BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


19 July 1952: UFOs over Washington DC. - and now they're back.

 
 
grant
18:19 / 24.07.02
Once again: Happy Birthday, Tom.

FILER'S FILES #30-2002, MUFON Skywatch Investigations
George A. Filer, Director Mutual UFO Network Eastern
July 24, 2002, Majorstar@aol.com.
Webmaster: Chuck Warren, http://.www.filersfiles.com


ALIEN ARMADA OVER WASHINGTON DC

Washington Post staff writer Peter Carlson reports on Sunday that, in the control tower at Washington National Airport, Ed Nugent saw seven pale violet blips on his radar screen. What were they? Not planes -- at least not any planes that were supposed to be there. He summoned his boss, Harry G. Barnes, the head of National's air traffic controllers. "Here's a fleet of flying saucers for you," Nugent said, half-joking. Upstairs, in the tower's glass-enclosed top floor, controller Joe Zacko saw a strange blip streaking across his radar screen. It wasn't a bird. It wasn't a plane. What was it? He looked out the window and spotted a bright light hovering in the sky. He turned to his partner, Howard Cocklin, who was sitting three feet away. "Look at that bright light," Zacko said. "If you believe in flying saucers, that could sure be one." And then the light took off, zooming away at an incredible speed. "Did you see that?" Cocklin remembers saying. "What the hell was that?"

It was Saturday night, July 19, 1952, fifty years ago -- one of the most famous dates in the bizarre history of UFOs. Before the night was over, a pilot reported seeing unexplained objects, radar at two local Air Force bases -- Andrews and Bolling -- picked up the UFOs, and two Air Force F-94 jets streaked over Washington, searching for flying saucers. Then, a week later, it happened all over again -- more UFOs on the radar screen, more jets scrambled over Washington. Across America, the story of jets chasing UFOs over the White House knocked the Korean War and the presidential campaign off the front pages of newspapers.
" 'Saucer' Outran Jet, Pilot Reveals," read the banner headline in The Washington Post.
"JETS CHASE D.C. SKY GHOSTS," screamed the New York Daily News.
"AERIAL WHATZITS BUZZ D.C. AGAIN!" shouted the Washington Daily News.
As rumors spread, President Truman demanded to know what was flying over his house. Soon the federal government was fighting the UFOs with the most powerful weapons in the Washington arsenal -- bureaucracy, obfuscation and gobbledygook. That seemed to work. The UFOs never returned.
Snip.

Dr. Bruce Maccabee isn't laughing. "One thing you have to understand: This is serious business," he says. "The skeptics like to make fun of us." Maccabee, 60, is a civilian physicist for the Navy and a prominent UFO believer. Maccabee buttresses his argument with an official government report. It's called "Quantitative Aspects of Mirages" and it was issued by the Air Force in 1969. "They proved in their own study that there wasn't enough temperature inversion to cause this effect," he says. "The Washington sightings cannot be explained as a radar mirage. "In the '70s, he filed the Freedom of Information Act request that led to the release of the FBI's file on UFOs. The file was called "Security Matter X" -- "the real X-Files," he says. Maccabee believes there were "solid objects" in the air over Washington 50 years ago. "And I think those solid objects were not made by us," he says. "And by us, I mean human beings." After 50 years, the debate over the Washington UFOs goes on and on. "You have dueling experts and dueling reports," says Kevin D. Randle, author of "Invasion Washington: UFOs Over the Capitol," a new book on the 1952 sightings. "One expert says it was temperature inversion. Another says it wasn't. In that situation, you have to refer back to the air traffic controllers and the pilots who actually saw the objects." Former controller Howard Cocklin is still convinced that he saw an object over National that night. "I saw it on the screen and out the window," he says. "It was a whitish-blue object. Not a light -- a solid form. An object. A saucer-shaped object." Now 83 and retired, Cocklin says he never saw anything like that saucer -- not before, not since. "It just went away," he says, sitting in an armchair in his Fairfax living room. "Where did it go? Why don't people see these things today? Why 50 years ago?"
Thanks to Washington Post.



(Link now fixed - read more on the Wash. Post site, including bits on Marilyn Monroe and the Pentagon.)
 
 
cusm
02:50 / 25.07.02
saw seven pale violet blips on his radar screen

Aren't radar displays a monochrome green? Especially in the 50s?
 
 
grant
12:53 / 25.07.02
I don't know, actually, but I think Filer's ex-Air Force, so he probably knows. Maybe they look violet when they fade out?
 
 
cusm
14:21 / 25.07.02
I suspect a bit of poetic license at work. Color recievers weren't invented till 1954, and radar has always been a binary display. You see a stationary blip when the scanner passes over the area, movement is calculated by the distance the blips traveled between radar passes. So, there wouldn't be any "streaking across the screen" going on either. There'd be a blip circled in grease pencil, followed by another one on the other side of the display when the scanner swung around again for another pass and soms quick calculations by the operator to determine velocity. Tis just the sort of thing that raises my suspicious when a detail like that is so out of place. Though if you want to be sure, I'm sure you could find archives of the headlines in question. This should be verifiable through archives of the Washington Post.
 
 
MJ-12
00:58 / 28.07.02
are they on schedule or something?

Saturday, July 27, 2002; Page B02
...
"It was this object, this light-blue object, traveling at a phenomenal rate of speed," Rogers said. "This Air Force jet was right behind it, chasing it, but the object was just leaving him in the dust. I told my neighbor, 'I think those jets are chasing a UFO.' "

Military officials confirm that two F-16 jets from Andrews Air Force Base were scrambled early yesterday after radar detected an unknown aircraft in area airspace. But they scoff at the idea that the jets were chasing a strange and speedy, blue unidentified flying object.

"We had a track of interest, so we sent up some aircraft," said Maj. Douglas Martin, a spokesman for the North American Aerospace Defense Command in Colorado, which has responsibility for defending U.S. airspace. "Everything was fine in the sky, so they returned home."

At the same time, military officials say they do not know just what the jets were chasing, because whatever it was disappeared. "There are any number of scenarios, but we don't know what it was," said Maj. Barry Venable, another spokesman for NORAD.

Radar detected a low, slow-flying aircraft about 1 a.m. yesterday, according to a military official. Controllers were unable to establish radio communication with the unidentified aircraft, and NORAD was notified. When the F-16s carrying air-to-air missiles were launched from Andrews, the unidentified aircraft's track faded from the radar, the military official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
...
"It was a routine launch," said Lt. Col. Steve Chase, a senior officer with the wing, which keeps pilots and armed jets on 24-hour alert at Andrews to respond to incidents as part of an air defense system protecting Washington after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Rogers remains convinced that what he saw was not routine. "It looked like a shooting star with no trailing mist," he said. "I've never seen anything like it."
 
 
grant
13:46 / 29.07.02
Ha! you just beat me to it!

It's worth mentioning that there's more text at the Wash. Post site for the first article. Marilyn Monroe is mentioned, as is Col. Ruppelt of Project Blue Book.
 
 
cusm
15:13 / 29.07.02
Yea, I was about to mention this as well, but it seems I get up way too late in the day to keep up with y'all sometimes

The similarity of dates is awfully spooky, I'll have to say.
 
  
Add Your Reply