to us, but we know the earth turns. The turning of the earth allows for the suns rays to caress the earth and give energy to life. The tree does not ask what it means to receive the sun’s caresses, but it is us who are able to ask what it means to feel the sun warm our faces.

So, is to speak the language of synchronicity to speak without speaking, to know without knowing, and are our interpretations what take us away from a simple life of being? Is it analysis which obscures rather than reveals the language of life, the language which one empty bit speaks in tandem with another empty bit? Is a problem that we have that we are so full of ourselves so full of “it” that we are unable to merely exist as a language dancing in nothing at all?

Like the street light outside my house I feel my thoughts are wrapped in a fog.
 
 
Papess
13:52 / 05.08.02
Okay, I had to check on the meanings of synchronicity and coincidence for my own clarification and was satisfied with their meanings but, I came across a definition or two that left me adrift.

synchronize - to agree in time, to be simulanteous

The first definition, when viewed from the aspect of the entire world. would seem to point to the idea that we are in fact, ALL in concurrence. There is much more agreement going on than our attention is drawn to (being distracted by various media). If we are using the theory that all is synchronized, in tandem, then there is a lovely vision it conjurs of true peace. Look at how much we actually agree upon in relation to the very little we do not. There is the New Aeon to consider and various wars, one of which is Armegeddon. In this intsance, is this the universe agreeing to disagree with itself?

Errr....? I think my wires are shorting

What I think I am trying to ask is, if we all start to NOT agree in the sun's daily rising will that cause the rift in fabric we call reality?

-May
 
 
Papess
13:22 / 07.08.02
"So, is to speak the language of synchronicity to speak without speaking, to know without knowing, and are our interpretations what take us away from a simple life of being? Is it analysis which obscures rather than reveals the language of life, the language which one empty bit speaks in tandem with another empty bit? Is a problem that we have that we are so full of ourselves so full of “it” that we are unable to merely exist as a language dancing in nothing at all?"
~ G.D.G

This is exactly why I do not feel the necessity for others to spoon-feed me their insights. It is enough, especailly when dealing with such subtle matters, to merely point at the nature of them. It is MY responsibility as a Mage/Sorceror/Witch...whatever, to be able to ride the lines of intent and let the concept reveal itself to me, instead of demanding that it be an apparent comprehension, free of mystery.

If I am still and use my spirit/mind/being to follow intent I can be there, in tandem with each and every concept/person/idea/intent presented to me. Granted, I am not always terribly focused so, I ask stupid (hehe) questions or simply need verbal (written) confirmation to my suspicions.

I completely agree with this concept and I know, with those I hold dear, there is often little reason to speak. We simply know. It is not an uncomfortable silence, it is filled with laughter and passion, kindness and respect. This is a personal measure I have for a great relationship...Can we be together in silence and be comfortable?

Sometimes, I wish the whole world would sit in silence...listening to the spaces between the sounds.

.......................May
 
 
Bear
13:53 / 07.08.02
Yesterday the words "What a Difference a Day Makes" kept springing up from the news/TV shows and even the weather - very strange but it also made allot of sense to me
 
  
Add Your Reply