BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


RAVE Act: new salvo in drug war.

 
 
grant
12:27 / 12.07.02
(Bold face mine. For emphasis, yeah?)

Subject: Senate Bill Could Cost You $250,000 and 20 years in prison.

PROPOSED LAW COULD SUBJECT YOU TO 20 YEARS IN
PRISON
Stop the Senate From Banning Marijuana Rallies
and Other Events

Take Action at: http://ga1.org/campaign/rave

The Senate is poised to pass legislation that
would give federal
prosecutors new powers to shut down hemp
festivals, marijuana rallies
and other events and punish business owners and
activists for hosting
or promoting them. The proposed law would also
potentially subject
people to enormous federal sentences if some of
their guests smoked
marijuana at their party or barbecue. It would
also effectively make
it a federal crime to rent property to medical
marijuana patients and
their caregivers.

The bill, known as the Reducing American's
Vulnerability to Ecstasy
Act (RAVE Act), was just introduced in the Senate
on June 18th and has
already passed the Senate Judiciary Committee. It
is moving VERY
rapidly and could be passed by the Senate as
early as this week. While
it purports to be aimed at ecstasy and other club
drugs, it gives the
federal government enormous power to fine and
imprison supporters of
marijuana legalization, even if they've never
smoked marijuana.

It is urgent that you take action today!

ACTIONS TO TAKE

** Fax your Senators today. Go to http://ga1.org/campaign/rave to find out more.

** Forward this alert to your friends, family,
and co-workers.

** After you fax your Senators, please follow it
up with phone calls.
Tell them you just faxed them a letter in
opposition to S. 2633,
the Reducing American's Vulnerability to
Ecstasy Act. Tell them
that innocent business owners shouldn't be
punished for the crimes
of their customers. Tell them this bill has
dangerous anti-civil
liberties provisions that they need to be
aware of, and this bill
deserves serious debate.

You can contact your Senators through the Capitol
Switchboard at
202-224-3121. To find out who your Senators are
go to:
http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator_by_state.cfm

MORE INFORMATION

The Senate is considering legislation that would
give federal
prosecutors new powers to shut down raves,
marijuana rallies and other
events they don't like and punish businessmen and
women for hosting or
promoting them. The bill (S. 2633), also known as
the Reducing
American's Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act (RAVE
Act), is moving very
rapidly and could be considered by the full
Senate as early as this
week. (A similar bill is also pending in the
House.)

S. 2633, sponsored by Senators Durbin (D-IL),
Hatch (R-UT), Grassley
(R-IA) and Leahy (D-VT), expands the so-called
"crack house statute" to allow the federal government to fine or
imprison businessmen and women if customers sell or use drugs on their
premises or at their events.
Property owners, promoters, and event
coordinators could be
fined hundreds of thousands of dollars or face up
to twenty years in
federal prison if they hold raves or other events
on their property.
If the bill becomes law, property owners may be
too afraid to rent or
lease their property to groups holding hemp
festivals or putting on
all-night dance parties, effectively stifling
free speech and banning
raves and other musical events.

The new law would also make it a federal crime to
temporarily use a place for the purpose of using any illegal drug.
Thus, anyone who used drugs in their own home or threw an event (such
as a party or barbecue) in which one or more of their guests
used drugs could potentially face a $250,000 fine and years in
federal prison. The bill also effectively makes it a federal crime to rent property to medical marijuana patients and their caregivers, giving the federal government a new weapon in its war on AIDS and cancer patients who use marijuana to relieve their suffering.

Health advocates worry that the bill will
endanger our nation's youth.
If enacted, licensed and law-abiding business
owners may stop hosting
raves or other events that federal authorities
don't like, out of fear
of massive fines and prison sentences. Thus, the
law would drive raves
and other musical events further underground and
away from public
health and safety regulations. It would also
discourage business owners from enacting smart harm-reduction
measures to protect their customers. By insinuating that selling bottled water and offering "cool off" rooms is proof that owners and promoters know drug use is occurring at their events, this bill may make business owners too afraid to implement such harm-reduction measures, and the safety of our kids will suffer.

The RAVE Act punishes businessmen and women for the crimes of their
customers and is unprecedented in U.S. history.
The federal government can't even keep drugs out of prisons, yet it
seeks to punish business
owners for failing to keep people from carrying
drugs onto their
premises. If this bill passes, federal
authorities will have the
ability to scare business owners away from using
or renting their
property for marijuana festivals, as well as any
other "politically
incorrect" event.

For more information on this bill, go to
http://thomas.loc.gov/ and
under "bill number" search for S2633.
 
 
grant
16:52 / 12.07.02
I've just been reading about the latest move in the War on Drugs, and I think it's a bad one.

As I understand it, S. 2633, also known as the Reducing American's Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act (the RAVE Act), makes businessmen liable for customers with drugs on their person. Legally speaking, this would be the same thing as arresting a telephone operator for connecting a con artist to a mark over the phone, or arresting a McDonald's manager for a crime if a mugger comes in, holds people and gunpoint and takes their valuables.


To take a step away from analogy, it would be the same thing as arresting a federal prison warden for prisoners selling and using drugs - and everyone knows this goes on every day.

No one's suggesting arresting the wardens, so I don't see how you can suggest arresting business owners.

Section 4 of the bill goes so far as to allow the federal government to fine property owners $250,000 in civil court, which doesn't require the same beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard of proof.

In businesses where drug use is likely regardless of the laws (like dance clubs), this step could be a killer, requiring business owners to stop providing "cool rooms" for kids in serious danger of overheating.

Studies show that "rave deaths" due to Ecstasy (MDMA) aren't due to heart attacks or some intrinsic poison in the drug - they're due to kids dancing themselves to dehydration, exhaustion, and toxic shock.

In short, this bill *as written* is not only questionable as far as the ethics of assigning responsibility - it's also downright dangerous to what amounts to, unfortunately, a significant percentage of society.

Isn't it right to take a moment to think this over?

 
 
Ierne
18:39 / 12.07.02
Thanks for the info, grant.

I'll definitely be harassing my senators over this one (Hello, Ms. Clinton)!!!

The proposed law would also potentially subject people to enormous federal sentences if some of their guests smoked marijuana at their party or barbecue.

So if I throw a party, and one of my pals lights up a joint, I could go to jail even though it's not my pot and i didn't smoke any?

That is just...wrong. So wrong.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
22:02 / 12.07.02
Reducing America's Vulnerability to Ecstasy?
Jesus, no wonder comedians have to work so hard when the politicians get in there first with the best material.
I remember a couple of years back, when there was a case here in the UK of care home workers being prosecuted for knowing drug dealing was going on at the homes. One of their defences was that, if that was a prosecutable offence, then Jack Straw (then Home Secretary) would be responsible for all the drug dealing going on in Britain's prisons (because he was responsible for the prisons, and he knew drug dealing was going on).
It didn't work, but by God, was it logical and fair.
 
 
Perfect Tommy
07:15 / 13.07.02
Thanks for the heads up. Senators have been harassed accordingly.
 
  
Add Your Reply